“I'm Laughing In Your FACE” Cenk Uygur vs Emily Schrader On Iran-Israel
Summary
TLDRThe escalating conflict between Israel and Iran has pushed the Middle East to a precarious edge, with over 300 drones and missiles launched in a报复性 attack by Iran. The conversation emphasizes the importance of restraint, the potential for full-scale war, and the need for a strategic response. The panel discusses the role of the US and other allies, the potential for regime change in Iran, and the critical balance between deterrence and diplomacy. The debate highlights the complexity of the situation, with varying opinions on the best course of action for Israel and the international community.
Takeaways
- 🚨 Iran launched over 300 drones and missiles in a revenge attack against Israel, escalating tensions in the Middle East.
- 🤝 Israel called for support from allies, appreciating the US, Britain, France, and other countries standing alongside them during the crisis.
- 🛡️ Israel's Iron Dome defense system successfully neutralized the majority of the incoming drones and missiles, preventing damage and casualties.
- 🔥 The debate on whether Israel should show restraint or respond strongly to the attack highlighted differing opinions on the best course of action.
- 👑 The exiled Crown Prince of Iran, Reza Pahlavi, emphasized the need for regime change in Iran and urged the international community to support the Iranian people.
- 🌍 The conversation touched on the broader implications of the conflict, including its potential impact on global security and regional stability.
- 🤔 The panelists discussed various strategies for dealing with Iran, including economic sanctions, support for the Iranian opposition, and potential military responses.
- 💡 The importance of a strong and strategic response from the West was emphasized to deter further aggression and promote peace in the region.
- 🗣️ The differing perspectives on the situation highlighted the complexity of the Middle East conflict and the need for a nuanced approach to diplomacy and security.
- 🌐 The potential role of the Abraham Accords in the current conflict was discussed, with speculation on Iran's motivations related to the normalization of relations between Israel and Arab countries.
- ⚖️ The balance between deterrence and restraint in responding to acts of aggression was a central theme of the debate, with various viewpoints on how to achieve long-term peace and stability.
Q & A
What was the nature of the attack on Israel by Iran?
-Iran launched more than 300 drones and missiles in a revenge attack for Israel's bombing of an Iranian diplomatic compound in Syria.
How did Israel respond to the attack?
-Israel's response is not explicitly mentioned in the transcript, but it is implied that they have a strong defense system capable of neutralizing such attacks.
What is the significance of the increasing direct conflict between Israel and Iran?
-The direct conflict signifies a shift from proxy wars and subterfuge to a more open and dangerous confrontation, potentially leading to full-scale warfare and increased instability in the region.
What was the panel's opinion on Israel's need for restraint?
-The panel had mixed opinions, with some members arguing that Israel should show restraint to avoid escalating the conflict, while others emphasized the need for deterrence and a strong response to protect its interests.
What was the Crown Prince of Iran's perspective on the regime's actions?
-The Crown Prince viewed the regime's actions as desperate and indicative of its increasing vulnerability. He argued for regime change and supported increased international pressure on Iran.
How did the panel discuss the potential strategies for dealing with Iran?
-The panel discussed various strategies including increasing economic pressure through sanctions, designating the IRGC as a terrorist organization, and supporting the Iranian people's struggle against the regime.
What was the panel's stance on the potential for regime change in Iran?
-The panel generally agreed that regime change in Iran could be beneficial for regional stability, but they had differing views on how to achieve it, ranging from supporting internal uprisings to increasing international pressure.
What was the discussion about the role of the United States in the conflict?
-The panel discussed the importance of U.S. policy and leadership in addressing the issue with Iran, with some members arguing for a stronger stance against the regime and others cautioning against actions that could escalate the conflict.
How did the panel address the situation in Gaza?
-The panel acknowledged the ongoing conflict and humanitarian crisis in Gaza, with some members criticizing Israel's actions and others emphasizing the need for a broader strategic approach to address the root causes of the conflict.
What was the panel's view on the potential consequences of an Israeli military response to Iran?
-The panel had differing views, with some members cautioning that a military response could play into Iran's hands and others arguing that a strong deterrent might be necessary to prevent future attacks.
Outlines
🌪️ Middle East Conflict Escalation
The paragraph discusses the heightened tensions in the Middle East due to Iran's missile and drone attack on Israel, in retaliation for Israel's bombing of an Iranian diplomatic compound in Syria. It highlights the precarious situation in the region and the potential for full-scale warfare. The speaker emphasizes the importance of Israel's restraint, considering its role as a key Western ally in a region with many unstable actors. The conversation also touches on the support Israel has from various countries and the need for a strategic response to maintain regional stability.
💡 Strategies for Dealing with Iran
This paragraph focuses on potential strategies to address the Iranian regime's aggressive actions. The discussion includes economic pressure through expanded sanctions, designating the IRGC as a terror organization, and targeting regime officials' personal assets. It also emphasizes the need for maximum support for the Iranian people's struggle, including ensuring internet access and finding ways to support Iranians financially. The conversation suggests that a dual approach of internal and external pressure could be a recipe for a successful transition, and questions Israel's potential response strategies.
