$50K wasn't enough! Akademiks reacts to news reports about Diddy beating up Cassie and how it leaked

King Akademiks
18 May 202478:40

Summary

TLDRThe video script discusses the fallout from a leaked surveillance video showing music mogul Sean 'Diddy' Combs allegedly assaulting his then-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, in a hotel hallway in 2016. The incident led to a lawsuit filed by Ventura and quickly settled. The video's release reignites public outcry and raises questions about Diddy's future in the entertainment industry. Speculations about the implications for Diddy's career, potential legal consequences, and the impact on his public image are explored, along with the reactions of various celebrities and the possibility of further allegations emerging.

Takeaways

  • 📹 The video in question shows Diddy assaulting his then-girlfriend Cassie Ventura in a hotel hallway in 2016.
  • 💼 Diddy's defense team likely knew about the video when he settled the lawsuit filed by Cassie, possibly to prevent its release.
  • 🤔 Speculation suggests that Cassie had more evidence, which might have contributed to Diddy's decision to settle quickly.
  • 📱 The lawsuit mentions videos taken on multiple devices, hinting at the possibility of more explicit or incriminating content.
  • 🚫 Diddy allegedly used his phone, laptop, and tablet to record intimate encounters, which could imply the existence of additional compromising videos.
  • 💰 The settlement was reached rapidly, with Cassie releasing a statement about a mutual agreement shortly after the lawsuit was filed.
  • 🎥 The video's release via CNN raises questions about its source, as it's unusual for the network to release such footage without payment.
  • 🚨 The video's release could potentially impact other lawsuits against Diddy, both civil and criminal, by providing visual evidence of his behavior.
  • 👮‍♂️ There's discussion about whether law enforcement could use the video as evidence for charges, despite the statute of limitations.
  • 🤝 Some celebrities have continued to support Diddy publicly, despite the allegations and video evidence.

Q & A

  • What incident is depicted in the video involving Diddy and Cassie Ventura?

    -The video shows Diddy assaulting Cassie Ventura in a hotel hallway in March 2016. He is seen punching, kicking, and attempting to drag her back to their hotel room after an argument.

  • When was the lawsuit filed by Cassie Ventura against Diddy, and what was the outcome?

    -Cassie Ventura filed a lawsuit against Diddy in November 2023, which was quickly settled overnight, with the details of the settlement not being disclosed.

  • What does the lawsuit allege Diddy did to Cassie Ventura?

    -The lawsuit alleges that Diddy became extremely intoxicated, punched Cassie Ventura in the face, causing a black eye, and proceeded to follow her into the hotel hallway where he continued the assault.

  • How did the video of the incident come to light, and who released it?

    -The video was released by CNN and was taken from surveillance cameras in the hotel. The video had not been publicly seen until it was leaked and reported on by CNN.

  • What are the implications of the video for Diddy's public image and career?

    -The video has severely damaged Diddy's public image, potentially leading to a loss of support from fans and the industry. It may also result in a loss of business opportunities and endorsements.

  • What is the speculation regarding the quick settlement of the lawsuit?

    -The speculation is that Diddy settled quickly to prevent further damaging evidence, such as the video, from coming to light and to avoid a more drawn-out legal battle.

  • What is the discussion about the potential legal consequences for Diddy after the video's release?

    -There is a discussion about whether the video could lead to criminal charges for Diddy, despite the civil lawsuit having been settled. The video's release could potentially influence ongoing or future investigations.

  • How does the script mention the role of other people who may have known about Diddy's behavior?

    -The script suggests that there may have been others in the industry who were aware of Diddy's behavior but did not speak up or take action, raising questions about complicity and silence.

  • What is the context of the discussion about the video and its impact on Diddy's music and public support?

    -The script discusses the possibility that Diddy's music may no longer be supported or played publicly due to the disturbing nature of the video and its impact on public perception.

  • What are the reactions from the public and the industry to the video and its implications?

    -The reactions are mixed, with some expressing shock and calling for a boycott of Diddy's music, while others speculate about the potential legal and career consequences for Diddy.

Outlines

00:00

🕵️‍♂️ Speculation on Diddy's Legal Strategy and Alleged Videos

The paragraph discusses speculation about Diddy's legal situation, suggesting that he settled a lawsuit quickly to prevent incriminating videos from becoming public. It is hypothesized that the accuser, Cassie, may have had more evidence against Diddy, possibly videos showing abusive behavior. The speaker also implies that Diddy might have been filming sexual encounters, and that Cassie could have had access to this footage. The paragraph ends with a question about the ethics of settling a lawsuit and then having evidence leak after the fact.

