“I'm Laughing In Your FACE” Cenk Uygur vs Emily Schrader On Iran-Israel

Piers Morgan Uncensored
15 Apr 202441:07

Summary

TLDRThe escalating conflict between Israel and Iran has pushed the Middle East to a precarious edge, with over 300 drones and missiles launched in a报复性 attack by Iran. The conversation emphasizes the importance of restraint, the potential for full-scale war, and the need for a strategic response. The panel discusses the role of the US and other allies, the potential for regime change in Iran, and the critical balance between deterrence and diplomacy. The debate highlights the complexity of the situation, with varying opinions on the best course of action for Israel and the international community.

Takeaways

  • 🚨 Iran launched over 300 drones and missiles in a revenge attack against Israel, escalating tensions in the Middle East.
  • 🤝 Israel called for support from allies, appreciating the US, Britain, France, and other countries standing alongside them during the crisis.
  • 🛡️ Israel's Iron Dome defense system successfully neutralized the majority of the incoming drones and missiles, preventing damage and casualties.
  • 🔥 The debate on whether Israel should show restraint or respond strongly to the attack highlighted differing opinions on the best course of action.
  • 👑 The exiled Crown Prince of Iran, Reza Pahlavi, emphasized the need for regime change in Iran and urged the international community to support the Iranian people.
  • 🌍 The conversation touched on the broader implications of the conflict, including its potential impact on global security and regional stability.
  • 🤔 The panelists discussed various strategies for dealing with Iran, including economic sanctions, support for the Iranian opposition, and potential military responses.
  • 💡 The importance of a strong and strategic response from the West was emphasized to deter further aggression and promote peace in the region.
  • 🗣️ The differing perspectives on the situation highlighted the complexity of the Middle East conflict and the need for a nuanced approach to diplomacy and security.
  • 🌐 The potential role of the Abraham Accords in the current conflict was discussed, with speculation on Iran's motivations related to the normalization of relations between Israel and Arab countries.
  • ⚖️ The balance between deterrence and restraint in responding to acts of aggression was a central theme of the debate, with various viewpoints on how to achieve long-term peace and stability.

Q & A

  • What was the nature of the attack on Israel by Iran?

    -Iran launched more than 300 drones and missiles in a revenge attack for Israel's bombing of an Iranian diplomatic compound in Syria.

  • How did Israel respond to the attack?

    -Israel's response is not explicitly mentioned in the transcript, but it is implied that they have a strong defense system capable of neutralizing such attacks.

  • What is the significance of the increasing direct conflict between Israel and Iran?

    -The direct conflict signifies a shift from proxy wars and subterfuge to a more open and dangerous confrontation, potentially leading to full-scale warfare and increased instability in the region.

  • What was the panel's opinion on Israel's need for restraint?

    -The panel had mixed opinions, with some members arguing that Israel should show restraint to avoid escalating the conflict, while others emphasized the need for deterrence and a strong response to protect its interests.

  • What was the Crown Prince of Iran's perspective on the regime's actions?

    -The Crown Prince viewed the regime's actions as desperate and indicative of its increasing vulnerability. He argued for regime change and supported increased international pressure on Iran.

  • How did the panel discuss the potential strategies for dealing with Iran?

    -The panel discussed various strategies including increasing economic pressure through sanctions, designating the IRGC as a terrorist organization, and supporting the Iranian people's struggle against the regime.

  • What was the panel's stance on the potential for regime change in Iran?

    -The panel generally agreed that regime change in Iran could be beneficial for regional stability, but they had differing views on how to achieve it, ranging from supporting internal uprisings to increasing international pressure.

  • What was the discussion about the role of the United States in the conflict?

    -The panel discussed the importance of U.S. policy and leadership in addressing the issue with Iran, with some members arguing for a stronger stance against the regime and others cautioning against actions that could escalate the conflict.

  • How did the panel address the situation in Gaza?

    -The panel acknowledged the ongoing conflict and humanitarian crisis in Gaza, with some members criticizing Israel's actions and others emphasizing the need for a broader strategic approach to address the root causes of the conflict.

  • What was the panel's view on the potential consequences of an Israeli military response to Iran?

    -The panel had differing views, with some members cautioning that a military response could play into Iran's hands and others arguing that a strong deterrent might be necessary to prevent future attacks.

