"Will You Give ANY Condemnation Of Hamas?" Israel-Palestine Debate | Abby Martin vs Emily Schrader
Summary
TLDRIn a heated debate on a recent show, American Israeli commentator Emily Shrader and journalist Abby Martin discuss allegations of genocide by Israel in Gaza, referencing a UN report and the International Court of Justice's acknowledgment of plausible genocide. The dialogue navigates through accusations of indiscriminate bombings, the siege of Gaza, and the impact on civilians, especially children. Both guests delve into the political and humanitarian ramifications, questioning accountability, the definition of genocide, and the roles of Hamas and Israeli leadership. The discussion also touches on potential paths towards peace, emphasizing the complexity and deeply entrenched positions on both sides.
Takeaways
- ð¡ The debate centers on whether Israel's actions in Gaza constitute genocide, a term that implies the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group.
- ð International perspectives on the situation vary, with some accusing Israel of genocidal intent and actions in Gaza, while others dispute the characterization of Israel's actions as genocide.
- ð Definitions of genocide include killing members of a group, causing serious harm, imposing conditions to physically destroy the group, preventing births, and forcibly transferring children.
- ð Over 32,000 Palestinians, mostly children, are reported to have been killed since an attack on October 7, according to a new report, raising significant international concern.
- ð The debate includes arguments about the accuracy of casualty numbers, the distinction between civilians and combatants, and the role of Hamas in the conflict.
- ð£ïž Voices from both sides of the debate passionately defend their positions, highlighting the complexity and depth of the conflict.
- ð¥ The discussion touches on humanitarian issues, including the blockade of Gaza and the impact on civilians' access to food, water, and medical aid.
- ð¢ The role of international bodies like the United Nations and the International Court of Justice in assessing and responding to the situation is discussed.
- ð¬ The conversation reveals a divide on how to address the conflict's root causes and the potential paths toward resolution.
- ðïž The debate underscores the urgent need for a solution that addresses humanitarian concerns, ensures accountability, and lays the groundwork for lasting peace.
Q & A
What was the main topic discussed in the transcript?
-The main topic discussed was whether Israel's actions in Gaza constitute genocide, including debates around the intentions, actions, and statements from both Israeli and Palestinian sides.
What are the five acts defined as genocide mentioned in the discussion?
-The five acts defined as genocide mentioned are: killing members of the group, causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group, deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part, imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group, and forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
Who are Emily Shrader and Abby Martin, and what perspectives do they represent?
-Emily Shrader is an American Israeli commentator who defends Israel's actions, while Abby Martin is a journalist and filmmaker who criticizes Israel's actions and labels them as genocidal. They represent opposing viewpoints on the Israel-Palestine conflict.
What was the significance of the ICJ ruling mentioned?
-The International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruling mentioned in the discussion concluded it was plausible that genocide could be taking place in Gaza, adding international legal perspective to the debate on Israel's actions.
How is genocide defined according to the discussion?
-Genocide is defined as deliberately killing people from a particular national or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that group.
What were some of the specific actions by Israel that were discussed as evidence of genocidal intent?
-Specific actions included the siege on Gaza limiting access to water, food, electricity, and aid, widespread preventable illnesses, and the indiscriminate bombing in densely populated areas.
What were some of the statements made by Israeli officials that were discussed in the context of genocidal intent?
-Statements included the Israeli president saying no civilian in Gaza is innocent and should have overthrown Hamas, and the defense minister referring to Palestinians as 'human animals' and announcing a complete siege of Gaza.
How did Emily Shrader and Abby Martin view the casualties and humanitarian aid in Gaza?
-Emily Shrader argued that aid is being prevented from entering Gaza by Egypt and not Israel, and blamed Hamas for mismanaging the aid. Abby Martin emphasized the blockade and restrictions by Israel and the dire humanitarian conditions in Gaza, including starvation and lack of medical supplies.
What was the stance on the legitimacy of Hamas' actions during the debate?
-Abby Martin viewed Hamas as an armed resistance group fighting for Palestinian liberation, while criticizing Israel's military occupation and policies. Emily Shrader, however, focused on Hamas' role in causing violence and suffering among Palestinians.
What solutions were proposed for achieving peace between Israel and Palestine?
-The debate touched on the need for new leadership on both sides that is genuinely interested in peace, the possibility of a two-state solution, and negotiations involving both Israeli and Palestinian leadership and international partners.
Outlines
ð¥ Debating Genocide Accusations and Accountability
The segment initiates a heated debate on whether Israel's actions in Gaza can be classified as genocide, emphasizing the severity of accusations from various international bodies and contrasting opinions on accountability. Key points include the substantial number of Palestinian casualties, the international and legal definitions of genocide, and the implications of these definitions on Israel's actions in Gaza. The discussion also touches on the contrasting perspectives of American-Israeli commentator Emily Shrader and journalist Abby Martin, highlighting their differing views on the situation's classification as genocide and the responsibility of Israeli leadership.
