Jon Stewart on America's Decades-Long Battle for Reproductive Rights | The Daily Show
Summary
TLDR这段视频剧本讨论了美国社会中关于堕胎和避孕的争议。剧本通过幽默的方式,展示了不同观点的辩论,包括反堕胎人士因网站发布的威胁性内容而被判赔偿1.07亿美元的案件,以及奥巴马政府与宗教领袖之间关于避孕的争议。剧本中涉及的角色包括政治评论员、医生、宗教人士和普通公民,他们就生命价值、个人自由和社会责任等核心问题展开了讨论。
Takeaways
- 📜 一起诉讼案中,反堕胎激进分子因网站发布的威胁性内容被判赔偿1.07亿美元。
- 💬 被告查尔斯·温格(Charles Wysong)认为这一判决是“司法的失误”,并否认其网站上的内容具有威胁性。
- 🎭 被告声称其网站上没有任何煽动暴力的文字,并将其中一句争议性的句子描述为儿童的押韵游戏。
- 😅 尽管赢得了1.07亿美元的赔偿,但支持堕胎的医生们对此表达了复杂的情感。
- 🤔 节目讨论了堕胎议题如何成为选举中的关键问题,以及它如何影响女性选民的投票决策。
- 🌟 节目嘉宾包括Mo Rocca和Nancy Walls,他们讨论了堕胎议题在政治辩论中的重要性。
- 📢 史蒂夫·卡瑞尔(Steve Carell)通过电话参与讨论,以幽默的方式表达了对堕胎合法性的支持。
- 👥 讨论中提出了关于女性在堕胎议题上的声音缺失,以及男性在讨论中的作用和立场。
- 🤷♂️ 讨论触及了生命的价值和人类生命的本质问题,以及何时开始赋予生命以法律保护的责任。
- 🧬 讨论还涉及了胚胎研究和成人干细胞研究的伦理问题,以及它们与堕胎议题的关联。
- 💊 节目最后讨论了宗教领袖与奥巴马政府之间关于避孕的争议,以及这一争议如何引发了关于宗教自由和世俗现实的辩论。
Q & A
联邦陪审团是如何裁决反堕胎激进分子的案件的?
-联邦陪审团裁定反堕胎激进分子需支付1.07亿美元的赔偿金,因为他们网站的堕胎医生通缉海报和公布堕胎医生姓名及地址的行为被认定为非法威胁。
田纳西州美国权利联盟的Charles Wysong对裁决有何看法?
-Charles Wysong将这一裁决称为“正义的流产”,并坚称他们的海报中没有任何威胁性内容。
反堕胎被告声称他们的网站上没有任何煽动暴力的文字,他们如何辩解?
-反堕胎被告声称他们的网站上没有任何文字煽动暴力,并声称网站上的“Ill-kay abortion-ay octors-day ow-nay”只是给孩子们的有趣的Dr. Seuss韵律。
选择权医生对胜诉有何感受?
-虽然选择权医生对胜诉感到高兴,但他们表达了复杂的情感,认为无法撤销或回溯已经发生的事情。
Dr. Newhall在赢得1.07亿美元赔偿后,她打算做什么?
-当被问及赢得1.07亿美元后打算做什么时,Dr. Newhall表现出痛苦,但据报道,她跳起来大喊要在迪士尼世界进行堕胎。
在《每日秀》中,Mo Rocca和Nancy Walls讨论了哪些关于堕胎议题的观点?
-Mo Rocca强调对于无数美国女性来说,她们的投票决定因素取决于候选人是否支持选择权。Nancy Walls则提到下一任政府将任命三到四位最高法院大法官,而Roe v. Wade案将成为试金石。
Steve Carell在电话中对堕胎议题有何贡献?
-Steve Carell贡献了一个幽默的观点,他说如果堕胎被禁止,只有不法分子会有堕胎。
Stephen Colbert提出了哪个重要问题?
-Stephen Colbert提出了一个重要问题,即在讨论女性是否应该有生殖权利时,为什么没有听到女性的声音。
讨论中提到的关于生命价值的根本问题是什么?