Outlines

00:00

🌪️ Middle East Conflict Escalation

The paragraph discusses the heightened tensions in the Middle East due to Iran's missile and drone attack on Israel, in retaliation for Israel's bombing of an Iranian diplomatic compound in Syria. It highlights the precarious situation in the region and the potential for full-scale warfare. The speaker emphasizes the importance of Israel's restraint, considering its role as a key Western ally in a region with many unstable actors. The conversation also touches on the support Israel has from various countries and the need for a strategic response to maintain regional stability.

05:02

💡 Strategies for Dealing with Iran

This paragraph focuses on potential strategies to address the Iranian regime's aggressive actions. The discussion includes economic pressure through expanded sanctions, designating the IRGC as a terror organization, and targeting regime officials' personal assets. It also emphasizes the need for maximum support for the Iranian people's struggle, including ensuring internet access and finding ways to support Iranians financially. The conversation suggests that a dual approach of internal and external pressure could be a recipe for a successful transition, and questions Israel's potential response strategies.

10:03

🤝 International Support and Policy Shifts

The discussion in this paragraph centers around the international community's role in addressing the Iranian regime. It calls for strong leadership from the Western world, drawing parallels to historical figures like Roosevelt and Churchill. The speaker argues for a policy shift that goes beyond immediate responses and focuses on long-term solutions, such as regime change in Iran. The conversation also touches on the importance of the Abraham Accords and the potential for Israel to be a strategic partner in the region, emphasizing the need for cooperation among world leaders to seriously address the Iranian issue.

15:05

🗣️ Debate on Israel's Response

This paragraph presents a debate on Israel's appropriate response to Iran's aggression. The participants discuss the merits of restraint versus deterrence, with differing opinions on the potential consequences of military action. The conversation explores the idea that a strong military response could backfire and embolden the Iranian regime, while also considering the need to protect Israeli and regional security. The debate also considers the potential impact of international politics and public opinion on the decisions made by Israel and its allies.

20:05

🌐 Global Perspectives on the Israeli-Iranian Conflict

The paragraph includes a variety of perspectives on the Israeli-Iranian conflict, highlighting the complexity of the situation. The discussion touches on the historical context, the role of Hamas as a proxy for Iran, and the international law surrounding military strikes. Participants argue about the origins of the conflict, the legitimacy of targets, and the potential for regime change in Iran. The conversation also addresses the importance of public opinion and the potential risks of alienating the American public through aggressive military actions.

25:07

🛡️ Deterrence and the Future of Middle Eastern Relations

The final paragraph delves into the topic of deterrence and its role in the future of Middle Eastern relations. It discusses the potential for Israel's missile defense system to serve as a deterrent to future attacks and the importance of maintaining a strong coalition of countries to support this effort. The conversation also considers the implications of a potential military response from Israel, the need for a smarter, long-term strategy, and the potential impact on American public opinion and political support for Israel.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Revenge attack

A retaliatory action taken in response to a perceived harm or injustice. In the context of the video, Iran's firing of drones and missiles against Israel is described as a revenge attack for Israel's bombing of an Iranian diplomatic compound in Syria.

💡Proxy warfare

A form of indirect warfare where one nation supports and directs another group or nation to engage in combat, rather than engaging directly. The video discusses how Iran and Israel have been involved in proxy conflicts, using intermediaries to attack each other without direct confrontation.

💡Diplomatic compound

A geographical area, usually in a foreign country, that serves as the diplomatic territory of a country, housing its embassy and other official representation. The video refers to the bombing of an Iranian diplomatic compound in Syria by Israel, which is a significant escalation in their conflict.

💡Iron Dome

A mobile air defense system developed by Israel for shooting down short to medium-range rockets and artillery shells. The script mentions the Iron Dome in the context of Israel's defense against the Iranian attack, highlighting its effectiveness.

💡Regime change

The process of replacing the ruling regime, especially by undemocratic means. The video discusses the idea of regime change in Iran as a potential solution to the ongoing conflicts, suggesting that the current Iranian regime is the root cause of instability in the region.

💡Escalation

An increase in intensity or scale, particularly in a conflict. The video explores the potential consequences of escalating the conflict between Iran and Israel, including the possibility of a full-scale war and the impact on regional stability.

💡Deterrence

A strategy or threat that dissuades an adversary from taking certain actions. The script discusses the concept of deterrence in the context of Israel's potential response to the Iranian attack, emphasizing the need to prevent future aggression.

💡Sanctions

Penalties imposed for disobedience to a set of rules, typically by an authoritative body. The video discusses economic sanctions as a tool to pressure the Iranian regime, suggesting that increased sanctions could lead to its downfall.