🤝 International Support and Policy Shifts
The discussion in this paragraph centers around the international community's role in addressing the Iranian regime. It calls for strong leadership from the Western world, drawing parallels to historical figures like Roosevelt and Churchill. The speaker argues for a policy shift that goes beyond immediate responses and focuses on long-term solutions, such as regime change in Iran. The conversation also touches on the importance of the Abraham Accords and the potential for Israel to be a strategic partner in the region, emphasizing the need for cooperation among world leaders to seriously address the Iranian issue.
🗣️ Debate on Israel's Response
This paragraph presents a debate on Israel's appropriate response to Iran's aggression. The participants discuss the merits of restraint versus deterrence, with differing opinions on the potential consequences of military action. The conversation explores the idea that a strong military response could backfire and embolden the Iranian regime, while also considering the need to protect Israeli and regional security. The debate also considers the potential impact of international politics and public opinion on the decisions made by Israel and its allies.
🌐 Global Perspectives on the Israeli-Iranian Conflict
The paragraph includes a variety of perspectives on the Israeli-Iranian conflict, highlighting the complexity of the situation. The discussion touches on the historical context, the role of Hamas as a proxy for Iran, and the international law surrounding military strikes. Participants argue about the origins of the conflict, the legitimacy of targets, and the potential for regime change in Iran. The conversation also addresses the importance of public opinion and the potential risks of alienating the American public through aggressive military actions.
🛡️ Deterrence and the Future of Middle Eastern Relations
The final paragraph delves into the topic of deterrence and its role in the future of Middle Eastern relations. It discusses the potential for Israel's missile defense system to serve as a deterrent to future attacks and the importance of maintaining a strong coalition of countries to support this effort. The conversation also considers the implications of a potential military response from Israel, the need for a smarter, long-term strategy, and the potential impact on American public opinion and political support for Israel.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Revenge attack
💡Proxy warfare
💡Diplomatic compound
💡Iron Dome
💡Regime change
💡Escalation
💡Deterrence
💡Sanctions
💡Islamic Republic of Iran
💡Gaza
💡Abraham Accords
Highlights
Iran launched over 300 drones and missiles in a revenge attack against Israel, escalating tensions in the Middle East.
The conflict between Israel and Iran is reaching a boiling point, with the potential for full-scale warfare.
Israel's response to the attack could significantly impact regional stability, with global implications.
The United States, Britain, France, and other countries are standing in support of Israel during this crisis.
Israel is expected to act as a responsible ally, showing restraint in the face of aggression.
The Iranian regime's nature and behavior are the root causes of many problems in the region, according to the exiled Crown Prince of Iran.
The failure of the Iranian attack on Israel, with 99% of drones and missiles neutralized, demonstrates the strength of Israel's defenses.
The international community, including Western and Middle Eastern allies, must consider regime change in Iran as a solution to ongoing issues.
Economic pressure and sanctions are suggested as methods to increase pressure on the Iranian regime.
Support for the Iranian people in their struggle against the regime is crucial, including ensuring internet access and easing financial restrictions.
The potential for Israel to launch a direct attack into Iran is debated, with concerns about escalating the conflict.
The Biden Administration's policy towards Iran is criticized for appeasement, with calls for stronger leadership.
The Abraham Accords are highlighted as a positive development for regional relations, despite attempts by Iran to sabotage them.
The debate emphasizes the complexity of the situation, with differing views on the appropriate response to Iran's aggression.
The importance of public opinion and American support for Israel is discussed, with concerns about the potential loss of backing due to recent actions.
The potential for a military response from Israel is weighed against the risks of escalating the conflict and uniting the Iranian people behind the regime.
The conversation underlines the need for a strategic approach to dealing with the Islamic regime in Iran, focusing on long-term solutions rather than immediate reactions.
The role of the Western world in supporting democracy and human rights in Iran is emphasized as a key element in fostering change.
