‘The Five’ reacts to Trump’s unanimous Supreme Court victory
Summary
TLDRThe transcript details Donald Trump's celebration of a 9-0 Supreme Court victory allowing him to be on the ballot, despite Colorado's attempt to bar him due to the Insurrectionist Clause. Reactions from experts and pundits are shared, with some expressing disappointment and concerns about threats to democracy, while others hail the decision as upholding constitutional rights and the will of voters. The ruling's implications for upcoming elections and the ongoing legal battles surrounding Trump are also discussed, highlighting the intense polarization and high stakes involved.
Takeaways
- 😃 Donald Trump celebrated a 9-0 Supreme Court victory allowing him to be on the ballot, despite attempts to bar him under the Insurrectionist Clause of the 14th Amendment.
- 😔 Critics expressed disappointment, stating that the ruling undermines the ability to hold accountable those who violated their oaths and threatened democracy.
- 🤔 The decision impacts over 30 states and sets a precedent that states cannot bar federal candidates from running.
- 🤬 Trump supporters accused his critics of being consumed by hatred and disregarding the Constitution in their efforts to stop him at all costs.
- ✊ The ruling was seen as a win for democracy, ensuring that voters can have their voices heard rather than being disenfranchised by legal challenges.
- 🧐 While the conservative justices ruled that Congress has the sole authority on this issue, some liberal justices disagreed with the broadness of the decision.
- 😏 Trump's supporters claim that each legal challenge he overcomes only strengthens his position and popularity among his base.
- 🙄 Critics accused Trump's detractors of engaging in a campaign of lawfare, using legal challenges as a strategy to circumvent the will of the voters.
- 🤯 The decision highlights the deep political divisions and polarization surrounding Trump's candidacy and the 2024 election.
- ⚖️ The ruling underscores the pivotal role of the Supreme Court in adjudicating high-stakes political issues and shaping the democratic process.
Q & A
What was the Supreme Court's decision regarding Donald Trump's eligibility to run for president?
-The Supreme Court unanimously ruled 9-0 in favor of Donald Trump, rejecting Colorado's attempt to keep him off the presidential ballot due to the insurrectionist clause of the 14th Amendment.
Why did Colorado try to keep Trump off the ballot?
-Colorado attempted to keep Trump off the ballot based on the insurrectionist clause of the 14th Amendment, citing his alleged involvement in the January 6th Capitol riot, though he was never charged with insurrection.
How did the Supreme Court's decision impact other states?
-The ruling impacted over 30 states that were considering similar efforts to bar Trump from running for president based on the insurrectionist clause.
What was the reaction of Trump's supporters to the Supreme Court's decision?
-Trump's supporters celebrated the decision as a victory for democracy and a rejection of what they saw as politically motivated attempts to prevent Trump from running for office.
How did Trump's opponents react to the Supreme Court's decision?
-Trump's opponents expressed disappointment and concern that the decision would allow someone they consider a threat to democracy to run for president again.
What was the reasoning behind the Supreme Court's unanimous decision?
-The conservative justices argued that Congress, not individual states, has the sole authority to determine if the insurrectionist clause applies, while the liberal justices disagreed with how broad the decision was in giving Congress exclusive power.
How did the media's coverage of the case impact public perception?
-The script suggests that the media gave false hope to Trump's opponents by indicating the case had a chance, only to reverse course after the unanimous decision, leading to accusations of lying and misleading the public.
What does the script imply about the broader strategy of Trump's opponents?
-The script implies that Trump's opponents are pursuing a strategy of using legal challenges and indictments to label him as a felon, with the goal of dissuading voters from supporting him, rather than relying on winning at the ballot box.
How did the Supreme Court's decision impact the upcoming presidential election?
-The decision affirmed that voters, not the courts or individual states, would ultimately decide whether Trump could run for president again, making the upcoming election crucial in determining his political future.
What was the significance of the 9-0 unanimous decision?
-The unanimous 9-0 decision was seen as a decisive victory for Trump and a resounding rejection of the legal efforts to disqualify him from running for president, suggesting that the court found the arguments against him unconvincing.
Outlines
🗳️ Trump's Victory at the Supreme Court
This paragraph discusses Donald Trump's victory at the Supreme Court, where the court rejected Colorado's attempt to keep him off the ballot due to the insurrectionist clause of the 14th Amendment. Despite not being charged with insurrection, the decision is celebrated as a win for democracy. However, critics express disappointment, believing that states should be able to bar oath-breaking candidates, and warn that democracy remains under threat.
