‘The Five’ reacts to Trump’s New York court victory
Summary
TLDRNew York's efforts to seize Donald Trump's building encountered a significant obstacle when an appeals court reduced a staggering $450 million bond to a $175 million judgment, with Trump given 10 days to pay to prevent Attorney General Letitia James from seizing his assets. Concurrently, Trump faces a hush money trial set to start on April 15, marking him as the first presidential candidate to be on trial while campaigning. The legal battles have ignited fierce debates, with Trump criticizing the cases as election interference and a misuse of government power, while Democrats express outrage over the reduced bond, viewing it as an example of a dual justice system favoring Trump. This situation unfolds amidst other legal challenges and public controversies surrounding Trump.
Takeaways
- 📊 An appeals court significantly reduced the bond amount required from Donald Trump from $450 million to $175 million, relating to New York's plan to seize his building.
- 🗞️ Trump has a 10-day window to pay the lowered bond amount to prevent Attorney General Letitia James from seizing his assets.
- 📝 While dealing with the bond issue, Trump is also facing a separate hush money trial set to start on April 15, making him the first presidential candidate to be on trial while campaigning.
- 🧐 Trump criticized the criminal cases against him as election interference and labeled the case involving the bond as a scam, sham, and hoax.
- 😡 Democrats expressed frustration over the decreased bond, seeing it as Trump receiving a favorable treatment unlike others, suggesting a two-tier justice system.
- 📚 Judge Pirro commented on the bond reduction as reasonable and criticized the initial $450 million amount as baseless, comparing Trump’s bond situation with other high-profile cases.
- 🚫 Discussions in the script touched on perceived biases in the legal system and the impact of such high-profile legal battles on public opinion and the justice system itself.
- 💰 Greg Gutfeld questioned the rationale behind the outrage over the bond reduction, suggesting it stems from an obsession with Trump rather than principle.
- 💼 Jessica Tarlov argued that public perception might not favor Trump, even if he sees the legal challenges as potentially boosting his popularity.
- 🧹 The debate also covered broader themes of legal precedents, potential impacts on the real estate industry, and the politicization of legal processes.
Q & A
What was the original bond amount set for Donald Trump in New York's plan to seize his building, and to what amount was it reduced?
-The original bond amount was set at $450 million, and it was reduced to $175 million.
Why does Donald Trump have 10 days to pay the reduced bond amount?
-Donald Trump has 10 days to pay the reduced bond amount to stop Attorney General Letitia James from seizing his assets.
What is the significance of the hush money trial's start date for Donald Trump?
-The hush money trial's start date on April 15th is significant because it means Trump will be the first presidential candidate on trial while campaigning.
How did Donald Trump describe the criminal cases against him?
-Donald Trump slammed the criminal cases against him as election interference and described the case as a scam, a sham, and a hoax.
What was the reaction of Democrats to the decreased bond amount in Trump's case?
-Democrats who were once thrilled about the prospect of Trump surrendering his assets were fuming over the decreased bond, describing it as infuriating and an absolute travesty, indicating a two-tiered system of justice.
What did Judge Pirro say about the connection between the original $475 million bond and its justification?
-Judge Pirro argued there was absolutely no connection between the $475 million bond and any justifiable reason, implying it was an arbitrary decision by the judge influenced by bias against Trump.
How did the bond amounts for Sam Bankman-Fried and Bernie Madoff compare to Donald Trump's original bond amount?
-Sam Bankman-Fried's bond was set at $250 million with a million victims, and Bernie Madoff's bond was $10 million with 40,000 victims, contrasting sharply with Donald Trump's original half-billion-dollar bond with no victims.
What does Greg Gutfeld imply about the nature of the bond and its impact on real estate investment?
-Greg Gutfeld implies that the bond was not based on thoughtful, reasoned penalties but was instead manipulated for political reasons, which could have long-lasting negative consequences on real estate investment in the city.
How does Jessica Tarlov's perspective differ regarding the bond reduction and justice?
-Jessica Tarlov suggests that the outrage over the bond reduction stems from a perception of a two-tiered system of justice, where no other person but Donald Trump would have had their bond amount lowered that much, highlighting concerns over unequal treatment.