Transcripts
this weekend Israel again found itself
under attack Iran fired more than 300
drones and missiles in a Revenge attack
for Israel's bombing of an Iranian
diplomatic compound in Syria after
decades aspiring through proxies
assassinations and subterfuge two Titans
of the Middle East are now on the brink
of full Warfare the region and the world
is suddenly a much more dangerous and
precarious Place Israel says it will
respond how and when it does could be
the difference between stability and a
full region
War we appreciate the US standing
alongside Israel as well as the support
of Britain France and many other
countries we have determined a clear
principle whoever harms us we will harm
them I took some Flack over the weekend
for immediately urging Israel to show
restraint in fact one of the people who
criticize me most viciously will be on
my panel debating exactly that point at
a moment many people have argued that
Israel is the only country on Earth as
expected to endure this kind of attack
and respond with restraint with caution
but my response is to say that's exactly
the point the whole reason Israel is
such a vital Ally to the West is because
it's supposed to be the adult in the
room a western facing Democratic
socially liberal bull walk in a
neighborhood of trigger happy Fanatics
if you don't want the United States to
be dragged into another Middle Eastern
bloodbath you should agree that this is
the time for his key Ally in the region
to prove his commitment to peace and
let's face it Iran is already already a
big loser here yes many Israelis would
have died if this attack had been
successful but it wasn't it was an
abject failure 99% of the drones and
missiles were swatted from the sky
Western and Middle Eastern allies
including Jordan and Saudi Arabia have R
ried behind Israel after months of
eroding their trust and patience with
increasingly brutal assault on Gaza for
Minister Netanyahu has reclaimed at
least a little of his reputation for
security which was dealt a terrible
permanent Blow by October the 7th but
for once I agree with President Biden
Israel needs to take the win because it
was a win these missiles did not land
and cause damage the Middle East is
simmering to the boil hundreds of people
are dying in Gaza every day as Israeli
hostages remain captives of Hamas it's
time to turn the temperature down not
pour fuel onto the fire in a few minutes
I'll be debating this with The Young
Turks founder Jen Yuga former
Congressman Joe Walsh and Israeli
journalist Emily shrer but first i'm
joined by by the exiled Crown Prince of
Iran Resa palavi uh Crown Prince it's
it's great to have you back on
uncensored first of all if I may get
your reaction to uh the attack by Iran
directly on Israel
soil well you know these are signs of a
regime that is becoming more and more
desperate and
vulnerable at the same time it's
launching uh an attack against Israel it
has been launching an attack at home on
Iranian women and trying to uh again
exercise its repression at home uh this
is going to be an ongoing problem and I
think ultimately the world needs to
realize that the root cause of many
problems we see in the area and not just
this one instance but in general is uh
the regime's nature and and behavior it
has not only affected Iranians or
Israelis it has also affected syrians
Iraqis Lebanese and other immediate
Neighbors in the
region Iran has operated uh through
proxies for a number of years obviously
this is the first time they've directly
attacked Israel in this manner how
significant is this
escalation well I think a lot of it is
perhaps mostly to for home consumption
to say we've done something uh one thing
that was really uh uh rendering it even
more of a is that despite launching so
many different missiles and drones none
of them actually reached Target so was
it really an exercise for purposes of
domestic consumption or was it actually
the intent to escalate uh I think this
time K took a huge gamble assuming that
uh probably there will be a lot of
pressure uh to keep these relies from
retaliating but then again I think we
should look beyond the Tit for Tat
argument I think the world needs to now
really uh scratch their head and say
look diplomacy has failed our
expectation of behavior change from this
regime over decades is pointless the
time has come to look for an ultimate
solution to the problem if we indeed
want to avoid escalation we have to put
an end to this regime which is the ask
of the Iranian people in the first place
but the world needs to seriously
consider that the only solution and
alternative is regime change in
Iran but how do how does the world
affect regime change in Iran
well two things number one is to
actually increase even more pressure on
the regime economically by means of
expanding the sanctions I think it is
time that the G7 and the European
countries join the US in putting the
irgc on the terror list this will
further put pressure on the regime to
Target the regime's officials
individually on their personal assets to
expel their diplomats or elements
associated with the regime that room
freely in European and American cities
uh and uh actually implement
further oil sanctions which by the way
were not properly implemented which
simply gave the regime more money which
of course it spent on his proxies
whether theotis or uh Hamas and what
have you uh that's on the external
Factor aspect parallel to this needs to
be a policy of Maximum support that
means support for the Iranian people in
their uh struggle against this regime
and that could come in many forms I
think the most important one is to make
sure that Iranians remain connected to
the world and therefore uh internet
access is key I've mentioned that many
times before uh Elon Musk with Starling
have done their part I think we need
more of that happening there are means
of perhaps uh making exceptions to some
of the current limitations of uh uh the
inability for Iranians to let's say send
money back home because as you know
under the current sanctions it's
impossible to transfer money we are only
limited to some digital currency that
could be at least uh an exception to the
rule to make it easier for us to support
families at home especially our working
force if they want to go on strike not
to remain completely uh you know
impoverished and unable to actually do
that and there are many other elements I
know there there are too many details to
discuss in one short interview but there
are many ways to equal the the playing
field for the Iranians and that could be
a a dual element of pressure from uh
from in the interior of the country as
well as external pressure this could be