05:01

🎥 Reactions to Leaked Video and Impact on Public Perception

This section delves into the reactions to a leaked video that allegedly shows Diddy assaulting a woman. It discusses how public opinion has shifted in light of the video and how it has been perceived as requiring courage for the victim to come forward. The paragraph also explores the potential legal implications, including the possibility of the video being used in legal proceedings and the impact on Diddy's reputation. It raises questions about why the video was not released earlier by the hotel and suggests that Diddy's influence may have played a role in keeping it under wraps.

10:02

💸 Theories on Payment for Silence and Destruction of Evidence

The paragraph focuses on theories surrounding the payment of $50,000 by Diddy to the hotel for security footage. It is suggested that the payment was made to ensure the destruction or withholding of the footage, indicating Diddy's desire to prevent its release. The discussion includes speculation on who within the hotel might have been involved in the transaction and the potential consequences of such an action. There is also an exploration of the ethics of paying for silence and the potential legal implications.

15:03

🤔 Contemplation of Diddy's Strategy Amidst Legal Allegations

This section contemplates Diddy's potential strategy in the face of multiple lawsuits and the recent release of incriminating footage. It suggests that fighting the lawsuits in court might be a way for Diddy to regain some public trust, as settling could be perceived as an admission of guilt. The paragraph also discusses the possibility of criminal charges and the potential impact on Diddy's reputation and career, emphasizing the severity of the allegations and the courage of the accuser.

20:05

📺 CNN's Involvement in the Leak and Speculations on Motives

The paragraph discusses the role of CNN in the release of the video footage and speculates on their motives. It questions whether CNN typically engages in such activities and hypothesizes about their possible reasons for releasing the footage. The discussion also considers the potential implications for Diddy and the ongoing legal cases, as well as the possibility of the video being used as evidence in future proceedings.

25:07

🚨 Concerns Over Potential Criminal Charges for Diddy

This section expresses concern over the possibility of Diddy facing criminal charges due to the video and the allegations against him. It discusses the potential for federal involvement in the case and the serious nature of the accusations, which could include kidnapping and assault. The paragraph also highlights the power and resources Diddy has at his disposal and the need for law enforcement to handle any actions against him carefully and correctly.

30:09

🎶 Diddy's Public Image and the Impact of the Video on His Career

The paragraph examines the impact of the video on Diddy's public image and career, suggesting that his portrayal as a loving figure in the industry is now overshadowed by the allegations of violence. It discusses the potential long-term effects on his ability to be the face of brands or promote a positive image. The section also speculates on how the industry, which often operates in private, might continue to support Diddy despite public outcry.

35:10

🔍 Analyzing the Legal and Public Reactions to Diddy's Situation

This section analyzes the legal and public reactions to the video and the allegations against Diddy. It discusses the potential for the video to be used in legal proceedings, the limitations of statute of limitations, and the possibility of Diddy facing charges. The paragraph also considers the public's response to Diddy's new song, which seems to be a defiant statement amidst the controversy.

40:14

👥 The Role of Diddy's Associates and the Feds' Investigation

The paragraph delves into the role of Diddy's associates, particularly Brendan Paul, who was arrested in connection with Diddy's case. It discusses the possibility of Paul cooperating with federal investigators and the potential implications for Diddy. The section also explores the feds' extensive investigation into Diddy's activities and the seriousness of the charges he might face.

45:17

🗣️ Public Figures' Support for Diddy and the Broader Implications

This section highlights the support Diddy has received from various public figures and celebrities despite the allegations against him. It raises questions about the ethics of continuing to support someone facing such serious accusations and discusses the potential backlash these figures may face for their public support.

50:18

📝 Van Lathan's Response to Allegations and the Call for Accountability

The paragraph focuses on Van Lathan's response to allegations of complicity and his attempt to clear his name. It discusses his denial of any wrongdoing and his explanation of why he did not air certain interviews related to Diddy. The section also touches on the broader implications of the allegations and the need for accountability within the industry.

55:20

🤔 Connections Between Brendan Paul's Arrest and Diddy's Investigation

This section explores the potential connections between Brendan Paul's arrest and the federal investigation into Diddy. It discusses the possibility that Paul's arrest was part of a broader effort to gather evidence against Diddy and the potential implications for Diddy's legal situation.

