NEW Fed Jan 6 Probe UNLEASHED: Terry Schilling Breaks It Down
Summary
TLDR前美国总统唐纳德·特朗普面临与1月6日国会大厦袭击事件相关的指控。然而,众议院共和党人的一份新报告描绘了与众议院特别委员会调查结果不同的情景。美国原则项目主席特里·施林对此进行了讨论,指出报告中的证据显示特朗普曾请求国民警卫队,却被委员会忽略。他还提到了卡西迪·赫钦森的证词与其他证人的证词相矛盾,暗示委员会有预设的叙述并排除了与此相悖的证据。施林认为,这些行为破坏了公众对司法公正的信任,可能导致更多的不信任和分裂。
Takeaways
- 📜 前总统唐纳德·特朗普面临与1月6日国会大厦袭击有关的指控。
- 🔍 众议院共和党人的一份新报告与众议院1月6日特别委员会的发现描绘了不同的情景。
- 💬 报告指出,特朗普的副幕僚长安东尼·奥拉多作证称,特朗普和马克·梅诺曾请求在1月6日部署1万名国民警卫队。
- 🚫 这一证词被1月6日委员会排除在外,这被认为是有利于特朗普的证据。
- 🤔 报告暗示1月6日委员会有预先设定的叙述,并排除了与之相矛盾的证据。
- 📢 媒体曾报道特朗普未请求国民警卫队,但报告显示这不是事实。
- 🚨 另一项重要指控是,卡西迪·赫钦森在媒体上声称特朗普试图夺取车辆方向盘,但被司机的证词所反驳。
- 🎭 赫钦森的证词被包含在报告中,而司机的反驳证词被排除。
- 😤 嘉宾特里·施林认为这是一个虚假的委员会,它排除了支持特朗普的任何人。
- 🏛️ 由于缺乏少数派代表,这个委员会被认为在政治上存在偏见。
- 🌪️ 施林预测,这些事件可能导致特朗普的再次当选,因为民主党正在重复2016年的错误策略。
Q & A
唐纳德·特朗普前总统面临哪些指控?
-唐纳德·特朗普前总统面临的指控与2021年1月6日对首都的袭击有关。
众议院共和党人的报告与众议院特别委员会的发现有何不同?
-众议院共和党人的报告提出了与众议院特别委员会不同的事件版本,指出有证据被压制或排除在特别委员会的报告之外,例如特朗普曾请求派遣国民警卫队到华盛顿特区。
安东尼·奥拉多是特朗普的什么职位?
-安东尼·奥拉多是唐纳德·特朗普的副幕僚长。
特朗普和梅农请求了多少国民警卫队?
-特朗普和梅农请求了10000名国民警卫队队员。
为什么特朗普请求国民警卫队的信息没有包含在特别委员会的报告中?
-这部分信息被认为可能是对特朗普有利的证据,而特别委员会似乎有意排除与他们预设叙述相矛盾的信息。
卡西迪·赫钦森的证词中有哪些争议?
-卡西迪·赫钦森声称特朗普试图抢夺总统专车的方向盘,但这一说法被司机的证词所反驳,而司机的证词并未被特别委员会采纳。
南希·佩洛西如何影响特别委员会的组成?
-南希·佩洛西控制了哪些共和党人可以加入特别委员会,导致只有立场已经确定的共和党人被选入委员会。
特朗普的竞选活动是否受到了法律诉讼的影响?
-尽管特朗普面临多起法律诉讼,但他仍在继续筹款和竞选活动,这表明他没有受到诉讼的显著影响。
特朗普在纽约面临的案件是什么?
-特朗普在纽约面临的案件涉及声称其团队伪造商业记录,与向成人电影女演员斯托米·丹尼尔斯支付的封口费有关。
曼哈顿地区检察官建议的延迟会对特朗普的竞选活动产生什么影响?
-尽管曼哈顿地区检察官建议延迟审理特朗普的封口费案件,但这预计不会影响特朗普作为假定的候选人的竞选义务。
特朗普面临的91项重罪指控涉及哪些司法管辖区?
-特朗普面临的91项重罪指控涉及四个不同的司法管辖区,但他的支持者认为这些指控是出于政治动机。
特朗普被指控煽动叛乱的证据是否完整?