-讨论中提到关于生命价值的根本问题是,是否每一个人类生命都有内在的价值,以及何时开始是一个生命,何时我们有责任给予它与你我相同的保护。
关于堕胎议题的讨论中,有哪些关于生命和选择的复杂观点?
-讨论中提到,即使是支持选择权的人也不希望堕胎,他们可能没有思考过其含义和逻辑结论。同时,如果培养一代人认为因为生命对我们来说是干扰或中断,就可以夺去一个生命,那么当他们年老时,孩子们可能会以同样的理由对待他们。
在讨论中,提到的关于宗教领袖和奥巴马政府之间的避孕争议是什么?
-争议是关于奥巴马政府决定让宗教附属机构或其保险公司涵盖避孕作为政府强制的健康保险的一部分。一些宗教领袖认为这是奥巴马自为艾利亚·伍德在逾越节晚餐上留座位以来最大的失误。
在国会听证会上,关于避孕议题的讨论有哪些不合理之处?
-在国会听证会上,一些发言者使用了极端的比喻,如斯大林的引用和“灵魂强奸”的说法,这些比喻并没有帮助理性地解决问题,反而引发了嘲笑和反感。
Outlines
😡 关于反堕胎活动家的争议
本段讨论了一群反堕胎活动家因在其网站上发布涉嫌威胁堕胎医生的“通缉海报”和姓名地址列表,被联邦陪审团裁定必须支付1.07亿美元的损害赔偿金。其中一名被告,田纳西州美国权利联盟的查尔斯·怀松,将这一裁决描述为“司法误判”。这些被告声称,他们的网站上没有任何煽动暴力的言辞,甚至将一句话描述为儿童的趣味押韵句。此外,反对堕胎的被告们对裁决感到满意,但有些堕胎医生对结果有复杂的情绪。视频还涵盖了“每日秀”两位资深政治记者关于堕胎议题如何成为前一晚辩论的焦点、以及未来政府对最高法院大法官的任命可能如何影响罗伊诉韦德案的讨论。
👴 老龄化社会与堕胎的伦理讨论
这一段深入探讨了堕胎议题的道德和伦理层面,包括堕胎对个人自由的影响、生命的内在价值、以及是否有权决定另一个人的生命。讨论还触及了人们如何看待老年人作为社会负担的问题,以及这与堕胎议题的相关性。此外,还讨论了胚胎研究、辅助生殖技术(IVF)及其伦理问题,特别是与冷冻胚胎相关的复杂性。对话强调了人类生命的价值和权利,以及如何平衡个体自由与社会、政府的角色。
🔥 宗教自由与避孕权利的辩论
第三段关注了避孕权利与宗教自由之间的冲突,特别是在奥巴马政府期间。讨论涵盖了政府要求宗教附属机构或其保险公司为非宗教雇员提供避孕措施的决定,这一决策引发了宗教领袖的强烈反对。段落通过使用幽默和讽刺的方式,展示了这一争论的复杂性,包括对宗教机构支付员工工资的比较,以及这些资金可能用于避孕或其他非宗教活动的可能性。此外,还讨论了国会议员举行的听证会,以及如何在宗教自由和世俗世界的现实之间寻找平衡。
🎶 视频结尾的音乐元素
最后一段以活力四射的音乐结束,这种音乐元素在视频的开头和结尾处被用来营造一种轻松愉快的氛围。这种选择反映了整个视频旨在以幽默和讽刺的方式处理严肃话题,同时通过音乐使观众保持参与和兴趣。
Mindmap
Keywords
💡堕胎权
💡争议
💡讽刺
💡法律
💡道德
💡政治
💡权利
💡生命
💡保健
💡自主权
Highlights
Militant anti-abortionists were ordered to pay $107 million in damages for their website's abortion doctor wanted posters and baby butcher name and address lists.
Defendant Charles Wysong called the decision a 'miscarriage of justice', claiming the posters were not threatening.
Pro-life defendants argued their website contained no inciting words of violence.
Pro-choice doctors expressed mixed feelings about the verdict and its implications.
Dr. Newhall reportedly celebrated winning $107 million by saying she would perform an abortion at Disney World.
The debate on the abortion issue highlighted the divide between pro-choice and pro-life stances.
