BREAKING🔥 Fani Willis DISQUALIFICATION Saga - Whistleblower Complaint🚨 FANI's Entire Teams Bad News
Summary
TLDRThe transcript revolves around the controversy and legal disputes involving Fulton County District Attorney, Fanny Willis. The case includes allegations of misuse of federal funds, a potential conflict of interest due to a personal relationship with a lead prosecutor, and a looming deadline from the House Republicans to produce documents related to her office's spending. The situation is further complicated by a whistleblower's complaint and the defiance of a congressional subpoena, leading to threats of contempt of Congress. The transcript highlights the intense legal and political maneuvering, as well as the potential implications for the ongoing election subversion case against former President Donald Trump.
Takeaways
- 🚨 The Fulton County district attorney's office is under scrutiny for the alleged misuse of federal funds, with accusations of using the funds for unrelated expenses.
- 🎙️ Audio evidence has surfaced that suggests a whistleblower warned DA Fanny Willis about improper use of federal grants, which were supposed to be for specific purposes like youth violence and gang prevention programs.
- 🤝 DA Fanny Willis is facing a looming deadline from House Republicans to produce documents related to her office's spending, or else she may be held in contempt of Congress.
- 🔎 The investigation into the Fulton County DA's office involves examining whether there was any misuse of state funds and abuse of power for personal gain.
- 🛫 The controversy includes the firing of a staffer who raised concerns about the misuse of federal funds, which led to a deeper investigation into the district attorney's actions.
- 💼 Documents and invoices related to the case show line items for meetings with the White House, raising questions about the nature and purpose of these interactions.
- 🏛️ The case against Donald Trump and others is being challenged on the grounds that it violates First Amendment rights, with Trump's lawyers arguing that the prosecution seeks to criminalize political speech.
- 🏃♀️ DA Fanny Willis has been defiant in her response to the subpoena, stating that her office is cooperating but also asserting that the efforts to delay her election subversion case are futile.
- 💔 The relationship between DA Fanny Willis and Nathan Wade, a lead prosecutor, has come under scrutiny, with allegations of an affair and questions about the appropriateness of his appointment and expenses.
- 📈 The situation has led to a heated public debate about the integrity of the legal process, the use of public funds, and the potential political motivations behind the case.
Q & A
What allegations are facing Fani Willis, the Fulton County District Attorney?
-Fani Willis is facing allegations of misusing federal funds, specifically a whistleblower claimed that Willis's office planned to use part of a federal grant for unrelated expenses. Additionally, there are concerns about her handling of an election interference prosecution case.
What triggered the congressional inquiry into Willis's use of federal funds?
-The inquiry was triggered by whistleblower complaints alleging that Fani Willis misused federal funds, prompting House Republicans to investigate the appropriateness of her office's spending.
What is the main contention in the case against Fani Willis related to her office's spending?
-The main contention is whether Willis improperly used federal grant money, which was earmarked for specific purposes, for other unrelated expenses, possibly including political pursuits.
What consequences is Fani Willis facing due to the allegations against her?
-Willis faces potential disqualification from the 2020 Georgia election case, a looming deadline to produce documents to Congress, and possible contempt of Congress if she fails to comply.
How has Fani Willis responded to the allegations and congressional demands?
-Willis has denied the allegations, asserting that her office has not misused federal funds, and stated that her office is cooperating with the congressional investigation.
What was the nature of the audio evidence mentioned in relation to Willis's case?
-The audio evidence reportedly shows a whistleblower warning Willis about misuse of federal funds by a top aide, which later led to the whistleblower's firing.
What role does the Fulton County Commission play in the controversy surrounding Willis?
-The Fulton County Commission is relevant for approving budgets and funding for the DA’s office. There is scrutiny over whether Willis sought or received proper approval for the expenditure of funds, especially for hiring additional personnel like special prosecutors.
What specific documents are being sought from Willis by congressional investigators?
-Investigators are seeking documents that detail Willis’s office's spending of federal funds, particularly how the funds were allocated and whether they were used for intended purposes.
What implications does the investigation have on Willis’s prosecution of the election interference case?
-The investigation could impact Willis's ability to continue leading the election interference case, especially if she is found to have misused funds or if her actions are deemed politically motivated.
What is the significance of the deadline set by House Republicans for Willis?
