In 1-2 years AI Art will be dead and here's why

The Art Mentor
20 Apr 202316:02

TLDRThe video script argues that AI-generated art, referred to as 'AR', is a fleeting trend that will die out within the next few years due to lack of user loyalty and the superficial reasons behind their engagement. The speaker asserts that AR fails to provide the long-term fulfillment that traditional art creation offers, and users are primarily driven by the desire for quick attention and sales. The script also criticizes the limitations of AI in art, predicting legal challenges and a return to valuing human artistic potential.

Takeaways

  • ๐ŸŽจ **Lack of Genuine Interest**: AI art users are not drawn to art for the right reasons, such as personal fulfillment or learning, but for quick attention and potential sales.
  • ๐Ÿšซ **Short-lived Engagement**: AI art provides a temporary dopamine hit rather than long-term satisfaction, leading to a high likelihood of users leaving once the novelty wears off.
  • ๐Ÿ“‰ **Fleeting Popularity**: The speaker predicts that within 2-5 years, the hype around AI art will die down, and users will abandon it.
  • ๐Ÿš€ **Gimmicks and Advances**: AI art advancements are seen as gimmicks, necessary to keep users engaged but ultimately not fixing the inherent flaws in AI-generated art.
  • ๐Ÿ’ก **Job Market Concerns**: AI art is not seen as a sustainable career path, as it is expected to replace both artists and AI art users due to its ability to perform tasks currently done by humans.
  • ๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐ŸŽจ **Real Artists' Resilience**: Despite AI art's impact, real artists will continue to create and thrive in the industry, driven by a sincere passion for art.
  • ๐Ÿ”„ **AI Art Style Saturation**: The AI art style has become easily identifiable and over-saturated, leading to a growing distaste among consumers and artists.
  • โš–๏ธ **Legal and Ethical Issues**: Legal battles and the exploration of AI's 'black box' training sets will likely lead to limitations on AI's role in art and potential consequences for developers.
  • ๐Ÿ”’ **Anti-AI Software Development**: The development of anti-AI software to protect artists' work from being scraped by AI databases will become more prevalent.
  • ๐ŸŒ **Client Savviness**: Clients are becoming more knowledgeable about AI art and are increasingly seeking out human-made art, leading to more opportunities for real artists.
  • ๐Ÿ“‰ **AI User Exodus**: The speaker anticipates a mass exodus of AI users as they face the same challenges and competition as traditional artists, leading to many quitting within a few years.

Q & A

  • What is the main prediction made by Sean in the video?

    -Sean predicts that AI art, as it currently exists, will die out within the next two to five years due to a lack of genuine interest from its user base and the inability to provide long-term fulfillment like traditional art-making does.

  • Why does Sean believe AI art users are not loyal?

    -Sean argues that AI art users are not loyal because they were attracted to AI-generated art for the wrong reasons, such as gaining attention, clout, or quick sales, rather than a sincere interest in art and learning about it.

  • What does Sean suggest is the primary reason for the short lifespan of AI art?

    -Sean suggests that the primary reason for the short lifespan of AI art is that it serves as a cheap and quick dopamine hit for users, rather than providing the long-term fulfillment and personal growth that traditional art-making offers.

  • What does Sean think about the potential job opportunities for AI art users in the future?

    -Sean believes that the potential job opportunities for AI art users in the future are minimal and misguided, as AI was developed to replace artists and those who use it, making it unlikely that anyone would pay for what AI can already do.

  • How does Sean view the continuous advancements in AI art?

    -Sean views the continuous advancements in AI art as gimmicks, necessary to keep the user base interested and engaged. He believes these advancements are attempts to fix the inherent flaws in AI-generated art.

  • What is Sean's perspective on the legal challenges facing AI art?

    -Sean predicts that in the next two to five years, legal precedence will be set through lawsuits against AI developers, leading to severe limitations and caps on what AI can do in the art field.

  • What does Sean say about the potential for AI to democratize art?

    -Sean argues that the claim of democratizing art by AI developers is misleading rhetoric. He believes that true art democratization has already been achieved through public education and that AI's impact will be limited by legal and practical challenges.