Vance DeGeneres pointed out the next administration could appoint Supreme Court justices who might use Roe v. Wade as a litmus test.
Steve Carell humorously contributed to the discussion by saying if abortions are outlawed, only outlaws will have abortions.
Stephen Colbert raised the point that two men discussed reproductive rights without any women's input.
The discussion touched on the fundamental issue of whether every human life has intrinsic worth and value.
The debate questioned at what point a fetus is considered a life and when society has the responsibility to protect it.
The argument was made that allowing abortion for convenience could lead to a slippery slope of devaluing human life.
The conversation included a personal story about a child born from a frozen embryo, challenging the notion that embryos are just tissue.
The battle between religious leaders and the Obama administration over contraception policies was a major topic.
The controversy involved religious-affiliated institutions being required to cover contraception in their healthcare plans.
Some religious leaders felt this was a violation of their religious conscience, comparing it to 'soul rape'.
The Catholic Church's stance was that Viagra is covered because it addresses a medical problem, while contraception is seen as a choice.
A panel convened by Congressman Darrell Issa to discuss the issue initially did not allow women to speak.
A comparison was made to a kosher deli being forced to serve pork, illustrating the conflict between religious freedom and government mandates.
The discussion highlighted the complexity of the issue, with various perspectives and analogies being used to frame the debate.
Transcripts
(energetic upbeat music)
- Doctor, Doctor, give me the news,
I've got a bad case of threatening yous.
Militant anti-abortionists, usually rational to a fault,
were ordered to pay $107 million in damages
after a federal jury
found their website's abortion doctor wanted posters
and baby butcher name and address lists
amounted to illegal threats.
Defendant Charles Wysong
of Tennessee's American Rights Coalition
called the decision, "A miscarriage of justice."
- There's nothing in those posters
that's threatening and they know it.
- Wysong then added, "Threatening, I mean, come on,
it's not like we hire snipers with wilderness skills, much."
(audience laughs)
The pro-life defendants claimed nowhere on their website
are there any words which incite violence,
claiming the sentence,
"Ill-kay abortion-ay octors-day ow-nay"
was just a fun Dr. Seuss rhyme for kids.
(audience laughing)
While pleased with the verdict,
pro-choice doctors expressed mixed feelings.
- There is no way to remove or turn back what has occurred.
- Although she appeared distressed,
when asked what she's going to do
now that she's won $107 million,
Dr. Newhall reportedly jumped in the air and yelled,
"I'm gonna perform an abortion at Disney World."
(audience laughing)
(audience members jeer) Settle down.
(energetic upbeat music)
Joining me right now
are two senior political correspondents
on "The Daily Show" staff, Mo Rocca and Nancy Walls.
What really struck me about the debates last night
was the abortion issue.
It came to the forefront
and I thought really divided the two candidates.
Mo, what were your impressions about their abortion issue?
- Well, Jon, I can say with certainty
that for countless American women,
the deciding factor in how their vote is cast
depends on whether or not the candidate is pro-choice.
- Yes, Jon, I'd like to-
- Mo, that's an interesting point.
You know, you really,
you feel like abortion is the swing issue this year?
- Absolutely. - Well, Nancy...
You know what, I'm sorry, Nancy.
I've got word that Vance DeGeneres in Tampa
would like to weigh in, Vance.
(bar patrons chattering)
- You know, the next administration
is going to appoint three,
maybe four Supreme Court justices.
Now, all the experts agree that Roe v. Wade
will be a litmus test.
- Well, that's a valid point, Vance, I'd have to say.
- Right, you know, the real issue here, Jon is that-
- Yeah, yeah. Hold that thought, honey.
We've actually got Steve Carell on the phone, I believe.
He's off today, but he's calling in
from his home in New Jersey.
Steve, did you have something you wanted to contribute
to the abortion discussion?
- [Steve] Yes, Jon, if abortions are outlawed,
only outlaws will have abortion.
(audience laughing and clapping)
And I ain't gonna play Sun City.
(audience laughing)
- That's an excellent point, Steve.
I've gotta say that's exactly- - Jon, I really feel
like I have to comment here as-
- [Colbert] Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa there.
