AI가 그린 그림이 미술대회 1등해서 난리난 미술계 근황 / 스브스뉴스
TLDRA recent art competition in Colorado, USA, sparked controversy when a piece created by artificial intelligence (AI) won the grand prize. Jason Allen, the artist who submitted the AI-generated work, revealed the process of creation on social media platforms. The AI, named Midjourney, produced over 900 images, from which Allen selected and refined three for submission. The use of AI in art creation has raised questions about the role of AI in the creative process and the definition of authorship. The debate extends to copyright law, as current legislation only recognizes works created by humans. The National Intellectual Property Committee in Korea is actively discussing the implications of AI creations on intellectual property rights, considering the potential for future laws to accommodate AI-generated works. The situation reflects the growing presence of AI in various creative fields, from poetry to music, and underscores the need for legal clarity in a rapidly evolving technological landscape.
Takeaways
- 🎨 An AI-generated artwork won the grand prize at an art competition in Colorado, USA, sparking controversy in the art world.
- 🤖 The winning artist, Jason Allen, used an AI called 'Midjourney' to create over 900 images and selected three for submission.
- 📈 Allen utilized an AI tool named 'Gigapixel' to enhance the resolution of the images, which contributed to his winning entry.
- 💰 Allen received a $300 prize for his AI-assisted artwork, which led to significant debate among artists about the role of AI in art creation.
- 🤔 The debate centers around whether AI should be considered a tool or an artist, and if the human input in guiding the AI process qualifies as authorship.
- 📚 AI has access to vast amounts of data, enabling it to learn and mimic various artistic styles, which raises questions about originality and creativity.
- 🇰🇷 In Korea, AI creations are increasingly common, but current copyright law only recognizes works made by humans, leading to legal and ethical dilemmas.
- 🚀 Kakao Brain's attempt to publish a collection of AI-written poems without copyright registration highlights the need for updated laws to address AI-generated content.
- 🎼 AI is also composing music, with many AI-composed songs used in YouTube videos, further blurring the lines between human and AI creation.
- 🤝 The National Intellectual Property Committee in Korea is discussing the legal implications of AI creations with various ministries, including the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism.
- 📉 Producers of AI creations are concerned about their investment in technology if copyright laws do not recognize their work, while consumers may face increased costs if copyrights are enforced.
- ⏳ The committee has recommended that humans or corporations involved in AI creation be attributed copyright, with revisions to the law to accommodate the use of big data in AI processes.
Q & A
What was the controversy surrounding the art competition in Colorado, USA?
-The controversy was that a person named Jason Allen won the grand prize for submitting a painting created by an artificial intelligence (AI), which led to debates about the role of AI in art and whether AI-generated works should be eligible for such competitions.
What is the name of the AI that created the winning artwork?
-The AI used to create the winning artwork is called 'Midjourney'.
How did Jason Allen use AI in the creation of the winning artwork?
-Jason Allen used the AI 'Midjourney' to create over 900 images, then he curated and selected three of his favorite works. He also used an AI called 'Gigapixel' to enhance the image resolution.
What was the reaction of the art community to the AI-generated artwork winning the competition?
-Many artists were angry and questioned the legitimacy of AI participation in the competition, arguing that it undermines the human effort and creativity involved in traditional art.
How does the AI 'Midjourney' work?
-The AI 'Midjourney' allows users to create images by typing commands in a chat window, such as 'slash imagine' followed by a description. The AI then generates images based on the text provided.
What is the current stance on AI creations and copyright law?
-Current copyright law typically only recognizes works made by humans. AI creations often fall into a gray area, as they are not made by a human in the traditional sense, leading to difficulties in registering copyright.
What is the role of the National Intellectual Property Committee in the context of AI creations?
-The National Intellectual Property Committee has established a special AI-Intellectual Property Committee to discuss and prepare for the future where AI creations are more prevalent. They are looking into the implications of AI on copyright law and how to adapt the legal framework to accommodate AI-generated works.
