Trump Left In TEARS After Judge DESTROYED Him With Wrong Decision!
Summary
TLDRThe video discusses the indefinite postponement of Donald Trump's trial for mishandling classified documents by Judge Eileen Cannon, a Trump appointee. The judge's decision to delay the trial, along with her use of paperless orders, is criticized as potentially shielding her from appeals and scrutiny. The video suggests that these tactics could be preventing a trial before the November 2024 election, potentially benefiting Trump's presidential campaign. It raises questions about the impartiality of a judge appointed by the defendant and the integrity of the judicial process.
Takeaways
- 📜 The trial concerning Donald Trump's mishandling of classified documents has been indefinitely postponed by the judge in Florida.
- 🚫 The delay is seen as a strategic move by Trump to avoid criminal charges before the November 2024 US presidential election.
- 🧐 Judge Eileen Cannon, appointed by Trump, is criticized for her handling of the case, including the use of paperless orders to avoid documentation.
- 📚 The case involves nearly three dozen National Security records, including nuclear secrets, found at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate.
- 💼 Trump's legal team has argued that these records are his personal property, a claim that Judge Cannon has accepted.
- 🤔 The postponement raises questions about whether the trial will occur before the presidential election and the potential impact on Trump's campaign.
- 👨⚖️ Prosecutor Jack Smith may attempt to have Judge Cannon removed from the case, but this process could be lengthy and uncertain.
- 🤝 Judge Cannon's actions are viewed by some as favoring Trump, who appointed her, and there are concerns about her impartiality.
- 👥 The script mentions two of Judge Cannon's clerks quitting mid-term, suggesting possible disagreements or ethical concerns.
- 📉 The public interest in resolving the case before the election is highlighted, but the delays suggest a lack of urgency from the court.
- 🕰️ The potential for the case to be dismissed if Trump is reelected is noted, emphasizing the political implications of the delays.
Q & A
What is the current status of Donald Trump's classified documents case?
-The trial has been indefinitely postponed by Judge Eileen Cannon, who has laid out a plan through the end of July to handle other issues in the case before announcing a new trial date.
What strategy is being suggested that Donald Trump's legal team is employing?
-The script suggests that Donald Trump's legal team is using delay as a primary strategy to keep him free of criminal charges until after the November 2024 US presidential election.
What is the role of Judge Eileen Cannon in the case?
-Judge Eileen Cannon is the federal judge who has postponed the trial and is accused of using paperless orders to shield herself from scrutiny by the appeals court.
Why is there a discussion about the possibility of removing Judge Cannon from the case?
-There is a discussion because of her perceived bias and the use of paperless orders, which makes it difficult for the prosecution to appeal her decisions and may suggest a lack of impartiality.
What is the significance of the November 2024 US presidential election in relation to the case?
-If Donald Trump is reelected, he may have the power to dismiss Jack Smith and both of his cases, which could potentially impact the outcome of the legal proceedings.
What are the accusations against Judge Cannon regarding her handling of the case?
-The accusations include gross incompetence at best and blatant corruption at worst, with the judge being accused of acting in Trump's favor and delaying the trial for his benefit.
What is the Presidential Records Act mentioned in the script?
-The Presidential Records Act is a law that Trump's legal team argues gives him rights to the documents found at Mar-a-Lago, claiming they are his personal property.
What are the implications of Judge Cannon's actions for the rule of law in the United States?
-The implications suggest a potential erosion of trust in the judiciary, as her actions may be seen as prioritizing political interests over impartial justice, which could undermine the rule of law.
Why is there concern about the use of paperless orders by Judge Cannon?
-The concern is that paperless orders make it harder for the prosecution to appeal decisions and for the appeals court to scrutinize her actions, potentially allowing her to avoid accountability for her rulings.
What is the potential impact of the delays on the public interest?
-The delays may be seen as detrimental to the public interest, as they postpone the resolution of a significant legal case involving a former president, which many believe should be resolved prior to an election.
What are the ethical considerations for judges regarding impartiality?
