平型关大捷真相|抗日战争|八路军|林彪|聂荣臻|国共内战|日军|王局拍案20240321
Summary
TLDR该视频脚本详细讲述了中国抗日战争中的平型关大捷的历史真相。通过中国教授江克诗的研究,揭示了历史宣传与实际战况之间的差异。江教授通过对比日本军事档案与中国共产党的历史叙述,发现所谓大捷的战果被夸大,实际上平型关战役中日军的伤亡大约为200人。视频强调了面对历史的重要性,以及政治宣传如何影响我们对历史事件的理解。
Takeaways
- 📷 一张广为人知的照片,原本认为是平型关大捷中的一个场景,实际上是战后在太行山重现的场景。
- 🕵️♂️ 这张照片的真实故事由在日本大学工作的中国教授江可实揭露。
- 📚 江教授的研究显示,平型关大捷的历史叙述与日方档案记录存在显著差异。
- 🔍 传统上认为的平型关大捷中击毙的日军人数被夸大了。
- 📉 原先宣称消灭了4000名日军的数字,随着时间的推移被修正为大约1000人,最终稳定在162人。
- 🎬 江教授通过研究日军档案,挑战了关于平型关大捷的一些常见说法,包括战斗地点和战略。
- 🏆 平型关大捷被历史上多次利用来服务于不同的政治和意识形态目的。
- 📘 江教授认为,战争中双方的政治宣传往往夸大军事成就,制造极端英雄。
- 🌐 他的研究挑战了现有的历史叙述,提出需要更加客观和真实地面对历史。
- 📝 江教授的书提出,真实的历史往往被政治宣传所掩盖,呼吁公众理性看待历史事件。
- 🤔 通过对比中日双方的历史叙述和档案,揭示了历史叙述如何被用作政治工具。
Q & A
这张照片的拍摄背景是什么?
-这张照片拍摄于1937年10月,地点在太行山区,是115师在平型关战役结束后的重现场景。
这张照片中的士兵和指挥官是谁?
-照片中的士兵正在射击重机枪,指挥官站在后面,但他们并不是在真实的平型关战役中的人物,而是重现场景中的演员。
平型关大捷的历史叙述中,115师消灭了多少日军?
-根据中共历史叙述,115师在平型关大捷中消灭了超过4000名日军,但这个数字随着时间推移有所减少,最终稳定在1000人左右。
根据江克诗教授的研究,平型关大捷中日军的真实伤亡情况是怎样的?
-江克诗教授通过研究日本军事档案发现,平型关大捷中日军的真实伤亡大约为162人,其中158人的姓名、军衔和地址都有精确记录。
江克诗教授是如何发现平型关大捷历史叙述与日本军事档案的差异的?
-江克诗教授在日本大学任教期间,利用业余时间研究了日本发布的战时军事档案,发现与中共发布的历史材料存在显著差异,从而开始对中国抗日战争的历史进行研究。
平型关大捷的历史叙述被利用了几次?
-根据江克诗教授的研究,平型关大捷的历史叙述被利用了三次,分别在抗日战争期间、1945年国共内战前夕和中华人民共和国成立后。
历史叙述与政治宣传之间的关系是什么?
-历史叙述往往被政治宣传所利用,成为创造极端国家英雄、塑造共同记忆的工具,而非真实反映历史事件。
江克诗教授对于中日两国历史叙述的看法是什么?
-江克诗教授认为中日两国都在基于自己的政治立场解释历史,而非面对真实的历史,这使得和解变得困难。
江克诗教授的研究对于我们理解历史和面向未来有何启示?
-江克诗教授的研究提醒我们,应该以历史学的态度来接近和理解历史事件,而非仅仅基于宣传和政治立场,这对于我们真正认识历史和面向未来是有益的。
为什么历史叙述的夸张和戏剧化会对国家有害?
-历史叙述的夸张和戏剧化可能会导致虚假的民族主义和爱国主义情绪,这不仅不利于国家的长远发展,还可能在面对真实历史细节时显得不堪一击,影响国家形象和国际关系。
江克诗教授提到的“五英雄”和“刘庄战斗”的历史叙述有何问题?
