Shadiversity CRINGE POSTING on Twitter
TLDRThe transcript discusses the challenges and toxicity within the writing community on Twitter, particularly in the political and literary spheres. It delves into the issues of virtue signaling, the representation of conservative voices in the fantasy genre, and the problems with the portrayal of women in military settings in literature. The critique focuses on the lack of authenticity and sensitivity in writing, urging for a more inclusive and well-researched approach to storytelling.
Takeaways
- 🌟 The speaker criticizes the culture of 'Writer Twitter', describing it as a toxic environment filled with virtue signaling and unnecessary conflict.
- 📚 The transcript discusses the challenges faced by different genres in the literary world, particularly the 'sword and sorcery', 'splatter punk', and 'lit bro' categories.
- 🤬 The speaker expresses frustration with the lack of diversity and inclusivity in the publishing industry, feeling that it is controlled by a few major companies and does not provide opportunities for a wide range of voices.
- 👥 The conversation highlights the issues of misogyny and inappropriate content in certain genres, especially in the 'sword and sorcery' area, where the speaker criticizes the portrayal of women and the lack of realism in dialogue.
- 💭 The speaker argues against the notion that women are unfit for combat roles in military settings, citing personal experience and historical examples to debunk stereotypes and misconceptions.
- 📖 The critique of Shad Brooks' work exemplifies the speaker's broader concerns about the quality of writing and the representation of characters in modern literature.
- 🤔 The transcript questions the motivations behind 'woke' writing and suggests that it is sometimes used as a tactic to provoke certain groups, rather than being a genuine effort towards inclusivity.
- 🚀 The speaker encourages conservative individuals to focus on improving the quality of literature and breaking down barriers in the publishing industry, rather than engaging in unproductive online arguments.
- 🌐 The discussion touches on the global aspects of military history, including the roles of women in various cultures and time periods, emphasizing the importance of accurate representation in storytelling.
- 📈 The speaker calls for more research and understanding of historical contexts when writing fiction, to avoid perpetuating harmful stereotypes and inaccuracies.
- 💌 The transcript ends with a message to Shad Brooks and others in the literary community, urging them to strive for higher standards in their work and to contribute positively to the world of literature.
Q & A
What is the main theme discussed in the transcript?
-The main theme discussed in the transcript is the critique of certain writers and their work on Twitter, specifically focusing on the toxicity and issues within the writing community on the platform.
What are the three specific areas mentioned as problematic in the writing world according to the speaker?
-The three specific areas mentioned are the sword and sorcery genre, the splatter punk and extreme horror genre, and the diminishing but still prominent lit bro area.
What issue does the speaker have with the portrayal of women in the sword and sorcery genre?
-The speaker criticizes the portrayal of women in the sword and sorcery genre as being misogynistic and based on stereotypes, with examples showing women being excluded from battlefields and discussed in a derogatory manner.
How does the speaker describe the splatter punk and extreme horror genre?
-The speaker describes the splatter punk and extreme horror genre as having an irritating neckbeard problem, implying that it attracts individuals with certain undesirable social behaviors and attitudes.
What is the speaker's view on the lit bro area?
-The speaker views the lit bro area as being out of touch, with its prominent figures being described as having bizarre, outdated views and being exclusionary in their work.
What is the speaker's criticism about the character Tia in the excerpt from the book?
-The speaker criticizes the character Tia for being a stereotype and for the unrealistic and offensive dialogue given to her, which includes discussions about women's roles and capabilities in combat that are based on misconceptions and prejudices.
What does the speaker suggest is the problem with the writing in the provided excerpt?
-The speaker suggests that the writing in the excerpt is problematic due to its poor quality, lack of authenticity, and the promotion of harmful stereotypes and misconceptions about women.
How does the speaker feel about the publishing industry?
-The speaker feels that the publishing industry is gatekeeping and nepotistic, making it difficult for new and diverse voices to break through and contribute to literature.
What is the speaker's advice to those who are critical of 'woke' literature?
-The speaker advises those critical of 'woke' literature to focus on improving the quality of writing and storytelling rather than focusing on the representation and inclusivity aspects, which they believe are often used to provoke reactions rather than contribute positively to the literary world.
What does the speaker suggest is a better approach for those dissatisfied with the current state of literature?
-The speaker suggests that those dissatisfied should work on creating and promoting better writing, supporting diverse voices, and challenging the gatekeeping practices of the publishing industry rather than focusing on criticizing 'woke' elements in literature.
Why does the speaker argue that the portrayal of women in the military in the excerpt is unrealistic?
-The speaker argues that the portrayal is unrealistic because it is based on stereotypes and misconceptions, and does not reflect the actual experiences and capabilities of women in military settings, both historically and in modern times.