What is the main argument presented by those critical of the actions against Trump in the script?
-The main argument presented by critics is that the legal actions against Trump, including the unprecedented bond amount and seizure of assets, are politically motivated attempts to interfere with the election and undermine him, rather than being based on fair legal standards.
Outlines
🚧 Trump's Legal Battles and Public Reaction
An appeals court significantly reduced the bond amount in a case against Donald Trump from $450 million to $175 million, giving him 10 days to pay to prevent asset seizure by Attorney General Letitia James. This development coincided with a separate ruling that Trump's hush money trial will start on April 15, making him the first presidential candidate to be on trial while campaigning. Trump criticized the cases against him as election interference, framing them as a weaponization of the government. The reduction in bond amount has sparked outrage among Democrats, who see it as a preferential treatment and an abuse of the justice system. The segment also touches on a prosecutor's personal scandal and the comparison of Trump's bond to other high-profile cases, arguing that Trump faces an unjustly high bond despite having no direct victims. The narrative underscores the deep political divisions and the contentious nature of Trump's legal challenges.
🔍 Perspectives on Trump's Financial and Legal Strategy
The discussion shifts to varying opinions on the implications of Trump's legal and financial maneuvers. Critics argue that the reduced bond amount reflects a two-tier justice system favoring Trump, while his supporters see it as a win against biased legal actions. Trump himself downplays the financial impact, boasting about his ability to cover the bond and suggesting that legal battles could boost his popularity. The segment debates the strategic motivations behind the lawsuits, with some viewing them as attempts to influence the upcoming election rather than pursue justice. The conversation also touches on the broader implications for the real estate industry and the potential chilling effect on investment in cities where such legal precedents are set. Overall, the dialogue captures the complex interplay between politics, justice, and public opinion in the context of Trump's ongoing legal challenges.
🎭 The Political and Public Divide Over Trump's Trials
The third segment delves into the polarized public and political reactions to Donald Trump's legal challenges, highlighting the intensity of feelings on both sides. Supporters of Trump argue that the legal actions against him are politically motivated attempts to prevent his re-election, while his critics believe they are necessary to hold him accountable for alleged wrongdoings. The discussion emphasizes the stark contrast in how different segments of the population perceive justice and fairness, especially in the context of high-profile political figures. There's also mention of the impact these trials could have on Trump's political future, with some arguing that being a convicted felon could harm his chances in the election, despite Trump's belief to the contrary. The segment underscores the deep divisions in American society over Trump's presidency and legal issues, as well as the broader implications for the rule of law and democratic processes.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Appeals Court
💡Bond Reduction
💡Attorney General Letitia James
💡Hush Money Trial
💡Election Interference
💡Asset Seizure
💡Sam Bankman-Fried
💡Bernie Madoff
💡Real Estate Industry
💡Two-Tiered System of Justice
Highlights
New York's plan to seize Trump's building runs into a major roadblock as an appeals court slashes a $450 million bond to $175 million.
Trump has 10 days to pay the lower amount to stop Attorney General Letitia James from seizing his assets.
Trump's hush money trial is set to start April 15, making him the first presidential candidate on trial while campaigning.
Trump criticizes the criminal cases against him as election interference.
Democrats express frustration over the decreased bond amount, seeing it as a private system of justice for Trump.
Judge Pirro defends the reduced bond amount as appropriate, criticizing the initial $475 million as disconnected from reality.
Comparison of bond amounts: Sam Bankman-Fried's $250 million vs. Bernie Madoff's $10 million, highlighting the discrepancy with Trump's case.
Judge Pirro argues that the business records case against Trump, set for April 15, lacks basis and credible witnesses.
The discussion includes a Supreme Court decision against a biased indictment and critique of the legal process against Trump.
Greg Gutfeld comments on the public's emotional reactions to Trump's legal situation and the unprecedented nature of the case.
Jessica Tarlov argues that the lowered bond exemplifies a two-tiered system of justice, privileging Trump.