⚖️ Dissecting the Supreme Court Ruling
The summary delves into the nuances of the Supreme Court's ruling. It highlights the unanimous decision by the conservative justices, who stated that Congress decides on such matters. The liberal justices objected to the breadth of the decision, while Justice Amy Coney Barrett expressed reservations about limiting the authority to Congress alone. Concerns were raised about the timing of the ruling and its potential impact on the volatile political climate.
🎯 Strategies and Criticisms Surrounding Trump's Legal Battles
This paragraph critiques the strategies employed by Democrats and the media in their efforts to prevent Trump's candidacy. It accuses them of engaging in tactics such as labeling Trump as a felon, circumventing the will of the people through legal maneuvering, and relying on polling data rather than evidence. The paragraph also alleges a broader campaign to undermine Trump's political success and portrays the legal battles as a means to an end, rather than a pursuit of justice.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Insurrection
💡14th Amendment
💡Supreme Court
💡Democracy
💡Ballot
💡Indictment
💡Litigation
💡Partisan
💡Felon
💡Voter
Highlights
Donald Trump celebrated his 9-0 victory at the Supreme Court, which rejected Colorado's attempt to keep him off the ballot due to the Insurrectionist Clause of the 14th Amendment.
The ruling impacts over 30 states and is seen as a reversal of efforts to prevent Trump from running for office.
Critics express disappointment, believing states should be able to bar oath-breaking candidates, and warn that democracy remains under threat.
Supporters argue the 14th Amendment does not apply to states disqualifying federal candidates, and accuse critics of being consumed by hatred and trying to suppress votes.
The Supreme Court's decision is seen as helping Democrats face reality that litigation will not stop Trump from being on the ballot, and they need to focus on campaigning.
The ruling was not unanimous, with Amy Coney Barrett expressing concern about the broad interpretation that Congress is the only body that can decide on the Insurrectionist Clause.
Critics accuse the media and pundits of falsely raising hopes about the case's success and now admitting they need to win at the ballot box.
Supporters argue that every attempt to indict or challenge Trump has made him stronger, and the opposition's hatred is fueling his momentum.
Some suggest the ruling is a victory, but part of a broader strategy to label Trump as a felon, driven by polling data rather than morality.
The goal is seen as circumventing voters by using lawfare tactics to disqualify Trump, rather than engaging in political debates and campaigns.
Attacks on Justice Clarence Thomas are noted, despite the unanimous decision, possibly due to his wife's involvement.
Suggestions are made to increase the number of Supreme Court justices to balance the conservative majority.
The decision is seen as a reminder that elections, not litigation, are the appropriate way to determine the outcome.
The ruling is described as a sobering moment for those who thought litigation could prevent Trump from being on the ballot.
The decision is praised as a unanimous victory for liberty and the country, and a rebuke of efforts to undermine democracy.
Transcripts
>> IT IS A VERY BIG DAY FOR
LIBERTY AND IT IS A GREAT DAY
FOR THIS COUNTRY.
>> DONALD TRUMP CELEBRATING HIS
9-0 VICTORY AT THE
SUPREME COURT.
SUPREME COURT.
THEY REJECTED COLORADO'S ATTEMPT
TO KEEP HIM OFF THE BALLOT.
THE DECISION FOLLOWING MONTHS OF
DEBATE OVER WHETHER HE WAS IN
VIOLATION OF THE INSURRECTIONIST
CLAUSE OF THE 14TH AMENDMENT.
DESPITE HIM NEVER BEING CHARGED
WITH INSURRECTION AND THIS IS
QUITE THE REVERSAL.
NOW THAT IT HAS FAILED, SHE SAYS
IT IS UP TO VOTERS TO SAVE
DEMOCRACY.
>> MY LARGER REACTION IS
DISAPPOINTMENT.
I BELIEVE STATES SHOULD BE ABLE
TO BAR OATH BREAKING.
IT WILL BE UP TO AMERICANS.
DEMOCRACY REMAINS VERY MUCH
UNDER ATTACK AND UNDER THAT
THREAT.
THIS UPCOMING ELECTION WILL BE
CRUCIAL.
>> THE RULING IMPACTING OVER 30
STATES.
I AM SUPPOSED TO INFORM ALL OF
YOU WE ARE IN THIS TEMPORARY
STUDIO SO WE CAN GET READY TO
SOUP THE LACK -- GET READY FOR
COVERAGE.