a recipe that could lead to a successful
uh
transition obviously uh a lot of
speculation about what Israel's response
will be to this unprecedented missile
strike do you think it would be uh a
smart strategy for Israel to launch an
attack directly into Iran as some of the
more uh right-wing members of the
cabinet apparently want to
do you know I cannot speculate as to
what would be the decision inter inter
internally uh at the level of cabinet
and what's been decided and I know
there's a lot of back and forth uh
between different countries that are
Consulting with the Israeli government
but I can tell you one thing at the end
of the day I think that bib Netanyahu
Muhammad bin Salman and many others in
the region know that we cannot only
remain focus on again what can happen or
not and whether or not this could
escalate Beyond I think everybody in the
region understand that so long as the
regime and its nature is constantly
creating Havoc towards more extremism
more radicalism more instability more
threats uh we cannot contemplate any
solution other than uh dealing only with
the status quo we need to start
strategically Thinking Beyond the status
quo these are the kind of discussions I
had uh recently uh at least last year
when I was in Israel uh visiting that
country and what I've been talking about
with uh uh foreign countries in Europe
and the United States whether
legislators or in government there has
to be
ultimately uh a fundamental shift in
overall policy as they deal with the
Islamic regime in Iran and that would
mean that rather than staying only
focused on how do we respond or what's
proportional response and what are the
uh collateral uh elements because we
know people are suffering we know
Iranians are suffering Israelis are
suffering Palestinians are suffering but
all because of of this regime so the
only remedy ultimately while we are
looking at the immediate response is a
general shift in in policy that is the
only way we can get out of this mess and
solve really a problem for the region in
terms of stability and peace and of
course beyond that uh what could rectify
what the regime from its beginning has
derailed which is peace and stability in
our
region what is your message to President
Biden because clearly America's role in
this will be absolutely
crucial I think this Administration
needs to realize that uh uh what has
happened in terms of appeasement when
you're releasing money to this regime it
only emboldens it to do even more of
what it's done I wonder if this had not
happened about a year ago uh as a
continuation of attempt of reaching
another nuclear deal with Iranians or
paying ransoms for release of their
hostages but there are not that that
factor did not directly contribute to
the Hamas attack against Israel uh these
are the kind of question that needs to
be really answered and I haven't had any
response to this question heard here in
Washington it's not too late I mean look
at it the the Abraham Accords what was
uh going on in a very positive way the
regime very astutely tried to sabotage
it and again cleverly using his proxies
because it every time wants to take
credit for it without being accountable
for it this is the time to finally keep
the regime accountable and I don't think
that the policy of appeasement works it
only emboldens the regime and the
consequences is more suffering for the
people there needs to be now strong
leadership we need the same kind of
leadership that we saw between Roosevelt
and Churchill at the end of the second
world war we need to have the same
result that Ronald Reagan and Margaret
Thatcher had to put an end to the Soviet
communist system in in Russia today we
need the same kind of strong leadership
emanating from the free West Western
World in support of democracy and
freedom and human rights in a country
that could be the pivotal element in
changing everything that this regime has
done to divert us from that from that
Rail and I think Iran is going to be the
most important strategic partner to key
countries in the area Israel Saudi
Arabia and others to bring about that
change and we need to work with one
another and I hope that the world
leaders will finally decide uh to
consider this uh issue very seriously
and I stand ready to present to them our
viewpoints on behalf of my compatriots
of how they can best find a solution
that is win-win which is in the interest
of the Iranian people but also in their
own interest whether it's National
Security or even down the line economic
interest Grand prce pvi really good to
talk to you thank you very much indeed
for taking the time thanks for having me
again
Pierce well going down to my panel to
debate this Jake yuger Joe Walsh and
Emily shraer uh let me start with you
Joe W because you were giving me a bit
of uh hammer on X formerly Twitter
yesterday because I tweeted in reaction
to What had happened that I I wanted
Israel to show restraint and I feared
that Netanyahu wouldn't do that now just
to clarify what I meant I didn't mean
there should be no response I just
wanted that response not to be just
going all guns blazing into Iran because
I I genuinely fear that might uh
accelerate this into a a much more
catastrophic situation but you feel very
strongly don't you could tell that you
believe Israel is always the one when it
gets attacked that is urged so restraint
and they shouldn't be told to do
that pierce really good to be with you
and uh I apologize if in my Twitter
response to you if I got personal I
apologize I didn't mean it my my beef
wasn't with what you said that Israel
should show restraint because I actually
agree with that my beef was the timing
of that tweet and so many others Israel
was under attack the uh missile the you
know the alarms were going off in
Jerusalem missiles were raining down on
Israel and it just didn't seem Pierce
like that was the proper time while
Israel is being attacked to come out and
say Israel needs to show restraint um I
agree with the sentiment of what you
said I just didn't think it was the
proper time until we knew Pierce how
many of those missiles might have gotten
through Andor killed
Israelis right fair enough um let me go
to Jen uh Jen it's it's very complex
situation this in fact the whole
Regional issues are very complex and we
have of course at the same time the
situation in Gaza but Jen when you see
what Iran did to Israel what do you
think Israel's response should
be uh their response should be nothing
uh they should leave well enough alone
Joe Biden uh with a rare uh Victory here
H in being right about the situation
deescalate right now Israel obviously
started this uh and by then I don't mean