Gutfeld and Tarlov debate Trump's impact on real estate and his contributions to the economy versus allegations against him.
The panel discusses the broader implications of the legal actions against Trump for real estate investment and justice.
Concerns are raised about the precedent set by using legal mechanisms in a way perceived as targeting a political figure.
The debate touches on Trump's potential popularity gain from his legal challenges and the political motivations behind the cases.
Transcripts
♪ ♪
[INDISTINCT]
>> Dana: NEW YORK'S PLAN TO
SEIZE TRUMP'S BUILDING RUNNING
INTO A MAJOR ROADBLOCK.
AN APPEALS COURT FLASHED A
STAGGERING $450 MILLION BOND TO
$175 MILLION JUDGMENT.
HE HAS 10 DAYS TO PAY THE LOWER
AMOUNT IN ORDER TO STOP
ATTORNEY GENERAL LETITIA JAMES
FROM SEIZING HIS ASSETS.
THAT'LL HAPPENING WHILE TRUMP
WAS IN A DIFFERENT COURTROOM
TODAY.
A JUDGE RULING HIS HUSH MONEY
TRIAL WILL START APRIL 15TH,
MEANING TRUMP WILL BE THE FIRST
PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE ON TRIAL
WHILE CAMPAIGNING.
TRUMP SLAMMING CRIMINAL CASES
AGAINST HIM AS ELECTION
INTERFERENCE.
>> I RESPECT THE APPELLATE
DIVISION FOR SUBSTANTIALLY
REDUCING THEIR RIDICULOUS AMOUNT
OF MONEY THAT WAS PUT ON BY A
CORRUPT JUDGE.
NOT TO BE LOOKED AT IN JAMES NOT
TO BE LOOKED AT.
SHE IS LIKE THE PUPPET MASTER OF
THE JUDGE.
WE ARE GOING THROUGH THIS
WEAPONIZATION OF OUR GOVERNMENT
TO TRY AND KNOCK OUT SOMEBODY'S
POLITICAL OPPONENT.
SO FAR BASED ON THE POLLS, IT'S
NOT WORKING AT ALL.
THAT CASE IS A SCAM, A SHAM, AND
A HOAX.
>> Dana: DEMOCRATS WHO WERE
ONCE THRILLED ABOUT THE PROSPECT
OF TRUMP SURRENDERING HIS ASSETS
FUMING OVER THE DECREASED BOND.
>> THIS IS SO INFURIATING, I
DON'T KNOW WHAT TO DO.
NOW HE'S GETTING HIS OWN PRIVATE
SYSTEM OF JUSTICE.
AN ABSOLUTE TRAVESTY.
>> THIS IS ONE HECK OF A BREAK
FOR YET AGAIN -- GO >> THE
PLAYBOOK IS DIFFERENT FOR FORMER
PRESIDENT TRUMP.
>> HE HAS PRETTY MUCH GOTTEN
EVERYTHING IS WANTED.
>> NO ONE ELSE IN THE COUNTRY
WOULD HAVE THAT KIND OF LUCK.
>> Dana: AND MY FAVORITE IS
BACK AFTER BEING FORCED TO
DISMISS HER EX-LOVER FROM
TRUMP'S ELECTION INTERFERENCE
CASE.
THE PROSECUTOR SAYS IT IS FULL
STEAM AHEAD TO GO AFTER TRUMP.
>> I DON'T FEEL LIKE WE HAVE
BEEN SLOW DOWN AT ALL.
I THINK THEIR EFFORTS TO SLOW
DOWN THIS TRAIN.
THE TRAIN IS COMING.
BUT THE RECORD, I'M NOT
EMBARRASSED BY ANYTHING I HAVE
DONE.
YOU KNOW, I GUESS MY GREATEST
CRIME IS, I HAD A RELATIONSHIP
WITH A MAN.
THAT IS NOT SOMETHING I FIND
EMBARRASSING IN ANY WAY.
>> Dana: ALL RIGHT, JUDGE.
THERE'S LOTS TO SHOOT AT HERE.
TAKE YOUR PICK, WHICH EVERYONE
YOU WANT.