-江克诗教授指出,“五英雄”和“刘庄战斗”的历史叙述与日本军事档案中的记录存在显著差异,这些叙述被夸大和戏剧化,与实际发生的历史事实不符。
Outlines
📸 平型关战役照片背后的故事
本段介绍了一张广为流传、被认为拍摄于1937年平型关战役的照片实际上并非战时实拍,而是战后在太行山区由第115师重演的场景。该照片及相关影像资料成为后来平型关战役叙述的重要文件,尽管它们并未真实反映当时的历史场景。另外,本段提到江克石教授通过研究揭示了这张照片背后的真实故事,他利用日本军方档案,揭示了中共官方历史叙述与实际事件之间的重大差异。
🔍 平型关战役的实际过程
本段深入讲述了平型关战役的具体过程,指出战役共分为三个阶段,从1937年9月22日开始,持续到9月30日。虽然中共历史书籍强调第八路军在战役中取得了显著的胜利,实际上主战场上的冲突主要是由晋绥军和日军之间进行,第八路军主要进行侧翼骚扰。同时,指出林彪在此战役中的策略并非独创,而是基于常识的军事布局。教授江克石的研究显示,战役期间中共方面大大夸大了击杀日军的数字。
🎖️ 平型关战役的真实损失与影响
本段讨论了平型关战役中日军的实际损失情况,强调基于日本档案的研究结果显示,中共宣称的胜利与实际的日军损失数字有着显著差异。同时,提出了历史叙述和政治宣传之间的差异,指出战时双方都有夸大军事成就的倾向。此外,本段还揭示了平型关大胜利如何被中共在不同历史时期以不同方式利用,用于加强民族主义和爱国主义情感,尽管这种叙述往往与历史事实不符。
📚 历史与政治宣传的差异
通过对平型关战役的讨论,本段进一步探索了历史叙述与政治宣传之间的区别,强调了政治宣传经常以夸大或虚构的方式来塑造国家英雄,无论是在中国还是日本。此外,指出了政治宣传如何影响民众对历史的理解,以及它对于国家主义和爱国主义情感建构的作用。最后,讨论了这种宣传对于真正理解历史和面向未来的负面影响。
🤔 面对真实历史的挑战
本段探讨了如何面对和理解真实的历史,特别是在中日韩三国间因政治立场差异而对历史的不同解读,这些差异使得真正的和解变得困难。指出在战后日本如何逐渐从教科书和历史记载中淡化极端英雄的形象,而中国则在不同时间点出于不同的政治和社会需要,多次利用平型关战役的叙述。最后,通过揭示历史与政治宣传的区别,强调了面对历史真相的重要性,以及这种真实性对于建设性地理解历史和促进未来发展的价值。
📢 对历史真相的反思与启示
本段通过分析平型关战役背后的真实故事,对历史叙述与政治宣传的区别进行了深入的探讨。强调了在特定的封闭信息环境中,政治宣传可能暂时维持国家的民族主义和爱国主义情绪,但一旦信息壁垒被打破,公众将发现许多宣传是基于虚构或夸张的历史。最后,推荐读者深入了解江克石教授的研究,以反思如何更真实、更有建设性地面对历史和未来。
Mindmap
Keywords
💡抗日战争
💡平型关大捷
💡政治宣传
💡历史档案
💡历史真实
💡民族记忆
💡历史研究
💡历史叙事
💡历史修正
💡历史教育
Highlights
照片展示的是1937年平型关战役期间,第115师在重机枪位置的士兵,但实际上这个场景是在战役结束后,于同年10月在太行山重现的。
这张照片及其背后的故事揭示了历史与政治宣传之间的复杂关系,展示了历史叙述可能会如何被塑造。
江克石教授深入研究了平型关战役的真实历史,与中共官方叙述存在显著差异。
平型关大捷在中共历史叙述中被描述为抗日战争中的第一个重大胜利,但实际上日方档案显示的日军损失远低于中方宣称的数字。
日本档案提供了与中共叙述不同的平型关战役和其他抗日战争事件的细节,揭示了历史叙述的多面性和复杂性。
江克石教授的研究挑战了一些关于抗日战争的“共同记忆”,揭示了宣传和历史事实之间的差距。
抗日战争叙述中的夸大和误导不仅限于中方,日本方面也有其政治宣传的例子。
历史叙述的政治化和工具化对于理解历史的真实性和面对未来构成了障碍。
通过对比中日双方的历史档案,江克石教授的研究提出了关于历史真实性和历史记忆构建方式的重要问题。
江克石教授的研究强调了在面对历史时采取批判性思维的重要性,挑战了官方历史叙述和政治宣传。
本次讲述揭示了历史学者在研究过程中可能面临的挑战,尤其是在处理政治敏感的历史事件时。
讨论了如何通过多元化的历史来源和独立的研究来获得对过去事件更加全面和深入的理解。
揭示了历史叙述如何被用作塑造国家认同和民族主义情绪的工具。
讨论了在当前信息环境下,公众如何能够接触到更多元和真实的历史视角。
最后强调了对历史真实性的追求与现代社会对历史认知和记忆的建构之间的紧张关系。
Transcripts
The photo you are now seeing
is very familiar to those with even a slight understanding of China's War of Resistance
It widely appears in Chinese textbooks and in the exhibition halls of history museums
Its caption notes that this is from 1937
a heavy machine gun position of the 115th Division of the Eighth Route Army during the Pingxingguan campaign
In the photo, a soldier is shooting in front of a heavy machine gun, with a commander standing behind
But today, I want to tell you about this photo
Actually, the shooting location is not Pingxingguan, nor was it taken in September 1937
In fact, this photo was taken in October 1937
after the Pingxingguan campaign had ended
The 115th Division, led by Lin Biao and Nie Rongzhen, hid in the Taihang Mountains
In October, a director from a film studio in the Nationalist-controlled area
came to the Taihang Mountains to shoot a documentary on the Pingxingguan campaign
So, they reenacted a Pingxingguan battle scene
in this area of the Taihang Mountains
To coordinate the operation, Zhu De and Peng Dehuai on September 23