we can get into oh my God their proxies
and Hamas but then the occupation and we
can go all the way back to 1948 what I
mean specifically is uh they attacked
Iran basically on its home soil by
attacking the consulate killing their
top General Etc it was an act of Prov a
it was meant to get Iran to retaliate
Netanyahu who has been dying for a war
with Iran for about two decades now he
definitely started this it left Iran
absolutely no choice but to respond and
they responded in a way that basically
showed their hand which was we don't
want a war they gave 72-hour notice it
took the drones several hours to get
there if Iran wanted to do damage inside
Israel it would not have done this type
of attack at all this was Iran basically
saying look we have to appease our
domestic uh audience here and tell them
oh we were tough and struck Israel back
but they knew they were going to get no
casualties so we had a Tit for Tat we
should leave it alone right now if
Israel goes back and hits Iran again
then there's going to be no end to this
then Iran is going to have to respond
and this time it's going to be real and
people are going to die in Israel it's a
terrible disastrous idea they should
definitely stop right
now okay Emily Sher I can see you uh
well I would say not entirely agreeing
with what you just
heard yes I I strongly disagree as you
can imagine I think the entire premise
of asking Israel to exercise restraint
rather than deterrence is a fundamental
part of the problem here I mean as the
Crown Prince mentioned the Islamic
Republic has been doing this for many
many years it's a fundamental premise of
the regime since 1979 they have been
sworn to Israel's destruction they have
been sworn to America's destruction this
is a fundamental value of the Islamic
Republic and not only that but I find it
very interesting what uh Chen is saying
right now because uh the majority of the
Iranian people both inside and outside
of Iran disagree with him in fact there
are thousands and thousands of Iranians
who wish that Israel will assist the
people of Iran in bringing down this
regime we are not going to see a better
future in the Middle East for the Arab
Muslims for the Iranians or for the
Israelis in the Middle East until there
is regime change in Iran and to say that
Israel started this is prop posterous
it's not Israel that has a countdown to
the destruction of Israel in the center
of their largest city that's Iran it's
Iran who has made hating Israel a
fundamental premise of the regime an
obsessive hatred an obsessive irrational
hatred that they have taken money from
the people of Iran and poured hundreds
of millions of dollars into terrorist
proxy organizations on the borders of
Israel in order to ultimately destruct
and destroy the state of Israel I also
want to add one more thing about the
consulate that's important to note that
it was not in fact a consulate was an
Annex of the consulate and even if it
was a consulate under international law
it is permissible to strike when it's
being used as a military headquarters to
plan and conduct terrorist operations
Israel is in a state of War we're in a
state of war with a proxy of the Islamic
Republic of Iran Hamas and that is what
that commander who was killed in that
strike was doing there so this is a
legitimate Target even though Israel
hasn't officially claimed
responsibility okay I'm going to bring
Joe in in a moment I just want to Jen
you were laughing at one stage there
what were you laughing at yeah yeah I
mean look a lot of absurd things were
said there uh like any mention of the
Crown Prince I mean the guy's the the
son of a former dictator of Iran he has
zero credibility with the Iranian people
look I the Iranian regime is that's
absolutely disaster he is the most he is
the most popular figure of any Iranians
are you are you
Iranian ask the Iranians yourself it's
very very clear while there
the vast majority of them the vast
majority of them do support the show is
she just going to talk over me because
we can keep doing this all day long let
me answer the questions so first of all
the idea that they want their dictator
back is hilarious second of all but the
thing that I laughed out loud at is
she's like oh the Iranian people want
Israel to bomb them do they do they
that's the most Preposterous thing I
have ever people
want it's actually not there are
multiple polls that show that I
personally think it's crazy multip show
that they want to B by there have been
that they support that they support
Israeli strikes that they support
Israeli strikes on regime irgc and
regime sites
exclusively on
irgc yes the majority of the Iranian
people support regime change the
majority of the Iranian people support
regime change I find it disgraceful that
you are laughing at the suffering of 0
islamist dictatorship no there are women
who are being dragged Away by the
morality police as the Crown Prince
mentioned there is a second front of
this war and it is against thean people
internally is that funny to you funny to
you that women are being time is she
just going to talk 90% time I do is that
funny let me just respond real quick do
you find it funny that women that
Iranians are being oppress can I respond
all right
whatever all day long we're not gonna
all right all right so listen the
Iranian regime is terrible I don't want
Muslim fundamentalists in charge of Iran
and the people of Iran don't want Muslim
fundamentalists in charge of Iran so
saying that they're against the regime
is obvious that's not the point the
question is what are you going to do
about it if you said hey there's an
internal Revolution and they're
disgusted by the way that the Iranian
regime is treating women or its own
citizens and not giving them freedom I
totally agree but if you claim that they
want Israel to bomb Iran in order to
effectuate regime change you sound I
mean you s it's not even you don't even
sound like a lunatic you sound like
you're a comic or something you're
trying to make a joke that's why I'm
laughing no the Iranian people do not
want to be let me bring in let me bring
in Jo but furthermore all right let me
let me bring in Joe Joe's been waiting
very patiently Joe here's here's my
question for you about this I I I'm not
a conspiracy theorist by nature but let
me just put an idea out there about what
may be really going on here it doesn't
seem to me to be a coincidence that it
that October the 7th happened when it
did or that Iran chooses this moment to
attack Israel directly and that it may
all be linked to the Abraham Accords to
the normalization of relations between
Israel and many of the Middle Eastern
countries to the fact that Saudi Arabia
