BREAKING: Hawley Brutally Confronts Granholm About 'Institutionalized Corruption' Leading To Clash

Forbes Breaking News
16 Apr 202406:04

Summary

TLDRIn a tense exchange, a senator confronts the Secretary of Energy about alleged institutional corruption within the department. The Secretary is accused of misleading the committee by initially denying ownership of individual stocks, which she later admitted to owning and selling, including one in Ford that her husband had owned. The senator also questions the Secretary's involvement with Proera, a company where she sat on the board and made millions, and her promotion of its stock and products. The dialogue further implicates the Secretary for attending conferences funded by foreign billionaires, potentially influencing American politics through dark money. The Secretary defends the department's ethics office and its oversight of stock trades but the senator remains critical of her actions and the department's integrity.

Takeaways

  • 📉 The Energy Department has been accused of institutionalized corruption with over 130 officials involved in 2,700 trades related to their work.
  • đŸ€” The Secretary of Energy was questioned about owning individual stocks, which she initially denied, but later admitted to owning and failing to report them.
  • đŸ•°ïž There was a delay in reporting the stock holdings and sales, raising concerns about transparency and honesty.
  • đŸš« The Secretary was criticized for misleading the committee and hiding information regarding her stock holdings.
  • 🏩 It was suggested that the Secretary's actions may have been influenced by her financial interests, particularly in Proera, where she had been a board member.
  • đŸ’Œ The Secretary claimed that she was unaware of some of her stock holdings, including a Ford stock owned by her husband.
  • 📈 The Secretary sold six stocks, one of which was a conflict of interest, but could not specify the other five.
  • 🧐 The Secretary's knowledge of foreign billionaires funding conferences she attends was questioned, with concerns about potential conflicts of interest.
  • 💰 The involvement of foreign money, through entities like the Burger Action Fund, in funding conferences the Secretary attended was highlighted.
  • đŸš« The Secretary denied any wrongdoing and stated that the Department of Energy has a strong ethics office that prevents stock trading in areas of oversight.
  • ❗ The situation was described as deplorable and outrageous, with a call for change and accountability in the Energy Department.

Q & A

  • What was the main issue raised by the senator regarding the energy department officials?

    -The senator raised concerns about over 130 officials in the energy department who reported more than 2,700 trades of shares, bonds, and options in companies related to the agency's work, which the senator described as institutionalized corruption.

  • What was the secretary's initial response when asked if she owned any individual stocks?

    -The secretary initially stated that she did not own any individual stocks, responding with 'no' three times when directly asked by the senator.

  • Why did the senator accuse the secretary of misleading the committee?

    -The senator accused the secretary of misleading the committee because it was later discovered that she did own multiple individual stocks, which she had failed to report for several months.

  • What was the secretary's explanation for the delay in reporting her stock holdings?

    -The secretary claimed that she was not aware that she still owned individual stocks and that she had believed they had been sold. She said she reported the situation to the committee as soon as she realized the mistake.

  • What specific stock was mentioned that the secretary was aware of owning?

    -The secretary mentioned that she was aware of owning Ford stock, which her husband had owned since he was very young.

  • How did the senator characterize the secretary's actions regarding her stock holdings and involvement with Proera?

    -The senator accused the secretary of presiding over institutionalized corruption, suggesting that she had a conflict of interest by owning stock and promoting Proera, where she had previously sat on the board of directors.

  • What was the senator's concern about the secretary attending conferences funded by foreign billionaires?

    -The senator expressed concern that attending conferences funded by foreign billionaires, potentially using dark money, could be an attempt to influence American politics.

  • What was the secretary's defense regarding the trading of stocks by energy department executives?

    -The secretary stated that no one in the Department of Energy, including herself, trades stocks in areas they have oversight over, and that the department has a strong ethics office that consults with employees about their stock holdings.

  • What report did the Wall Street Journal publish that was referenced during the discussion?

    -The Wall Street Journal published a report that detailed how energy department officials were trading stocks in companies they had direct oversight over, which was a point of contention in the discussion.

  • What was the senator's final conclusion about the situation in the energy department?