>> Judge Pirro: THANK YOU FOR
THE $175 MILLION BOND -- WHICH
CERTAINLY IS APPROPRIATE.
THERE WAS ABSOLUTELY NO
CONNECTION BETWEEN THE
$475 MILLION AND I THINK IT IS
HALF A BILLION DOLLARS AT THIS
POINT WITH THE INTEREST THAT HE
PULLED OUT OF THE SKY AND SAID
I'M GOING TO HIT DONALD TRUMP
FOR THAT.
THEY ARE DISAPPOINTED BECAUSE
THEY WANTED TO CALL HIM BROKE.
HE'S GOING TO MAKE THAT
$175 MILLION BOND.
IN HIS CONDITION OF COURSE UPON
HIS PERFECTING HIS APPEAL BY
SEPTEMBER, THAT MEANS HE'S GOT
TO HAVE ALL HIS APPELLATE WORK
IN THE APPELLATE DIVISION FIRST
APARTMENT WHICH RENDER THIS
DECISION REDUCING THE BOND.
I WANT TO -- I LOOK THIS UP.
WHEN SAM BANKMAN-FRIED WHO
APPARENTLY GONE TO SOMETHING
LIKE A MILLION DOLLARS OR A
MILLION VICTIMS, HIS BOND WAS
$250 MILLION.
BERNIE MADE OFF AT 40,000
VICTIMS.
HIS BOND WAS $10 MILLION.
DONALD TRUMP, NO VICTIMS, HALF A
BILLION DOLLARS.
I MEAN, I DON'T KNOW WHERE THOSE
PEOPLE FROM THE OTHER STATIONS
ARE LEARNING THE LAW BUT THEY
ARE TALKING ABOUT.
THERE IS NO HARM NO FOUL NIGHT.
THAT'S THE END OF IT.
NO ONE RELIED TO THEIR DETRIMENT
ON ANYTHING.
NO ONE LOST A DIME.
DONALD TRUMP IS A WHALE CLIENT.
EVERYONE WHO COMES IN WITH HIM
MAKES MONEY WITH HIM.
THAT'S NUMBER ONE FAN.
NUMBER 2 ON THE BUSINESS RECORDS
CASE THAT'S GONNA ON APRIL 15TH,
THEY'VE GOT A CONVICTED FELON
WHO WAS A LIAR WHO IS THE MAIN
WITNESS IN THAT CASE ON THE CASE
THAT IS LITERALLY WITHOUT BASIS
BECAUSE THEY TOOK A FELONY
CHARGE.
THEY TRIED TO BREATHE LIFE INTO
A STATUTE OF LIMITATION PAST
MISDEMEANOR IN NEW YORK THAT
DIDN'T WANT TO GO ON.
ALVIN BRAGG DIDN'T WANT TO
PROSECUTE.
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT WOULDN'T
PROSECUTE AN F D.C. DIDN'T
PROSECUTE.
THEY CAME AND BREATHED 8 INTO
THIS FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORD
BY BOOTSTRAPPING FROM THE FEDS
AND PULLING AWAY THE STATUTE OF
LIMITATIONS IN THE MISDEMEANOR.
PULLING OUT MICHAEL COHEN TO BE
THEIR CENTRAL WITNESS.
IT IS ABSURD.
THE LAST THING I WANT TO SAY IS
THIS.
YOU HAVE A SUPREME COURT WHO
CAME OUT AS AT THE SECRETARY OF
STATE AS WELL AS THE
SUPREME COURT JUSTICE IN
COLORADO WERE WRONG.
YOU CAN TAKE THEM OFF THE
BALLOT.
THEY SAID TO FANI WILLIS, GET
RID OF YOUR LOVER.
YOU CAN'T HAVE HIM ON.
SIX OF YOUR ACCOUNTS GO BECAUSE
YOU DON'T KNOW HOW TO DRAFT AN
INDICTMENT.
THIS B-17, THEY ARE SAYING YOUR
BOND IS NOWHERE CONSISTENT WITH
THE FACTS.
WE ARE GOING TO TAKE IT DOWN 40
OR 60%.