Outlines
🗣️ Writer Twitter: Echoes of the Cringe Wars
The paragraph delves into the author's experience with Writer Twitter, a space they describe as one of the most toxic areas on the platform. The author notes that it feels like the heart of the 'cringe wars', with people from all political directions engaging in virtue signaling and non-functional interactions. The author criticizes the constant need for validation and the lack of genuine communication, highlighting the prevalence of self-aggrandizing behavior and the tendency to engage in conflicts with individuals of significantly larger followings, often to no avail.
📚 The Conservative Corner: A Look into Sword and Sorcery
This section focuses on the conservative voices within the writing world, particularly in the sword and sorcery genre. The author discusses the presence of reactionary individuals who might identify as liberals but exhibit certain regressive views. The paragraph touches on the prominence of this genre and its tendency to attract new writers, despite the author's personal reservations about its content and the attitudes it fosters.
🎭 The Extremes of Genre Fiction: Misogyny and Exploitation
The paragraph examines the darker side of certain genre fiction, including splatter punk and extreme horror, where the author notes a prevalence of misogyny and violence. The author discusses the exploitation of women and minorities in these genres, and the disturbing tendency of some authors to eroticise violence. The paragraph also touches on the B-movie and video nasty fandoms, highlighting the problematic attitudes these communities can foster.
🤬 The Sword and Sorcery Controversy: Wokeness and Race Swapping
This section addresses the controversy surrounding the sword and sorcery genre, particularly in relation to wokeness and the practice of race swapping characters. The author criticizes the genre for its reaction to diversity and inclusivity, noting the overblown responses to characters of color. The paragraph also discusses the genre's tendency to attract individuals who express regressive opinions and the author's personal experiences with this community.
😅 Cringe Chronicles: An Insensitivity Reader's Perspective
The paragraph presents a humorous and cringe-worthy account of the author's encounter with an insensitivity reader. The author shares an excerpt from a manuscript they initially believed to be a parody but later realized was genuine. The excerpt contains offensive dialogue and stereotypes, leading the author to critique the writing's quality and the insensitivity of its content.
🤯 The Military and Misogyny: Debunking Myths
In this section, the author debunks common misogynistic myths about women in the military. They argue against the idea that women are a liability in combat situations due to physical differences, pregnancy, and menstrual cycles. The author draws from personal military experience to refute these notions, emphasizing that women are capable of handling the challenges of military life and that their presence can be beneficial for morale and mental well-being.
📚 Historical Inaccuracies: A Critique of Medieval Military Writing
The paragraph critiques the inaccurate portrayal of medieval military logistics and the role of women in warfare. The author points out the historical inaccuracies in the depiction of women's roles and the misunderstanding of military strategies. They argue for a more authentic representation of the past, including the recognition of women's contributions to military campaigns and the realities of life in the field.
🚫 The Publishing Industry: Gatekeeping and Lack of Diversity
The final paragraph discusses the gatekeeping and lack of diversity in the publishing industry. The author criticizes the industry for its nepotism and the barriers it creates for new and diverse voices. They call for a change in the industry's approach, advocating for the inclusion of more talented writers from various backgrounds and experiences. The author also condemns the focus on 'woke' content as a gimmick rather than a genuine effort to promote inclusivity and representation.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Writer Twitter
💡Virtue signaling
💡Sword and sorcery
💡Splatter punk
💡Lit bro
💡Shadowversity
💡Wokeness
💡Gatekeeping
💡Insensitivity reader
💡Cringe
Highlights
The critique of the toxic environment on writer Twitter, which is described as a hub for virtue signaling and unnecessary conflict.
The discussion on virtue signaling, its role in human interaction, and how its misuse can lead to polarization and hostility.
The observation that certain circles within the writing community are dominated by individuals with regressive views, particularly in the sword and sorcery genre.
The mention of the splatter punk and extreme horror genres as areas where problematic behavior, such as misogyny, is prevalent.
The critique of the 'lit bro' subculture, characterized by outdated views and exclusionary behavior.
The exploration of the impact of woke culture on the writing and publishing industry, and how it can lead to forced representation and tokenism.
The argument that the publishing industry is gatekeeping and nepotistic, limiting opportunities for diverse voices and stories.
The critique of authors who focus on controversial topics for the sake of provoking reactions rather than contributing to meaningful discourse.
The discussion on the importance of historical and cultural accuracy in writing, particularly in fantasy and historical fiction genres.
The critique of the portrayal of women in certain genres, highlighting the need for more nuanced and respectful representation.
The argument that writers should focus on improving their craft and storytelling rather than engaging in online conflicts and virtue signaling.
The call for readers and consumers to demand better representation and quality in literature, and to challenge the status quo of the publishing industry.
The emphasis on the need for writers to conduct thorough research and understand the complexities of the subjects they write about, to avoid inaccuracies and stereotypes.
The discussion on the role of social media in amplifying certain voices and the impact it has on the literary landscape.
The critique of the lack of diversity in the publishing industry and the need for more inclusive practices that allow for a wider range of stories and perspectives.