-The deadline signifies the urgency and seriousness of the congressional inquiry. Failure to meet the deadline could lead to further actions against Willis, such as contempt of Congress proceedings.
Outlines
📜 Controversy in the Bonnie Willis Disqualification Case
The paragraph discusses the ongoing controversy surrounding the potential disqualification of Bonnie Willis, with new audio evidence suggesting a whistleblower warned her about misuse of federal funds by a top aid. The situation is further complicated by the firing of a staffer who raised concerns about these funds. The Fulton County district attorney's actions are under scrutiny, with House Republicans threatening contempt of Congress if documents related to the spending of federal funds are not produced. The case raises questions about the appropriate use of state and federal funds, the potential misuse of power, and the relationship between Willis's office and the White House.
🏛️ Oversight of Fulton County DA's Federal Grant Usage
This paragraph delves into the specifics of Fulton County DA's office's use of federal grants, highlighting the lack of oversight and the concerns raised by a former employee. The discussion focuses on the county's position on the budgetary authority and the district attorney's argument that she is a constitutional officer, not bound by county ordinances or state statutes. The narrative also touches on the broader implications of the case, including potential political motivations and the need for transparency in the use of public funds.
🔎 Investigation into Political Motives and Federal Fund Misuse
The focus of this paragraph is on the investigation into the possible misuse of federal funds by the Fulton County DA's office, with an emphasis on the political dimensions of the case. It discusses the relationship between the DA's office and the White House, the potential for political persecution, and the specific allegations of using federal funds for personal and political purposes. The paragraph also highlights the tension between the DA's office and Congressman Jim Jordan, who is seeking further information and documents to understand the extent of the alleged misuse.
⚖️ Legal Proceedings and the DA's Credibility
This paragraph covers the legal proceedings against the Fulton County DA, including the challenges to her handling of the election subversion case and the allegations of misuse of federal funds. The narrative explores the DA's defiance in the face of congressional scrutiny, her claims of cooperation, and the potential impact of these issues on the ongoing trial. The paragraph also touches on the broader implications for democracy and the rule of law, as well as the personal and professional credibility of the DA.
💼 Examination of Personal and Professional Relationships
The paragraph delves into the personal and professional relationships of the Fulton County DA, particularly her relationship with Nathan Wade, who was hired despite his questionable credentials. The discussion includes allegations of personal trips funded by taxpayer dollars, the implications of these expenditures on the case against former President Trump, and the potential conflicts of interest arising from the DA's personal involvement with her lead prosecutor. The narrative raises questions about the integrity of the legal process and the appropriate use of public funds.
🎭 DA's Conduct and the Impact on the Election Interference Case
This paragraph examines the conduct of the Fulton County DA in the context of the election interference case, highlighting her combative demeanor in court and the potential implications for the case. The discussion includes her interactions with the judge, her attempts to refute allegations, and the overall impact of her behavior on the perception of the legal proceedings. The narrative also touches on the broader implications for the defendants in the case, the potential for the case to be thrown out, and the DA's credibility in light of the ongoing investigation.
🤝 The Relationship Between the DA and Nathan Wade
The paragraph focuses on the relationship between the Fulton County DA and Nathan Wade, exploring the nature of their interactions and the financial arrangements between them. The discussion includes allegations of cash payments, the lack of documentation to support these claims, and the implications of these arrangements for the integrity of the legal process. The narrative also raises questions about the professional standards of Wade's law firm and the appropriateness of his involvement in the case against former President Trump.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Fulton County
💡Disqualification
💡Whistleblower
💡Federal Funds
💡Misuse of Funds
💡Contempt of Congress
💡Election Interference
💡Trump
💡Nathan Wade
💡Conflict of Interest
Highlights
New audio evidence suggests a whistleblower warned Georgia DA Fonnie Willis about misuse of federal funds.
The whistleblower was fired shortly after raising concerns about the top aid's activities.
Willis initially agreed to investigate the claims but later the accuser was dismissed.
House Republicans threaten to hold Willis in contempt if she doesn't produce documents related to her office's spending.
Lawyers attempting to remove Willis from the 2020 Georgia election case testified before the state senate committee.
Willis's office argues that as a constitutional officer, she doesn't need county approval for her budget.
The county maintains that Willis requested additional funding for specific purposes, which she later diverted.
