Brooks and Capehart on Supreme Court arguments over immunity for Trump
Summary
TLDRThe video transcript discusses the legal and political implications surrounding former President Trump and his close associates. It delves into the Supreme Court's deliberation on Trump's potential indictment, highlighting the conservative justices' focus on precedent rather than the individual. The conversation also touches on the decline of democracy and the need for guardrails to prevent criminalizing political actions. The discussion moves to Trump's hush money trial in New York and the indictment of his advisors in Arizona for their involvement in the fake electors scheme. The panelists express their views on the Biden administration's decision to delay the ban on menthol cigarettes, emphasizing the importance of public health over political considerations. The conversation concludes with a debate on the pro-Palestinian protests and the need to differentiate between well-intentioned protesters and those promoting violence or hate speech.
Takeaways
- đ€ The Supreme Court justices seem more interested in the precedent of the case involving Trump's potential indictment rather than Trump himself, indicating a focus on legal principles over personalities.
- đșđž There is a concern that democracies in decline often see current officials using their power to prosecute members of the opposing party who were previously in office.
- đ§ The discussion suggests the need for more safeguards or 'guardrails' in a democracy to prevent the criminalization of political differences.
- đ The electorate's role in preventing the erosion of democratic norms is highlighted, emphasizing the importance of not electing individuals who would undermine these norms.
- đ The Supreme Court's potential ruling on whether a former president is immune from indictment is seen as unprecedented and disturbing by the commentators.
- đž In New York, a trial related to hush money payments made by Trump to an adult actress is ongoing, with testimony from a tabloid publisher confirming the burying of damaging stories.
- đ In Arizona, Trump's close advisors are implicated in a scheme involving fake electors to overturn the 2020 election results, with 18 people indicted.
- đ« Trump's violation of a gag order in the New York case is noted, with concerns about how to rein in such behavior.
- đ The Biden administration's decision to delay a ban on menthol cigarettes is criticized, with suggestions that it may be motivated by political considerations and concerns over alienating black voters.
- đ Pro-Palestinian protests against Israel's actions in Gaza have spread and are sustained, raising questions about the Biden administration's response.
- đ§âđ€âđ§ There is a call to differentiate between protesters motivated by compassion and those who may be promoting violence or antisemitism, with the latter needing to be condemned and expelled from institutions.
Q & A
What was the main focus of the discussion regarding the Supreme Court and former President Trump?
-The discussion focused on the Supreme Court's arguments about Trump's potential criminal prosecution and the conservative justices' interest in the precedent rather than Trump himself.
What pattern does David Brooks mention is often seen in declining democracies?
-David Brooks mentions that in declining democracies, it's a pattern for people in office to use their power to imprison members of the opposing party who were in office before them.
What does Jonathan Capehart suggest as the first action for the American electorate?
-Jonathan Capehart suggests that the first action the American electorate can take is to no longer elect individuals who would crash through the guardrails and to elect others who would not enable such behavior.
What is the significance of the hush money trial in New York involving former President Trump?
-The hush money trial is significant as it involves payments made by Trump to an adult actress in 2016, with testimony from a tabloid publisher confirming that stories harmful to Trump were buried.
How does David view the situation with the Arizona case where Trump's advisors were involved in the fake electors scheme?
-David does not believe that the developments in the Arizona case have changed the landscape for Trump, but he was morbidly fascinated by the tabloid publisher's testimony.
What is Jonathan Capehart's perspective on the public's reaction to the inner workings of the tabloid newspaper industry?
-Jonathan Capehart believes that while he is familiar with the world of tabloid publishers, the larger public might find it fascinating to learn about the inner workings, especially in relation to political figures.
What is the current status of the gag order violation by former President Trump in the New York case?
-As of the time of the discussion, former President Trump had violated the gag order a total of 15 times.
Why does David Brooks believe the Biden administration delayed their decision on banning menthol cigarettes?
-David Brooks hopes that the delay was out of a sense that adults can make up their own minds, comparing the situation to Michael Bloomberg's attempt to ban big gulp sodas in New York.
What is the FDA's stance on menthol cigarettes, according to Jonathan Capehart?
-Jonathan Capehart supports the FDA's push to ban menthol cigarettes, emphasizing the need to save lives by reducing the use of an addictive and harmful product.
How does David Brooks feel about the pro-Palestinian protests and their potential impact on the Biden administration?