-Judges are expected to follow a Code of Ethics that emphasizes the importance of impartiality. If a judge's impartiality can be reasonably questioned due to their connections or actions, recusal may be appropriate to maintain the integrity of the judicial process.
Outlines
📜 Delay Tactics in Trump's Classified Documents Case
The script discusses the indefinite postponement of Donald Trump's trial concerning the mishandling of classified documents found at his Mar-a-Lago estate. The judge in Florida, Eileen Cannon, has removed the trial date from the calendar and outlined a plan to address other issues in the case by the end of July. Trump's legal team has argued that the documents, including sensitive national security records, are his personal property, a claim that Judge Cannon has accepted. The strategy of delaying the case is seen as a way for Trump to avoid criminal charges before the November 2024 presidential election. The script also suggests that the judge may be shielding herself from scrutiny by issuing paperless orders, making it difficult for the prosecutor, Jack Smith, to appeal decisions or have her removed from the case.
🤔 Questioning Judge Cannon's Impartiality and Delays
This paragraph delves into concerns about Judge Cannon's impartiality and her handling of the case. It raises questions about her decision to delay the trial indefinitely, especially considering the public interest in resolving the charges against Trump before the presidential election. The script points out that Judge Cannon has acted in ways that favor Trump, including granting him relief that his lawyers did not even request. It also mentions the resignation of two of her clerks and suggests that she may be using stall tactics to avoid scrutiny. The New York Times is cited, indicating that the judge has not addressed the backlog of motions that she contributed to. The paragraph concludes by speculating on the potential political motivations behind Judge Cannon's actions and the implications for the rule of law.
👨⚖️ The Impact of Politically Motivated Judicial Appointments
The final paragraph of the script addresses the broader issue of politically motivated judicial appointments and their impact on the justice system. It criticizes the practice of appointing judges to achieve political goals, rather than for their adherence to ethics and good faith. The script highlights the case of Judge Cannon, who was appointed by Trump and has been accused of delaying the proceedings to benefit him. The paragraph also discusses the potential repercussions of such actions, suggesting that if justice is not served, it could lead to a dystopian scenario where the rule of law is compromised. It calls for a system where there is no direct connection between the defendant and the judge to ensure impartiality and the integrity of the legal process.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Donald Trump
💡Federal classified documents case
💡Judge Eileen Cannon
💡Delay
💡Mishandling of classified documents
💡Mar-a-Lago
💡Presidential records act
💡Prosecutor Jack Smith
💡Paperless orders
💡November 2024 US presidential election
💡Legal justification
Highlights
Judge in Florida has indefinitely postponed the trial of Donald Trump's classified documents case.
Delay is seen as Trump's strategy to avoid criminal charges before the November 2024 US presidential election.
Judge Eileen Cannon has laid out a plan through July to handle other issues, delaying the trial announcement.
Donald Trump is charged with mishandling nearly three dozen National Security records.
Trump's legal team argues that the National Security records found at Mar-a-Lago are his personal property.
Judge Cannon is accused of shielding herself from scrutiny by issuing paperless orders.
Prosecutor Jack Smith may face challenges in removing Judge Cannon from the Mar-a-Lago case.
Judge Cannon's actions are seen as delaying tactics, possibly to protect Trump from trial before the election.
Judge Cannon, a Trump appointee, has made rulings that favor Trump in the documents case.
Concerns raised about Judge Cannon's impartiality due to her appointment by Trump.
Judge Cannon's handling of the case is criticized as potentially corrupt and delaying justice.
The trial's delay raises questions about the integrity of the judicial process and the rule of law.
Judge Cannon's decisions are compared to those in autocratic regimes, undermining the legal system.
The possibility of Trump being reelected could lead to the dismissal of cases against him.
Judge Cannon's actions are seen as favoring Trump, who appointed her to her position.
Criticism of the judicial system for allowing a defendant to appoint a judge in their case.
Concerns about the precedent set by allowing a judge to be appointed by the defendant they are presiding over.
The video ends with a call to action for viewers to share their thoughts on Judge Cannon's handling of the case.