Willis is facing a deadline to prove her innocence in the misuse of federal funds investigation.
The dispute between Fulton County and Willis involves whether she used federal grants for unauthorized expenses.
Jim Jordan, a powerful Congressman and Trump supporter, is involved in the dispute with Willis.
Jordan's committee is seeking to understand the relationship between Willis's office and the White House.
Willis claims she is cooperating with Jordan's committee but accuses them of trying to slow down her election subversion case.
The Georgia case against Trump has been delayed for two months due to challenges to Willis's qualifications.
Trump's lawyers argue that the case seeks to criminalize political speech, violating the First Amendment.
Willis defends her position, stating that nothing will derail her efforts to bring the election interference prosecution to trial.
The case raises questions about the appropriate use of federal funds and oversight in political cases.
Willis's personal relationship with a lead prosecutor on the Trump case complicates the situation and credibility of the case.
The controversy involves allegations of personal misuse of funds and potential political motivations.
The future of the election interference case against Trump and others hangs in the balance due to the controversy surrounding Willis.
Transcripts
well tonight after more than two months
of controversy a decision may be on the
horizon in the Bonnie Willis
disqualification case you fire bombshell
new audio appears to show a
whistleblower privately warned in battle
Georgia da fonnie Willis that her top
Aid was abusing federal funds now we are
following the latest in the fton County
district attorney disqualification Saga
now in the audio Willis appears to agree
with this whistleblower and say that
she'd look into it yet a little less
than two later the staffer who raised
the concerns was fired let's take a
listen to that audio he told everybody
in front of Crystal Deonte everybody
we're going to get MacBooks we're going
to do we're going to get swag we're
going to use it for travel I said you
cannot do that it's a very very specific
Grant took me off I question Junior da
there's kids in there from out of the
the um the county all this took me off
Junior da I did not want to do it he
made it look as if I wasn't doing what I
needed to do because I questioned him
because I knew for a fact Mr cuy
respectfully did not know what he was
doing period so I respect that as your
assessment um it was clear to me that
you and Mr cuffy were not getting along
and I'm not saying that your assessment
is wrong I want you to really listen to
the words I'm saying cuy and this is my
personal opinion to one woman to another
is dangerous to your Administration Fon
County DA fonny Willis is facing a
looming deadline House Republicans in
Washington are threaten to hold her in
contempt of congress if she does not
produce documents relating to her
office's spending of federal funds well
this stems from a whistleblower
complaint alleging fonnie Willis misused
federal funds the lawyer at the center
of the attempt to remove Fon County DA
fonny Willis from the 2020 Georgia
election case testified before the state
senate committee she talked about what
exactly she says she found that she
believes should disqualify Willis well
Chris that's exactly what it does so to
be very clear what's happening here at
the State House is different from what
is happening a couple of locks away at
the Fulton County Courthouse in that
situation the judge will decide whether
or not fny Willis will stay on the case
now here at the State House what
lawmakers are doing is they are looking
into whether or not there was any misuse
of State funds and the misuse of power
for personal game those are the two
issues they're looking at here so you've
gone back and reviewed all of the Fulton
County commission's minutes in records
to see what requests were made and if
there was a resolution granting the
additional funding yes oh yes was there
ever a request for additional funding
for a special prosecutor to pursue these
election cases no there wasn't and I
knew that before um we got the District
Attorney's response but subsequently we
got a response from the district
attorney's office that said we didn't do
it we don't have to do it I'm a
constitutional officer um so their
argument was we don't have to comply
with those statutes or those rules
because she's saying um she's a
constitutional officer so she doesn't
have to get County approval she can
spend her budget however she wants then
why would she have gotten County
approval for the uh the other 55
attorneys so what I've surmised is that
was because those were staff members and
so she she C she went and asked for
additional budgetary money she needed a
higher budget so for those 55 people she
went and asked for more money because
she didn't have enough money and once
she was awarded that it's her position
now that she can spend that money
however she wants doesn't have to use
for 55 new staff she can use it for
special attorney general yes not
attorney
general essentially that that that is
their argument in their reply briefs
that they filed um in court that they
have her an authority they don't have to
comply with the county ordinances don't
have to comply with the statute um so