    -The senator concluded that the record was deplorable, despicable, and outrageous, citing the trading of shares by department officials, the secretary's misleading testimony, and her attendance at conferences funded by foreign billionaires.

  • What was the senator's recommendation for the secretary at the end of the discussion?

    -The senator suggested that the secretary should consider it a time to change the current practices and thanked the chairman, implying that the secretary should take responsibility for the situation.

Outlines

00:00

😡 Misleading Testimony on Stock Ownership

In this heated exchange, a senator confronts the Secretary of Energy for providing false testimony regarding her ownership of individual stocks. The senator accuses the Secretary of misleading the committee and hiding information about her stock holdings, which were related to companies the department oversees. The Secretary claims she was unaware of the stocks and reported them as soon as she discovered the mistake. The senator also questions the Secretary's involvement with Proera, a company she sat on the board of and promoted as Secretary, and whether it was one of the stocks she sold.

05:02

😠 Outrage Over Institutionalized Corruption

The senator continues to express outrage over what he sees as institutionalized corruption in the Department of Energy under the Secretary's leadership. He criticizes the Secretary for misleading the committee, attending conferences funded by foreign billionaires using dark money, and allowing department executives to trade stocks in companies they have direct oversight over. The senator calls the Secretary's actions deplorable, despicable, and outrageous, and demands change. The Secretary defends the department's strong ethics office and policies against trading stocks in areas of oversight.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Institutionalized Corruption

Institutionalized corruption refers to a situation where corrupt practices become embedded within an organization's policies and procedures, making them a regular part of the organization's functioning. In the script, it is suggested that the Energy Department has become a site of such corruption, with officials trading shares in companies related to the department's work, which is seen as a serious ethical breach.

💡Individual Stocks

Individual stocks are shares in a single company that an investor can buy and sell. The script highlights the importance of transparency in ownership of such stocks, especially for officials who may have conflicts of interest due to their positions. The Secretary's ownership of individual stocks and the subsequent failure to report them is a central issue in the dialogue.

💡Ethics Officers

Ethics officers are professionals responsible for ensuring that an organization's conduct adheres to ethical standards and regulations. In the context of the video, the ethics officers are said to have flagged the trading of shares as being directly related to the Energy Department's work, indicating a failure of ethical oversight.

💡Stock Act

The Stock Act is a U.S. federal law that prohibits members of Congress, employees of Congress, and other federal employees from using non-public information for trading stocks. The script implies that there have been multiple violations of this act within the Energy Department, indicating a lack of compliance with federal regulations.

💡Hatch Act

The Hatch Act is a federal law that limits certain political activities of federal employees. The script suggests that the Secretary has been referred for violations of the Hatch Act, which could involve using official authority for political purposes or engaging in political activities while on duty.

💡Foreign Billionaires

Foreign billionaires in this context refer to wealthy individuals from other countries who are alleged to be funding conferences and events that the Secretary attends. The concern is that such funding could be an attempt to influence U.S. politics through what is termed 'dark money,' which is money used in political campaigns in a way that conceals the identity of the contributor.

💡Dark Money

Dark money is funds used for political purposes that are not immediately transparent to the public. In the script, it is suggested that foreign money is being funneled into American politics through various front groups, which is a serious concern as it can undermine the integrity of political processes.

💡Energy Department

The Energy Department is a federal department within the United States government responsible for energy policy and safety. The script discusses the alleged corruption within this department, including the trading of stocks and the influence of foreign funding, which is critical to the department's reputation and function.

💡Misleading

Misleading, in this context, refers to the act of providing false or inaccurate information intentionally, which can be considered unethical or illegal, depending on the context. The Secretary is accused of misleading the committee by denying ownership of stocks and failing to disclose them in a timely manner.

💡Portfolio

A portfolio refers to a collection of financial assets, such as stocks, bonds, and other investments held by an individual or institution. The script discusses the Secretary's portfolio and the oversight of it, particularly concerning stocks that may present a conflict of interest due to their relation to the Energy Department's work.

💡Transparency

Transparency in this context means the openness and clarity with which information, particularly regarding financial holdings and potential conflicts of interest, is disclosed. The dialogue emphasizes the importance of transparency in government, especially when it involves the integrity of officials and the trust of the public.