00:22

🏆 Diddy's BET Achievement Award and Public Perception

The paragraph discusses Diddy's BET Achievement Award and the public's perception of him in light of the allegations and the video. It questions whether Diddy's recognition is still warranted and whether his music should continue to be supported and played in public settings.

05:23

👀 Cassie Ventura's Lawsuit and the Disturbing Hotel Video

This section details Cassie Ventura's lawsuit against Diddy and the disturbing video that emerged from a hotel in 2016. It describes the violent incident captured on surveillance footage and the subsequent legal actions taken by Ventura. The paragraph also includes reactions to the video and the context in which it was released.

10:23

🕒 Timeline of Events Following the Hotel Incident

The paragraph attempts to establish a timeline of events following the hotel incident involving Diddy and Cassie Ventura. It seeks to determine when Cassie was next seen in public after the alleged assault and discusses her appearance at an award show, suggesting a possible discrepancy between the timeline of the incident and her public appearances.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Diddy

Diddy, also known as Sean Combs, is a central figure in the video script. He is a prominent music producer and artist. The video discusses allegations of assault and other misconduct against him. The term is used repeatedly throughout the script, highlighting its relevance to the video's theme of examining the consequences of his alleged actions.

💡Lawsuit

A lawsuit is a legal action taken by Cassie Ventura against Diddy, alleging assault and other forms of abuse. The script discusses the implications of this lawsuit and its quick settlement, suggesting it may have been motivated by a desire to prevent incriminating evidence from becoming public. The lawsuit is a key element in the video's narrative, illustrating the legal recourse sought by victims of alleged abuse.

💡Assault

Assault is a criminal act that involves the threat or use of physical force against another person. In the video, the term is used to describe the violent behavior allegedly exhibited by Diddy towards Cassie Ventura. The script provides a detailed account of the incident, which is captured on video and forms the basis of the legal and ethical discussions in the video.

💡Settlement

A settlement refers to a resolution between parties in a dispute, often involving financial compensation. The script suggests that Diddy settled the lawsuit quickly, possibly to avoid further public scrutiny and the emergence of incriminating evidence. The concept of settlement is significant in the video as it raises questions about the motivations behind such actions and their implications for justice.

💡Video Evidence

Video evidence plays a crucial role in the video script as it provides a visual account of the alleged assault. The script discusses the existence of multiple videos captured on different devices, suggesting a premeditated effort to document the events. The video evidence is central to the narrative, as it substantiates the claims made in the lawsuit and influences public opinion.

💡Cassie Ventura

Cassie Ventura is an American singer, songwriter, and model who is portrayed as the victim in the video script. She filed a lawsuit against Diddy for alleged assault and abuse. The script discusses her actions before and after the incident, including her attempts to delete evidence and the subsequent settlement. Cassie Ventura's story is integral to the video's exploration of the impact of alleged abuse on victims.

💡Sexual Misconduct

Sexual misconduct encompasses a range of inappropriate sexual behavior, and in the video, it is suggested that Diddy engaged in such behavior. The script alludes to allegations of forcing Cassie Ventura into sexual situations and using illicit substances, contributing to a broader narrative of predatory behavior. This keyword is significant as it expands the scope of the discussion beyond physical assault to include other forms of abuse.

💡Public Image

Public image refers to the perception of a person or entity by the general public. The video script discusses the potential damage to Diddy's public image as a result of the allegations and the release of the video evidence. The concept is important as it highlights the discrepancy between Diddy's public persona and the allegations of misconduct, raising questions about the authenticity of celebrity images.

💡Legal Consequences

Legal consequences are the outcomes or repercussions that result from legal actions or proceedings. The script speculates on the potential legal ramifications Diddy may face, including further lawsuits and criminal charges. The term is significant as it underscores the gravity of the allegations and the potential for formal legal repercussions in response to the alleged misconduct.

💡Criminal Charges

Criminal charges are formal accusations brought against an individual for alleged criminal activity. The video script raises the possibility of Diddy facing criminal charges as a result of the video evidence and the allegations made by Cassie Ventura. The term is relevant as it indicates the severity of the situation and the potential for formal legal action against Diddy.