-David Brooks is frustrated with the lack of distinctions being made between protesters' motivations and condemns any antisemitic or violent actions. He also expresses concern that the Chicago convention could resemble the 1968 situation, which would be detrimental for the Biden administration.
What is Jonathan Capehart's concern regarding the protests on college campuses?
-Jonathan Capehart's concern is that outside individuals may be causing violence during protests and that the blame is then placed on those who are legitimately protesting, as was a concern during the Black Lives Matter movement.
What issue does David Brooks mention as being of more interest to young adults than the Israel-Gaza conflict?
-David Brooks mentions that according to a Harvard survey, issues like inflation, crime, and healthcare are of greater interest to young adults than the Israel-Gaza conflict.
Outlines
đ€ Supreme Court Arguments on Trump's Potential Indictment
The first paragraph discusses the legal challenges faced by former President Trump and his associates in various courts. The focus is on the Supreme Court's deliberations regarding Trump's potential indictment. The conservative justices appear more concerned with the precedent such a case would set rather than the specifics of Trump's situation. The conversation also touches on the decline of democracy and the need for increased legal protections for political figures to prevent the criminalization of political differences.
đ° Trump's Legal Woes and Public Perception
The second paragraph delves into the ongoing legal issues involving former President Trump, including a hush-money trial in New York and the indictment of his advisors in Arizona for their involvement in a scheme to overturn the 2020 election results. The discussion includes testimony from a tabloid publisher confirming the burying of stories that could have damaged Trump's 2016 campaign. The speakers express their views on the implications of these cases on Trump's political future and the public's perception of his actions.
đ Biden Administration's Delay on Menthol Cigarette Ban
The third paragraph addresses the Biden administration's announcement to delay a decision on banning menthol cigarettes. There is a debate on whether this decision is motivated by public health concerns or political considerations, particularly regarding its potential impact on the African-American community, who disproportionately use menthol cigarettes. The speakers argue for the importance of treating adults as responsible individuals capable of making their own choices, while also acknowledging the addictive nature of menthol cigarettes and the need for protective public health measures.
Mindmap
Keywords
đĄSupreme Court
đĄDemocracy in Decline
đĄGuardrails
đĄHush Money
đĄFake Electors Scheme
đĄMenthol Cigarettes
đĄPalestine-Israel Conflict
đĄAntisemitism
đĄNanny State
đĄPublic Standing
đĄAccountability
Highlights
The Supreme Court justices argue about potential immunity for former President Trump, with conservative justices focusing on precedent rather than Trump himself.
Concerns raised about the pattern of people in office using their power to imprison members of the opposing party who were in office before them, indicating a democracy in decline.
Discussion about the need for more guardrails in a democracy in decline to prevent criminalizing certain presidential actions.
The importance of electing leaders who will not crash through guardrails and enablers who will not allow it.
Speculation that the Supreme Court may not provide a clear answer on Trump's immunity.
David Pecker, a tabloid publisher, testifies about Trump's hush money payments to bury stories, revealing the moral netherworld Trump entered.
Jonathan Capehart discusses the fascinating testimony from Pecker and the larger public's reaction to the inner workings of the tabloid newspaper world.
Trump's legal troubles, including fraud, sexual assault, and immunity hearings, are highlighted as he spends more time in court than on the campaign trail.
Trump violating a gag order 15 times in the New York case, raising questions about whether he can be reined in.
The Biden administration delays plans to ban menthol cigarettes, which disproportionately impact Black smokers.
Concerns that the delay is a political move that could alienate Black voters Biden needs.
The FDA's efforts to ban menthol cigarettes seen as a life-saving measure, despite accusations of a nanny state.
Pro-Palestinian protests over Israel's actions in Gaza spreading quickly across US campuses.
Calls to separate well-motivated protesters from those promoting violence or anti-Semitism.
Fears that the Chicago convention could resemble the unrest of 1968, damaging the Biden administration.
Harvard survey shows young adults are more interested in issues like inflation, crime, and healthcare than the Israel-Gaza conflict.
Concerns that outside agitators could cause violence at protests and then shift the blame to legitimate protesters.
Transcripts
G
FORMER PRESIDENT TRUMP AND SOME
OF HIS CLOSEST ASSOCIATES PLAY
OUT IN STATE COURTS, THE SUPREME
COURT, AND THE COURT OF PUBLIC
OPINION.
MEANWHILE, AS FOREIGN AID BEGINS
TO ARRIVE IN UKRAINE AND THE
MIDDLE EAST, PROTESTS BOIL OVER
ON CAMPUSES ACROSS THE U.S.