they don't have to comply with our state
statute that they have once they're
awarded the budget they can use that
budget however I mean how their how
their motion and I and I'm happy to send
the motion um it's public record but how
their motion argued it was if they get
$5 million they can pay that to one
person if they want um as long as the
you know because the voter's authorized
her to do that so the county their
position is the county authorizes a
budget and she can pretty much has
inherent authority to do it however even
though she specifically asked for the
money to prosecute backlogged homicide
cases in Atlanta yes okay um what's your
opinion on that you think the statute or
County procedures permit that no I do
not um and there's and I cited several
different County um County ordinances so
when I read the statute when I read 15-1
1820 and it makes sense you know it
makes sense intuitively as lawyers when
we Bill someone is reviewing our bills I
mean that that that's just you know
that's the process if you're in private
practice you know your client authorizes
your bills if you're in if you're doing
Public Defense which I've done Public
Defense I've done appointed work um you
know the the governing agency approves
my bills and they will cut them they
will regularly cut them um if they're
too high and so there's always some type
of budgetary authority that's that's
reviewing everything um so I thought it
was very strange that in this case there
isn't one um and that there's really no
oversight because it is public money so
I know that I know that it's an elected
official but it's still public money um
and I don't live in Fon County so it
would probably aggravate me more if I
did so we have the code section up that
you're referencing for prosecuting
attorneys getting additional personel
that's what Mr Wade would qualify as
correct yes so under B um that is the
that's the section that authorizes the
appointment of special counsel and it
says the manner and amount of
compensation to be paid is fixed by
either local act or by the district
attorney with the approval of the county
um and so that's where that that's our
argument that that this was not
appropriate expenditure because it did
not have County approval so our state
law requires if a DA is going to go seek
outside Council I'm going to call them
that must be approved by the County
Commission yes without a doubt good
evening carress woman and so what
provoked this request for documents to
begin with what made you think that her
office was using Federal front funds
inappropriately because we have evidence
that she has been receiving federal
funds and obviously we have oversight as
to how they're being spent being the
judici Judiciary Committee and Congress
and so it is our right determine whether
she is spending those funds
appropriately we have the same issue
with brag in New York they're using
federal funds to to engage in political
persecution and to go after political
enemies we also need to find out to what
extent she has uh corresponded with
worked with coordinated with the White
House in her efforts to to pursue this
uh this litigation against Donald Trump
and other citizens wait when you when
you send money to a DA's office now you
get sent around the country from the
Department of Justice I understand the
oversight is it just you know here's 12
million or here's 12 million spend it on
fixing the jails adding more assistant
Das I mean are you specific so I mean
because or or do you just sort of send a
check you don't you don't just send a
check they are supposed to use that
money for specific purposes and that's
one of the reasons why we have the
oversight it's just not just that they
get a blank check to do whatever they
want to do and again when we're talking
about political persecution which I
think it's very obvious in light of what
has happened over the last couple of
weeks and the the mini trial that we
that we watched play out in the court
down there addressing her relationship
her inappropriate relationship with one
of her underlings and whether that has
color colored this litigation and her
effort to prosecute Donald Trump so
again I think that we have every right
to determine whether our money is being
used inappropriately and whether she is
the conduit by which the White House is
attempting to hamstring uh President
Biden's primary political opponent are
there some specific documents you've
requested that she has not provided to
date I know that she says it's sort of a
rolling process and um I don't know if
she's dragging her feet or not but
nonetheless are there some specific
documents that you want that you think
that she's sitting on deliberately well
some of the documents that I would like
to see relate to the relationship and
the coordination and the interaction
with the White House when her uh former
Paramore uh was billing the county he
has line items in there for meeting with
white with the White House in Washington
DC for eight hours at a time I think it
would be entirely appropriate for us to
have some understanding of what what
what took place it during those meetings
and again we need to get back to the
fact or to the question of whether Joe
Biden and the White House are
coordinating in these efforts to
prosecute Donald Trump Donald Trump is
clearly not only the front runner he is