ð Exploring the Complexity of Innocence and Guilt
This paragraph delves into the nuanced debate over the innocence of Palestinians, the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, and the role of Hamas in the conflict. It examines the contention that a significant portion of the Gaza population supports Hamas, complicating the narrative of innocence. Discussions include the impact of Hamas' actions on the distribution of humanitarian aid, the classification of individuals as combatants, and the influence of Hamas' indoctrination on the youth. The complexity of determining innocence amidst the conflict, the accusations against Israel's blockade, and the allegations of collective punishment are critically analyzed.
ð International Reactions and Definitions of Genocide
The focus shifts to international reactions and legal definitions surrounding the accusations of genocide against Israel. It features the debate over whether Israel's actions meet the legal criteria for genocide, citing specific instances and statements from Israeli officials that could imply genocidal intent. The discussion also references a UN Human Rights report and the opinions of international law experts, juxtaposing these with the perspectives of both Emily Shrader and Abby Martin. The segment underscores the polarized views on Israel's military actions and the broader implications of labeling these actions as genocide.
âïž Examining Leadership and Accountability Amid Conflict
This segment scrutinizes the leadership on both sides of the conflict, questioning the accountability of Israeli and Palestinian leaders for their roles in the ongoing violence. It explores the argument that Hamas, as an armed resistance group, is reacting to Israeli policies, while also confronting accusations against Israel for its military actions in Gaza. The conversation challenges the legitimacy of both Hamas and the Israeli government, probing the moral and legal responsibilities of leaders in times of conflict. The debate over the classification of terrorist organizations and the legitimacy of armed resistance versus state actions is central to this discussion.
ð£ïž Confronting the Moral Implications of Civilian Casualties
The dialogue intensifies around the moral implications of civilian casualties, the accuracy of casualty figures, and the justification of military actions by both Israel and Hamas. It delves into the dispute over reported numbers of killed and injured, the credibility of sources providing these figures, and the broader ethical considerations of wartime conduct. The discussion notably includes a tense exchange on the legitimacy of condemning Hamas' actions on October 7th, juxtaposing it with the broader context of the conflict and the historical grievances of the Palestinian people.
ð« Debating Denial, Accountability, and the Path Forward
The concluding segment tackles the themes of denial, accountability, and prospects for peace. It presents a pointed debate on the refusal to acknowledge the wrongdoing of both Hamas and the Israeli military, highlighting the impact of such denial on potential resolutions to the conflict. The discussion also ventures into the possibilities for a negotiated settlement, the preconditions for peace, and the role of international intervention in addressing the root causes of the conflict. The segment underscores the challenges of achieving consensus on the classification of actions as war crimes or genocide, and the importance of leadership in navigating towards peace.
Mindmap
Keywords
ð¡Genocide
ð¡ICJ ruling
ð¡Hamas
ð¡Siege on Gaza
ð¡Humanitarian Aid
ð¡Collective Punishment
ð¡Civilian Casualties
ð¡Radicalization
ð¡UN Report
ð¡Armed Resistance
Highlights
Debate on whether Israel's actions in Gaza constitute genocide, with references to international definitions and the ICJ ruling.
Discussion on the criteria of genocide and its applicability to Israel's treatment of Palestinians in Gaza.
Claims of genocidal intent within Israeli leadership, supported by controversial statements made by Israeli officials.
Examination of the humanitarian impact on Gaza, including siege conditions and allegations of collective punishment.
Contrasting views on the legitimacy of Palestinian support for Hamas and the consequences of Israeli policies.
The role of Hamas in Gaza, including allegations of misuse of humanitarian aid and indoctrination of youth.
Dispute over casualty figures and the credibility of sources reporting on the conflict.
Arguments regarding the definition of terrorism and the legitimacy of armed resistance.
Examination of international responses to the conflict, including UN reports and calls for an arms embargo on Israel.
Discussion on the potential for a negotiated settlement and the obstacles to achieving peace.
The impact of external narratives and propaganda on the perception of the conflict.
Analysis of the historical context of Hamas's origin and its impact on the current conflict.
Debate on the responsibility and accountability of Israeli and Palestinian leadership for ongoing violence.
Considerations on the future governance of Gaza and the prospects for peace in the region.
Reflections on the role of international law and the International Court of Justice in addressing allegations of genocide.