FOR MORE ON A CONSEQUENTIAL WEEK
OVERSEAS AND HERE AT HOME, WE
TURN TO THE ANALYSIS OF BROOKS
AND CAPEHART.
THAT'S "NEW YORK TIMES"
COLUMNIST DAVID BROOKS, AND
JONATHAN CAPEHART, ASSOCIATE
EDITOR FOR "THE WASHINGTON
POST."
BIG WEEK SURROUNDING FORMER
PRESIDENT TRUMP.
LET'S START WITH THE SUPREME
COURT.
THE JUSTICES ARGUE ABOUT TRUMP'S
POTENTIAL COMMUNITY.
WHAT DID YOU TAKE AWAY FROM THE
ARGUMENTS?
>> A LOT OF COMMENTARY ON THE
FACT THAT THE MORE CONSERVATIVE
JUSTICES DID NOT SEEM INTERESTED
IN DONALD TRUMP.
THEY WERE INTERESTED IN THE
PRECEDENT.
I FIND IT INTELLECTUALLY
INTERESTING, BUT IT WAS A LITTLE
WEIRD THAT TRUMP WAS BARELY
MENTIONED IN SOME CASES.
NORMALLY, YOU WOULD SAY A
PRESIDENT IS NOT ABOVE THE LAW,
OF COURSE.
BUT, IF YOU LOOK AT DEMOCRACIES
IN DECLINE, THEN IT IS A PATTERN
THAT PEOPLE IN OFFICE USE THEIR
POWER TO THROW IN JAIL THE
PEOPLE WHO ARE IN OFFICE BEFORE
THEM OF THE OPPOSING PARTY.
SO, WE ARE IN A DEMOCRACY IN
DECLINE.
SO, IT DOES MAKE YOU THINK,
WELL, IF THE REPUBLICANS WERE TO
TRY TO INDICT MAYORKAS AND
IMPEACH HIM, MAYBE THERE SHOULD
BE SOME PROTECTIONS AGAINST
THAT.
I DON'T KNOW WHERE YOU WOULD
DRAW THE LINE BETWEEN THOSE
PRESIDENTIAL ACTIONS WHICH ARE
IMMUNE TO INDICTMENTS AND THOSE
THAT ARE NOT.
IN A DEMOCRACY IN DECLINE, YOU
HAVE TO THINK ABOUT BUILDING
MORE GUARDRAILS SO WE DON'T
START CRIMINALIZING.
JONATHAN: THE FIRST THING WE CAN
DO AS AN AMERICAN ELECTORATE IS
NO LONGER ELECT SOMEONE WHO
WOULD CRASH THROUGH THE
GUARDRAILS, AND ELECTING OTHER
PEOPLE WHO WOULD ENABLE THAT
PERSON TO CRASH TO THE
GUARDRAILS.
I AGREE WITH DAVID.
THE IDEA THAT THE SUPREME COURT
COULD POSSIBLY HANDOUT A RULING
THAT WOULD FORCE THE JUDGE TO GO
THROUGH THE COUNTS AND FIGURE
OUT WHETHER PRIVATE -- WHAT ARE
PRIVATE ACTS AND OFFICIAL ACTS
TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE FORMER
PRESIDENT IS IMMUNE IS INSANE.
THIS COUNTRY IS ALMOST 250 YEARS
OLD, IF MY MATH IS RIGHT.
PULLING UNTIL THE ELECTION OF
DONALD TRUMP HAVE WE EVER HAD TO
EVEN CONTEMPLATE THIS QUESTION.
UNTIL WE STOP ELECTING CHIEF
EXECUTIVES WHO LACK THIS SHAME
GENE, YEAH, MAYBE WE WILL HAVE
TO ANSWER THIS QUESTION.
BUT, THE FACT THAT WE ARE HERE
IS, IT IS REALLY DISTURBING.
AND LISTENING TO THE QUESTIONING
BACK AND FORTH MAYBE WONDER
WHETHER THE SUPREME COURT, DO
THEY REALLY WANT TO SQUANDER
THEIR PUBLIC STANDING SUCH HEAD
AS IT IS -- AS IT IS THAT
EVERYONE WILL LOOK AT AND SAY
WHAT ARE YOU DOING?
AMNA: DO YOU THINK WE WILL GET A
CLEAR ANSWER FROM THEM OF THIS?
JONATHAN: I DON'T THINK SO.