the candidate for the Republican Party
he is beating Joe Biden in all of the
polls there's one particular entry that
I have a high interest in and I I can't
figure this one out I know about the
meetings at the White House and and I
got that you have the interest in but
there's one entry in his invoices where
he said he met I think with White House
councel in Athens Georgia and for the
life of me I can't figure out I mean I
get you know going to the White House
and maybe there's some negotiation about
documents or whatever and I I I await
the answer to that but why why do you
think that what's with this Athens
Georgia meeting with the White House
Council you don't expect that one so
think that that's also very significant
we need to find out that but we also
have learned that there is an assistant
district attorney in her office who is
being paid 40 some thousand 50 some
thousand a year yet has a side business
that is he is a a a political operative
a Democrat political operative where
he's actually red in hundreds of
thousands of dollars if not more in
furthering the Democrat agenda I think
we're entitled to find out more
information about that relationship and
why he's in the office and as as you say
there were meetings with white house
councel I think we have the right to
understand what took place during those
meetings We are following a dispute
right now between Fulton County Georgia
essentially Atlanta the da here funny
Willis and her dispute with a powerful
Congressman house should diser chairman
Jim Jordan of Ohio an ardan Trump
supporter recently threatened to hold
Willis in contempt of congress for not
providing information about how the DA's
office used a Federal grant but in a def
defiant response Willis said she is
cooperating with Jordan's committee and
suggested what Jordan really wants is to
slow down her election subversion case
against Trump and others she wrote in
part nothing that you do will derail the
efforts of my staff and I bring the
election interference prosecution to
trial the Georgia case delayed for two
months by a challenge to Da fonny Willis
finally moves forward today in Atlanta
Judge Scott McAfee will hear arguments
that the charges violate Trump's Free
Speech rights under the First Amendment
Trump's lawyers say the case seeks to
criminalize political speech da Fon
Willis firing back at Republicans
seeking info about her use of federal
funds saying quote nothing you do will
derail the efforts of my staff and I to
bring election interference prosecution
to trial so that a jury of fton County
Citizens can determine the guilt or
innocence of the defendants tensions
escalating on Capitol Hill as
Congressman Jim Jordan calls on fonnie
Willis to appear before lawmakers
The embattled Fulton County district
attorney facing an ultimatum show up or
face contempt of congress if she doesn't
comply with the Congressional subpoena
Congress is trying to find out if and
how her office misused federal funds so
F Willis's office is saying that she's
innocent their office did nothing wrong
but Congressman Jim Jordan is saying
they haven't sent over enough to prove
that they're looking for yet another
slice of the pie so in a letter from we
obtains from Jim Jordan to Fanny will
his office it reads in part quote your
office unlawfully planed to use part of
a
$488,000 Federal grant earmarked for the
creation of a center of Youth
Empowerment and gang prevention to cover
frivolous unrelated expenses we know the
allegations here Center on a former
employee who said the district attorney
fired her soon after she raised concerns
about how one of their employees hoped
to use those Federal grant money for
things outside
of the scope of that Federal grant the
youth violence and gang prevention
program the congressman Jim Jordan he's
emphasizing the seriousness of the
matter he's saying that failure to
adhere to The subpoena would result in
severe
consequences as part of that letter he
says quote the committee expects that
you will produce all responsive
Documents To The subpoena and the
categories prioritized by the committee
if you fail to do so the committee will
consider taking further action such as
the invocation of contempt of congress
proceedings and that's what's really new
in this story here so we've reached out
to Willis's office in response for this
subpoena we have not heard back from her
yet we'll update you when we do but when
this subpoena was initially sent out
back in February February 2nd she sent
us this this statement she says in part
quote these false allegations are
included in baseless litigation filed by
a holdover employee from the previous
administration who was terminated for
cause the courts have ruled they found
no merit in these claims we expect the
same result in any pending litigation
Mary right now it's still unclear
whether or not these federal funds in
question were used or misused improperly
or not let's talk about this Georgia
case and we know this Fanny Willis looks
unbelievably compromised it looks like
she's admitted her relationships with
Nathan Wade who whose credentials are
weak to be a lead prosecutor on a former
president United States Ates they're
going to be questioning today lot of his
expenses that he was paid and were they
used to go on vacation together look at
some of these stuff you probably can't