  • What does Sean suggest will happen to AI art users once the novelty wears off?

    -Sean suggests that once the novelty of AI art wears off and the glory is gone, AI art users will lose interest and flee, as they are not in it for the right reasons or seeking personal fulfillment through art.

  • What is Sean's stance on the potential for AI to bring something truly new and innovative to the art world?

    -Sean is skeptical about AI's potential to bring anything truly new and innovative to the art world, stating that AI has only created an easily identifiable and now widely disliked AI art style.

  • What does Sean predict will be the outcome of the legal battles surrounding AI art?

    -Sean predicts that the legal battles surrounding AI art will result in severe limitations on AI's capabilities, and potentially lead to incarcerations for those involved in AI development if the contents of the training data sets are scrutinized.

  • What advice does Sean give to traditional artists who are concerned about the impact of AI on their careers?

    -Sean advises traditional artists not to worry about AI replacing them, as he believes AI's impact will be short-lived and limited. He encourages artists to focus on honing their skills and reclaiming their place in the art world.

Outlines

00:00

๐ŸŽจ The Imminent Decline of AI Art

The speaker, Sean, predicts that AI art will lose its popularity within the next few years due to a lack of genuine interest from its user base. He argues that AI art users are not true art enthusiasts but are attracted to the technology for superficial reasons such as gaining attention or making quick money. Sean suggests that once the novelty wears off and the 'glory' fades, these users will abandon AI art. He also criticizes the idea of AI art as a career, stating that it will not provide sustainable job opportunities and that the real art industry has its own set of challenges that AI users are not prepared for.

05:01

๐ŸŒช๏ธ The AI Art Hype Cycle

Sean continues his critique by discussing the hype cycle of AI art, comparing it to pyramid schemes and gimmicky marketing tactics. He points out the infighting among AI art users over prompts and copyrights, which he sees as a sign of cannibalism within the community. He predicts that this internal conflict, along with the saturation of AI art, will lead to a distaste for AI-generated images and a renewed appreciation for human-made art. Sean also highlights the adaptability and infinite potential of human artists versus the limitations of AI.

10:02

๐Ÿšซ Legal and Ethical Concerns of AI Art

The speaker addresses the legal and ethical issues surrounding AI art, predicting that lawsuits and legal precedents will limit the capabilities of AI in the art world. He emphasizes the unknown nature of AI's training data and suggests that uncovering this data could lead to severe consequences, including jail time for those involved. Sean argues that the true purpose of AI art is not to democratize art, as claimed by developers, but rather to exploit it for profit.

15:03

๐Ÿ”„ The Future of Art: Human Resurgence

In the final paragraph, Sean predicts a future where human artists reclaim their position in the art world, as the hype around AI art fades. He dismisses the idea of AI art democratization and assures artists that their unique skills and knowledge will always be valued over AI-generated content. Sean encourages artists to take action and reclaim their place in the industry, suggesting that there are ways to use AI to their advantage without being replaced by it.

Mindmap

Keywords

๐Ÿ’กAI art

AI art refers to the creation of visual art using artificial intelligence, often through machine learning models that generate images based on certain inputs or prompts. In the video, the speaker is critical of AI art, arguing that it lacks the depth and genuine interest in art that human artists possess, and predicts its decline due to users seeking quick attention and sales rather than a sustainable artistic practice.

๐Ÿ’กcustomers

In the context of the video, 'customers' refers to the users of AI art platforms who are seeking to generate art for reasons other than a sincere interest in the artistic process. The speaker argues that these customers are not loyal and are primarily driven by the potential for gaining attention or making sales, which contrasts with the intrinsic motivation of traditional artists.

๐Ÿ’กdopamine hit

A 'dopamine hit' is a metaphorical term used to describe the temporary pleasure or satisfaction one receives from an activity or experience. In the video, the speaker uses this term to describe the fleeting sense of accomplishment that AI art็”จๆˆทๆไพ›, which is contrasted with the long-term fulfillment that comes from traditional art creation.