was on the verge of joining that
normalization of relations with Israel
and that for Iran this is the Ultimate
Nightmare and that through their proxy
tentacles in Gaza and Hamas uh they
facilitated what happened on October the
7th to cause and maybe deliberately
provoke Israel into what they would see
as an overreaction which would then lose
Global support and it may be that what
they've done with this missile strike
directly into Israel is part of a same
process deliberately goding Israel into
potentially overreacting which may
ultimately play into Iran's
hands uh Pierce I think you are spot on
my friend look it it it's silly to
engage in who started this first let's
not do that uh we all three of us agree
that Iran's ruling regime is an evil
regime the Iranian people deserve to
live in Freedom Pierce you're exactly
right look the answer is the only way we
get to peace in this region is when
Israel can partner with the moderate
Arab countries and
isolate isolate is Iran isolate Iran's
proxies and all the other islamists not
Muslims islamists who want to destroy
Israel Pierce which is why I agree with
chank on what Israel should do to what
happened over the weekend do nothing
ignore Iran finish the job in Gaza work
with the moderate Arab world to rebuild
Gaza and completely ignore Iran isolate
Iran that's the only way we're going to
get to peace
Emily I mean do you agree with that do
you not see the danger Emily that if
Israel does Now launch a massive Counter
Strike into Iran that it could actually
be doing exactly what Iran wants it to
do of course that's a distinct
possibility I think there are a lot of
options on the table when it comes to
any kind of response I know there's
already been some discussion this
morning about a Cyber attack there are a
number of different options that have
been put forward to the cabinet and it
remains to be seen what they will do
about it
I don't know if a military option is the
best option for a regime change in Iran
I've advocated for many years now that I
think that the Western governments have
an obligation and a duty to assist the
people of Iran what the Crown Prince was
mentioning about maximum support is
incredibly important the people of Iran
want this regime to fall and I do
believe that there is a way to do it
peacefully but it does require a lot of
effort on the part of the West and it
does require enforcement of sanctions
not just putting on on the books
enforcement of sanctions adding
additional sanctions choking this regime
out until they fall and also empowering
the people we had multiple uprisings
that have been quashed violently by the
Islamic Republic the people are ready we
need to support them and we haven't seen
that from the Western World we haven't
seen that from Europe with their failure
to designate the irgc we haven't seen
that with the enforcement of sanctions
we haven't seen that with a very very
weak Iran policy from the Biden
Administration that that is something
that allows this regime to continue not
to mention of course releasing billions
of dollars in assets that is then going
to terrorist organizations throughout
the Middle East that disproportionately
harm and kill Arab Muslims in the region
so really Israel and the Arab world are
on the same page as you mentioned about
the Abraham Accords this is a major
threat to the Islamic Republic this is
what they're seeking to destroy they are
an anti-peace entity and so I think that
the Democratic Western world needs to
push back against that and they need to
empower the people of Iran increase the
pressure on the regime increase support
for the people and see if that can get
us to where we need to go with this
regime
falling okay Jen I mean I I was struck
by the fact that immediately uh racing
to the defense of Israel when these
missiles were fired were the British uh
but also Jordan uh Saudi Arabia you know
it was it was fascinating to watch the
geopolitics play out here how
significant do you think that was
yeah so there's a lot going on there
first of all when UK and us help Israel
knock down the drones in the missiles
I'm totally in favor of that I as you
know uh Pier I've been consistent on
this from day one I don't want any
civilians dying in Israel in Gaza and
Iran uh that's what I care about the
most and so we want to avoid war Saudi
Arabia has always hated Iran that's not
surprising look Israel actually could
unite a lot of the Arab countries
moderate or otherwise Saudi Arabia of
course is is not moderate they're also
fundamentalist uh Muslims they're also
dict dictators Etc but it you could
rally all those folks as long as you end
the occupation but if you're going to
continue the occupation for another 75
years 75 days Etc you're never going to
Rally any of those Arab countries yeah
you might get a deal with a dictator or
two because they have economic interests
on your side but you're not ever going
to get the people on your side and and
by the way in this conversation we're
actually finally getting to somewhere
productive look there's plenty of
disagreement I have with Emily on the
the money and the sanctions Etc but
overall think about it guys if you bomb
Iran do you think that makes regime
change more likely or less likely
obviously it makes it less likely
because it allows the regime to Rally
the Iran people it depends on what kind
of strike depends on what kind if you're
targeting an irgc site if you're
targeting a nuclear site you can't make
a blanket statement like that that's
massively
overpro there is a strategic military
option there is no there is no people on
Earth there are no people on Earth that
say oh it's okay to bomb our country as
long as you
bomb military or nuclear facilities or
anything like that no of course they're
going to think Israel bombed us you have
to bomb them back it's going to Rally
them around the I can't understand why
you can't
this it's so look guys I don't know
saying it it's thousands of
irans let me bring
bring let me bring in
let's clarify let's clarify let's
clarify okay so Emily says bombing Iran
is going to get the Iranian people on
Israel's side I say no what do you no to
be fair no no no to be wait a minute to
be fair what she said was it it depends
it depends what targets Israel targeted
in that eventuality it was purely
military targets nuclear targets and so
on not a point the Iranian appear are
you saying that the Iranian would be
like oh you targeted us but in the best
possible intentions we're so happy
Israel only our military facil no what
I'm sounds no what I'm saying is I think
Emily has a point there would clearly be
a different response I would imagine