-根据众议院共和党人的报告,特朗普被指控煽动叛乱的证据并不完整,因为一些可能对他有利的证据被排除在外。
Outlines
📜 关于1月6日事件的新报告
该段落讨论了关于前总统唐纳德·特朗普在华盛顿特区面临的与1月6日国会大厦袭击有关的指控。众议院共和党人的新报告提出了与众议院特别委员会发现的情况不同的观点。美国原则项目主席特里·席林加入了讨论,他解释了这份报告的内容以及其重要性。报告中指出,特朗普的副幕僚长安东尼·奥拉多和马克·门诺曾请求在1月6日部署1万名国民警卫队,但这一证据被特别委员会忽略。此外,还讨论了有关特朗普试图在1月6日控制车辆前往国会大厦的指控,以及这些指控与证人证词之间的矛盾。席林认为,这个特别委员会有预设的叙述,排除了与他们的结论相矛盾的证据,这不利于建立共识,而是一种宣传行为。
🚨 拒绝作证与政治偏见
这段落涉及了一些人拒绝遵守传票的情况,包括彼得·纳瓦罗和史蒂夫·班农。纳瓦罗因认为委员会的政治偏见而拒绝作证,现已被送往监狱。讨论了历史上罕见的委员会构成,没有包括少数派代表的情况,以及这种委员会对长期影响的可能后果。席林预测,这些事件可能导致特朗普的再次当选,因为民主党人试图以2016年的方式抹黑特朗普,但美国人民能够看穿这些行为。
🎙️ 采访结束与感谢
节目最后,主持人对特里·席林表示感谢,并结束了采访。背景音乐响起,标志着这一部分的结束。
Mindmap
Keywords
💡唐纳德·特朗普
💡1月6日委员会
💡安东尼·奥拉多
💡国民警卫队
💡证据排除
💡卡西迪·赫钦森
💡特别检察官
💡政治偏见
💡南希·佩洛西
💡选举
💡重罪指控
Highlights
前总统唐纳德·特朗普正面临与1月6日国会大厦袭击有关的指控。
众议院共和党人的一份新报告与众议院1月6日特别委员会的调查结果描绘了不同的情景。
美国原则项目主席特里·施林加入了讨论,提供了报告的分析。
报告显示,特朗普的副幕僚长安东尼·奥拉多·瓦加和马克·门诺曾请求1月6日部署1万名国民警卫队。
有关国民警卫队的请求被1月6日委员会排除在外,这是对特朗普有利的证据。
报告指出,1月6日委员会有预设的叙述,排除了与他们的调查结果相矛盾的证据。
巴里·劳德的办公室报告指出,有多份证据被压制、销毁或排除在1月6日委员会的报告之外。
媒体曾报道特朗普从未请求国民警卫队,但事实上这是错误的。
关于特朗普试图在1月6日抢夺方向盘的证词,被众议院共和党的报告证明与事实不符。
司机的证词与卡西迪·赫钦森的指控相矛盾,但赫钦森的证词被包含在报告中。
这个委员会被批评为有预设的叙述,排除了支持特朗普的证据。
南希·佩洛西控制了哪些共和党人可以加入委员会,导致缺乏真正的两党合作。
委员会的组成在美国历史上是非常罕见的,没有包括少数派代表。
由于委员会的政治偏见,一些人拒绝遵守传票,包括彼得·纳瓦罗和史蒂夫·班农。
特朗普面临的91项重罪指控分布在四个不同的司法管辖区。
纽约地方检察官建议将封口费案件推迟30天,该案件指控特朗普团队伪造商业记录。
特朗普的法律团队抱怨证据在最后一刻被扣留。
特朗普在应对法律挑战的同时,还在进行筹款和竞选活动。
特朗普被指控试图通过声称他煽动叛乱来从选票上除名。
最高法院阻止了民主党试图将特朗普从选票上除名的行为。
特朗普的法律挑战和竞选活动将继续进行,不受封口费案件延迟的影响。
Transcripts
[Music]
former president Donald Trump is facing
charges here in Washington DC related to
the January 6th attack on the capital
but a new report from House Republicans
paints a different picture of that day
compared to the findings of the house
January 6 select committee joining us
now is Terry Schilling president of the
American principles project welcome
Terry thanks so much for having me Terry
can you help us break down that report a
little bit what's in it and why is this
important well the big thing that's
coming out here is uh it it is
apparently clear that Donald Trump's
Deputy Chief of Staff uh Anthony orado
uh W gave witness and testimony that
Donald Trump and Mark mennow had
requested uh 10,000 National Guard
troops uh for January 6 they were
concerned about a clash between the prot
Trump uh protesters and the anti-trump
protesters and they were they were
wanting more security all of that was
withheld from the January 6 committee
UHC and it was basically exculpatory
evidence uh which it really paints a
picture that this whole thing this whole
January 6 committee had a predetermined
narrative that they wanted to uphold and
they got rid of anything uh that uh
contrast or contradicted what they were
trying to find here yeah there were
report from uh Barry lauder's office
points out that there are multiple
pieces of evidence that were either
suppressed or destroyed or excluded from
the January 6 select committee's report
and I think that 10,000 National Guard
story is important because about a month
ago when we had all of these media
stories going around they were claiming
that Trump never requested the National
Guard and that that was a fake narrative
and it turns out that that wasn't true
now another important allegation here is
that one of the January 6 committee star
Witnesses Cassidy Hutchinson testified
in front of this big media circus about
how Trump had tried to grab the wheel of
the Beast to redirect his Secret Service
agents to the capital on that day what
did the louder milk report from House
Republicans find out about her
claims well Amber had found that the
driver uh that she implicated in that
story had actually given witness
testimony that uh to the contrary that
Donald Trump never did any of that he
directly contradicted her claims and
that was withheld but Cassie
Hutchinson's testimony was included in
the report Amber I think that the real
thing that bothers me about this is that
this was a sham committee right it was
it had a predetermined uh narrative from
the beginning they got rid of anyone
that was actually supportive of Donald
Trump that's not how how you operate if
you want to build a consensus if you
want to build a consensus which is
something you need in order to try and
convict and prove to the American people
that the former president is guilty of
insurrection uh then you need consensus
this is a bare minimum and instead what
we got was a propaganda committee uh