💡Power Dynamics

Power dynamics refer to the distribution of power and influence between individuals or groups. The script discusses the power imbalance between Diddy and Cassie Ventura, suggesting that Diddy used his influence to control and intimidate. This keyword is important as it contextualizes the allegations within broader societal issues of power imbalance and its misuse.

Highlights

Diddy's alleged assault on Cassie Ventura in 2016 is captured in a video obtained by CNN.

The video's revelation may have influenced Diddy's decision to settle a lawsuit filed by Cassie quickly.

Speculation about the existence of more incriminating videos that could have contributed to the settlement.

Cassie's lawsuit hints at multiple devices used to record their encounters, suggesting possible evidence of abuse.

Diddy's alleged use of Cassie's phone to record videos, which she claimed to have deleted.

The possibility of Diddy facing more serious consequences due to the video's existence.

The video's release raises questions about the ethics of settling lawsuits to silence allegations.

Diddy's team's statement that the settlement is not an admission of wrongdoing.

Cassie's attorney's statement reinforcing her allegations after the video's release.

Discussion on whether it's opportunistic to file a lawsuit, settle, and then have evidence leak.

The impact of the video on public perception and the potential for other victims to come forward.

Legal implications of the video and its potential use in criminal proceedings against Diddy.

The role of power and influence in suppressing evidence and managing public image.

The aftermath of the video's release on Diddy's reputation and future in the music industry.

The possibility of the video being used as part of a larger federal case against Diddy.

The impact of the video on Diddy's personal life and relationships within the industry.

The potential for the video to affect Diddy's legal strategy regarding other lawsuits.

Speculation on whether the video's leak could be an inside job or an intentional release by authorities.

Transcripts

00:04

it is no doubt Diddy I'm I'm not in any

00:07

question seeing on that video and so

00:10

that's going to be very very difficult

00:12

to to spin that here's the thing when

00:15

they filed this lawsuit against Diddy I

00:18

have to imagine her defense team knew

00:20

about this video and I also have to

00:22

imagine this is why he decided to settle

00:25

he didn't want this coming out and and

00:27

and we don't know what else there is

00:30

okay I'm going to speculate and this is

00:31

straight speculation but if you ask me

00:33

what probably more there is and this is

00:36

what I'm saying that I think Cassi had I

00:39

think she crossed her tees and dotted

00:40

her eyes before she ever even filed this

00:42

lawsuit and who knows how long this went

00:44

behind the scenes where they were

00:46

probably trying to get a settlement

00:47

before the F even

00:49

happened I do think she has more things

00:51

and if you read the lawsuit very

00:53

carefully you could kind of like you

00:56

know you kind of get like a hint of what

00:58

she probably has in the lawsuit she says

01:02

um videos okay okay now during the freak

01:08

offs in addition to directing um Cassie

01:11

and masturbing Mr col was used his phone

01:15

laptop and tablet so this [ __ ] is

01:17

filming on three devices this [ __ ]