Transcripts
ared resistance trying to fight for do
you think Israel is a terrorist
organization genocidal intent this is
usually one of the hardest things to
prove in a case of genocide not the case
in Israel's genocide in Gaza so you're
happy to believe those numbers of course
I'm happy to those numbers Israel needs
to be held accountable and stopped
immediately because it's the gravest
crime against humanity that a state can
commit Israel isn't interested in
occupying Gaza in any sort of permanent
way that is not something we want I'm
not spokesperson well he should be tried
at the head and putting the that's a
different question I mean he's
committing question but you say you
can't interfere in Palestinian politics
but you're very prepared to interfere in
Israel
B genocide not a word to be used lightly
in recent months a term which means to
deliberately kill people from a
particular National ethnic group with
the aim of destroying said National
Group has been leveled to Israel for his
treatment of the war in Gaza the Israeli
government has repeatedly denounced the
accusation despite the icj ruling in
January that it was plausible
that genocide could be taking place over
32,000 Palestinians mostly children are
believed to have been killed since the
horrific attack on October the 7th a new
report from the United Nations says
there are reasonable grounds that Israel
has carried out acts of genocide in Gaza
this debate will rage on long after this
war is over as well whether or not
Netanyahu and the Israeli government
need to be held to account for their
actions strong voices and opinions rage
on both sides none more fervent than
those of my next two guests I'm I'm
joined by the American Israeli
commentator Emily Shrader and the
journalist and filmmaker Abby Martin but
welcome to both of you um Abby Martin
let me let me start with you to me
genocide would mean the wholesale
destruction of a people because of their
ethnicity that's how I've always
understood genocide to me there is a
internationally recognized fivepoint
guide to what is genocide it says
killing members of the group causing
serious bodily or mental harm to members
of the group deliberately inflicting on
the group conditions of Life calculated
to bring about his physical destruction
whole or part imposing measures intended
to prevent birst within the group
forcibly forci forcibly transferring
Children of the group to another group
by that
definition do you believe that what's
happened in Gaza constitutes
genocide I do and I think that the fact
that this debate is Raging on shows that
what Israel is doing is egregious enough
the fact that people are actually having
a debate on whether or not it is
genocide like you said the international
court of justice has agreed that there's
a plausible case for genocide I think
that you just clearly articulated
several factors that Israel is in fact
carrying out the mental bodily harm and
carrying about conditions uh to destroy
a group of people clearly the Complete
Siege on Gaza the elimination or the
prevention rather of water food
electricity the prevention of of Aid um
widespread preventable illnesses uh
killing people now uh we see 2 million
people on the brink of starvation
clearly these are all intended to
destroy a group of people when you
compound that with the indiscriminate
bombing in the most densely populated
places on Earth I would absolutely
constitute that as genocidal killing and
then peers compound that with the fact
that there's genocidal intent this is
usually one of the hardest things to
prove in a case of genocide not the case
in Israel's genocide in Gaza we have
five pages just in the icj ruling that
clearly lay out the explicit intent to
carry out genocide and I'll just point
to two uh the Israeli president who said
shortly after October 7th that uh no
civilian in Gaza is innocent um and that
they should have overthrown Hamas and
because they didn't they are essentially
worth uh you know killing and then you
have the defense minister shortly after
October 7th that these are human animals
and we need to act accordingly as he
announced the Complete Siege of Gaza so
taking all that into account I would
absolutely constitute what is happening
is genocide and Israel needs to be held
accountable and stopped immediately
because it's the gravest crime against
humanity that a state can commit okay
Emily Trader I mean there's no doubt
that if you study the direct quotes from
some members of netanyahu's cabinet they
are certainly speaking in a genocidal
way there's no question there's enough
of that being said since October the 7th
there's also
I actually would dispute that I actually
take issue with some of the comments
that she made for example when we're
talking about human animals it was
specific in the context and if you
understand Hebrew you know H that the
context of this was speaking
specifically about Hamas terrorists who
I would agree with that description of
course not all Palestinians are human
animals and Palestinian civilians there
are many innocent people however as
president Herzog said it is also true
that there is a certain degree of
complicity with many of the people of
Gaza now does that mean that they
deserve to die as she stated no of
course not but it's not the same thing
as being innocent either but that would
imply that there are no innocent people
in the Palestinian side I don't think
that it's true that there's no innocent
people I think that there is a certain
degree of complicity with many of the
population as we see in in the polls
according to their polls a Palestinian
conducted poll over 70% of the people in
Gaza support the actions of October 7th
I wish it wasn't the case but Emily
you're
you're just using that PO you're using
that poll to paint all civilians as
guilty do you realize that do that deiz
stated the opposite I said 70% saying
that because said
70% of course there are innocent
Palestinians what does that mean what
you're rationalizing Collective
punishment and starvation of 2 million
people 1 million kids that's what you're
rationalizing by saying that 7% over
17,000 trucks of humanitarian Aid have