that was pushing lies and withholding
evidence that contradicted their
predetermined narrative so this is this
is a a blight on on America it's a BL on
Congress and and everything that's going
on here I mean the driver also commented
you know to keep it 100 here the driver
also commented that the former president
clearly wanted to go to the capital um
reports like this and the findings do
you think they will have any effect on
special Council Jack Smith's case
against the former president since there
are as you you noted a few discrepancies
here I think one of the most strong ones
um is probably the Cassidy Hutchinson
extra story tale that literally went
around through you know a game of
telephone one two three she was a third
person who heard it who really knows
where the facts lie there um do you
think that any of this is going to
affect the special council's
case uh it's hard to say but it
definitely doesn't help the special
council's case this only hurts it and it
show it's going to make uh the jury and
and the people making the decision about
uh where to come down with Trump on this
it's going to make them a lot more
skeptical the claims against him you if
you want to do this right if you really
want to get president Trump um on this
stuff you have to go above and beyond to
be accurate this is a former president
United States who's being accused of
very serious crimes and essentially
treason um and it turns out that the mor
treeson sacks are the people that are
putting together the Sham committee and
trying to falsely convict a a former
sitting president I think it's
interesting too that the committee
apparently waited until months after
Cassidy Hutchinson gave that public
testimony to even interview any of the
potentially corroborating Witnesses
including the driver there were two
other apparently firsthand Witnesses who
they didn't even bother to talk to in
regards to that claim um you talked
about this as a sham committee and I
think it's important for viewers to
understand that the reason why you
saying that is because Nancy Pelosi of
course had control over which
Republicans were allowed to sit on the
committee Republicans were not allowed
to pick their own people to be on there
so the only Republicans who were on it
were Liz Cheney and Adam kininger who
had already made their minds up that
Trump had committed Insurrection or
engaged in an Insurrection now we see
that there are multiple people who
refuse to comply with subpoenas
including Peter Navaro and Steve Bannon
Peter Navaro is now reporting to prison
because he said he was not going to
testify in front of the committee
because of the fact that the makeup was
so politically
biased no that that's exactly right and
you know there's a few interesting
things here which is first and foremost
this is incredibly rare I don't think
this has actually been done in American
history where uh there are no uh
minority Representatives or from the
opposition included on the committee
there's typically when they have these
types of committees to really dig deep
they produce a Minority Report so they
have a majority report that the majority
of the committee agrees to and it's
usually partisan and then they release a
Minority Report well this this this
isn't able to happen now and Republicans
have to go outside of the system outside
of the community to produce their own
findings um but the the the real
important reason why this is important
is because people are going to prison
people are going to prison over a sham
committee that was never open and and
it's also interesting that Nancy Pelosi
is all of a sudden allied with the
chenies who would have predicted
that what do you think will this that
the effect will be long term um
obviously this is a highly U politicized
event all of us saw what happened on
January 6 we've we've heard from the
officers themselves we've heard from
those who were barricaded within their
within their Senate offices and other
Chambers um what do you think is going
to be the aftermath you know we're still
having this conversation now we're years
out of January 6 obviously in the midst
of an election cycle uh what is your
take well unfortunately for Democrats
and unfortunately for America I think
it's going to end up leading to the
reelection of Donald Trump right I think
that the real problem here is that