THEY ARE BAD SHAPE ALREADY AND
IT'S CAN IT CONTINUE THAT WAY.
THIS IS ALL COMING OUT OF THE
DEMOCRATS WHO HATE DONALD TRUMP.
>> Dana: HOW DO YOU SEE ALL
THIS?
>> Greg: I LIKE MY SHIRT EVEN
THOUGH IT LOOKS RATHER STRANGE
ON TV.
I LOVE THAT MONTAGE.
THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO ARE SO
INFURIATED, THEY DON'T KNOW WHAT
TO DO.
SO IN PRETTY RATED, I DON'T KNOW
WHAT TO DO.
BECAUSE TRUMP ONLY IS GOING TO
PONY UP $175 MILLION.
WHAT KIND OF LIFE DO YOU LEAD,
YOU KNOW?
YOU HAVE ANY FRIENDS OR ANY
FAMILY?
WHAT KIND OF LONELY EXISTENCE IS
THIS WHEN YOU DERIVE YOUR
HAPPINESS OR SORROW BASED ON THE
TRIALS OF ANOTHER PERSON?
I CAN'T IMAGINE HOW SMALL THAT
WORLD IS.
WHEN I SAW THAT ON MOTION, I
DON'T EVEN GET THAT MAD.
AT CRIME SPREE'S.
I WAS ANGRY BECAUSE THERE WAS
ACTUAL CRIME.
OVER SOMEBODY ELSE, IT IS SO
WEIRD.
THE BOND WAS BASED NOT ON
THOUGHTFUL REASONED PENALTIES,
IT WAS BASED ON WHAT TRUMP WAS
GOING TO MAKE, HIS PROFIT.
IT WAS REVERSED ENGINEERED USING
THE MANIPULATION OF A LAW THAT
WASN'T USED IN THAT WAY BEFORE.
THAT IS WHY IT WAS CALLED
UNPRECEDENTED.
I STILL WANT TO KNOW WHO HE
WRITES THE CHECK OUT TO EVEN
WHERE THIS BOND.
IF YOU HATE TRUMP, YOU SHOULD
STILL MAINTAIN A SHRED OF
PRINCIPLE AND SAY, I DON'T WANT
THIS GUY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, BUT
I REALIZE THAT THIS IS, LIKE,
ILLEGAL, IMMORAL, AND WOULD
LAUGH LASTING CONSEQUENCES IN
THE REAL ESTATE INDUSTRY.
PEOPLE LIKE JAMIE DIMON ARE
SAYING THAT.
AND YOU ARE NOT.
I THINK THE PROBLEM RIGHT NOW
IS, YOU CAN'T ARGUE WITH AN
IGNORANT MOB.
PEOPLE CHEERING THIS ON, THOSE
PEOPLE YOU SAW HAVE NO IDEA WHAT
THEY ARE CHEERING.
THEY HAVE NO IDEA.
LIKE, WHEN THEY SEE
"UNPRECEDENTED" IN THE SEIZURE
OF PRIVATE PROPERTY, THEY DON'T
THINK, THIS IS WHERE PEOPLE LIVE
AND WORK.
THEY DON'T KNOW WHAT THIS IS
GOING TO INCENTIVIZE WHERE THE
FUTURE.
REPUBLICANS ARE GOING TO BE TO
DO THIS.
OR DEMOCRATS WILL DO THIS.
THE PEOPLE IN REAL ESTATE ARE
NOT GOING TO WANT TO INVEST IN
THE CITY.
IF YOU BRING THIS STUFF UP, THEY
WILL LOOK AT YOU WITH A BLANK
FACE.
THEY ARE SOAKED TO THE GILLS
WITH TDS.
IT'S LIKE ARGUING WITH A MOB,
TORCHING AN AUTO ZONE.
THEY ARE IN THAT MOMENT,
DESTROYING THAT BUILDING.
YOU DO REALIZE THAT PEOPLE WORK
THERE AND, IT'S NOT CAN I HELP
EVERYBODY LIVING IN THAT AREA.
THEY DON'T CARE.