see it there $800 for nappy Valley Nappa
Valley Hotel 3,000 for a Royal Caribbean
vacation close to that no Norwegian crws
on and on and on one flowers all these
bills are they related to the money he's
getting because of the job she gave them
and what does it mean for the case yeah
she used taxpayer dollars to to help
Nathan Wade who spent it in all kinds of
ways but he also used that money to go
after president Trump for goodness sake
so yeah that I think she's compromised
and back up a second she charged
president Trump and 18 other people and
was looking to charge three United
States senators she put this out
including the top Republican on the
Senate Judiciary Committee and now we
find out we're talking to this
individual now we find out there's a
whistleblower in the fton County DA's
office who says that fonny Willis also
misspent federal funds that's why we've
subpoena Miss Willis for information
related to that and other issues we want
to know what's going on here but she
sure looks like she's been compromising
this entire ridiculous effort that she
undertook several months ago I just hope
they blow up the case because she has no
credibility and she led the charge and
it seems to be all about politics fton
County district attorney fonnie Willis
is facing a new deadline in the ongoing
investigation into her office's use of
federal funds the federal government has
a right to ensure that federal dollars
aren't being misspent or misappropriated
and that's either for personal use or
even divert it into another program US
House Judiciary chair representative Jim
Jordan issued this letter Thursday
saying Willis's compliance with a
previous subpoena was deficient to
produce documents proving her office did
not mishandle Federal money for example
the money was given to prosecute uh drug
crimes that it's not being used to
prosecute uh even homicides for example
that' be a misuse of the federal funding
Willis's office was originally
subpoenaed for the documents in February
after House Republicans began
investigating if Willis used federal
funds during her investigation into
former president Donald Trump
practically
disruptive um because you know if if he
follows through on the threat and if
there is a contempt there's going to be
a hearing the allegations were made by a
former employee in Willis's office in
the past Willis has called the
allegations false and said quote the
courts have ruled found no merit to
these claims lawyers get involved um po
potentially even the Department of
Justice gets involved and so it would be
a distraction and it could be disruptive
ultimately in the letter sent to
district attorney Willis representative
Jordan says the allegations are
concerning and the committee has an
obligation to investigate these claims
if she was asked the question you know
did you keep cash and trying to assess
the real issue here is whether or not
there are misconduct allegations that
can lead to her being disqualified those
misconduct allegations include number
one did she have an affair with a guy
before she hired him and what has come
out is that she hired him in November of
2022 and the affair started in early
2023 so I guess a few weeks after they
took a look at each other they decided
they were going to have sex together but
the truth is that it's more than that
was she partaking of trips that
literally she was indirectly paying for
and when it got to the point where she
had to prove that she was in fact
reimbursing uh Mr Wade for these trips
she couldn't have any proof she didn't
have any she said she want to believe
with cash I mean who to B with cash and
then finally um she said that she never
received a gift with of aggregate of
over $100 what she's got to worry about
is not so much her reputation because
she's outraged she's got to worry about
the reputation of her office that DA's
office has a stink on it now did she
hire someone
that she brought in because she wanted
to have a relationship with him did she
spend and by the way how do you go on
five trips as a DA in six months I mean
from Biz to the Bahamas to Aruba to uh
Miami at the Napa Valley I mean who's
running the DA's office nobody has time
to do this she was out of control but
the in the in the end I think she
started understanding that it wasn't her
show she had to calm herself so went on
for hours and this is one key part if if
control room can you get intro number
four ready and I'll ask Jesse about this
because there's been a lot of qu if you
turned in late tuned in late there was
all these questions about money and cash
and how much she paid and she says she
paid her fair share Etc but this was a
moment today where you thought oh there
could be trouble watch I've given them
cash only a few times in life probably
four okay probably the most money I've
ever handed him is $2,500 you have no
proof of reimbursement for any of these
things because it was all cash right the
testimony of one witness is enough to
prove a fact the only money you've ever
given him outside of a contract is cash
I didn't give him money in a contract so
that was cute but I didn't give him
money out in a contract his money back I
don't need anybody to foot my bills the
only man who's ever foot my bills
completely is my daddy you've been
watching all day you love it I don't
even know where to start Dana I'm so