๐Ÿ’กgimmick

A 'gimmick' is a trick or device relied on to attract attention or produce a desired effect, often with the implication that it is superficial or unoriginal. In the video, the speaker uses this term to describe the perceived advancements in AI art, suggesting that they are merely superficial fixes or novelties designed to keep users engaged and interested.

๐Ÿ’กjob opportunities

Job opportunities refer to potential employment or career prospects. In the context of the video, the speaker is skeptical about the promise of sustainable careers for those involved in AI art, suggesting that the market for such work is limited and that AI users may not have the necessary skills to succeed in traditional art fields.

๐Ÿ’กcannibalism

In the video, 'cannibalism' is used metaphorically to describe the infighting and competition among AI art users, particularly in regards to protecting and selling their prompts and the resulting disputes when others use or share these prompts. This term is used to illustrate the self-destructive nature of the community and the lack of collaboration and support that is typically found among traditional artists.

๐Ÿ’กcommodification

Commodification refers to the process of transforming something into a commodity, or a product that is mass-produced and sold for profit. In the video, the AI art style is described as being commodified due to its mass production and influx, leading to a growing distaste among the general public and a decline in its perceived value.

๐Ÿ’กlegal sphere

The 'legal sphere' refers to the domain of law and legal matters. In the context of the video, the speaker discusses the potential legal challenges and limitations that AI art may face in the future, including lawsuits and the setting of legal precedents that could restrict the use and development of AI in art.

๐Ÿ’กdemocratization of art

The 'democratization of art' is the idea of making art more accessible and available to a wider audience, often through technology or other means that lower barriers to entry. In the video, the speaker criticizes this concept as a misleading rhetoric used by AI developers to attract users, arguing that true art cannot be democratized in the same way and that the claim is more about market expansion than artistic empowerment.

๐Ÿ’กintrinsic reasons

Intrinsic reasons refer to motivations that come from within an individual, as opposed to external factors. In the video, the speaker contrasts the intrinsic motivations of traditional artists, who create art for personal fulfillment and a love of the process, with the extrinsic motivations of AI art users, who are driven by external rewards like attention and sales.

๐Ÿ’กsustainable career

A 'sustainable career' implies long-term employment or a profession that can be maintained over an extended period. In the video, the speaker questions the sustainability of careers in AI art, implying that the skills and work produced by AI users may not be valued in the long run and that traditional art skills will be more valuable in the job market.

Highlights

AI art is predicted to die within the next two to five years due to a lack of customer loyalty.

AI art users are not attracted to art for the right reasons, but for attention, clout, or sales.

AI art provides a quick dopamine hit but not the long-term fulfillment of traditional art-making.

AI art users will likely abandon the medium when the novelty wears off.

AI art advancements are compared to gimmicks in video games, meant to retain user interest.

AI art's reliance on gimmicks is unsustainable and will lead to user exodus when tricks run out.

AI art is seen as a replacement for artists and their jobs, not a sustainable career path.

AI art users face the same job scarcity as traditional artists, with no distinct advantage.

AI art has a major job in taking low-quality clients that traditional artists don't want.

The average lifespan of a freelance AI artist is predicted to be one to two years.

AI art users are experiencing a high similar to art school graduates, but will face the same challenges.

AI art users are engaged in infighting, protecting their prompts, and attempting to copyright them.

AI art has a recognizable style that is already commodified and disliked by many.

AI art's potential is limited compared to the infinite potential of human artists.

Legal battles and the opening of AI's 'black box' will lead to limitations on AI art's capabilities.

The democratization of art by AI is seen as a false promise and misleading rhetoric.

Power in the art world will reconsolidate with human artists if AI art becomes mainstream.

Casual Browsing

Why AI Art users will quit in 1-2 years

2024-04-06 03:10:01

Where Will SoundHound AI Stock Be in 2 Years? | SOUN Stock Prediction | SoundHound Stock Analysis |

2024-03-28 05:30:01

Why the Internet is Dead (Dead Internet Theory)

2024-04-07 13:25:01

Why Your AI Art Isn't Selling (and never will)

2024-04-06 03:00:01

Here's how Apple's AI story will play out in 2024

2024-04-04 23:20:01

ChatGPT has gotten WORSE. Here's why and how to fix it

2024-04-11 19:20:01