THEY WILL TRASH IT AND PUNCH YOU
IN THE FACE.
THAT IS THE MENTALITY.
>> Dana: WHY WERE THEY SO MAD
ABOUT THE RULE OF LAW BEING
FOLLOWED?
>> Jessica: I DON'T THINK THEY
WOULD SAY THE RULE OF LAW AS
BEING FOLLOWED.
THEY FEEL THAT THIS IS
ABOUT 2 TEARS OF JUSTICE AND NO
OTHER PERSON BUT DONALD TRUMP
WOULD HAVE HAD THE BOND AMOUNT
LOWER THAT MUCH.
I KNOW THAT THERE HAVE BEEN
LARGER BONDS.
99.9% OF THEM HAVE BEEN TO
PUBLIC COMPANIES NOT
INDIVIDUALLY HELD COMPANIES.
THAT IS THE POINT OF
DISTINCTION.
>> Dana: ISN'T THAT TWO-TIERED
SYSTEM OF JUSTICE?
>> Jessica: I AM SAYING WHAT
THEY WERE ARGUING.
I HAVE CONSISTENTLY FELT
UNCOMFORTABLE ABOUT THIS AND
SAID THIS WAS A DISTRACTION FROM
THE CASES THAT PEOPLE ARE REALLY
INTERESTED IN SEEING PLAY OUT
BEFORE THEY CAST THEIR VOTES IN
NOVEMBER OR WHENEVER THEIR EARLY
VOTING PERIOD STARTS.
IT IS DEFINITELY A WIN FOR
TRUMP.
YOU SAW THAT IN HIS PRESS
CONFERENCE AFTERWARDS WHERE HE
SAID THE BEAUTIFUL APPELLATE
DIVISION.
I'M HAPPY TO PAY THIS.
I DO STILL THINK THAT THERE WAS
NO POINT IN HIM BRAGGING
BEFOREHAND ABOUT HOW HE HAD NO
MONEY.
$500 MILLION A FEW DAYS AGO
BEFORE THAT HE SAID HE HAD
$400 MILLION IN CASH.
I GUESS WE WILL NEVER KNOW.
I THINK HE REALLY GAVE UP THEIR
GAME AND ONE EXCHANGE WITH A
REPORTER WHO SAID, ARE YOU
MARRIED A CONVICTION COULD COST
YOU THE ELECTION?
HIS ANSWER WAS, WELL, HE COULD
ALSO MAKE ME MORE POPULAR.
I UNDERSTAND HIS THINKING ON
THAT.
SURVEY AFTER SURVEY REVEALS THAT
ISN'T THE CASE.
NO, HE GAINS POPULARITY.
HE DID THAT THROUGH THEIR
PRIMARY PURITY IS OBVIOUSLY
RUNNING VERY COMPETITIVELY.
PEOPLE DON'T WANT TO VOTE FOR A
CONVICTED FELON.
I THINK HE NEEDS TO BE CAREFUL
ABOUT THAT.
HE HAS A LOT OF CASES PENDING
AGAINST HIM.
>> Greg: IS THAT THE WHOLE
POINT OF THIS?
PEOPLE DON'T VOTE FOR A FELON.
IT IS A CIRCULAR ARGUMENT.
>> Jessica: THAT IS MAKING IT
OUT AS IF THE MAN DIDN'T DO
ANYTHING WRONG.
THE AVERAGE REAL ESTATE INVESTOR
IS INFLATING THE WORTH OF
THEIR --
>> Greg: YOU DON'T KNOW
ANYTHING ABOUT REAL ESTATE,
JESSICA, YOU RANTS.
LOOK AT THAT BUILDING.
TRUMP OWNS THAT BUILDING.
TRUMP OWNS ALL OF THESE
BEAUTIFUL PROPERTIES.
HE HAS BUILT THESE THINGS.
WHAT HAS JOE BIDEN BUILD?
JOE BIDEN HAS NOT BUILT
ANYTHING, JESSICA.