sent a telegram to Lin Biao, the commander of the 115th Division of the Eighth Route Army, and informed the deputy commander, Nie Rongzhen
The 115th Division was then deployed between Pingxingguan and Lingqiu
At that time, commanders of the Eighth Route Army, including Lin Biao and Nie Rongzhen,
were gathered for a meeting, and a series of photos were taken
Then, they called the soldiers to the mountain, firing guns into the valley, creating a "bang bang bang" sound
took some photos, and also shot some cinematographic works
This movie later became
a key historical document referenced in narratives of the Pingxingguan campaign
But actually, neither this photo nor the captured footage
depict the real historical scenes that occurred during the Pingxingguan campaign
Because at that time, in 1937,
the Eighth Route Army did not have their own war correspondents
So why am I talking about this photo?
It's because the story behind this photo evokes quite a bit of emotion in me
Sometimes history
sometimes, you really can't tell if it's real history or a movie
The person who thoroughly researched the story behind this photo is a Chinese professor
His name is Jiang Keshi, and he is Chinese
but works as a professor in a Japanese university
In Japan, he originally studied literature, and after obtaining his PhD,
he became a professor at Okayama University in Japan. But in his spare time, he discovered
that Japan had released a lot of wartime military archives
These military archives, compared with the historical materials released by the CCP
including the narratives of history, had significant discrepancies
So, he became curious
and in his spare time, started to research the history of China's War of Resistance against Japan
Today, I'm going to talk about a book he researched
titled "The Pingxingguan Great Victory as Appeared in Japanese Military Archives"
Speaking of Pingxingguan, everyone knows, in the narratives of CCP history,
it was the first major victory of the Eighth Route Army during the War of Resistance against Japan,
and also the first major victory for the entire Chinese military during the war
At that time, it was said that the 115th Division, commanded by Lin Biao at Pingxingguan,
eliminated over 4,000 Japanese troops
And then, over the years, this number seems to have "shrunk"
from 4,000 to 3,000, 3,000 to 2,000, and finally to 1,000
This force was changed from the main force to the follow-up force, then to the reinforcement force,
and then including the supply troops, changing back and forth
But basically, the current historical narrative has stabilized at 1,000 killed
And then, the description of this battle is very exciting
Talking about Lin Biao, as the commander,
went to Qiaogou near Pingxingguan three times for reconnaissance
Then, he planned an ambush in Qiaogou
At 7 a.m. on September 25, the enemy forces had all entered the ambush zone
The battle officially started, and the Eighth
Route Army surrounded and divided the confused Japanese troops.