THE SUPREME COURT JUSTICE EIGHT
NO HUMBLE PIE TODAY.
>> SHE IS A TRUMP HATER AND THAT
IS WHAT THIS IS ABOUT.
WHEN YOU GET THE SUPREME COURT
TO AGREE THAT IT IS
INCONCEIVABLE AND INCONGRUOUS TO
ASSUME SOMEONE THAT HOLD STATE
OFFICE CAN THROW SOMEONE OR
DISQUALIFY SOMEONE WHO IS A
CANDIDATE FOR FEDERAL OFFICE,
THE WHOLE THING -- IF YOU READ
THE TEXT OF THE SECTION THREE OF
THE 14TH AMENDMENT, IT IS CLEAR
IT DOES NOT APPLY TO THE STATES.
THIS HAS HAPPENED AS A RESULT OF
MAINSTREAM MEDIA AND
NANCY PELOSI'S DOCUDRAMA,
CONVINCING PEOPLE THERE WAS AN
INSURRECTION AND DONALD TRUMP
WAS AN INSURRECTIONIST WHEN HE
HAS NOT BEEN CHARGED OR
CONVICTED.
COLORADO'S HIGHEST COURT SHOULD
BE ABLE TO BAR HIM AND THE
ILLINOIS -- I THINK SHE WAS A
TRAFFIC COURT JUDGE IN ILLINOIS.
SHE THINK SHE SHOULD HAVE THE
POWER TO DECIDE A NATIONAL,
FEDERAL ELECTION.
THESE PEOPLE ARE SO OBSESSED AND
CONSUMED WITH HATRED THEY DON'T
CARE WHAT THE CONSTITUTION SAYS.
TO THEM IT IS ABOUT WE HAVE TO
STOP HIM AT ALL COSTS.
THEY TALK ABOUT THREATS TO
DEMOCRACY WHEN THEY USE LANGUAGE
LIKE WE HAVE TO SUPPRESS THE
VOTES IN THEIR DECISION AND THEY
ARE TRYING TO PREVENT AMERICANS
FROM VOTING.
THIS IS A GROUP THAT IS SO
INTIMIDATED AND FEARFUL THAT
DONALD TRUMP IS AHEAD OF
JOE BIDEN THEY WILL USE EVERY
MEANS THEY CAN AND IN THE END,
THIS IS AN INTERESTING CASE.
THE SUPREME COURT REALIZED IT
WAS IMPORTANT TO DECIDE IT TODAY
EVEN THOUGH THE COURT WASN'T
MEETING AT 10:00 A.M., THEY
ISSUED THE DECISION AND THEY DID
THAT BECAUSE THEY DID NOT WANT
ANYONE TO VOTE ON SUPER TUESDAY
AND NOT THINK THEIR VOTE WAS
GOING TO MATTER.
THAT IS SAVING DEMOCRACY, NOT AL
MAKE SURE COLORADO -- THAT MEANS
PEOPLE ARE DISENFRANCHISED FROM
VOTING IN A FEDERAL ELECTION.
IT IS ALL LUNACY AND TRUMP EIGHT
AND THE SUPREME COURT KNOCKED IT
DOWN.
>> DOES THIS HELP DEMOCRATS DEAL
WITH REALITY SO THEY STOP
THINKING THE LITIGATION IS GOING
TO STOP AND MAYBE HE WON'T BE ON
THE BALLOT AND START TO THINK WE
HAVE TO GET SERIOUS ABOUT TRYING
TO FIGURE OUT A WAY TO MAKE THIS
ELECTION?
>> THE SECRETARY OF STATE IS
FURTHER OUT OVER HER SKIS THAN
THE AVERAGE DEMOCRAT.
EVEN IF THEY THOUGHT THERE WAS
MERIT TO THE DECISION, THEY
STILL WOULD HAVE RATHER HE BE ON
THE BALLOT BECAUSE OF WHAT THAT
MEANS FOR THE FUTURE.
THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN ANOTHER
JANUARY 6, BUT A LOT OF PEOPLE
WHO WOULD CLAIM WE DID NOT GET A
CHANCE TO EXERCISE OUR
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.
WE THINK THIS IS THE APPROPRIATE
DECISION BUT WE WOULD RATHER HIS
NAME BE THERE.