HE HASN'T EVEN BUILT A CHARGING
STATION FOR THIS MAN IS
RESPONSIBLE FOR THOUSANDS OF
AMERICANS BEING HIRED AND
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS BEING MADE
BY BANKS BY INVESTORS IN THIS
GREAT CITY.
THE BOOK IN THE BACK SHOT OF
THAT STUPID FORMER ASSISTANT
U.S. ATTORNEY, DO YOU KNOW WHAT
IT SAID?
TAKING DOWN TRUMP.
THAT WAS THE BOOK IN HIS LITTLE
BACK SHOT LIBRARY.
THIS GUY IS A STRAIGHT PLAYER.
THESE ARE NOT STRAY PLAYERS.
THESE ARE HOUNDS, JESSICA.
A SAVAGE ATTACK ON A MAN,
BECAUSE THESE PEOPLE ARE
MENTALLY ILL.
THEY DON'T WANT TO SEE HIM
ACTUALLY CONVICTED AT ALL.
THEY JUST WANT TO SEE HIM
CONVICTED BEFORE THE ELECTION.
THEY DON'T CARE WHAT HAPPENS
AFTER THE ELECTION.
THAT IS THE WHOLE POINT OF THIS.
JOE BIDEN HAS UNLEASHED THE
HOUNDS.
TALKING ABOUT THE TRAIN.
COME ON.
IF YOU TAKE THE TRUMP TRAIN AND
YOU GO LIKE THIS, MY MONEY IS ON
THE TRUMP TRAIN.
REMEMBER AFTER 9/11, JESSICA.
WE TREATED -- YOUR DEMOCRAT
LAWYERS FLEW DOWN TO GET TO
REPRESENT HIM.
THEY NEED CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.
THEY NEED ALL OF THE RIGHTS THAT
THEY SHOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO
APPEAL, THE RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS
AND THE RIGHT TO A TRIAL.
THEY ARE GIVING TERRORISTS MORE
RESPECT THAN DONALD TRUMP.
THEY SAID, THIS IS WHAT MAKES
AMERICA, AMERICA.
NOW THEY ARE JUST DESTROYING
THIS MAN.
THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT PRECEDENT.
THEY ARE TRYING TO ATTACK HIM
ANYWAY THEY CAN.
>> Jessica: DONALD TRUMP
HAS -- HE THINKS IT IS GREAT
REPRESENTATION.
HE HAS GOTTEN ALMOST ALL OF HIS
REQUEST FROM THE SUPREME COURT
DOWN TO THE STATE COURTS.
WHAT YOU JUST SAID BEING ON
INCREDIBLY RUDE WAY THAT YOU
BEGAN ABOUT HOW I RENT MY
APARTMENT.
IT HAS GIVEN HIM -- SUBPOENAS
AND NOT RETURNING THEM TO
FOMENTING AN INSURRECTION AFTER
HE LOST AN ELECTION BY MILLIONS
OF VOTES.
>> Judge Pirro: HE'S NOT
CHARGED WITH THAT, IS HE?
>> Greg: I'M SAYING THERE IS
NO VICTIMS IN ANY OF THESE
CASES.
YOU GUYS ARE VERY ANGRY.
YOU GUYS ARE VERY ANGRY THAT HE
HAS THE CASH.
THE OTHER DAY, YOU SAID, HE'S
BROKE.
$500 MILLION CASH.
AND THEN, HE JUST PUT UP BOND
FOR $97 MILLION FOR THE WOMAN
WHO ACCUSED HIM AND PUT ANOTHER
$175 MILLION FOR THIS STUPID
CASE.
>> HE WAS FOUND LIABLE F
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)
Kevin O'Leary: This is an 'extraordinary assault' on America
Breaking Trump News [9AM] 3/25/2024 | 🅼🆂🅽🅱🅲 Latest Trump March 25, 2024
‘HOW IRONIC IS THAT?’: Attorney calls out Letitia James over Trump bond
BREAKING: Court finally issues ruling on Trump’s request to delay bond
NYC Protest Begins🔥Truckers Block New York! INVESTORS Boycott NY & Warns NY AG Letitia James
New York AG questions financial strength of company that posted Trump's bond