from a lot of Iranian people if they the
civilians were not targeted I mean
there's a qualitative difference between
military targets and civilian targets
isn't
there barely because look it's all about
rhetoric you think the Iranian regime is
going to tell their local population hey
guys don't sweat it it was just a
military site no they're going to RI
people up I think it's deeply
counterproductive it helps the mulas it
helps the grand Ayatollah if you bomb
Iran in any way shape or form do you
think that if America was bombed we'd be
like oh no it's okay they hit a military
Target so we're now in favor of the
country who bombed us there's a 0% let
me bring let me bring in let me bring in
Jo let me bring in Joe
let me let me we must let Joe have a
have a have a say Joe no and and I I'll
be brief Pierce thanks I just think what
happened this weekend and I say this as
someone who is off the charts pro Israel
what happened this weekend presents an
opportunity for Israel and and I think
turning the other cheek right now and
ignoring Iran right now is a huge signal
of strength I really do there are people
around the world who hate Israel who are
just waiting for Israel to bomb and
attack Iran don't give them that isolate
Iran ignore them and focus on what you
need to focus on
Israel problem here is that if Israel
doesn't respond sorry the problem here
is that if Israel doesn't respond in
some capacity maybe it's a Cyber attack
maybe it's some other method that we
haven't thought of yet I don't know but
if Israel does nothing this also is not
the right response because doing nothing
emboldens the regime we need to deter
the regime not just Israel but the
entire Western World this is a a
disgusting islamist human rights VI that
its own
people addressed maybe it can be done
through S you talk
about but that's not up to Israel
alone okay Emily here's my question for
you is it not a deterrence that Iran
fires off all these missiles including
ballistic missiles Cruise missil and so
on and none of them landed I mean barely
nothing worked it was all neutralized by
uh not just Israel's Iron Dome but also
by its uh other countries and their
defenses in the region but it was a
complete failure operationally now it
may well be that Iran intended it not to
be that successful hence the warnings
that they gave to the Americans to the
Saudis and so on it may be it was all
performative in that sense but the
reality is Israel's defenses unlike on
October the 7th they stood up
magnificently well is that not in itself
a pretty unnerving deterrent to to
enemies who want to try and do this
thing is that you can try but you won't
succeed well I think there's no question
it was a spectacular failure on the part
of the Islamic Republic with 99% of
their projectiles being shot down by a
coalition of countries however when it
comes to deterrence the Islamic Republic
knows full well that they can fire 10
times the amount as they themselves have
promised to do and overwhelm the missile
defense system so that isn't really uh
an accurate response and I also want to
add that what the Islamic regime did in
this instance by launching this by
escalating the conflict is actually a
sign of weakness of the regime itself I
mean they have rallied around bashing
Israel as a as a tool to you know try to
get people to their side and to show
that they are under attack for many many
years this is a tactic that they did
even with the Irani Iraq war they were
wildly unpopular and so they started a
war that being said you can see that in
the timidness of their strike and the
fact that Hezbollah which is an arm of
the Islamic Republic in Lebanon didn't
go full out on Israel although they also
fired Rockets um that they are not
prepared and that could be for a number
of different reasons uh but I don't
think that they are looking for a full
out war with Israel right now despite
that they they did escalate the
situation and I think that Israel has an
obligation uh to deter them and to
respond strongly and ensure that this
type of thing does not respond again or
does not occur again I'm sorry all right
I'll come to Jen in a moment but Joe
you'll you don't agree with that no
Emily look I agree that Iran is vastly
weakened after this weekend but man you
you bomb them you go after that regime
militarily you will do nothing but
embolden them they are weakened so keep
them on this path show your strength
look at them and look the other way and
do what you need to do that they're weak
continue to isolate this only works this
only works if you have the Coalition of
other countries if you have the West
involved if you have countries that are
willing to enforce sanctions that are
willing to designate the irgc no they
don't it's been years and and Europe has
refused to designate the irgc they're
not enforcing sanctions the Biden
Administration is weaker than ever
they're releasing billions in frozen
assets over and over and over again
appeasement doesn't work every time we
appease this regime EX tions go up
nuclear proliferation goes up funding
for Terror let me bring let me bring in
Jen let me bring in Jen here Jen you're
shaking your head there do you not agree
with the principle the CR Prince said
the same thing that that appeasing Iran
in any way has turned out to be a
completely pointless
exercise yeah that's 100% wrong we had
Iran completely contained uh under Obama
uh we did a great deal we took the
uranium out of the country they had no
nuclear program then that idiot Trump
came along egged on by the idiot
Netanyahu and said oh let's get out of
the deal so they can start doing uranium
enrichment again that was such a
terrible idea and now Iran is more
emboldened and more dangerous because of
that right-wing mentality of always go
maximalist you think like that people
don't know that Israel will try to
obliterate Iran if they have a everybody
knows that okay everybody knows that
Israel has nukes everyone knows that
Netanyahu is a warmonger and will do
vicious things it's not like we can't
see Gaza no but you're not going to help
the people of Israel let alone America
which I want to come back to if you
start this giant war in the Middle East
here's what the people the government of
Israel I don't think understands at this
point they have they're in great danger
of losing the American people for the
first time in my life the leftwing can't
stand what they've done in Gaza but I
got news for you a ton of the right-wing
can't stand it either and here's what
we're all unified about we don't want to
go into another disastrous war in the
Middle East Maga doesn't want that
progresses don't want that the only
people who want that coming to you no no