After assessing the situation, the Japanese attempted to seize the high ground.
A fierce close combat ensued between the two sides.
But actually, what really happened in the Pingxingguan campaign?
I want to tell everyone that the claim of annihilating 1,000 Japanese troops is also greatly exaggerated.
Because in the entire Pingxingguan campaign, not the so-called great victory,
the total Japanese casualties throughout the campaign were about 1,000.
Here, I need to first explain the relationship between the Pingxingguan campaign and the so-called great victory.
The so-called Pingxingguan campaign started on September 21,
1937, initiated by Japan's 5th Division.
The 5th Division of Japan launched the Pingxingguan campaign merely to punish the Jin-Sui Army
because of the setback they suffered in the Suiyuan incident a year earlier.
So, a year later, they wanted to take revenge and deal with the Jin-Sui Army.
At that time, the 5th Division wasn't a full-strength division,
it had only three companies, totaling 4,500 men.
Their strategic goal wasn't to reach Taiyuan,
but unexpectedly, as the battle progressed, Taiyuan was captured.
But that was a result, not the initial strategic goal.
On September 21, Japan's 5th Division issued such a mobilization order.
The entire Pingxingguan campaign lasted for about three phases.
From September 22 to September 24, was the first phase.
The Japanese began their attack, facing the Jin-Sui Army at that time,
including Fu Zuoyi's 7th Group Army and Yan Xishan's Shanxi Army,
with both forces totaling about 60,000 men.
In terms of military strength, the Nationalist forces had the absolute advantage,
including the 115th Division of the Eighth Route Army, which had about three to four thousand men.
However, due to the superior equipment and combat effectiveness of the Japanese,
these 4,500 men, starting from September 22, launched the attack
and maintained the initiative on the battlefield until September 24.
But from September 25 to September 26, the Jin-Sui Army launched a counterattack,
starting to encircle and cut off the Japanese forces, including their supply lines.
During this counterattack phase, the strategic goal was to eliminate the 5th Division,
these 4,500 men, because after all, they were at a numerical disadvantage.
However, from September 26 to September 28, the Japanese reopened their supply lines
as reinforcements arrived from Lingqiu.
After reopening the supply lines, from September 29 to 30, they began
a comprehensive strategic counterattack, which outlines the course of the Pingxingguan campaign.
During the eight days of the Pingxingguan campaign,
the main battles took place between the Jin-Sui Army and the Japanese forces,
with the Eighth Route Army only harassing the flanks.
On September 25, when Yan Xishan was planning a full counterattack,
he issued combat orders to the Eighth Route Army,
requesting the 115th Division of the Eighth Route Army to attack the Japanese flanks on the battlefield.
In fact, the so-called great victory at Pingxingguan occurred on September 25,
during the counterattack process of the entire Pingxingguan campaign,
the Eighth Route Army conducted an ambush on the flank.
This ambush took place near Pingxingguan
at a place called Qiaogou
To the Japanese Army's 5th Division combat headquarters in Guan Gou Village, a necessary path in between.
This road is about 3 kilometers long, with cliffs on both sides about 10 meters high.
At that time, this Guan Gou was the road that was being used.
Because at that time, whether it was the Japanese Army marching
or including the subsequent supplies, all had to go through this ditch.
So, was this ditch solely Lin Biao's own strategy at that time?
Actually, after Professor Jiang Keshi's verification, it was found not to be the case.