entered Gaza some of them that are being
stopped right now on the border are
actually being prevented from entering
by Egypt not by Israel Israel has
inspected them and approved them
furthermore the reason that Aid isn't
being distributed properly isn't because
of Israel it's because of Hamas who has
been taking the Aid shooting Palestinian
civilians inside of Gaza and this is
according to Palestinian statements on
social media in Arabic who have been
speaking about this and then taking that
Aid and selling it at double triple
quadruple the prices of what would be
the regular market for those items so
you cannot place this all in Israel but
if you say that
70% SEC Abby say 70% of people in
Palestine are of this view 50% of that
population are under 18 they're children
so are you including large numbers of
children in your assessment that
Palestinians all all believe this way I
don't believe that the statistics of
that poll how they conducted it included
children however I don't know so I would
have to investigate that include
children then that doesn't include Half
the people in Gaza that's according to
whose statistics according to the Gaza
Ministry of Health which is controlled
by half the population because even this
30,000 number is coming from Hamas hang
I'm not I I realize that but it hasn't
been disputed by other agencies and
historically the Hamas uh figures
through the Palestinian health authority
have been broadly proven to be accurate
over time which 30,000 casualties and
they're claiming that none of them are
comat how is that accurate do even make
sense that's not the number I'm talking
about the number I'm talking about is if
half the population of Gaza is under 18
then saying that 70% of the people in
Gaza have a view would have to include a
lot of children right and if you don't
include the children you don't include
Half the population well then you're
talking about a narrow number of people
comparative sure but you also have to
consider the fact that Hamas is actively
recruiting and indoctrinating youth with
this very extremist jihadist ideology
and it's child abuse it's an unfortunate
reality that Palestinian children are
dealing with why we killing loads why we
killing 12 13,000 innocent children
whatever the exact number is is
Superfluous to the general proportionate
effect that so many kids have been
killed I don't agree with this these
numbers how many you thinked we don't
know we do not know at
this consider the fact that there are
many of them ages of 14 to 17 are
members of Hamas seen that proven how
many Hamas terrorists have been killed
don't know at least 9,000 so happy to
believe those numbers how many people
believe those numbers you're happy to
believe those numbers of course I'm
happy to believe those numbers because
Israel is a de Democratic country with
the rule of law and they hold people
accountable when they violate those laws
right okay I mean see I I think the
problem with questioning the numbers
from the Palestinian health authority is
that most other agencies independent
agencies broadly agree that these
numbers are about right and if they're
right then 12,000 13,000 children have
been killed and I would I would argue
that it's very hard to see how the
radicalization issue that the Israelis
talk about will not be exacerbated by
killing 13,000 innocent
kids right and can I just address some
of the points she made because they're
all just egregious lies I mean she's a
paid propagandist for the state of
Israel I think way being a propagandist
em or defending the Chinese Communist
Party defending the Chinese Communist
Party against crimes
people let me speak Emily let me speak
you just spoke just flagrant lies for
the last minute when I was on this show
10 years ago I was actually speaking out
against RT on Russia Today can you say
the same I'm a completely independent
journalist you are literally a paid
propagandist for the Israeli military
you just had the audacity to sit down
with an Israeli military official the
Israeli military and I would be Happ so
you just were working for free you
literally said that you worked for the
ministry of strategic Affairs that
you've worked with stand with us which
is appendage of the Israeli government
let me address the things that you just
threw out there which are lies yes of
course they received grants from the
knesset no they don't em that is Absolut
Egypt Israel has look it up on look it
up on the internet Emily I'm not sure
why you're lying again but this what you
guys do deflect you lie nevered funding
the is keep speaking over each other the
entire time legal then stop lying Abby
let me speak stop lying Israel has
Israel has has bragged the fact that
Egypt just follows their orders okay so
we know know that the aid is being
prevented not only by fanatical Israelis
who are blocking the aid trucks proudly
um but from Israel themselves Emily and
we know that almost as many civilians
have been shot by Israeli forces just
trying to scavenge for Aid and food than
civilians have died on October 7th this
is regular routine massacres routine
massacres that are happening of just
desperate starving Palestinians that are
amassing to seek food is there anything
that is more depra
than
that you can't just
keep 7 million pound in one let me try
let me try if should be getting in TR
per day let me come if I can bring it
back to the debate which is about the
genocide uh on March the 26 2024 UN
Human Rights report called for Israel to
be placed under an arms embargo on the
grounds it has carried out acts of
genocide in Gaza Fran es albanes the UN
special reporter on human rights in the
Palestinian territory said in her report
there were reasonable grounds to believe
that Israel was carrying out three of
the five acts which I named earlier
defined as genocide and she said these
were killing Palestinians causing them
seriousy bodily or mental harm
deliberately inflicting conditions of
Life calculated to bring about the
physical destruction of the population
in whole or in part so to that point
Emily just forget the ad hominum stuff
for a moment on this you've got the UN
you've got the icj you've got uh