it's not Israel wants the war America
doesn't want the war hasomed from day
one that is what the Islamic Republic
the little Satan is Israel and the big
Satan is the United States this is their
ideology motivated they are not
motivated by reason they're motivated by
extremism you are missing the point no
no we can talk over each other all day
saying no it doesn't change the reality
okay here's the reality America doesn't
want to go to war if if any government
official whether it's Biden or Trump if
anybody brings us to war they will pay a
massive political price and by the way
so will Israel if Israel drags us into
this War I guarantee you they lose
American Support whether you like it or
you don't and the polling indicates this
you're this close to losing the entire
right wing let alone the entire left
wing we're sick of Palestinians being
murdered with our money and now you want
to start a giant war in the Middle East
and have us fight for it here's how many
troops should go into a war in the midle
zero zero America doesn't need to fight
arguing about politics and popularity
that's isra wants if Israel wants to
start a war with Iran good luck to you
okay America should have nothing to do
with it nothing I'm sick of Israel
starting hostilities killing uh Muslim
people and then saying America pay for
it America fight for it zero should go
and zero dollars should go if if the
goal and I think all three of us can
agree to this if the goal is to defeat
Iran's ruling regime you have to be
smart and if you respond militarily
right now in a big way against this
regime that will not defeat them Emily
I'm with you on your endgame but we have
to be smart and it would be terribly
shortsighted right now if Israel
responded in kind we're on a path where
we can isolate think Israel is
considering even responding in
kind any sort of military response would
backfire on Israel right
now that's right Emily and don't you
don't want to do it to Israel don't
agreee with that but but I actually I
actually want to address something else
which is that you're saying America
doesn't want a war I agree with you what
you're arguing about here is a
popularity contest you're arguing about
elections I'm not talking about that I'm
talking about the future and the safety
of the United States I'm talking about
the future and the safety of the western
world and the future and the safety of
the state of Israel and the reality is
that we're dealing with a regime that is
not logical they are concerned by
extremist ideology that they're trying
to promote all around the world it is
not logical that is why appeasement
hasn't worked and it's not going to work
and we've been trying to do this for 45
45 years now and it hasn't worked so try
something different we need to have a
smarter a better approach in order to
bring down this regime and you saying oh
we shouldn't do X because of popularity
that's not the question America and the
west and Israel need to do what they
need to do in order to protect
themselves even if sometimes it's
unpopular now are we at that point today
with Iran I don't know that's not a
decision that I'm making but for you to
say oh because of popularity it doesn't
matter because of popular because of
Elections the people of Iran who are
suffering under this regime for 45 years
the people who are sitting in Evan
prison because they went to a protest a
year ago that doesn't matter shame on
you you want to lose American elections
uh and and then lose uh all money to
Israel go have at it hos but that's not
going to help Israel at all okay so stop
going in a counterproductive uh
Direction all of this warmongering is
totally counterproductive it hurts
Israeli citizens obviously Iranian
civilians would be hurt but America I
don't understand how Israel is our Ally
all they ever do is drag us into Wars
drag us into conflicts we the idea
America is not safe unless we attack
Iran is on the FR lines of the war that
will come to the United States front
lines of a war they started a front
lines of a war they started I don't see
how this has anything to do with
American interest
heard
America yeah I know what they say and
you say that they're not rational that's
actually not true if they were
irrational and they were religious
zealots and all that so they're actually
greedy and corrupt that's the thing that
drives them and they want to keep their
lives and they want to keep their money
and so that's why they gave us 72-hour
notice before they
I can't go on with people that
constantly talk over me all right if
they were zealots they would have done
what Netanyahu did it attack blindly and
with rage and just kill everything in
sight you want to talk about zealous
look at the Israeli settlers the
fundamentalists of Muslims Jews and
Christi world all of their own
citizens what are you talking about by
accident because they're clown what are
you talking about do nothing about IR do
you know nothing about how the Islamic
Republic works you seem to think Iranian
are fine with their regime Emily let me
give the last word to let me give the
last word to Joe yeah and Emily let me
slap chank with this one because you and
I are on the same side of this one um
Israel I tweeted this over the weekend
chank and I believe it an attack on
Israel is an attack on America plain and
simple Israel is no it's not hold on let
me finish my brother Israel is our best
friend on this planet they are our
closest Ally if Israel was hit by any
country in that region like over the
weekend America would be there to defend
it to defend Israel because they are our
best friend and shank America will
always be pro-israel
period no it
won't pro Israel right
now yes I don't know
why why
go ahead I do think Jen has made one Jen
made a powerful Point earlier which is
which is true which is the polling has
never been as negative as this towards
Israel in America in modern times so
there is no doubt that there is a
certainly amongst younger people in
America there is a growing sense of
unease about the special relationship
and that is undeniable from the polls so
anyway we got to leave it there a
fascinating debate thank you all very
much indeed I appreciate it thanks e
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)
Israel vows to respond to Iranian drone attack
Reports that Israel has carried out attack on Iran
Iran launches drone attacks toward Israel, U.S. official confirms | full coverage
How will Israel and the US respond to Iran's attack on Israel? | DW News
Iran attack on Israel: IDF says 'majority' of 200+ drones intercepted | LiveNOW from FOX
Israel vows to ‘exact a price’ as Iran launches first ever direct attack