Why? Because, in fact, with this ditch, as soon as you see the site,
you would realize, if you have a bit of military common sense, you would set up an ambush here.
Moreover, from September 22 to September 24,
the National Army had already set up ambushes here several times.
It's just that at that time, the combat capability of the National Army was relatively poor.
When a battalion of troops met with the main force of the Japanese Army, they would collapse at the first contact.
Therefore, the Japanese Army didn't take the National Army's ambush seriously.
So Lin Biao setting up an ambush here on September 25 was actually common military sense,
not what you'd call a stroke of military genius.
That's the first point, the second point
is about how many Japanese soldiers were killed during the whole Pingxingguan campaign.
What exactly happened on the battlefield, Professor Jiang Keshi did a detailed verification.
His discovery, Lin Biao setting up an ambush in this bridge ditch,
actually had a real stroke of genius, what does this mean?
Because this bridge ditch, at that time, was located at the rear of the Japanese Army,
between their frontline combat troops and Lingqiu County.
So why set up an ambush here?
And the opening of his trumpet was facing the direction of the Japanese Army's frontline positions.
Therefore, Professor Jiang Keshi, after verification, believes that Lin Biao's intentions were here,
He did not want to actively attack those main forces,
he hoped that after Yan Xishan's Jinsui Army defeated the Japanese Army,
if the Japanese Army retreated from the front line, they would enter this pocket formation,
at that time, it would be possible to eliminate the remnants of the Japanese Army, without needing to pay a high price,
while also being able to expand the military achievements.
And Lin Biao's idea was very good, on one hand, to conserve strength and not engage in tough fights,
meanwhile, if the Jinsui Army really won, these defeated troops passing by here
I could still clean them up, smart, really strategic.
The real strategy is here.
Just coincidentally, after Lin Biao set up an ambush on September 25,
that day, really two battles occurred in this Qiao Gou.
These two battles, Professor Jiang Keshi did detailed verification in his book.
First, on that morning at 9:30, from the direction of Guan Gou Village,
about 50 vehicles came, a so-called Japanese Army logistic troop.
So why did they dispatch this logistic troop?
Upon checking the archives, it was very clear,
because from September 22 to September 24, after fighting for three days,
By September 24, they were somewhat unable to continue fighting, especially as the Shanxi forces began to counterattack.
On September 25, the Japanese Army requested this logistic unit
to return in the direction of Lingqiu County, to bring reinforcements.
Because they were unable to advance at the front, and the battlefield situation was unfavorable for them.
Thus, all 50 vehicles were empty, carrying nothing.
They were prepared to go there to bring back reinforcements. The person commanding this logistic unit
was Lieutenant Colonel Shizuka, a lieutenant colonel of the Japanese Army's logistic unit.
Logistic units, in Japanese military training, are considered a formal part of the order of battle,
but they are definitely not considered the main force.
This Lieutenant Colonel Shizuka was a lieutenant colonel of a logistic unit.
How many people were in this unit? Not quite 200, just over 100 people.
These hundred-plus people were the drivers, the porters,
plus some of their own combatants, roughly that number.
And they had no heavy weapons, only two machine guns in total.
Think about it, over a hundred people,
then at 9:30, they started fighting upon entering here. At that time, the 115th Division of the Eighth Route Army here
was led by Li Tianyou of the 686th Regiment.
This Li Tianyou later became a general after the founding of the PRC.
They began the attack, and the Japanese, wielding heavy machine guns, began to fire.
In fact, at that time, the Eighth Route Army's weapons and equipment were significantly better than the Japanese's.
Initially, after a brief moment of panic,
the Japanese quickly rushed to the mountains on both sides.
After occupying the high ground, they began to exchange fire with the Eighth Route Army.
In this, a Japanese squad of about twenty to thirty men
occupied a high ground called Laoye Temple.
Both sides engaged in a very intense fight for Laoye Temple's high ground.
If you look at the CCP's book on the Great Victory of Pingxingguan,
it contains a very important description about Laoye Temple.