01:19

thought he was the Steven Spielberg of

01:21

the free cffs right to film his ventur

01:23

having sex with a hired sex worker he

01:26

treated and forced counter as a personal

01:28

art project Justin candle he used for

01:31

lighting to frame the videos he took

01:33

when she while she quickly deleted any

01:37

photographs or video of sex acts if they

01:42

were taken on her phone that's that's a

01:44

very big clue right there so if Diddy

01:47

was also recording with her phone and I

01:49

know she saying she was deleting them

01:51

she probably had a couple up in there

01:54

let's be honest right that would make

01:56

sense now if she had videos of these

01:58

like I don't know like got 40 dudes in

02:02

the corner all jacking off waiting to

02:04

[ __ ] her and Diddy's in the other corner

02:06

with like 50 things recording and he's

02:09

like lathering up his [ __ ] jacket off to

02:11

like again I think she has videos I do

02:14

think she has videos of these encounters

02:16

right which again I think that probably

02:20

was one of those things it can't just be

02:23

not saying this wasn't bad of course

02:25

this is horrible right like like the

02:26

video of you know Diddy hitting her and

02:28

dragging horrible horrible extremely

02:30

horrible but I got to think that she

02:32

probably had a little bit more yo what

02:34

case you ever you ever seen get settled

02:37

so

02:38

expeditiously yo if you're sending a

02:40

wire sometime it'll even take a day

02:42

[ __ ] the [ __ ] got filed on Saturday no

02:44

Friday and by Saturday Cassie was

02:47

putting out a statement said hey you

02:49

know what the shit's over um we've came

02:51

to a mutual agreement settlement and

02:53

you're like huh so I have to believe

02:57

there was probably more things I think

02:58

there was actually videos If if you ask

03:00

me he didn't want this coming out and we

03:03

don't know what else there is I I could

03:06

not agree with you more they had to have

03:07

had this video I think they they must

03:09

have I think it's why they settled so

03:11

quickly um but I don't think he ever

03:13

imagined um that this would come out to

03:15

be completely blunt a a and remember

03:19

when they settled this

03:20

lawsuit you know he's his team at the

03:23

time through Benjamin brafman basically

03:25

said I don't want this to be an

03:26

acknowledgement of any wrongdoing but

03:27

Cassandra ventur team made it clear this

03:30

doesn't mean it it doesn't take away

03:31

from her allegations and in fact Douglas

03:34

wigdor who's her attorney released the

03:36

statement after this video came out

03:38

saying the gut-wrenching video has only

03:40

further confirmed the disturbing and

03:42

predatory behavior of Mr Colmes words

03:45

cannot express the courage and fortitude

03:48

that Miss Ventura has shown in coming

03:50

forward hey Chad let me ask you a

03:53

question and I'm I'm I'm I'm asking this

03:56

question um just as like a more of a

04:00

poll not because I have any agenda or I

04:02

feel any way about the

04:06

answer do you is it scummy is it

04:11

scummy is it scummy

04:14

[Music]