💡Islamic Republic of Iran

The official name of Iran's political system, which is an Islamic theocracy. The video refers to the Islamic Republic's aggressive foreign policy, support for proxy groups, and its role in regional conflicts.

💡Gaza

A self-governing Palestinian territory with a significant population. The script mentions Gaza in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, highlighting the humanitarian crisis and the role of Hamas, a Palestinian militant group, in the ongoing violence.

💡Abraham Accords

A series of agreements that led to the normalization of relations between Israel and several Arab states, including the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain. The video discusses the potential impact of these accords on regional dynamics and the Iranian regime's attempts to undermine them.

Highlights

Iran launched over 300 drones and missiles in a revenge attack against Israel, escalating tensions in the Middle East.

The conflict between Israel and Iran is reaching a boiling point, with the potential for full-scale warfare.

Israel's response to the attack could significantly impact regional stability, with global implications.

The United States, Britain, France, and other countries are standing in support of Israel during this crisis.

Israel is expected to act as a responsible ally, showing restraint in the face of aggression.

The Iranian regime's nature and behavior are the root causes of many problems in the region, according to the exiled Crown Prince of Iran.

The failure of the Iranian attack on Israel, with 99% of drones and missiles neutralized, demonstrates the strength of Israel's defenses.

The international community, including Western and Middle Eastern allies, must consider regime change in Iran as a solution to ongoing issues.

Economic pressure and sanctions are suggested as methods to increase pressure on the Iranian regime.

Support for the Iranian people in their struggle against the regime is crucial, including ensuring internet access and easing financial restrictions.

The potential for Israel to launch a direct attack into Iran is debated, with concerns about escalating the conflict.

The Biden Administration's policy towards Iran is criticized for appeasement, with calls for stronger leadership.

The Abraham Accords are highlighted as a positive development for regional relations, despite attempts by Iran to sabotage them.

The debate emphasizes the complexity of the situation, with differing views on the appropriate response to Iran's aggression.

The importance of public opinion and American support for Israel is discussed, with concerns about the potential loss of backing due to recent actions.

The potential for a military response from Israel is weighed against the risks of escalating the conflict and uniting the Iranian people behind the regime.

The conversation underlines the need for a strategic approach to dealing with the Islamic regime in Iran, focusing on long-term solutions rather than immediate reactions.

The role of the Western world in supporting democracy and human rights in Iran is emphasized as a key element in fostering change.