YOU HEARD THAT WHEN THE MAIN
DECISION WAS COMING DOWN BECAUSE
THAT WAS UNILATERAL.
THAT WAS ONE WOMAN DECIDING.
IT WAS A SOBERING WEEKEND.
WE ARE GOING TO TALK ABOUT THE
POLLS THAT CAME OUT IN THE NEXT
BLOCK.
THE INSURRECTION CLAUSE DOESN'T
SAY
INSURRECTIONIST.
THE SUPREME COURT WAS UNIFIED.
THERE WERE "THE FIVE"
CONSERVATIVES WHO SAID CONGRESS
DECIDES AND JAMIE RASKIN HAS
TALKED ABOUT THEY WERE WRITING A
BILL TO HAVE HIM BARRED.
>> WHICH IS A HUGE WASTE OF
TIME.
>> I AM JUST SAYING THAT IS THE
EFFECT.
YOU HAD "THE FIVE" CONSERVATIVES
AND THEN YOU HAD THE FOUR
OTHERS.
THE THREE LIBERAL JUSTICES WHO
OBJECTED TO HOW BROAD THE
DECISION WAS IN TERMS OF WHAT WT
THE CONSERVATIVES SAID WITH
CONGRESS SAYING THE COLORADO
CASE DOESN'T WORK BUT IT DOESN'T
MEAN CONGRESS IS THE ONLY BODY
THAT SHOULD DECIDE THIS AND YOU
HAD AMY TONY BARRETT, IT IS
ESSENTIALLY 5-4 WHO WENT AGAINST
THIS AND SHE SAID I DON'T AGREE
WITH EVERYTHING THE LIBERAL
FEMALE JUSTICES SAID, BUT I WANT
TO MAKE IT KNOWN THAT IT IS TOO
SOON TO SAY CONGRESS IS THE ONLY
DELIBERATING BODY WHO CAN DO
THIS.
>> SHE SAID SHE DOESN'T LIKE THE
FACT THAT THIS IS SETTLING A
POLITICALLY CHARGED ISSUE IN A
VOLATILE PRESIDENTIAL SEASON AND
WHY DIDN'T YOU TURN DOWN THE
NATIONAL TEMPERATURE ARE NOT UP.
THAT IS WHAT THE THREE LIBERAL
JUSTICES WERE DOING.
>> WHEN YOU TAKE A SHOT AT A
POLITICIAN AND YOU FAIL, IT
USUALLY MAKES THAT POLITICIAN
STRONGER.
>> THESE ARE THE DAYS I ENJOY
DOING "THE FIVE."
YOU LOOK AT YOUR PHONE AND YOU
SEE 9-0 AND YOU CAN'T WAIT TO
SIT NEXT TO JESSICA.
WE CAN ALL JUST BASK IN THE
GLORY OF THE SUPREME COURT'S
DECISION, UNANIMOUS, 9-0.
YOU CAN GET INTO THE WEEDS AND
TALK ABOUT THE LADY CAUCUS, I
WOULD RATHER JUST LOOK AT 9-0.
SO MANY PEOPLE GAVE THE COUNTRY
FALSE HOPE.
THESE PEOPLE WENT TO LAW SCHOOL.
EVEN I CANNOT READ -- EVEN I CAN
READ THE 14TH AMENDMENT THAT
THIS WAS NOT GOING TO GO THE WAY
THE DEMOCRATS THOUGHT IT WAS
GOING TO GO.
THESE PEOPLE, THEY CALL THEM
JUDICIAL PUNDITS AT THE NETWORKS
AND ON CABLE, CAME OUT STRONGLY
SAYING THIS CASE HAD A SHOT.
NOW, THE SAME PEOPLE ARE SAYING,
WE KNEW IT WAS GOING TO BE A
UNANIMOUS DECISION.
THEY ARE LYING TO YOU.
EVERYONE HAS BEEN LYING TO YOU.
THEY ARE GETTING EVERYONE'S
HOPES UP.
THEY ARE THEY ARE ALL OF A
SUDDEN HAVING TO GRAPPLE WITH
THE FACT THAT THIS IS -- THIS IS
A DIRECT QUOTE, WE ARE GOING TO
HAVE TO WIN THIS AT THE BALLOT
BOX.
THEY ARE ADMITTING THIS WAS THE
STRATEGY.
THEY ARE ADMITTING THEY HAVE
NOTHING EXCEPT LAWYERS AND
JUDGES.