This description is somewhat exaggerated,
claiming there were airplanes in the sky, tanks on the ground, and artillery.
As a result, after repeated bloody charges, the Eighth Route Army finally annihilated the enemy.
But actually, at that time, the Japanese only had twenty to thirty men with a light machine gun,
and they fought a fierce battle with the Eighth Route Army for 4 hours. Soon after the battle began,
Lieutenant Colonel Shizuka was shot and killed.
So, around 12:40, a lieutenant from Shimura at that time announced
they began to retreat upon receiving the order.
In the process, around 11:30, a rescue team arrived from the rear,
a squad of about 100 people.
So, the total Japanese combat forces in this area amounted to about 350 people.
And how many were there on the Eighth Route Army side? About 3,000, almost ten times the number of the Japanese forces.
But despite being ten times the number of the Japanese, this situation of the Eighth Route Army against the enemy
resulted in a fierce battle lasting 4 hours.
Moreover, the pocket formation on their side was not secured; the rear was always open.
At that time, the Eighth Route Army attempted to secure the rear pocket formation,
but a bayonet charge by the Japanese scattered the Eighth Route Army's forces.
Ultimately, the so-called pocket formation remained open.
So later, from 12:40, the Japanese began to retreat,
all the way from this bridge ditch back to their starting point.
Before leaving, they burned those vehicles.
By 3:30 pm, the Japanese had regrouped back in Guan Gou Village.
Then they began to tally the casualties of this battle, with the Japanese losing a total of 62 people.
For this battle, about 30 people were killed or wounded.
This was one of the main battlefields of the Pingxingguan campaign,
namely the main battlefield in the area around Laoye Temple.
The current location of the Pingxingguan Memorial is right here.
Coincidentally, while fighting near Laoye Temple,
around 11 am, another group of Japanese troops came from the northern part of the bridge ditch.
What were these Japanese troops doing?
They were coming from the Lingqiu direction, a Japanese luggage unit.
This luggage unit, with about 100 horses pulling carts loaded with luggage,
carried mainly dry bread and some cotton clothes,
intended for the front-line troops to deliver these supplies.
There were also a few pieces of combat supplies.
This unit had about seventy to eighty "special duty soldiers,"
plus 15 regular infantrymen.
What are "special duty soldiers"? Let me explain here:
In the Japanese army, "special duty soldiers" were actually non-combat personnel.
"Special duty soldier" is a euphemism.
Originally they were called "ronin."
"Ronin" sounds very discriminatory.
In essence, they were the labor force of the Japanese army.
These people did not need to fight and did not undergo military training
because they were meant to perform laborious tasks.
They transported the wounded, food, military doctors, and ammunition.
Thus, these people had no combat capability.
About 70 of these people, plus 15 escort soldiers, made up this unit.
That's this unit.
Then, before this unit entered the bridge ditch village,
they happened to encounter a group of seven people.
This group of seven, coming from Lingqiu and the headquarters,
included a staff officer, Lieutenant Colonel Hashimoto.
He was originally going to the frontline headquarters in a car,
but coincidentally, it rained heavily on the 24th,
and when they drove on the 25th, the car got stuck in the mud and couldn't move.
So after Lieutenant Colonel Hashimoto got down,
he and his men began to proceed on foot.
Upon reaching the entrance of the bridge ditch, they joined up with the luggage transport unit.
Then they proceeded into the bridge ditch,
and upon entering, they encountered an encirclement by the 115th Division of the Eighth Route Army.
This unit was almost entirely wiped out,
with nearly 100 people, only six survived.
At the beginning of the attack,
since these special duty soldiers had no combat experience,
they panicked amidst heavy machine guns, mortars, and grenades from above.
These men began to scatter in confusion.
Lieutenant Colonel Hashimoto was a staff officer,
he was commanding on the spot, but he had hardly any troops to command.
He also rushed up the cliff and engaged in a firefight with the Eighth Route Army.
During the exchange of fire, their firepower gradually diminished.
Thus, only 6 people from this unit survived in the end.
These six hid in small caves,
or pretended to be dead, lying under dead horses.