Highlights

130+ officials in the Energy Department reported 2,700 trades of shares, bonds and options in companies related to the agency's work, which the Senator calls 'institutionalized corruption'.

The Secretary of Energy initially denied owning any individual stocks, but later admitted to owning and failing to report multiple stocks.

The Secretary claimed she thought she had sold all individual stocks, but was incorrect.

A timeline dispute arises as the Secretary sold stocks a month after testifying she didn't own any, and informed the committee a month after the sale.

The Secretary sent a letter to the committee explaining the mistake after realizing the error.

One of the stocks the Secretary owned was Ford, which her husband had owned since he was young.

The Secretary could not name the other five stocks she sold, stating they were non-conflicting.

The Senator accuses the Secretary of presiding over corruption, violating the STOCK Act, and being referred by the Inspector General for Hatch Act violations.

The Secretary's connection to Proera, where she was a board member and had stock options, is questioned as a conflict of interest.

The Senator questions if the Energy Department is influenced more by the Secretary's stock ownership or foreign funding of conferences she attends.

The Secretary denies knowing the names of foreign billionaires funding the conferences.

A Swiss billionaire named Isor Weiss is identified as using dark money to funnel foreign money into American politics, including funding a conference the Secretary attended.

The Secretary defends the Energy Department's ethics, stating no one trades stocks in areas they oversee.

The Wall Street Journal is cited for reporting on Energy Department officials trading stocks in companies they have oversight of, which the Secretary disputes.

The Senator concludes by calling the situation 'deplorable', 'despicable' and 'outrageous', demanding change and accountability.