engaged in this courtroom drama so many
things I want to say at once I just I
don't know if we're going to have enough
time we are covering this for the whole
hour is that correct I I I don't know if
I we please cover this for the whole
hour just start first of all it must be
exhausting to prosecute Trump because
This Woman's taken seven vacations
Year my favorite part was when she was
asked if she's ever been to any other
continents with Wade and she said well
I've been to bise is what is
bise B is North America Central
America this woman is Prosecuting the
former president of the United States
she flies to a country and doesn't know
what continent it's on that's just
number
one these are not smart or professional
people these are Petty people that all
of a sudden everyone's looking at and
their dirty laundry is totally exposed
her friend Dana for 30 years sorority
sisters she moved into this woman's
condo she hired her to work in her
office her friend
testified that she saw her kissing and
cuddling and holding hands just right
there alone direct witness
testimony should sink her because you're
not allowed to hire the person you're
having sex with and then not disclose it
and then pay him a bunch of money and
then he takes you on vacation and you
claim you gave him cash she says she's
keeping lots of cash in her house would
the top law enforcement official in
Fulton County announced to the entire
world hey everybody in Atlanta I keep
lots of cash in my
apartment it's it doesn't even add up
Dana and then when they say well where'
you get the cash from she goes Blood
Sweat and Tears hard work well do you
have any withdrawal slips from the bank
no she's been accumulating a cash horde
for many years she thought the guy said
yes she that was one of my
favorite parts I mean I could go on for
hours and hours and he said I would
never say about this case so much to say
can I asked the call uh control room for
call for number one this is the
friend revealing the
relationship you're confused you think
I'm on trial these people are on trial
for trying to steal an election in 2020
I'm not on trial no matter how hard you
try to put me on trial it is a liot it
is a
liot Mr SE thank you we're going to take
5 minutes all right that wasn't the one
I wanted but you get the picture of how
it went Greg yeah I think the view found
a backup host I mean the amount of
nonsense she can unload matches all of
them combined I'm like the judge I
didn't know know you could be this
combative and belligerent I mean that's
okay I guess I mean do does the average
guy get the same uh leeway to do that I
mean why are they so hands off I'd
really like to know it I'm telling you
man that was it was exhausting I felt
like I was on I was trapped with a
combative customer service rep from a
rental car agency who is battling me on
everything like I said that I wanted a i
wanted a four-door no we're out of did
you say that no we only have two doors
but I I I'm pretty sure I said
convertible we don't have any
convertibles are you saying I'm lying it
I I just she was amazing she was trying
to flood the Zone with a barrage of
frantic words a sides and tangents it
was like listening to a shoplifter tell
a cop her life story when he's just
asking her did you put a Snickers bar in
your purse I mean I I I I guess she's
like hoping that people will forget what
the case is about as long as you keep
building and building this nonsense
instead of digging a bigger hole You Dig
a bunch of little holes over here and
hope people just fall in and it just got
after a while I I couldn't handle it I
mean it is weird though that this person
is a DA and not just a DA but you know
presiding over probably one of the
biggest trials you know it's it's a
president on trial and and that's the
person in charge and I mean that is not
that's
not an even killed person uh I I I think
that I I originally would think that she
was you know maybe she felt like the
jury would identify with her but there's
no jury right so all I can think of is
she's auditioning for the view she knows
she's going to be impeached or whatever
you call it and this is like her next
gig because man she doesn't need a
script she just go I want to ask you to
do call forat number two that's on the
second part of the page this is the
MSNBC saying that she's in a lot of
trouble
watch this is epic this is Monumental if
things are going in the direction we
think uh fonnie Willis lied to the court
it's game over for her she will be
disqualified not to watch a Bravo
housewives episode or about salacious
details about a romance so I don't think
this is a good day for the state which
means Jessica it's a good day for
president Trump yeah and this this case
we'll get to the judge on this in a
moment but it looks like it's not going
well for Vonnie Willis or and you got to
imagine all of those other defendants
are thinking this case could get thrown
out I'm not sure I'll let the judge
comment on whether this could end up in
it being thrown out the Trump team and
what they are happy about is it it would
mean if she was disqualified it's
another delay all he's trying to do is
delay everything and he was in court in
New York today right trying to get the
Alvin Brad case delayed and that seems
like it'll go forward on March 25th the
thing is nobody cares about the Alvin