They were later rescued by the Japanese returning to the battlefield.
The Pingxingguan campaign, in essence, unfolded like this,
it was not just a battle of Pingxingguan but a great victory.
The total number of Japanese casualties in the northern and southern battlefields has very precise numbers,
because the Japanese archives are very comprehensive.
After the war, they made battlefield summary reports,
and the deceased soldiers have death records.
Based on these death records, compensation was distributed to the families,
and the compensation from the Japanese Army was quite high.
It amounted to 20 times the annual income of the military.
You see, that's a lot.
The Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare also retains complete records of this.
So, Professor Jiang Keshi compiled these numbers,
and the total number of Japanese casualties in the great victory of Pingxingguan was about 162.
For 158 of them, there are precise records of their names, military ranks
and addresses
This is very well preserved in the Japanese archives.
About 100 people were injured,
so adding up, it's a great victory in the Pingxingguan campaign.
The CCP's proclaimed great victory at Pingxingguan, the total casualties on the Japanese side were also about 200 people.
That's roughly the situation.
Think about it, compared to the CCP's propaganda of annihilating more than 1,000 enemies, the difference is quite significant.
It's seven or eight times less, right?
Why do I spend a whole day talking about this book?
I find Professor Jiang Keshi's point in this book particularly interesting.
He says that during the war, the political propaganda from both sides
inadvertently exaggerates military achievements.
Because political propaganda is about creating extreme national heroes.
It's not just the CCP; Japan did it too.
For example, Japan's propaganda during the Russo-Japanese War included a military god,
Yamaguchi, who was later proven to be fabricated.
And then during the Pacific War, wasn't Pearl Harbor attacked?
The Japanese propaganda of nine military gods bombing the American base,
later it was found they intentionally left one out,
one downed Japanese pilot.
This Japanese pilot landed on Roy Island, right?
After landing on Roy Island, it led to conflicts between the Japanese descendants and the natives later,
which directly resulted in all Japanese Americans being interned in camps.
But in Japanese propaganda, this part was completely removed,
that is, through such deliberate creation of extreme heroes,
to make ordinary people sacrifice themselves as cannon fodder for Japanese militarism.
That's how Japan did it, and the CCP did the same.
After the Pingxingguan great victory was first announced by the CCP,
Chiang Kai-shek really awarded commendations.
Why? Because at that time, there was the myth of the invincible Imperial Japanese Army.
So all of China was longing for a victory over the Japanese army.
The Pingxingguan great victory announced by the Eighth Route Army indeed boosted morale,
and Chiang Kai-shek was also cautious.
He encouraged the Eighth Route Army to fight the Japanese because at that time, the KMT and the CCP were at odds.
Although the Eighth Route Army went to the battlefield,
it was basically not controlled by the military group and operated independently.
So Chiang Kai-shek hoped to encourage the Eighth Route Army to really fight the Japanese.
This was the first time it was utilized.
So his view is that the three countries, China, Japan, and Korea,
actually explain history based on their own political stance,
rather than facing the true history, which makes reconciliation difficult.
But after the war, Japan, with its peace constitution,
these so-called extreme heroes
disappeared from textbooks and history.
Gradually, we are returning to a real historical scene.
From the complete disclosure of archives during the war by Japan,
and research in this area, you can see.
But it's different on the Chinese side; the Pingxingguan campaign was actually exploited
It was utilized three times, the first time as Professor Jiang Keshi mentioned
At that time, the entire Chinese nation hoped for a victory, so such a military achievement was exaggerated
Not only the Pingxingguan campaign but the Battle of Taierzhuang was also exaggerated
In the Japanese records, whether it was the Battle of Taierzhuang or including the Pingxingguan campaign
Both were very ordinary battles
And during the war, other feats by the Eighth Route Army were also crafted
We'll talk about that in a moment
The second exploitation was actually in 1945 when the KMT and CCP were going to fight
When the KMT and CCP were about to fight, the Communist Party had a theory
What was the theory?