What are the challenges in granting copyright to AI creations?
-Challenges include determining the subject of copyright (whether it should be the AI, the programmer, the user, etc.), the differing interests of stakeholders, and the sheer volume of AI-generated works which may not all warrant copyright protection.
What is the recommended approach by the National Intellectual Property Committee regarding AI and copyright?
-The committee recommends that humans or corporations contributing to the AI creation process should be attributed copyright. They also suggest revising the copyright law to exempt the use of works when utilizing big data.
How does the use of AI in creative fields affect the value and perception of human creativity?
-The use of AI in creative fields raises questions about the value of human creativity and effort. Some argue that AI should be seen as a creative tool, similar to a brush or a design program, with humans still recognized as the authors of the final work.
What are the implications of AI-generated works for the future of art and intellectual property?
-The implications include a potential shift in how we perceive and value art, the need for a revised legal framework to accommodate AI creations, and the possibility of a more democratic art creation process where technology plays a significant role.
What is the current status of discussions regarding the legal recognition of AI-generated works?
-The discussions are ongoing, with various reviews and considerations of international cases. There is no immediate solution, and the situation is being closely monitored as technology and AI capabilities continue to evolve.
Outlines
🎨 AI Art Controversy: The Grand Prize Winner
The first paragraph discusses the controversy surrounding an AI-generated artwork winning a grand prize at an art competition in Colorado, USA. Jason Allen, the human behind the AI, used a tool called Midjourney to create over 900 images, then selected and refined three to submit. The competition did not have guidelines against AI submissions, leading to Allen's victory and subsequent backlash from the artistic community. The narrative explores the blurred lines between human and AI authorship, the role of AI as a creative tool, and the implications for copyright law as AI-generated content becomes more prevalent.
🤖 AI and Copyright: A Complex Conundrum
The second paragraph delves into the complexities of attributing copyright to AI creations. It highlights differing stakeholder perspectives, with producers of AI content facing low incentives to innovate without copyright protection, and consumers potentially facing costs for previously free AI-generated works. The discussion touches on the National Intellectual Property Committee's recommendations for revising copyright law to accommodate AI contributions and the challenges of mass-producing sophisticated creations. The paragraph concludes with the observation that while AI's presence in creative fields is growing, the legal and ethical frameworks to address it are still under development.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Artificial Intelligence (AI)
💡Grand Prize
💡Jason Allen
💡Midjourney
💡Gigapixel
💡Copyright
💡AI Creations
💡Discord
💡AI-Intellectual Property Committee
💡Big Data
💡AlphaGo
Highlights
AI artwork won the grand prize at an art competition in Colorado, USA, causing controversy in the art world.
The award was not reversed due to the lack of guidelines for AI-created works.
Jason Allen, the winner, revealed the AI submission process on social media.
Allen used the AI Midjourney to create over 900 images and selected 3 for submission.
An AI called 'Gigapixel' was used to enhance the image quality.
The controversy revolves around whether AI can be considered an artist and if humans can claim authorship.
AI can create images in minutes, raising questions about the role of human effort in art creation.
Allen's role was to guide the AI, curate images, and select the best ones.
The use of AI in art raises copyright issues as current laws only recognize human-made works.
Kakao Brain's attempt to publish an AI-written poetry collection without copyright highlights legal gaps.
AI compositions are used in YouTube videos without copyright claims, indicating a need for legal clarity.
South Korea's National Intellectual Property Committee is discussing the future of AI and intellectual property laws.
There is debate on who should hold the copyright for AI creations and the extent of protection needed.
The committee suggests attributing copyright to humans or corporations involved in AI creation.
AI creations may be granted weaker copyright protection than human works, considering future advancements.
The National Intellectual Property Committee recommends revisions to copyright law for AI usage in big data.
Related ministries are in agreement and will conduct further reviews based on the committee's recommendations.
The complexity of enacting relevant laws means continued research and observation of international practices.
AI's presence in art competitions and other creative fields is expected to lead to significant legal and ethical decisions in the near future.