Brad case what they do care care about
is this case and the election
interference case that Jack Smith is
bringing and the documents so um I agree
with what with much of what has been
said I think that there were some
moments where she had legitimate reason
to be upset um when she was holding up
the document saying you lied in here the
lawyer had lied and put in the
documentation that uh Nathan Wade had
spent time in her condo in South Fulton
in 2021 said that's not true and that
that's where the disagreement with the
friend is their relationship hadn't
started until it doesn't mean it's a lie
the finder of facts determines whether
that's a lie she doesn't determine
it okay she was refuting testimony that
had come from her former friend
obviously something very bad happened in
that falling out and from that
particular yeah and in fact Willis at
one point says I have not spoken to
Robin in over a year I certainly do not
consider her a friend now judge can I
have you listen to what is a friend I
mean is it a personal friend is it a ro
that's right R have I ever paid you cash
think about that okay I just want I just
want to get to this part because it's
about democracy right so this is Will is
talking about democracy listen hear call
for number
four I'm very much want to be here so
I'm not a hostile witness I very much
want to be not so much that you're
hostile Miss will it be an adverse
witness your interests are opposed to
miss
Merchants Merchant's entrance are P are
cont contrary to democracy your honor
not to mine
okay mhm if that isn't a political
answer and first of all it appears she
doesn't understand the difference
between a hostile and an adverse witness
she is a hostile witness the way she
approached that that chair I've never
seen anything like it but more than that
she is an adverse witness legally which
allows cross-examination of her based
upon the fact that her interests are
contrary to miss Marchin Miss Marin's
papers included affidavits from
individual who swore to tell the truth
so an affidavit is something where if
you don't say the truth you can be
punished for it so she comes out as
though again she's running the courtroom
that's a lie no you refute it you say
it's a lie but that's not up to you and
she says I'm not hostile you're number
one as hostile as you can get body
language wise and number two you are as
adverse as any witness in a criminal
courtroom and when she says I'm not
hostile or she says that's an inaccurate
wa for you to ask me a question since
when are you the judge and that the
judge let her get away with this I've
lost respect I want to give Jesse one
more chance but can you get can you have
Jesse respond to call for number three
you haven't seen testimony yet during
this Roundup from Nathan Wade himself
this is about the
ATM you don't have a single solitary
deposit slip to corroborate or support
any of your allegations that you were
paid by Mrs Willis in cash do you
no sir not a single solitary one not a
one not a
one well I mean if you're paid in cash
you spend the cash Dana but someone's
got to have a withdrawal slip and it's
only Fanny but remember you can't ask
her those questions she's had that
hoorde for at least 10 years I want to
talk about Nathan Wade may I Nathan Wade
said it's not unusual for clients to
come to his law firm and pay large sums
of cash Bravo what kind of Law Firm
accepts large sums of cash from clients
that kind of guy is Prosecuting the
president of the United States a
personal injury attorney that takes cash
payments no questions asked are you
kidding me also how about this this is
how Wade does business Wade puts
everything he spends his money on on his
corporate card yes yes then at the end
of the year he gives the statement to
his tax attorney and the tax attorney
divides what was business and what was
personal and then they filed their taxes
I have never ever heard of anybody doing
that at all also funny from Wade Wade at
this point he's not supposed to be
sleeping with Fanny he's going to her
condo and this is when she's very lonely
and he's just picking her up and they're
going to dinner at Lickety splits or
Mellow Mushroom or Mellow Mushroom or
sometimes he's going to her condo and
they're reviewing documents has anybody
else from the legal team gone to F's
condo to review documents absolutely not
this would be like I don't know Robert
Mueller appointing Andrew Weissman to
work on his team they're
screwing and then he hands weissan $40
million which they're supposed to
investigate Donald Trump with and
Weissman takes Mueller to B to Nappa and
to Aruba and when everybody asks
questions meller says oh I just paid him
back in cash because I keep large stacks
of cash in the house and I'm not going
to show you my withdrawal
slips this doesn't add up
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)
BREAKING🔥 Fani Willis DISQUALIFICATION Saga - FANI WILLIS RESIGNATION🚨Accused of Misusing GA Funds
BREAKING🔥 Fani Willis DISQUALIFICATION Saga - FANI'S Last minute change after Attorney Testimony🚨
BREAKING🔥 Fani Willis DISQUALIFICATION Saga - FANI's Entire Team REMOVED🚨Trumps Motion of Appeal
'EXPLOSIVE ENDING': Former DOJ official reacts to DA Fani Willis hearing wrapping up
The Faulkner Focus 3/6/24 FULL END SHOW | BREAKING FOX NEWS March 6, 2024
‘The Five’ reacts to judge fining Trump for violating gag order