Transcripts

00:00

Senator

00:02

Holly thank you Mr chairman Madam

00:04

Secretary nice to see you again when you

00:06

were here last I talked with you about

00:09

the fact that more than 130 officials in

00:11

the energy Department reported more than

00:14

2,700 trades of shares bonds and options

00:17

and companies that ethics officers said

00:19

was directly related to the agency's

00:21

work this is institutionalized

00:23

corruption and I asked you point blank

00:26

do you own any individual stock and you

00:29

told me

00:30

no let's just look at it it was not a

00:33

difficult question do you own individual

00:35

stocks Madam Secretary you said No in

00:37

fact you repeated it three times to me

00:39

no no no turns out that was false you

00:44

did own multiple individual socks and

00:47

you neglected to report it to this

00:48

committee for months afterwards why did

00:50

you mislead this committee oh my

00:53

goodness that was exactly my response so

00:57

why did you mislead this committee I

01:00

believed that I had sold all individual

01:03

stocks and I was incorrect so I came

01:07

back you just don't know the your

01:08

portfolio um pretty much it's a big one

01:11

I guess huh no it's extremely small um

01:14

apparently not someone manages it for

01:16

you so I came back as soon as I found

01:19

out that in fact I had not sold all

01:21

individuals wait wait wait wait no

01:22

that's not true either let's just look

01:24

at the Timeline let let's not you're I

01:25

just remind you you're under oath Madam

01:28

Secretary you testified you didn't own

01:31

any individual stocks you didn't sell

01:33

the stocks for a whole another month and

01:35

after you sold the stocks you

01:37

waited month before you informed this

01:41

committee why did you mislead us and

01:43

what were you hiding why did you wait so

01:46

long why did you hide this I did not

01:49

hide it because I brought it forth to

01:51

the committee when I realized that we

01:52

had made a mistake really what what what

01:55

explains the delay why did you wait for

01:57

a full month to exp to explain your

01:59

actions to this committee your false

02:00

testimony uh that's less than a month

02:03

and I sent a letter explaining what had

02:05

happened May the 15th to June the 9th we

02:07

going I owned a a Ford stock that was

02:10

you misled this committee and you wait

02:12

what were the stocks what were the

02:13

stocks that you owned it was a Ford

02:15

stock that my husband had owned since he

02:17

was very young and uh I just was not

02:20

aware of it and what were the others you

02:22

sold six stocks what were the other five

02:24

I sold uh non-conflicting stocks what

02:28

were they I don't honestly

02:30

I don't even know I do know they Ford

02:33

one because that was a conflict that's

02:34

why I ra this you're here before this

02:37

committee a year later after actively

02:39

misleading to us after denying and

02:42

delaying and delaying and now you won't

02:44

tell us was one of them

02:45

proa no you sat on the board of

02:47

directors at proera you made Millions

02:49

CNN reports and stock options at proera

02:52

then you you promoted proera stock and

02:55

proera products as Energy Secretary was

02:58

that one of the stocks that you sold

03:01

this is

03:01

so I mean really was that one of the

03:04

stocks you sold yes really you are

03:06

presiding over institutionalized

03:08

corruption in your energy Department you

03:10

have violated the stock act nine

03:12

separate times you have been referred by

03:15

the Inspector General for violations of

03:17

the Hatch

03:18

Act it is institutionalized corruption

03:21

that you are now the face of and here's

03:24

what I'm trying to figure out I just

03:25

want to know who really runs the energy

03:26

department is it you or is it the mega

03:29

Corporation whose stock that you own

03:30

that you're making profits in oh my

03:32

goodness or maybe it's the foreign

03:33

billionaires who fund your conferences

03:35

let's try something else do you know the

03:37

names of the foreign billionaires who

03:39

fund the conferences you go to since you

03:41

don't know the stocks do you know the

03:43

names of the foreign

03:45

billionaires this is unbelievable to me

03:48

let me help you Mr chairman one of them

03:49

isor Weiss a Swiss billionaire who has

03:53

used various dark money front group I

03:55

not know what youel various dark money

03:58

front groups to funnel foreign money

04:01

into American politics he has used the

04:04

burger action fund $20 million that then

04:07

sent money to the fund for a better

04:09

future that then sent money to The

04:11

Climate power group that has funded

04:13

conferences you've

04:15

attended do you know who this is do you

04:17

think it's a good idea to attend

04:19

conferences by Foreign billionair I have

04:22

no idea what you're talking you don't

04:23

know the stocks you don't know the

04:24

billionaires you would take no

04:26

responsibility Meanwhile your energy

04:28

Department executive in your energy

04:30

Department are trading stocks and in

04:33

companies that they have direct

04:34

oversight over and you were too that is

04:37

incorrect nobody and I in the department

04:39

of energy and we have a strong ethics

04:42

office does not trade stocks in anything

04:44

that they have oversight over that's

04:46

that

04:47

is not true Madam Secretary The Wall

04:50

Street Journal has reported on this

04:51

extensively Street I may Senator if I

04:53

might just ask the question is it

04:55

possible that maybe we can continue this

04:58

at a later time but if you had any

04:59

questions on the energy Direct Energy

05:01

policies M Mr chairman this is directly

05:04

relevant to institutionalized corruption

05:06

in the department of energy that she

05:08

oversees you're I think about to say

05:10

that that the Wall Street Journal

05:11

report's wrong The Wall Street Journal

05:13

report did not say that people over whom

05:15

they were were in areas where they were

05:17

directly overseeing headstocks they did

05:19

not our ethics office consults with all

05:23

of our employees that need to be cons

05:25

that that have a reporting requirement

05:28

about their stock Holdings they do not

05:30

own stocks in areas that they have any

05:32

influence over nor do I Madam Secretary

05:35

all I have to say is this record is just

05:36

deplorable it is Despicable it is

05:39

outrageous that hundreds of officers in

05:41

the energy Department are trading shares

05:43

it is outrageous that you misled us it

05:45

is outrageous that you are continuing to

05:48

mislead us and it is outrageous you're

05:50

going to conferences and events funded

05:51

by Foreign billionaires using dark money

05:53

to try to influence our politics this

05:56

has got to change and frankly you should

05:58

go thank you Mr chairman

06:02

uh Senator Lee

Rate This
★
★
★
★
★

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Tags associés
Senate HearingEnergy DepartmentStock TradingMisleading AllegationsInstitutional CorruptionEthics ViolationsPolitical InfluenceDark MoneyForeign FundingCorporate TiesRegulatory Oversight
Avez-vous besoin d'un résumé en français?