increasingly the Americans actually
trying to distance themselves from
what's Happening Here a growing sense
that there is if not full-blown genocide
a version of genocide happening here
that meets quite a few criteria I mean I
think the definition of genocide
requires intent to destroy a nation um
and that is not what we're seeing it's
not what we've seen since day one you
have to remember the fact that this war
cabinet minister who actually said he
would be happy to drop a nuclear bomb on
Gaza that would have been the
destruction of plenty of stupid comments
from many Israeli politicians that I
don't agree with you said earlier that
nobody on this is not the we did not
start this this is not a war we wanted
not a war we started further Isel does
have the ability to commit genocide and
they are not why would we send 17,000
trck that's such an abuser crazy thing
to say you have a gun to the head of
Palestinian saying we can commit
genocide over each other I want to
finish my point about the the cabinet
member who said that was quite crystal
clear in his genocidal intent he thought
it would be fine to drop a bomb a
nuclear bomb on Gaza you said earlier
that nobody on the cabinet nobody under
Netanyahu from the start of his War had
ever espoused any genocidal thoughts or
statements he did that guy I didn't say
that no one in in government has said
that I said that the quotes she
specifically mentioned are inacurate but
what about the guy who got fired
specifically for saying
about so do you accept there have been
people with that mindset on the cabinet
I think there are people who have made
all kinds of egregious statements on
both sides and I can give you a few
examples of genocidal intent if you want
from the other side because that's
really the only side that has proven we
can come to that we can come to that but
on that point do you accept then that
there are people in Israeli government
albeit he was fired for it who have
espoused genocidal sentiment they have I
don't know of anyone who is in the
current Israeli government that would
support any form of genocide has anyone
ever have on both Sid okay Abby five
pages yeah five pages of people
including social media posts of
celebrities including some of the people
I know that doesn't that doesn't qualify
as a legitimate intent to carry out a
genocide they included one from a
comedian on there well not to mention
the fact that if we talk about the
illegitimacy
completely decimated every
cultural aspect of life in Gaza has been
completely obliterated to make it
uninhabitable and unsurvivable for
future Generations there I mean that is
hard
to that is hard to argue when you look
at what's happened in Northern Gaza
particular it's pretty much been leveled
I've been there I've seen it with my own
eyes why would anyone expect regular
Palestinians to be able to go back to
homes that don't exist where are they
going to go many of them already have
started going back and they need to
reconstruct Gaza the same way that they
needed to reconstruct Gaza after 2021
but they're going to have to do so
together with Partners whether it's
Israel the United States or other Arab
nations in a post Hamas reality and and
if we're talking about the problem in in
in Gaza and how the Palestinians are
suffering you cannot remove Hamas from
this equation Hamas is the the group
that has been persecuting the
Palestinian people as well well that is
true Abby I don't think there any
question I I don't think there's any
question Hamas has been suppressing and
oppressing its own people I think that
they have become increasingly vocal in
their desire to cause maximum damage to
Israel and to Jewish people they've said
since October the 7th through their
official spokesman that they will do
this again and again and again that
actually is genocidal rhetoric if you're
pledging to destroy a people in as many
numbers as you can as often as you can
that is a form of genocide isn't
it look what precipitated even the
origin of Hamas Hamas didn't just grow
out of thin a I mean it was precipitated
by about question Decades of brutal
occupation and ethnic cleansing yeah but
what about question whether or not Hamas
is genocidal as in its intent I disagree
and Emily's saying look look Hamas is
reacting they're an armed resistance
group trying to fight for their I'm Not
Jus they've done
and the United States also called Nelson
Mandela in thec a terrorist organization
I
to fight for the liberation of Palestine
do you think an obligatory do you think
Israel is a terrorist organization em do
you think Israel is a terrorist
organization can you answer my question
do you think Hamas is a terrorist
organization did I already did let me
explain something do you think that the
acts committed on October 7th were
legitimate you think that gang rape that
act that
isra hang hang on do you think
October let me ask you let me ask you
the question which has made me Infamous
famous whatever you want to do but do
you condemn Hamas for what they did on
October the
7th I'm not going to sit here and give
an obligatory condemnation of Hamas I
will terrorist attack what I think
surely on pure Humanity grounds you
cannot watch the devastating murder of
1200 people and not say it was a
Despicable Terror and condemn the people
who did it look look listen I'm not
going to give an obligatory condemnation
of what I will do is cond that
precipitate violence what I will do is
condemn the roots of the violence
because inevitably you will have
blowback when you deny millions of
people basic human rights when they are
living under brutal medieval Siege and
barbaric military occupation a fascist
military occupation in the West Bank
Hamas doesn't govern the West Bank look
at what Israel has done in the West Bank
can't condemn Hamas for what they
October 7th this is not about Hamas well
it's
what will be
get I'm not going to sit here and
condemn Hamas the entire War I'm sorry
this entire War has been because of what
Hamas did in October the 7th you can go
back in history you can go back in
history and you can find arguments on
both sides in the last 70 years I've had