DAVID: I DON'T THINK SO EITHER.
AMNA: MOVING ON THEN.
THERE ARE A FEW OTHER CASES I
WANT TO GET YOUR TAKES ON AS
WELL BECAUSE THEY ARE VERY
DIFFERENT.
THEY BOTH INVOLVE FORMER
PRESIDENT TRUMP.
IN NEW YORK, THERE'S A HUSH
MONEY TRIAL THAT IS CONTINUING
RELATED TO THE PAYMENT HE MADE
TO AN ADULT ACTRESS IN 2016.
WE ARE TESTIMONY FROM A TABLOID
PUBLISHER NAMED DAVID PECKER
CONFIRMING THAT HE DID BURY
STORIES THAT COULD HAVE HARMED
THEN-CANDIDATE TRUMP.
IN THERE WAS ODA, TWO OF HIS --
IN ARIZONA, TWO OF HIS CLOSEST
ADVISORS PROBLEM 18 PEOPLE
INDICTED IN THE FAKE ELECTORS
SCEHEM 20 -- SCHEME TO HELP
OVERTURN TRUMP'S 2020 LOSS.
DID EITHER OF THOSE DEVELOPMENTS
CHANGE LANDSCAPE?
DAVID: I DON'T THINK THEY HAVE
CHANGED THE LANDSCAPE FOR HIM.
I WAS MORBIDLY FASCINATED BY THE
TABLOID PUBLISHER'S TESTIMONY.
THAT IS NOT THE WAY WE DO
TESTIMONY.
PAYING PEOPLE HUSH MONEY TO BURY
STORIES, IT IS LIKE A MORAL
NETHERWORLD THAT TRUMP ENTERED.
I WAS ONCE IN THE 1980'S INVITED
TO A PARTY, THE OPENING OF
TRUMP PLAZA.
I LOOK AROUND THE ROOM, IT IS
ALL THE PEOPLE YOU THINK ARE
CORRUPT.
A BUDDY OF MINE GOES UP TO ME
AND SAYS NOT INDICTED, NOT
INVITED.
WE ARE REALLY ENTERING A
DIFFERENT LAYER OF NEW YORK THAT
I WAS USED TO.
THAT IS WHAT WE ARE CONFRONTING
AND HAVE BEEN FOR A BUNCH OF
YEARS.
AMNA: JONATHAN?
JONATHAN: THE TESTIMONY OF DAVID
PECKER WAS FASCINATING.
I LIVED AND WORKED IN NEW YORK
FOR 16 YEARS.
I WORKED AT THE DAILY NEWS SO
THE NEW YORK POST WAS A
COMPETITOR.
I KNOW THIS WORLD.
DAVID PECKER IS NOT FOREIGN TO
ME.
WHAT HE'S TALKING ABOUT IS NOT
FOREIGN TO ME, BUT I THINK FOR
THE LARGER PUBLIC, TO HEAR WHAT
REALLY GOES ON, PARTICULARLY
WITH THAT KIND OF TABLOID
NEWSPAPER I THINK IS
FASCINATING.
ALSO, LET'S NOT FORGET, WE ARE
TALKING ABOUT A FORMER PRESIDENT
WHO IS IN COURT OVER HUSH-MONEY
PAYMENTS, WHO HAS BEEN FOUND
LIABLE FOR FRAUD AND FOR SEXUAL
ASSAULT, WHO COULD IT BE IN
WASHINGTON FOR THE IMMUNITY
HEARING FROM WHEN HE WAS
PRESIDENT.
THIS GUY IS GOING TO -- HAS BEEN
SPENDING MORE TIME IN COURT THAN
ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL TO RUN FOR
REELECTION.
I THINK WHAT MAKES THIS WEEK AND
THIS CASE SO FASCINATING IS THAT
WE ARE WATCHING THIS GUY BE HELD
ACCOUNTABLE FOR AT LEAST A
SLIVER OF WHAT HE HAS ALLEGEDLY
DONE.
AMNA: IN THE NEW YORK CASE, HE
IS NOW VIOLATED THE GAG ORDER A
TOTAL OF 15 TIMES.
JONATHAN: AND COUNTING.
AMNA: IS THERE ANY WAY FOR
PRESIDENT TRUMP TO BE REIGNED IN
ON THAT FRONT?
DAVID: I THINK HIS ENTIRE
ADMINISTRATION TRIED TO DO THAT
FOR FOUR YEARS AND IT DIDN'T
WORK.