04:15

to file the

04:18

lawsuit get the

04:22

settlement now that you can't you know

04:24

because you know obviously she signed a

04:25

non-disclosure and you know I mean like

04:27

now she can't speak on anything about it

04:30

unless it's to the cops after you do

04:33

that and you got your

04:35

money then your best friend starts

04:38

talking which your best friend's

04:40

basically like your mouthpiece then your

04:42

lawyer is gassing everything else and

04:45

then videos are leaking which I don't

04:48

know if Cassie leaked this nor would I

04:49

accuse her but maybe and then

04:53

also you're also cooperating with the

04:56

cops to possibly throw this thing in

04:58

jail it is I'm I'm just asking is it

05:01

scummy that you finessed the [ __ ] for

05:03

the bread and you still doing all the

05:05

things that he didn't want you to do

05:08

that's why he paid you you get what I'm

05:12

saying somebody said nah [ __ ] didd

05:16

he Southwest says hell no it's coming to

05:19

put hands on

05:23

women somebody says Nah do you you see

05:26

him kicking her and dragging her okay

05:29

the the majority of people and and again

05:31

I'll just ask this to see where the

05:33

because

05:35

I you know before this video came to

05:37

light um I remember like even wack 100

05:41

was just like yo it's it's kind of

05:45

basically saying that Cassie was

05:47

finessing did he right uh I've played or

05:50

I'll play it

05:52

afterwards wack 100's opinion on it now

05:55

everybody everybody's opinion has

05:56

changed since seeing this video right

05:59

and I think even people holding out hope

06:00

like maybe this is all Bs once you see

06:02

this video I guess it's like [ __ ] it's a

06:04

rap to bring this to light your reaction

06:08

she is incredibly courageous after

06:11

watching that video I cannot imagine

06:15

what it took for her quite frankly to

06:17

come forward I mean he was beating her

06:20

she could have been killed I mean that's

06:23

I don't I know it seems like I'm over I

06:25

do agree with that him attacking her

06:27

from the back was was was was definitely

06:31

cowardice was

06:34

definitely

06:36

just BR I'm not even gonna lie to you

06:40

like I could only see a coward doing

06:43

that to another man much less doing it

06:45

to a woman who you're clearly stronger

06:46

than right reacting but in watching that

06:49

video that truly could have happened and

06:52

she still came forward and I think that

06:54

is absolutely incredible and it did take

06:57

a tremendous amount of courage and I'm

06:59

just I cannot thank her enough really

07:02

for speaking out for other women quite

07:04

frankly who may be going through this

07:06

and I just it's incredible and I'm so

07:08

glad you said that because so many times

07:10

these allegations come out and they say

07:12

oh these women are you know there this

07:15

couldn't have happened why would they

07:16

stay with them if this happened this is

07:18

a money grab it takes unfortunately

07:21

video like this to come out for people

07:24

to believe it now let's be clear Sean

07:26

comms wasn't charged with a crime he

07:27

wasn't found liable in a court of law

07:29

but these were serious allegations that

07:31

were consistent with other accounts and

07:34

unfortunately um it sometimes it takes a

07:37

video like this for people to believe um

07:39

that this happened I'm curious now with

07:42

this video coming up how do you think

07:44

and at the time of this recording this

07:46

is immediate reaction how does com's

07:49

team respond to

07:51

this gosh Jesse I don't I guess the

07:54

answer to that question is I don't know

07:55

I don't know how you respond to this

07:58

um I would imagine just being in being

08:01

consistent right um with the other

08:03

statements that I've looked at that H

08:05

that his attorneys have put out it's

08:06

very much him being misconstrued by

08:10

either law enforcement by federal

08:12

agencies and so I have to wonder here if

08:14

he's going to sort of I don't want to

08:15

say play a victim HT that's not the

08:17

right word but almost think that he has

08:19

been victimized by this this video

08:22

coming out it just seems to be

08:23

consistent with the statements that he's

08:25

made in the past but again I am

08:26

completely hypothesizing here some

08:28

people might look at this and say if

08:30

this happened to her why didn't she go

08:32

to police right well in the complaint in

08:34

addition any suggestion that Miss ventur

08:36

would refuse the foo the Freak off or

08:39

otherwise report Mr com's abuse was met

08:42

with ultimatums by Mr comes who would

08:44

say that Miss Ventura could not go to

08:46

the police because she had a lot to lose

08:49

so there is this idea of um this power

08:53

that he had over um the people in his

08:56

orbit and we saw Echoes of this in other

08:58

lawsuits um Rodney Jones the producer

09:00

who sued uh Diddy for sexual assault and

09:04

harassment and sex trafficking said that

09:07

didd he would threaten him and he would

09:09

show him weapons and talk to him about

09:11

how he was involved in these shootings

09:13

and these illegal campaigns and he had

09:14

these you know scary people that were

09:16

working with him um now we have a better

09:19

understanding of when we talk about if

09:20

all this is true how law enforcement

09:23

wasn't alerted to it beforehand right

09:26

absolutely I think she 100% feared for

09:29

her life what she had to lose was her

09:32

life very clearly in looking at that

09:34

video why didn't the hotel release this

09:38

footage back in 2016 I mean if they see

09:40

this on their tapes honestly and again I

09:43

am hypothesizing here I think when

09:46

you're a powerful person you can make a

09:47

lot of things go away um and in my

09:49

opinion I think he maybe he did not

09:52

realize in that moment I he by the way

09:54

they did reach out to the hotel for a uh

09:56

statement this is what this is what what

09:59

um the statement has said what the [ __ ]

10:02

come

10:03

on why is my computer acting

10:06

up don't tell me my computer's not right

10:13

tonight what the

10:21

hell my B I don't know what the hell

10:24

happened to my computer just now okay I

10:26

think it might be this website anyway

10:28

I'm on res Hilton's website yeah this

10:31

[ __ ] is like a virus right

10:36

here hold on let see if I can find the

10:38

article

10:40

again where is the article

10:44

[ __ ] okay anyway basically they reached

10:47

out to the hotel apparently uh People

10:50

magazine reached out and the hotel said

10:52

this the hotel said the hotel is no

10:55

longer under IHG management and we don't

10:58

have access to Prior incident records or

11:02

footage

11:05

H what's

11:08

IHG so basically the the hotel is kind

11:10

of saying they're pretty much kind of

11:13

waving their head like we a release this

11:14

[ __ ] which means it must have been

11:16

gotten before and also supposedly

11:19

they're saying that I'm looking for

11:21

where it says on this page they're

11:22

saying that this might have been part of

11:25

the

11:26

footage obtained from um Diddy's [ __ ]