Democrats are following the same
hysterical Playbook that they tried to
follow in 2016 where they're trying to
cast Donald Trump as this Nazi ass
figure this hitlerian uh American figure
and the American people see through it
the American people are not stupid they
understand BS and they can sort through
it now you can fool some of the people
some of the time but you can't fool all
the people all the time and so I think
that you know this next election really
is going to determine the future and
what this you know what happens from
here I think Donald Trump will get
reelected because of all of the
fraudulent claims that are being made
against him but if he isn't if he isn't
reelected then I'm even more worried
because you're going to see a lot more
of these sham committees and a lot more
innocent people uh being thrown into
jail
uh for purely partisan uh reasons
through their weaponized federal
government Trump has 91 felony charges
across four different jurisdictions um
he is in court case after court case
meanwhile trying to fund raise and
campaign at the same time turning to
another one of those legal battles let's
talk about New York for a bit um The
Manhattan DA has now suggested a 30-day
delay to the hush money payments case
against the former president remember
that was the case that alleged Trump's
team falsify business records connected
to hush money payment made to adult film
actress stormmy Daniels that trial is
scheduled to get underway later this
month on March 25th but the da suggested
he delay after the former president
legal team complained that evidence had
been withheld until the last minute
Terry will this change affect the former
president's campaign obligations as the
presumptive
nominee no I don't think so I think he's
going to carry on and I think that's
exactly the right thing I think listen
if Donald Trump was not a threat to the
swamp if he wasn't disruptive to the
system they wouldn't be making up all
these allegations I I think you know
it's important to note that allegations
are one thing and and and these are all
Democrats right when you when you start
to get Republicans pressing charges
against him and and trying to take him
to court and convict him well then we'll
have something else but right now this
is just and I think the American people
are seeing through this this is what
happens when you try to disrupt the
swamp there's a very powerful system in
place all the billionaires all the major
corporations Hollywood Academia
everyone's lined up on the Progressive
side of this um and you have to ask
yourself like what is going on here that
the billionaires in the rich class are
are now teaming up with Democrats
there's something arai here and and it
stinks well one quick final question for
you Terry we're almost out of time but
going back to this January 6 question um
I think it's also important to point out
that this exculpatory evidence is really
key to the fact that Donald Trump was
just Democrats just tried to remove him
from ballots in places like col in Maine
thankfully the Supreme Court said they
couldn't do that but they tried to
remove him from these ballots by
claiming that he had incited this
Insurrection it turns out now they
didn't even have all the evidence
available to make a proper determination
there thank goodness that the Supreme
Court came down on the right side of
this right I mean we haven't seen
Democrats try to kick a republican off
of the ballot for president since the
1860s right I think this really speaks
to how divided and fractured and
polarized America is right now um but
thank goodness that the Supreme Court
was a voice of calm and reason in this
situation otherwise we'd have quite the
civil unrest on our hands right now
Terry Schilling from American principal
project thanks again for joining
Rising thanks so much for having me
[Music]
guys
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)
Democrat UTTERLY DEVESTATES Marjorie Taylor Greene w/ ONE SINGLE SENTENCE!!!
ABC World News Tonight with David Muir Full Broadcast - May 7, 2024
Breaking Down Trump’s Options to Pay $454M Civil-Fraud Penalty | WSJ
Trump Claims He Has '$500 Million' Cash For His Bond #TYT
IT'S OVER: Trump Properties Can Be SEIZED As Court Rejects Bond | The Kyle Kulinski Show
トランプ氏「麻生氏は素晴らしい人」「偉大なシンゾーを通して知り合ったんだ」麻生太郎副総裁と会談|TBS NEWS DIG