JONATHAN: NO.
AMNA: I NEED TO ASK YOU ABOUT
PRESIDENT BIDEN BECAUSE WE
SHOULD MENTION, OFTEN TIMES WHEN
AUTHORITIES DON'T WANT YOU TO
TALK TOO MUCH ABOUT SOMETHING,
IT GETS ANNOUNCED ON A FRIDAY
AFTERNOON.
WE DID HAVE AN ANNOUNCEMENT.
THEY ARE DELAYING THEIR
DECISION, THEIR PLANS TO BAN
MENTHOL CIGARETTES.
WE KNOW THAT IS KNOWN FOR ITS
APPEAL TOWARDS BLACK SMOKERS.
81% OF BLACK SMOKERS SMOKE
MENTHOL CIGARETTES.
THIS IS SOMETHING THE FDA HAS
BEEN PUSHING FOR YEARS NOW.
THEY FAILED TO GET IT ACROSS THE
FINISH LINE.
WHY DO YOU THINK THE BIDEN
ADMINISTRATION DECIDED TO DO
THIS NOW?
DAVID: I HOPE IT WAS OUT OF A
SENSE OF SOME SENSE THAT ADULTS
CAN MAKE UP THEIR OWN MIND.
I FRANKLY HAD THE REACTION THE
WAY MICHAEL BLOOMBERG IN NEW
YORK TRIED TO BAN THE BIG GULP
SODAS.
I HAVE SEEN THE STUDIES ON THE
MENTHOL CIGARETTES.
THE FBI SAYS A LOT FEWER PEOPLE
WILL SMOKE IF WE BAN THEM.
AT SOME POINT, WE ARE DEMOCRACY
WHERE ADULTS ARE TO BE TREATED
LIKE ADULTS.
EVERYONE KNOWS THIS STUFF IS
REALLY BAD FOR YOU AND PEOPLE
MAKE THEIR OWN DECISIONS.
AMNA: JONATHAN, THERE HAS BEEN
ACCUSATIONS THAT THIS IS ABOUT
POLITICS AND IT COULD ALIENATE
BLACK VOTERS THAT PRESIDENT
BIDEN NEEDS.
JONATHAN: CIGARETTES ARE
ADDICTIVE AND MENTHOL IS
PARTICULARLY ADDICTIVE.
WHEN YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT AN
ADDICTIVE SUBSTANCE, AN
ADDICTIVE PRODUCT THAT HAS A
DISPROPORTIONATE IMPACT ON
AFRICAN-AMERICANS, WELL,
SORRY, I LOOK AT THE FDA AND SAY
GOOD FOR YOU.
YOU SHOULD BE DOING THIS.
FOLKS SHOULD BE FORCED TO QUIT,
MEANING THIS IS NOT GOOD FOR
YOU.
THIS IS ABOUT ATTEMPTING TO SAVE
YOUR LIFE.
I MAYBE AGREE WITH YOU ON
MICHAEL BLOOMBERG AND THE BIG
GULP SODAS.
THE FIRST THING MIKE BLOOMBERG
DID WHEN HE WAS MAYOR OF NEW
YORK THAT PEOPLE STARTED
SCREAMING ABOUT THE NANNY STATE
WAS BANDING CIGARETTES IN
RESTAURANTS AND OUT EVERYONE
LOVES HIM FOR IT.
IF THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION IS
TRYING TO PLAY POLITICS BY
DUMPING THIS ANNOUNCEMENT ON A
FRIDAY AFTERNOON, FINE,
ELECTIONS ARE DECIDED ON THE
MARGINS.
BUT IN THE END, WHAT THE FDA IS
PROPOSING NEEDS TO BE DONE.
IT IS ABOUT SAVING LIVES.
AMNA: THE PRO-PALESTINIAN
PROTESTS, PROTESTING ISRAEL'S
WAR CONDUCT IN GAZA.
THEY HAVE SPREAD VERY QUICKLY.
THEY ARE SUSTAINING ON CAMPUSES.
SHOULD THESE BE A WARNING SIDE
TO THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION?
DAVID: I HAVE BEEN FRUSTRATED
THAT PEOPLE ARE MAKING SOME
DISTINCTIONS HERE.
I THINK MOST OF THE PROTESTERS
ARE APPALLED BY THE HORRORS THE
PALESTINIANS ARE SUFFERING AND
WELL MOTIVATED BY COMPASSION.