I'll handle this one.
- Yes, I'm sorry, Stephen Colbert.
- Well, Jon, I think there's one thing
that no one is naming.
Last night on that stage, two men stood behind podiums,
two men and talked about whether women
should have reproductive rights.
Now why haven't we, you know, heard from any of the chicks?
(audience laughing)
- Well, that's a valid point.
We've got time for one more comment.
Nancy, what about that?
Why are women dropping the ball on this?
(audience laughing)
- You know, Jon, I've been sitting here
listening to all of you- - Excuse me!
- And the issue- - Excuse me, Jon!
- of whether women should have to-
- I'm sorry, you know what, oh, is that over there?
Our cameraman, Tom, has been waiting very patiently.
Tom, you had something you wanted to say?
- Yeah, I just think that women
should definitely have the right
to decide what happens to their own bodies.
Also, I think prostitution should be legalized.
- All right, well, that's an excellent discussion.
I wanna thank everybody, Mo, Vance, Stephen,
Steve Carell at home, Tom the cameraman, terrific work.
(energetic upbeat music)
- The issue is so much more than about abortion.
It's about the fundamental issue
of whether or not every human life
has intrinsic worth and value.
I believe that every life has value.
- [Jon] Right.
- And then the question comes, is it a life?
At what point is it a life?
And at what point is it our responsibility
to give it the same protection
that hopefully would be given to you or to me?
- Right, do you believe...
Here's what I'm always curious about.
- Yeah. - In terms of the rhetoric,
and I'm sure there's complaints
on the pro-life side as well.
Do you think that on the side of choice,
that they don't believe that every human life has value?
'Cause I'm always curious. - Yeah.
- I tend to think that the discussion is painted
in that direction as pro-abortion and this idea
that there's a callous indifference to life,
which doesn't seem to be the- - I don't think
there's anybody that wakes up and says,
"I really think abortion is a wonderful, wonderful thing."
I don't truly believe that even people
who would consider themselves pro-choice like abortion.
I think that they haven't thought through the implications
and the logical conclusion.
For example, if we train a generation coming up after us
that it is okay to take a human life
because that life represents to us an interference
or an interruption to our lives, either economically
or socially or whatever the reason.
And by the way, 93% of abortions are elective abortions.
Then what happens when our children one day look at us
and we're old, and we're gonna get there, Jon, we are.
- What? - Someday.
- Not if we keep talking about this.
- I do not want to give... (audience laughing)
But, you know, I do not want to give my kids the opportunity
to say, "Dad, you are an interference.
Coming to see you in the nursing home
is really messing up my social life.
You are very expensive, Dad.
Your long-term care bill is breaking us."
- But you're not at that point living inside your kids.
In other words, the... - No.
(audience applauding) - But I don't mean that for...
You know, and I think there's a...
And I don't mean to make light of it
because I think my personal feelings about it,
look, I have kids and I think it's very difficult
when you look at an ultrasound of your child
and you see a heartbeat, you are filled with that wonder
and love and all those things.
I just don't feel personally
that that's a decision I can make for another person.
- I think one of the fundamental questions
that we would have to come to is,
does a person have a right to own another person?
- Whoa. - That really is the issue.
Can a person own another person?
Can the mother totally own the child?
Can the father own the child? - Can the government
totally own the mother? - No.
I don't think the government
should completely own anybody. - Isn't it the same thing?
But isn't that the same argument?
- But our Founding Fathers, Jon, said that,
"We hold these truths to be self-evident,
that all people are created equal
and are endowed by their creator
with certain inalienable rights,
among these life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."
- Right. - The concept was
that there is an equality about each human life
that no one is worth more than another,
no one is worth less than another.
- Isn't it the decision that's been made,
or at least tried to be made is that the progression
of that life, there becomes a point
where the state has an interest in protecting that life,
but at a certain point on its cellular level,
there is time built in for those types of decisions.
- Even if there was a concession for that,
there's a heartbeat at 21 days.
Many abortions happen well after the heartbeat.
Late-term abortions, where many people are saying,
"Look, no one should be able to intervene."
- What about embryonic research.