Transcripts
and we have some breaking news now in
Donald Trump's Federal classified
documents in case the judge in Florida
has indefinitely postponed this trial
delay delay delay is the name of the
game for Donald Trump this is Trump's
primary strategy to keep himself free of
criminal charges in the mara Lago
documents case prior to the November
2024 US presidential election and it
seems to be working quite well in his
favor but just how far can Donald Trump
stretch his luck
that this classified documents case
against Donald Trump it's too
complicated and there's too much to do
right now that she has to work through
and so she's taken the trial date off of
the calendar instead laid out a plan
through essentially the end of July to
handle other issues in this case largely
around the use of classified documents
remember this is a case charging Donald
Trump with the mishandling of nearly
three dozen National Security records
Donald Trump's legal team was somehow
able to argue that dozens of National
Security records including nuclear
secrets found at the mar Lago estate
were his own personal private property
and this incredibly has convinced judge
eileene Cannon to go along with a
strategy of delaying the case from
proceedings she gets through all of the
other stuff she has to do in this case
that's when she will be announcing when
the trial will take place the bottom
line here Jake is exceeding inly
unlikely uh almost to the point where it
may be an impossibility for Donald Trump
to go to trial in this Florida
classified documents case before the
November election will prosecutor Jack
Smith find a way to have judge Eileen
Cannon remove from the mara Lago case if
Jack Smith is able to successfully lay
the groundwork for the removal ask this
might just happen but we have to
remember something like that takes time
and must be done by the book what we are
seeing now just in the last few weeks
are glimmers of what it looks like when
the courts don't
hold So Yesterday federal judge alen
Cannon a trump appointee who first made
name for herself an egregious ruling on
his behalf in the documents case she
announced that she was indefinitely
postponing Donald Trump's criminal trial
for stealing top secret government
documents and she did so and this is the
important part without much of a legal
justification at all
furthermore it appears that judge Canon
is shielding herself from scrutiny by
the appeals court through her issuing a
paperless orders which are basically
simple orders without any
documentation by using paperless orders
there's really not much for jacksmith to
base an appeal on in my opinion it comes
off as a form of cover so that if the
need arises she can eventually argue
that her orders were misunderstood
misinterpreted or taken out of context
judge Canon wouldn't have the benefit of
this cover if every word were in print
issuing paperless orders is a smart move
by judge Cannon because it makes a RIT
of mandemus essentially a legal slap on
the wrist that much more difficult for
Jack Smith to execute it also makes it
magnitude harder to get her removed at
this point I highly suspect that judge
Canon's team is being coached behind the
scenes by much more competent
folks Smith asked the judge to hurry up
and rule on what is one of team Trump's
most Brazen claims that the documents
Trump hoarded in Mar Lago in a bathroom
and a bedroom and a basement documents
containing some of this nation's
most secret and protected National
Security Secrets actually belonged
rightfully to Trump because of the
presidential records act or the
P furthermore the way judge Canon
handles things related to the maralago
case were any motion from the defense
gets a hearing a statute of repose for
the prosecution then a hearing to cover
the previous hearing and then a long
wait before issuing a paperless ruling
almost always benefits the
defense come a time when he tries to get
her removed from the case but at this
point that's premature what Jack Smith
knows tonight though is that it's very
possible that he may not be able to
bring either one of his Federal cases
against former president Trump before
the election and the election is a
significant point on on the calendar
because if Trump is reelected he can
have Jack Smith and both of his cases
dismissed we can speculate that until
now Jack Smith has been avoiding an
attempt to have judge Canon removed from
the case because it would have made a
trial before the election less likely
but now a trial before the election is
virtually impossible whether she stays
on the case or
not given the severity and widespread
consequences of Trump's case judge
Canon's excuse of I've got a bunch of
other es to rule on oopsie to delay the
trial seems to be gross incompetence at
best and blatantly corrupt at worst I
mean it's not like there's massive and
timely public interest in finding out
whether or Trump is guilty of his
charges before the presidential election