I've had the argument many times canot
doing what you're doing is what am I
doing what you're doing is conflating
and pretending like there are two equal
sides oh they has been fighting for
decades there's always reasons on both
sides to start the violence no that's
not true there's one side that's an
occupying colonizing force that
continuously and violently expels and
subjugates and brutalizes and terrorizes
the other side they are living under the
boot of Israeli authorities whether
you're in Gaza and occupied completely
militarily by the outside or whether
you're living under a fascist military
dictatorship in the West Bank so do you
if you violence that the root of the
violence 75 years ask
I hear you let me ask you this if you
believe then that Hamas are a armed
resistance as you put it and they have
presumably then you believe what they
did on October the 7th was justified do
you I didn't say that no absolutely
would not sitting here justifying
anything is The Logical extension of
your argument if you believe they're an
armed resistance and they are they are
doing what they're doing because they
are responding to acts of Terror by
another side surely you would say that
what they did was justified
or if it's not justified what is
it you either condemn it or you think
it's Justified I don't think you can sit
in the middle can
you um I look I don't need to sit here
and give a condemnation of Hamas I I I
can explain why Hamas exists I don't
have to support what they did I don't
have to justify or rationalize it in the
face as a person who studies history you
can sit as a person who studies history
Emily Emily you're doing the exact same
thing and you're projecting it on me
okay so do you condemn the actions of
Israel for killing 13,000 children I
don't accept that 13,000 children have
been killed that hasn't that isn't
anything that's verified the problem but
it depends on the context of what's
Happening do I condemn
C Palestinians their reality do I think
Israel is always denying Palestinians
their reality this is why Palestinians
have other do I think everything Israel
has done even in this war is correct no
there's no problem with saying that what
has been wrong what have they done I
already said the same thing about Hamas
I already said about Hamas Emily tell me
what Israel's done that's that's wrong
in your eyes I think that that should
have been a priority from the beginning
uh in order to plan a safe evacuation
route before they implemented a military
plan I think that everything has been
done too late okay Abby what would you
say Hamas have done
wrong uh I look again I'm not going to
sit up here I don't even know really
what happened is it to condemn rape you
can't find anything anything all the
lies that have been perpetrated look
Hamas killing civilians I'm sure
atrocities were committed on both sides
um on October 7th I I'm sure octob 7 at
were
committ many civilians were killed by
isra Emily Emily I can't even hear
myself talk because you just can't stop
AB speak um there's so many lies that
were put out by Israeli authorities that
it's really hard to parse through look I
mean we don't know how many civilians
were killed in the crossfire by Israeli
soldiers um and listening to Hannibal
directive so look the the mass rapeing
babies the The Ripping the babies out of
pregnant women's stomachs I mean all of
these things are such egregious lies
that I really can't sit up here and
condemn things that I don't even know
what happened what about the atrocities
which Hamas recorded and filmed
themselves and then posted to the world
to brazenly boast about what they were
doing what about
that look nothing that Hamas did on
October 7th compares to what Israel has
done in I'm asking you a direct question
about the fact that they boasted about
the mass Mur just make it all about
October 7th and that's what I'm saying
it all pales in comparison
P that happened I already said I already
killing civilians is wrong What kill
civilians is wrong so what Hamas did in
October 7 was what does that make what
is has done H hang on I'm trying to
unpick your argument so if it's wrong to
kill civilians were Hamas wrong to do
what they did in October the 7th given
how many civilians were brutally
murdered are you doing the same thing to
Emily and if not just asking you you
think it was wrong why are you not
sitting
herck is it wrong to kill 13,000 why
can't you ask wrong to kill 100 I
already said it I already said it I'm
not going to sit here you're you're
you're you're basically comparing Hamas
to Israel I'm not comparing anything you
said just now unless unless I'm mistaken
you just said to me that the killing of
innocent civilians is wrong I then asked
you fairly self-evidently I think the
question that in that case given that
Hamas showed us on tape them killing
civilians innocent civilians on October
the 7th do you accept that was wrong yes
or no you saw you saw the tape yeah they
they showed us you saw the tape of them
killing innocent civilians yes they
literally broadcast it to the world yes
we all did and so do Israeli soldiers in
a fashion is for it's like watching
forget Israel for a moment it's like
watching Naz if it's wrong to kill
innocent civilians Abby on social media
if it's wrong to kill innocent civilians
I'll ask you one more time you haven't
got to answer up to you but viewers are
watching this and they know you haven't
answered you think it's wrong to kill
innocent civan answered I I I think I
think it's wrong to kill innocent
civilians so what Hamas did was
wrong she's not going to answer well let
her answer she wants to last time I'm
going to ask you so I don't I I already
look I already told you I'm not going to
sit here and condemn what Hamas did I
understand why I don't have to agree
with what Hamas did right to understand
wasn't my question I just asked you
whether the mass
Mur was wrong to understand why blowback
for horrific policies of aparte and
ethnic cleansing there's obviously
inevitably
going
policies yes absolutely it was back but
was it wrong 100% was it
wrong I'm not look I I don't know how
how much you want to just go around the