11:31

when the raid

11:33

happened and supposedly when the raid

11:35

happened this is part of that footage

11:38

and even though it can't be uh um

11:40

prosecuted on a state you know um state

11:43

level you know the feds might use it but

11:45

I guess I don't know maybe they're

11:46

leaking it for other I don't know

11:48

exactly but some people believe that

11:51

maybe it wasn't Cassie who leaked it

11:53

maybe the this was at Diddy's crib on a

11:56

hard drive which that kind of sounds

11:58

foolish

11:59

why the hell would if I'm Diddy why the

12:01

hell would I have a video of me

12:03

committing a crime just stored in a hard

12:05

drive at the crib that sounds wild so

12:08

maybe it is Cassie clearly he was

12:11

intoxicated or under the influence of

12:12

something or his staff realized oh no

12:16

there's a CCTV camera here we need to

12:18

get this footage or put pressure on the

12:20

hotel again I'm 100% hypoth

12:23

hypothesizing this is all alleged but I

12:25

think that's why it's been sat on for so

12:27

long you're not wrong cuz now again this

12:30

is an immediate reaction episode so I'm

12:31

going back to the lawsuit upon

12:34

information and belief Mr Colmes paid

12:36

the Intercontinental Century City

12:39

$50,000 for the hallway security footage

12:42

from the evening your reaction well I

12:44

mean that's not at all surprising in any

12:46

way shape or form and if you want me to

12:47

be I guess very well I see somebody in

12:50

the chat says well a he um he he paid

12:55

$50,000 for the footage well I don't

12:58

think he paid for a copy of the footage

13:00

I think you pay for the footage not to

13:01

come out also this ain't this ain't the

13:03

like this ain't the movies where it's

13:04

like there's one VHS tape of of of the

13:08

incident right so this is digital

13:11

footage right which means you could just

13:13

email this you could make copies of this

13:16

which means again if he paid $50,000 he

13:19

don't want to copy of this he want to

13:20

make sure this [ __ ] won't come out so I

13:22

would imagine he's paying 50,000 for

13:25

either them to destroy it them to

13:28

[ __ ] delete it or you know I don't

13:32

know if he would necessarily want a copy

13:34

because like that's kind of odd to just

13:35

keep a copy especially if it's consist

13:38

of you committing a crime on on a tape

13:39

but whatever uh but I would imagine he

13:43

was paying for them to destroy it had to

13:46

not give him a

13:47

copy crass um I'm surprised that amount

13:50

is that low for a video like that to be

13:54

super

13:55

CR does that's another good idea well

13:59

not good idea but um a good thought

14:03

$50,000 from a billionaire who's just

14:06

now well I mean here's the thing though

14:09

and you know where these things usually

14:10

come from bro it's probably two guys

14:13

working security right and probably a

14:16

hotel manager right the the manager of

14:18

the night shift or the day shift they

14:20

probably going to bust that down these

14:21

guys working at a hotel noce respect to

14:23

the people who work in the in in in the

14:25

um Hospitality field like $50,000 like

14:29

is Yo [ __ ] you bust it down between the

14:31

two security guards and the manager at

14:33

the time they say yo let's just keep

14:35

this [ __ ] hush you know what I mean

14:37

maybe maybe one of them like takes a

14:39

copy of the video for the for their own

14:40

sake but they probably bust down that

14:42

money like again if if especially if

14:46

didd he pay them the same day like yo

14:47

bro listen I give y'all 50,000 I don't

14:49

think they have the wherewithal to be

14:51

like nah [ __ ] [ __ ] if we drop this

14:54

[ __ ] [ __ ] you're going to be [ __ ] we

14:57

need more than this and we heard your a

14:58

billion all that Sak take that take that

15:00

[ __ ] [ __ ] we need a million right I

15:03

don't know how it would go with a

15:04

million I think did would probably just

15:05

got them killed like to keep it a beam

15:08

like what playb what [ __ ] a billion do

15:11

a million dollars all right say less

15:14

um meet my man in this dark alley for

15:17

this million dollars tonight yeah there

15:19

be that but yeah

15:22

$50,000 what comes to mind is that it's

15:25

probably one or two maybe three max

15:28

employees that probably kept it hush

15:30

from everybody else I'm pretty sure

15:31

there wasn't company emails sent you

15:33

know like when there's a big incident

15:34

that happens at a hotel they alert all

15:37

the the higher ups in the chain and

15:39

sometimes that might even go even

15:40

further than that it probably wasn't

15:42

that also didd he probably got on it so

15:44

quickly that like [ __ ] 50,000 is a lot

15:48

if especially if some [ __ ] just happened

15:50

and did's like scrambling he says I'll

15:53

give you 50 today just get rid of it

15:56

right

15:59

this feel to you that it gives so much

16:02

support to the other lawsuits and

16:06

whether that means he's going to try to

16:09

settle these now um or I don't know how

16:12

does it affect the other lawsuits in