right judge Canon's delays combined with
her prior actions especially when she is
essentially acted as Trump's own lawyer
granting him injunctive relief as his
own lawyers never even asked for makes
it really seem like Jack Smith has a
case to bring against her here I'm not a
lawyer but it certainly seems possible
she is opting not to settle open
questions before her which is her choice
I mean that's her choice and then
pointing out the fact that they are not
settled as the reason why she has to
further delay don't take my word for it
here's the New York Times in a news
article writing it up put it quote while
judge Canon stated reason for pulling
off putting off the trial indefinitely
was that a large number of legal issues
remain up in the air she never mentioned
that she herself helped allow the Log
Jam of motions to pile up when it was
reported that two of her clerks quit in
the middle of their clerk ships I knew
that her use of stall tactics would
happen the I can't keep up with my work
excuse was probably hatched to get out
of the spotlight and in the hopes that
she could keep her head down until it
all blew over keep in mind Federal clerk
ships are fairly prestigious and hard to
acquire and they're not the type of job
that people quit halfway through the
fact that she had two of her clerks quit
on her definitely raises some eyebrows
either they thought that working for her
could be detrimental to the resume or
they genuinely didn't agree with what
she was doing Canon is by herself as an
inexperienced judge in the Fort Pierce
Courthouse a satellite courthouse where
there is no senior judge there there is
no you know adult supervision where
someone is going to take her by the hand
and help with some of these complex
matters she's on her own and also some
of her law clerks have left for a
variety of reasons so this thing has
been beset with delays although what
really worries me is that I'm sure judge
Canon will have seen attempts to remove
her coming from a mile away let's assume
Jack Smith has an airtight case for
getting her removed from the maralago
case it's still completely unclear how
long that process in and of itself would
take
then assuming that judge Canon does get
removed you can bet that it'll be yet
another much longer process to find
another Court to try this case in I've
got to give it to judge Canon though
she's already done her job as far as
Trump's Army of minions is concerned
this right here is basically the real
life version of do what you must I've
already won for now it seems to me that
Trump has cashed in on his appointment
of Judge Cannon as she prevented a
felony conviction in the mara Lago
documents case before the November
election
so he stands a better chance of winning
the presidency oh and keep in mind judge
Cannon was appointed by Trump after he
lost in 2020 talk about a last minute
appointment did she offer any
explanation other than that it would be
a lot of
work uh well I think not just a lot of
work but what she's saying is that it's
a lot of really tricky and complex work
and part of this is frankly that the
former president again as Scott
mentioned filed Lots and lots of motions
so she does have a lot to go through in
this case now having said that um there
are cases where there is a very heavy
and aggressive motion practice and I
still haven't seen a situation where the
judge says the best thing to do is take
it off calendar however we have to keep
in mind that this isn't the only felony
conviction that has happened before the
November election as Donald Trump is
also on trial for 34 felony counts of
false ifying business records in the
first degree at the moment while the
Sixth Amendment of the United States
Constitution guarantees a speedy trial
to the defendant this trial clearly is
not that I have to say at this point I
think the headlines might as well read
judge appointed by defendant still
hasn't recused delays case again I mean
there should definitely be a law against
a judge being appointed by the defendant
we never needed it before but we sure as
hell do now you know all of Donald
Trump's attempts to subvert and sabotage
the Democratic process to steal the last
election
2020 overall the system held I mean
maybe barely but it held when push came
to shove the vast majority of people
involved in the election and
institutions stared down a novel attempt
to destroy the rule of law and they did
the right thing system might have bent
but it didn't break and while there's a
Code of Ethics that judges are expected
to follow in my opinion the problem now
is that we have in the United States a
large cohort of Judges specifically
appointed to achieve political goals and
these judges have little regard for
ethics or operating in good faith and
now we're seeing how poor the
enforcement mechanisms actually are is
this inevitably what happens when the
rules rely on the players in the game
operating in good faith the rule of law
which we talk about a lot on the show