You know, are you against IVF? Is that-
- You know, the interesting thing is that now more
of the really credible research
is happening toward adult stem cells.
There was such a political issue.
- No, no, no, IVF is not,
that's not stem cell. - Oh, I'm sorry.
- That's in vitro fertilization,
which is- - Oh, you're talking about-
- People that are having difficulty
having children go in and-
- You're talking about like, frozen embryos.
- Well, they're not frozen. - In vitro.
- Sometimes when a man loves a woman.
- Yes. (laughs) (audience laughing)
Is that what happens? I've always wondered how it was.
- But they've smoked a lot of pot
and can no longer produce sperm.
- Yeah. - They go to a doctor.
And what happens is they, it's sort of,
it's conception outside of the body.
- I understand what you're saying.
I thought you were talking about the frozen embryos.
I carry in my wallet a photo of a little girl.
She's four years- - I thought you were gonna say
"A frozen embryo." - No, no, no, no, no.
(audience laughing) - What? You carry what?
- No, that's in my other pocket I have, anyway.
- Right, right, right. All right, I'm sorry.
- Just in case. You never know when that might come in.
- No, no, no. I understand.
- But it's a four-year-old girl.
I met her and her mother in Seattle, Washington,
and she was the reason, I guess, it's triggered,
she was a frozen embryo. - Right.
- Implanted into her mother.
A beautiful, beautiful child.
And the mother approached me and said,
"If anyone ever says to you that, you know, these embryos
are just sort of tissue or they're just cells," said,
"look at the picture of my child
and tell me my child isn't real."
It was a powerful moment for me to see
and to actually physically hold this child and to realize-
- And here's where it's so complex.
That child would not be born without embryonic research.
(energetic upbeat music)
Let's begin tonight with the battle
between religious leaders and the Obama administration
over contraception in our ongoing coverage of
(logo swooshing) The Punanny State.
Now, for those of you (audience laughing)
who haven't been following the story,
let me bring you up to speed.
Years ago, Adam and Eve lived in a garden.
Nah, all right, let's just,
let's just scroll up and then, okay, okay, okay.
Ah, Martin Luther nailed 95 theses.
Let's just scroll up a little bit. Okay, here we go.
Two weeks ago, the Obama administration found itself
at the center of a controversy over its decisions
to make religious-affiliated institutions
or their insurers cover contraception
as part of their government-mandated healthcare.
The move was seen by some religious leaders
as Obama's biggest misstep since the time he set aside
a chair for Elijah Wood at the Passover Seder.
(audience laughing) Elijah Wood.
Oh, there are a couple of Orthodox Jews
that really got that. (audience laughing)
And everyone else does not understand it.
(audience laughing)
So we have ourselves an old-fashioned liberty standoff.
On the one hand, the Catholic Church,
they do not want to be forced to pay money
for insurance plans that cover contraception
for even their non-Catholic employees,
although they do pay those employees money,
so I guess the argument could be made
that by paying these employees,
church money ends up being used for contraception anyway,
and pornography and dildos rolled in glitter
and entrance fees to clubs where cats have sex with dogs.
8th Street and 3rd Avenue, it's called Collarz. (mumbles)
On the other side...
They've been there. They know. (audience cheers and applauds)
Meow, meow, meow!
Ruff! (audience laughing)
A lot of other names for that, though.
On the other side are women who, for some reason,
would like their preventative healthcare costs
provided by their healthcare insurance provider.
Tough case because the sides are the Catholics and women,
and both are infallible, am I right?
(audience laughing)
So last Thursday, Congressman Darrell Issa
convened a panel to settle the issue.
And while no ladies were actually allowed to speak
until the afternoon session,
and no ladies actually ever spoke on behalf of ladies,
some of these fellas were wearing gowns,
so that's something. (audience laughing)
Let's hear the reasoned tone that the sausage fest struck
in this effort to find balance between religious liberty
and the realities of the secular world.
- I don't normally quote from Joseph Stalin.
- Okay, I'm gonna stop you right there.
(audience laughing)
We're just gonna move on to the next guy,
if that's all right.
Anyone have a slightly less hyperbolic take on this?
- The violation of a person's religious conscience
was nothing less than the rape of the soul.