THERE ARE SOME PEOPLE THAT ARE
PROBABLY HARD LEFT PEOPLE, THEY
GET TO HAVE THEIR VIEWS.
THERE ARE A LOT OF PEOPLE THAT
ARE ANTISEMITIC AND VIOLET.
YOU SHOULD NOT BE ABLE TO SAY
THAT SCIENTISTS DO NOT DESERVE
TO LIVE.
IF YOU SAY THAT, THEY SHOULD BE
EXPELLED.
IF SOMEBODY SAYS SOMETHING LIKE
GO BACK TO POLAND, OR EVEN A
PRO-PALESTINIAN OR PRO
ISRAELI, GO BACK TO GAZA.
THOSE PEOPLE SHOULD BE EXPELLED.
THAT IS THE DISTINCTION THAT
SHOULD BE MADE.
THE PEOPLE ARE THREATENING THE
COMMUNITY BY THREATENING
VIOLENCE, THEY ARE BEING
EXPELLED.
YOU NEED TO SEPARATE THE BAD
ACTORS FROM THE PEOPLE THAT ARE
WELL MOTIVATED TO SAVE LIVES.
AS FOR THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION,
I WORRY THAT CHICAGO CONVENTION
WILL LOOK A LOT LIKE 1968.
THAT WILL JUST BE TERRIBLE FOR
THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION.
THE PRESIDENT LOOKS POWERLESS.
ONE FINAL THING I FOUND
INTERESTING.
HARVARD DOES THIS SURVEY WHAT
ARE YOUNG ADULTS INTERESTED IN?
ISRAEL GAZA IS 15 OUT OF 16.
A LOT OF PEOPLE I KNOW ARE
PASSIONATELY ON BOTH SIDES OF
THE ISSUE, BUT MOST YOUNG VOTERS
ARE INTERESTED IN INFLATION,
CRIME, HEALTH CARE, THE NORMAL
ISSUES.
IT IS ABOARD FOR US THAT ARE IN
EDUCATED CIRCLES NOT TO
GENERALIZE FROM OUR EXPERIENCE
BECAUSE A LOT OF PEOPLE THINK
ABOUT VERY DIFFERENT THINGS.
JONATHAN: I AGREE WITH YOU,
DAVID.
I THINK THE DISCUSSION ABOUT
WHAT'S HAPPENING IN THESE
PROTESTS IS MISSING A LOT OF
NUANCE.
NOT EVERYONE WHO IS PROTESTING
IS ANTI-SEMITIC, IS ROOTING FOR
VIOLENCE, OR EVEN CAUSING THE
VIOLENCE.
THEY ARE THERE FOR LEGITIMATE
REASONS.
I AGREE WITH DAVID.
IF THE COLLEGE COMMUNITY IS
DISRUPTING AND SAYING RACIST,
ANTI-SEMITIC THINGS, YES, THEY
SHOULD BE EXPELLED.
BUT WE ALSO SHOULD BE MINDFUL
THAT WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE WHO
ARE SAYING THESE THINGS?
SOME MIGHT BE MEMBERS OF THE
UNIVERSITY OR COLLEGE COMMUNITY,
BUT SOME COULD BE FROM THE
OUTSIDE.
MY BIG FEAR FROM THE BLM
MOVEMENT IS FOLKS FROM THE
OUTSIDE CAUSING VIOLENCE AND
THEN THE BLAME BEING HOISTED
UPON THE PEOPLE THAT ARE
LEGITIMATELY PROTESTING.
THAT IS MY BIG CONCERN WHEN WE
TALK ABOUT THIS LATEST NATIONAL
PROTEST.
AMNA: HERE IS TO NUANCE AND
FACTS.
THANK YOU TO BOTH OF YOU FOR
BRINGING THOSE TO THE TABLE
ALWAYS.
ALWAYS GOOD TO SEE YOU.
>> THANKS.
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)
âThe Fiveâ reacts to judge fining Trump for violating gag order
Donald Trump Found GUILTY in Hush Money Trial | EMERGENCY PODCAST | PBD Podcast | Ep. 417
âThe Fiveâ reacts to first day of Trump hush money trial
Meltdown After 9-0 Supreme Court Ruling Trump Can Be on the Ballot, with Stu Burguiere & Dave Marcus
'REAL PROBLEM': Ex-federal prosecutor warns 'we're deep in a lawfare system'
"Show Me Your Cards!" - Judge Threatens To Incarcerate Trump & Fines Him For Violating Gag Order