and on this network and venerate is
really only as good as the people who
are executing it in good faith
I mean to be clear the world over there
are plenty of autography from Egypt
under cc to Russia under Putin that have
laws statutes lawyers judiciaries bar
associations their version of it they
have all that stuff they just execute
the law in a way that essentially
supports a predetermined outcome I'm
still flabbergasted by how a judge can
actually be nominated by the defendant
in a case I mean it's absolutely and
completely ridiculous if if you stop to
think about it in the code of conduct
for United States judges an appearance
of impropriety means that even if a
judge believes they can be impartial if
there are circumstances that could lead
a person to reasonably question their
impartiality it could be appropriate for
recusal a lot of the reasons why there
have been so many delays have been her
own decisions to give a lot of
difference to Donald Trump which is odd
because you have someone like judge can
who previously was an a USA an assistant
us attorney a federal prosecutor uh but
she has bent over backwards for this
defendant imagine this if someone was on
trial and the defendant saved the
judge's life or killed their dog a
reasonable person would question the
judge's ability to be impartial when
combined with the rulings it just seems
ridiculous on all levels that I just
don't understand why more people aren't
talking about this there are what 19
other judges not appointed by the
defense defendant in the 11th Circuit
Court of Appeals who could have been
selected for such an important case on
the flip side if a defendant somehow
caused harm to a judge I would also be
asking for the same consideration of
impartiality for the benefit of the
defendant in any case for justice to
Prevail there simply shouldn't be any
direct connection between the defendant
and the judge
whatsoever and we've seen this before
with judge Canon because even before
there was an indictment in this case
judge Canon rejected herself and put a
hold on the case and granted the special
Master request even going beyond what
Trump had asked for because Trump had
asked for the special Master but didn't
ask for the whole case to be stopped uh
but she put a hold on the investigation
which is really unusual I've never seen
before a judge get involved in a
prosecutor's investigation this is
before any charges were filed what is
Justice anymore allowing Donald Trump's
case to be handled by so many judges
that he himself appointed to Lifetime
jobs is straight out of a dystopian
Nightmare and a lot of very smart
accomplished attorneys and legal experts
again with different ideological
backgrounds have said they've simply
never seen anything quite like what
Canada is doing by so transparently
putting her thumb on the proverbial
scale to delay and and thereby benefit
the man who put her on the bench in the
first
place as likely as Taylor Swift would
write another song If she had another X
judge Canon would be first in line for
Supreme Court if Trump gets
reelected at what point can we just call
them out on it when a judge clearly
wants the next Republican Supreme Court
position and they'll just kiss as many
asses and bend as many laws as possible
for them to get there judge Cannon if
you're watching this just know we're
watching you
too sometimes I can't help but imagine
that Germany was the same way in the
1930s life was normal until it wasn't
we're slowly but surely heating up the
pot until it boils let's just hope that
our grandkids will look back upon all of
this one day and they won't believe how
ridiculous these days
are having said all this what do you
think of Judge Cannon's handling of the
mara Lago case in my opinion this is a
pretty clear-cut case much more so than
any other criminal cases Donald Trump is
facing and yet judge Canon is able to
derail it completely should judge Canon
face any repercussions for her actions
or should judge Canon be fired out of a
cannon and into the sun let us know in
the comment section down below we'd love
to hear from you and what your thoughts
are on this entire situation if you like
the video make sure to hit the like
button and if you want to see more make
sure to subscribe to the channel and to
hit that Bell icon so you're notified as
soon as we upload our next video you
don't want to miss what's coming out
next so thanks for watching and we'll
see you in the next video goodbye for
now
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)
The 3 likely outcomes after special counsel rebuked judge in Trump case
‘Hurry up, and rule’: Jack Smith rips Judge Cannon for enabling Donald Trump’s delay tactics
Trump hit with INSTANT bad news in NY court
Special counsel blasts judge’s jury instruction request in Trump documents case
'EXPLOSIVE ENDING': Former DOJ official reacts to DA Fani Willis hearing wrapping up
Judge Cannon REVERSES HER OWN ORDER, Blames Prosecutor