It said that during the eight years of the War of Resistance, it was the CCP troops that were fighting
The KMT was actually hiding in the mountains, so now they want to reap the benefits
Didn't Mao write an article?
If you want to argue that the CCP was the mainstay in the resistance process
Then you must have examples, right? What are the examples?
Actually, during the entire eight years, the CCP could only showcase two battles against the Japanese
One is the Pingxingguan campaign, and the other is the Hundred Regiments Offensive
Therefore, the Pingxingguan campaign must be portrayed as a tremendous victory at that time
This was a political necessity
The third exploitation actually happened after the founding of the PRC
After the founding, Sino-Japanese relations have been fluctuating
As everyone knows, there was once a honeymoon period
But in the last two decades, Sino-Japanese relations have generally been discordant
The discordant result has led to
all kinds of war memories with Japan being repeatedly reinforced
Even repeatedly dramatized and storied
This is based not only on Sino-Japanese relations
But also on considerations of patriotism and nationalism
To shape a new common memory through
dramatization and storytelling of these wars
This common memory has nothing to do with the so-called historical facts.
Professor Jiang Keshi, through research, found that, in fact, several so-called common memories of the Anti-Japanese War
are false.
For example, the Five Heroes of Langya Mountain.
The Five Heroes of Langya Mountain, these five individuals, were actually trapped and then made a martyrdom act.
While it's quite heroic, the narrative process claims
they killed more than a hundred Japanese soldiers, and the five of them jumped off the cliff after running out of ammunition.
But Japanese archives have clear records
that during the entire battle involving the Five Heroes of Langya Mountain, the Japanese army only had one person wounded.
So, you see, this narrative actually has nothing to do with historical facts.
And then there's the defense of Liu Zhuang.
At that time, Liu Zhuang had 82 members of the New Fourth Army.
This platoon, all martyred in the end, claimed to have killed several hundred Japanese soldiers at the time.
But upon checking Japanese archives, it was found that the Japanese army only had two people killed.
To say that these 82 people collectively achieved martyrdom is also quite remarkable.
But then, to exaggerate it to the extermination of several hundred Japanese soldiers
is utterly absurd.
So, you can see that historical narrative and political propaganda
actually have nothing to do with each other.
History has only become a carrier, just a tool.
But the problem is that such a narrative system that instrumentalizes history
is really harmful to us today, seriously understanding history and facing the future.
Think about it, the Sino-Japanese War has been over for more than 70 years.
But then, think about it, these countries in East Asia have not reconciled,
and everyone is still arguing every day.
One very important reason is that
we have not approached the true content of this historical event
with a historiographical attitude.
It's all based on a propagandistic attitude to explain history,
and this propaganda is actually stance-first, conclusion-first
All these Sino-Japanese historical narratives ultimately point towards a history of hatred, hating Japan,
rather than pointing towards a true history.
But, when all of this encounters a real historical detail,
such as these archives from the Japanese side,
you will find that all those historical constructs are utterly untenable.
But then, you realize that the truth of history
really doesn't matter much in the process of propaganda.
Wasn't there someone who spoke about the historical facts of the Five Heroes of Langya Mountain?
And as a result, they were judged by a court in Beijing,
saying this is the national common memory, this is the core value of socialism.
If you violate it, you're breaking the law, you're infringing on the honor of the Five Heroes of Langya Mountain.
But what's truly sad is, this so-called narrative propaganda
can only be sustained within a specific, closed information environment.
Once this barrier of information is opened,
people will find out that all these propagandas are false.
The entire narrative system is false.
Can it really build up our true nationalism and our patriotic feelings?
Or say, the nationalism and patriotism it builds up,
does it really help our country, is it beneficial?
So, at the end of today's program, I recommend everyone
to take a look at Professor Jiang Keshi's book.
I think the issues he raises in this book truly make us reflect
on how to face history, how to face the future.
Okay, that's all for today, thank you, everyone.
The Eighth Route Army utilized favorable terrain to launch a fierce attack on the Japanese army,
and implemented a strategy of encirclement and segmentation against the chaotic Japanese forces.
A brutal melee battle ensued between the two sides.
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)