mulberry bush like this it's a fairly
straightforward question I don't see how
anyone can come isra is doing how can
you take debate like this and say
innocent civilians is WR not going to
tell you what heras did October 7th was
wrong it makes no sense Abby no
sense I'm not going to sit here and
condemn Hamas I'm not going to do the
obligatory ritual ritual that everyone
is browbeaten into doing I'm just not
going to do it per I doing right now is
your denial I think your denial that
what they did was a heinous act of
terrorism is actually in its way as bad
I'm about to finish my sentence I said
atrocities were Comm
and I thinkes are wrong and killing
innocent civilians are wrong so Hamas
were wrong to do it you're brow beating
me into trying to just ask you for a
straightforward answer this was a
horrific terrorist attack I I already
answered you I think your failure to say
that Hamas did something wrong is
terrible I think Emily's failure to
accept that 12 13,000 children have been
killed is he also terrible right I think
that the denial going on on both sides
here which I hear is frankly
appalling not denying I'm saying that we
don't have the evidence yet of what the
numbers are and we don't know what the
break it is we don't know yet you also
have to remember the fact that what as I
said to you Emily the Palestinian health
authority numbers historically have
turned out to be proven to be pretty
accur Authority the Ministry of Health
has been instructed explicitly by not to
report combatants the numbers are not
accurate and they cannot be trusted
Point as I've just said to you
historically if you go and check
historically the Palestinian health
authority run by Hamas their numbers
have turned out to be broadly accurate
that is why they are being treated now
as reasonably accurate numbers there can
be no doubt from the footage we've seen
from the hospitals of endless children
from the bomb sites endless children
being killed that there are thousands of
children being killed to try and deny
that to try and I'm not denying that
children are being killed I'm not
denying that you don't believe the
Specialties we don't know the numbers
yet and we cannot state definitively
especially if the source is Hamas that
13,000 children have been killed you
have actually no idea that 9,000 Hamas
terrorists have been killed according to
IDF intelligence yeah we do so you
believe IDF intelligence but you won't
believe terorist organization absolutely
I would believe the IDF over a us and UK
design even been
proven even if other independent
agencies who corroborated the
Palestinian health authority numbers you
what independent agencies the United
Nations yeah this is not independent as
has been proven by this war itself
members of unra are actually active
terrorists some of them took part in the
October 7th Massacre see here's my
problem with this debate no evidence
here's my problem with the debate for
both of you there is a level of denial
on both sides which I think people in
the middle who don't have a horse in the
race right who are looking at this from
afar they're a gas at the level of
self-denial they cannot believe Abby
that you're not prepared to say what
Hamas did was wrong and they cannot
believe uh Emily that on your side you
simply won't accept the obvious fact num
of H thousands and thousands of children
are being I I didn't say that thousands
of people are dying do not know the
numbers and no I'm not going to accept
the numbers from Hamas right so you
don't have to then be accountable for
the deaths of so many children
I I don't know what the number is
therefore I can't come I don't agree
with that I think Israel needs to
exercise as much caution as possible
they kill fewer children if possible of
course yeah of course do you accept
they've killed too many children how
would you don't think that yes first of
all but I also well that's but I also
think
it's many of these casualties are result
of being used as human shield actually
what you just said an important adiss
hang on hang on AB I'm going to come to
you but that's an important admission
actually by Emily that she thinks Israel
has killed too many children I think
that is a healthy moment children should
be killed fine you just said you think
they're killing too many children one is
too many fine but it's not laughable is
it uh it's terrible right so I I just
think that until you can admit on both
sides what's actually going on that we
can all see with our own eyes uh I think
you don't get anywhere with this debate
let me ask you this we talk about
genocide and we talk about how this all
uh plays out at the end how does this
end Abby I mean how do you actually get
peace when we can't even have a debate
without people screaming at each other
uh but we now know that a lot of Gaz has
been leveled I don't know if they can go
back and live there gazin I don't know
how many more are going to get killed if
Israel attacks the the Rafa ref refugee
camp in his efforts to to finish off a
mass I don't know these answers what I
do know is I find it very very
implausible that at the end of this it
simply all gets sorted out quite quickly
and the Garin go back to their destroyed
homes it all gets rebuilt and they'll
live happily ever after so how does it
end right I mean well no construction
material has been allowed in for quite
some time so there is no rebuilding
effort that's possible especially when
you've decimated the entire strip
demolished every aspect of civilian life
surgically striking doctors alongside
their entire families killing
over journalists many and targeted
assassinations alongside their entire
families I mean really the best and
brightest in Palestinian Society in Gaza
has been destroyed IDF soldiers posting
on Tic Tac that they're just blowing up
mosques because they're bored looting
and pillaging women's lerie I mean it
really is depraved levels of sadism
going on here how does it end a
negotiated settl
immediately um I think that what Hamas
is offering is not Beyond The Pale it
would be easy for Israel to comply with
the demands if we look at the five-day
truce that happened several months back