(audience reacts and boos)
- That's a quote from Roger Williams,
and I believe the worst "Law & Order" spinoff yet.
(audience laughing)
Ice-T, Belzer, and Markie Post, where's the chemistry?
Listen, no one loves their insurance plan, but soul rape?
Well, you may not realize this, but the Catholic Church
actually offers health plans that already cover Viagra,
AKA boner pill! (audience laughing)
AKA das stiff macher! (audience laughing)
AKA four-hour Johnson juice.
I'm guessing that that doesn't rape the soul,
that some of your employees, I guess,
are getting that subsidized Viagra,
and I guess some of them are single, unmarried men.
What do you think they're doing with their erections?
Seriously? We'd love to know.
Send your responses to Brian Williams
care of NBC Nightly News RE that question
you had about men's erections. (audience cheers and applauds)
So how is it that...
I can't wait to find out! (audience laughing)
How is it that women can't get their pill,
but men can get their pill?
Well, as it happens,
the church answered that very question 12 years ago.
- Viagra actually answers a medical problem.
Contraception is a choice that somebody may make,
but it doesn't answer a particular healthcare need.
- Two things, why, one,
does 12 years ago look like the '70s on television?
(audience laughing)
Has it really advanced that far in 12 years?
And two, so the Catholic Church says a boner is a need,
but not getting pregnant is more of a want.
(audience laughing)
By the way, while I was surprised
that the Catholic church is pro medically-induced boners,
I was even more shocked at the ad it ran
to show its support.
Now, you never know (audience laughing)
when the spirit will move you.
Anyway, I digress. Yeah. (audience applauding)
I don't know why they both get to wear nice hats,
but anyway, back to the hearing.
We've already heard from the Stalin and rape people.
Could someone please put this in terms
that are a little more relatable?
- For my testimony today, I would like to tell a story.
Let's call it the parable of the kosher deli.
- Go on. (audience laughing)
- Once upon a time, a new law was proposed
so that any business that serves food must serve pork.
Can a customer come to a kosher deli,
demand to be served a ham sandwich, and if refused,
bring down severe government sanction on the deli?
In a nation committed to religious liberty and diversity,
the answer is no. (audience laughing)
(audience cheers and applauds)
(audience laughing)
- Do you gots my pickle? (audience laughing)
Sir, your parable about the kosher deli, while delicious.
makes no (beep) sense. (audience laughing)
Nobody's forcing the kosher deli owner to serve a ham.
In the metaphor, it's more like the owner of the kosher deli
is refusing to pay taxes
because his money could go to food stamps,
which someone might theoretically use to buy ham.
Although, to be fair to Darrell Issa at the hearings,
a woman was put forth to speak on behalf of someone
who needed contraception to help with a medical condition,
and that speaker was denied a spot.
'cause you know, Stalin rape.
Anyway.
(upbeat energetic music) ♪ Hey, hey, hey, hey ♪
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/MOEKrI3BCJE/hq720.jpg)
Trump Has Change Of Heart About TikTok #TYT
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/sVMe_HXVYV0/hq720.jpg)
Mikey TINY Kingdom vs JJ GIANT Kingdom Survival Battle in Minecraft (Maizen)
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/UDjP3XV5-Gk/hq720.jpg)
‘Lefties are losing it’: MSNBC ‘dummies’ have a meltdown over Trump
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/5deFzIfdXbM/hq720.jpg?v=66203058)
Andrew Tate vs Ben Shapiro, Trevor Bauer Vindicated & Israel vs Iran | PBD Podcast | Ep. 399
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/9aR_TLoPgjU/hqdefault.jpg?sqp=-oaymwEXCJADEOABSFryq4qpAwkIARUAAIhCGAE=&rs=AOn4CLA-_VCjZtVjsxHkiNN_XISYK5iFxg)
EP-097 丁学良:中美交流的历史性赤字 | 丁学良 | 中国经济 | 中美关系 | 布林肯 | 留学生 | 川普 | 贸易战 | 特朗普 |
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/SzlRNiZ5vFM/hq720.jpg)
Lefties losing it: Rita Panahi reacts to ‘narcissist’ trans activist at Disneyland