THEY WANT TO PERSUADE A FEW
JUDGES, NOT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
IF YOU LOOK AT THE POLLS, THE
AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE NOT BEEN
PERSUADED AND IT DOESN'T LOOK
LIKE THEY WILL BE PERSUADED.
EVERY TIME HE IS INDICTED, HE IS
STRONGER.
EVERY TIME HE BEATS THESE SILLY
WRAPS, HE IS STRONGER.
YOU CAN SEE THE GEORGIA CASE,
THE JACK SMITH DECISION, EVEN
THE BRAD CASE.
EVERY TIME THEY HAVE CREATED A
MONSTER AND THEY ARE OVERRIDING
HATE FOR THIS MAN.
IT IS WEIRD.
HE HAD A NICE FOUR YEARS.
NO ONE WAS THROWN IN PRISON, WE
DIDN'T HAVE ANY WARS, THE
ECONOMY WAS HOT, THE STOCK
MARKET WAS HOT.
THERE WERE PROBLEMS LIKE WE ARE
DEALING WITH NOW.
>> ONE THING I NOTICE, THERE ARE
ALL OF THESE ATTACKS AGAINST
CLARENCE THOMAS TODAY.
IT WAS A 9-0 DECISION.
THEY JUST WANTED TO ATTACK
CLARENCE THOMAS?
>> BECAUSE HE IS BLACK.
>> NO, BECAUSE HIS WIFE.
>> JESSICA, I AGREE.
WE NEED TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT
THIS MAGGOT SUPREME COURT.
9-0.
I HEARD, THIS IS A RUMOR THAT
SOTO MEYER JUSTICE KAGAN
WERE LISTENING TO TOBY KEITH
TWIRLING THEIR RED HATS.
THIS IS WHY WE NEED TO GET MORE
JUSTICES INTO THE SUPREME COURT,
SO WE CAN BALANCE THIS EXTREME
NINE.
IT IS A BUMMER THAT IT IS UP TO
THE VOTERS.
ELECTIONS SEEM SO OLD-FASHIONED
WHEN YOU CAN RELY ON LIBERAL
TRAFFIC JUDGES, LIBERAL
PROSECUTORS NDA TO CIRCUMVENT
THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE AND LAW
FARE IS WHAT DEMOCRATS DO
INSTEAD OF DEBATING AND
CAMPAIGNING.
IMAGINE YOU HAVE THE
WORLD SERIES AND INSTEAD OF THE
TEAM PLAYING, THE OWNERS
INVESTIGATE THE STAR PLAYERS OF
EACH TEAM, TRYING TO GET THEM
OUT BEFORE THE GAME IS PLAYED.
YOU CAN TAKE THIS AS A VICTORY,
BUT THIS IS PART OF A BIGGER
STRATEGY.
THEY ARE DOING IT ALREADY.
THEY GET LOVE FROM THE MEDIA.
THE REASON THESE JUDGES ARE
DOING THIS IS BECAUSE IT IS
INCENTIVIZED.
YOU CAN GO FROM SECURITY IN
COLORADO OR ILLINOIS AND YOU GET
A WARM BATH UNTIL THE STUNT
FALLS APART.
THE BIG PLAY, THE GOAL IS TO
LABEL TRUMP AS A FELON.
THEY WILL TRY TO PRETEND THIS IS
A MORAL MISSION BUT IT IS NOT.
IT IS DIRECTED BY POLLING.
THEY SAW A POLL THAT VOTERS
WOULD BE LESS LIKELY TO VOTE FOR
TRUMP IF HE WERE A FELON AND
THEY START THERE AND WORK
BACKWARDS.
THEY DON'T CARE IF HE IS GUILTY
OR IS HE NEEDS TO PAY.
THEY WANT TO CIRCUMVENT THE
VOTER BY USING LAW FAIR BASED
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)
Meltdown After 9-0 Supreme Court Ruling Trump Can Be on the Ballot, with Stu Burguiere & Dave Marcus
Supreme Court overturns Trump Colorado ballot ban in unanimous ruling
“Running Out Of Options” - Supreme Court Keeps Trump on Ballot Infuriating the Establishment
Trump Gets VERY BAD NEWS in DC Civil Lawsuit
‘HOW IRONIC IS THAT?’: Attorney calls out Letitia James over Trump bond
"Show Me Your Cards!" - Judge Threatens To Incarcerate Trump & Fines Him For Violating Gag Order