uh the Palestinian hostages that
Israel's been keeping they're not called
hostages but they should be because
they're just political prisoners that
are languishing in military detention
the vast majority of those political
prisoners were not charged with anything
um 30 of them were kids for throwing
stones so this is this is the kind of
thing that we're talking about when
Hamas says release our hostages that's
who they're talking about um when they
say the removal of Israeli troops from
Gaza I don't see how that couldn't be
complied with I mean look there should
be a negotiated settlement if you want
the hostages back today that could
happen and that's why there's thousands
of Israelis protesting in the stre well
H have just rejected the latest uh peace
deal
offering well okay is it a permanent
ceasefire because if you're just talking
about a six week ceasefire well then
well then yeah I mean Israel is saying
they're just going to continue the
genocide after six weeks how is that um
something let me
ask before we go back to em let me ask
you this Abby do you think hamash should
stay in power at the end of
this look I'm I'm whatever the
Palestinians want that's do that's what
they will do I mean I think look I'm not
going to say I'm not going to speak on
behalf the Palestinians of who their
leadership should be what I will say is
Hamas isn't actually the most popular
faction in Palestinians
and Hamas is only the result of Israeli
policy of brutal aparte ethnic cleansing
and occupation that's why Hamas exists
any type of Palestinian leadership that
has arisen is a direct result of Israeli
brutality so I'm not going to speak on
behalf of Palestinians and say what
should or should not happen or who they
should and should not elect but I will
say that Hamas is a democratically
elected leadership of the Gaza Strip I
understand um let me ask you one more
question inevitably
should Poli maintain in place should
Netanyahu remain in power in Israel
after
this no hang on I think that the Israeli
people have spoken about Netanyahu but I
think that Netanyahu is the tip of the
iceberg to blame this all on Netanyahu
and his so-called
right should stay in power Foundation of
what Israel is should he should he stay
in power after this no he's committing
genocide no so you're prepared to say to
the Israeli people no your leaders
should go you're not prepared to tell
Inc the Israeli people are out in the
streets and the tens of thousands saying
Netanyahu should go there are many
Palestinians who want Hass to go too I'm
sure the point is you made B deal
election you made a big deal election
you made a big deal of saying it's not
down to me to tell Palestinian people
about their leadership and then you
immediately I give you the the open door
on nety yeah absolutely you should go
totally inconsistent well he should be
tried at the heg and put in the heg
that's a different question I mean he's
committing
question you say you can't interfere in
Palestinian politics but you're very
prepared to interfere in Israeli
politics let me ask you Emily well
because he's committing genocide he's
committing genocide and he should be
tried and thrown in a prison it's a
matter of international cours Emily
that's what international court right
that's what international none of them
actually spelled out Crystal clearly it
is genocide it is moving that way I have
to say uh Emily let me ask you the same
question how does this end I mean I
think that Israel as well as Palestinian
leadership needs to work together with
other partners especially in the Arab
world to help rebuild Gaza Israel isn't
interested in occupying Gaza in any sort
of permanent way that is not something
we want we withdrew from that territory
we do not want it um and I would like to
see Palestinians be able to return to
their home safely and elect some form of
government or leadership that is able to
actually Implement one day in the future
some sort of peace process and I think
that involves working together with
Community leaders who are on the ground
that are not aili with Hamas did you
accept that anything going forward which
looks like a peace deal would be a
two-state solution and that Palestine in
that respect would be an identifiable
State confirmed by Israel and that they
would no longer be dependent on Israel
for the flow of food and water and fuel
and all the other things which Israel
has had some control over now for
decades um in the long term of course
yeah I I do think that there needs to be
some sort of solution
the problem that we're facing today I
believe is actually the radicalization
element within Palestinian Society
because Palestinian leaders don't have a
mandate to lead not Hamas and not mahmur
Abbas and we don't have a leadership
that's able to implement any kind of
peace deal in any borders and when we
have that I don't think netanyahu's had
any interest in a peace deal either I
think he's been quite happy watching
Hamas and the Palestinian Authority at
each other's throats uh since the early
2000s I don't think he's ever shown any
real desire to find peace that's why I
think spokes I personally think I
personally think both Israel and the
Palestinians they they both need new
leadership that actually wants to F to
forge genuine peace in a two-state
solution which offers security and
safety to both sides and maybe it will
take time but you know what I remember I
remember in Northern Ireland people
saying it was equally intractable and
they eventually got there you just need
new leadership that knows what it's
doing who can actually believe in the
concept of peace we got to leave it
there Abby Martin Emily Shader thank you
for a spirited debate I appreciate it
very much indeed
thanks
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)
HEATED Israel Debate: Destiny Vs. Omar Baddar
"I Donât Need Your Pity!" Rahma Zein vs Mosab Hassan Yousef
"TIME OUT!" Alan Dershowitz And Mustafa Barghouti Debate Aaron Bushnell and Israel-Hamas
"This Is Where We Draw The Line!" | Iran Attacks Israel
Joe Rogan RIPS Israel 'Genocide', Candace Owens Firing
100+ Dead After Israeli Troops Open Fire On DESPERATE Palestinians In Food Lines