Transcripts

00:00

this weekend Israel again found itself

00:02

under attack Iran fired more than 300

00:04

drones and missiles in a Revenge attack

00:06

for Israel's bombing of an Iranian

00:08

diplomatic compound in Syria after

00:11

decades aspiring through proxies

00:13

assassinations and subterfuge two Titans

00:16

of the Middle East are now on the brink

00:17

of full Warfare the region and the world

00:20

is suddenly a much more dangerous and

00:22

precarious Place Israel says it will

00:25

respond how and when it does could be

00:27

the difference between stability and a

00:29

full region

00:31

War we appreciate the US standing

00:34

alongside Israel as well as the support

00:37

of Britain France and many other

00:39

countries we have determined a clear

00:42

principle whoever harms us we will harm

00:45

them I took some Flack over the weekend

00:47

for immediately urging Israel to show

00:49

restraint in fact one of the people who

00:51

criticize me most viciously will be on

00:53

my panel debating exactly that point at

00:55

a moment many people have argued that

00:57

Israel is the only country on Earth as

01:00

expected to endure this kind of attack

01:02

and respond with restraint with caution

01:04

but my response is to say that's exactly

01:06

the point the whole reason Israel is

01:08

such a vital Ally to the West is because

01:10

it's supposed to be the adult in the

01:12

room a western facing Democratic

01:15

socially liberal bull walk in a

01:17

neighborhood of trigger happy Fanatics

01:19

if you don't want the United States to

01:20

be dragged into another Middle Eastern

01:22

bloodbath you should agree that this is

01:24

the time for his key Ally in the region

01:26

to prove his commitment to peace and

01:28

let's face it Iran is already already a

01:30

big loser here yes many Israelis would

01:32

have died if this attack had been

01:33

successful but it wasn't it was an

01:36

abject failure 99% of the drones and

01:38

missiles were swatted from the sky

01:40

Western and Middle Eastern allies

01:42

including Jordan and Saudi Arabia have R

01:45

ried behind Israel after months of

01:47

eroding their trust and patience with

01:49

increasingly brutal assault on Gaza for

01:52

Minister Netanyahu has reclaimed at

01:54

least a little of his reputation for

01:55

security which was dealt a terrible

01:58

permanent Blow by October the 7th but

02:00

for once I agree with President Biden

02:02

Israel needs to take the win because it

02:05

was a win these missiles did not land

02:08

and cause damage the Middle East is

02:10

simmering to the boil hundreds of people

02:12

are dying in Gaza every day as Israeli

02:15

hostages remain captives of Hamas it's

02:17

time to turn the temperature down not

02:19

pour fuel onto the fire in a few minutes

02:22

I'll be debating this with The Young

02:23

Turks founder Jen Yuga former

02:26

Congressman Joe Walsh and Israeli

02:27

journalist Emily shrer but first i'm

02:29

joined by by the exiled Crown Prince of

02:31

Iran Resa palavi uh Crown Prince it's

02:34

it's great to have you back on

02:35

uncensored first of all if I may get

02:38

your reaction to uh the attack by Iran

02:43

directly on Israel

02:48

soil well you know these are signs of a

02:50

regime that is becoming more and more

02:51

desperate and

02:53

vulnerable at the same time it's

02:55

launching uh an attack against Israel it

02:57

has been launching an attack at home on

03:00

Iranian women and trying to uh again

03:03

exercise its repression at home uh this

03:06

is going to be an ongoing problem and I

03:09

think ultimately the world needs to

03:11

realize that the root cause of many

03:13

problems we see in the area and not just

03:15

this one instance but in general is uh

03:18

the regime's nature and and behavior it

03:21

has not only affected Iranians or

03:23

Israelis it has also affected syrians

03:26

Iraqis Lebanese and other immediate

03:30

Neighbors in the

03:32

region Iran has operated uh through

03:36

proxies for a number of years obviously

03:38

this is the first time they've directly

03:40

attacked Israel in this manner how

03:43

significant is this

03:46

escalation well I think a lot of it is

03:49

perhaps mostly to for home consumption

03:52

to say we've done something uh one thing

03:55

that was really uh uh rendering it even

03:59

more of a is that despite launching so

04:01

many different missiles and drones none

04:04

of them actually reached Target so was

04:06

it really an exercise for purposes of

04:09

domestic consumption or was it actually

04:12

the intent to escalate uh I think this

04:14

time K took a huge gamble assuming that

04:18

uh probably there will be a lot of

04:20

pressure uh to keep these relies from

04:22

retaliating but then again I think we

04:24

should look beyond the Tit for Tat

04:26

argument I think the world needs to now

04:29

really uh scratch their head and say

04:31

look diplomacy has failed our

04:33

expectation of behavior change from this

04:35

regime over decades is pointless the

04:38

time has come to look for an ultimate

04:39

solution to the problem if we indeed

04:41

want to avoid escalation we have to put

04:44

an end to this regime which is the ask

04:46

of the Iranian people in the first place

04:48

but the world needs to seriously

04:50

consider that the only solution and

04:51

alternative is regime change in

04:54

Iran but how do how does the world

04:56

affect regime change in Iran

04:59

well two things number one is to

05:01

actually increase even more pressure on

05:03

the regime economically by means of

05:05

expanding the sanctions I think it is

05:07

time that the G7 and the European

05:10

countries join the US in putting the

05:12

irgc on the terror list this will

05:14

further put pressure on the regime to

05:16

Target the regime's officials

05:18

individually on their personal assets to

05:21

expel their diplomats or elements

05:23

associated with the regime that room

05:24

freely in European and American cities

05:28

uh and uh actually implement

05:30

further oil sanctions which by the way

05:32

were not properly implemented which

05:33

simply gave the regime more money which

05:35

of course it spent on his proxies

05:37

whether theotis or uh Hamas and what

05:40

have you uh that's on the external

05:42

Factor aspect parallel to this needs to

05:45

be a policy of Maximum support that

05:47

means support for the Iranian people in

05:49

their uh struggle against this regime

05:52

and that could come in many forms I

05:54

think the most important one is to make

05:56

sure that Iranians remain connected to

05:58

the world and therefore uh internet

06:00

access is key I've mentioned that many

06:02

times before uh Elon Musk with Starling

06:05

have done their part I think we need

06:07

more of that happening there are means

06:08

of perhaps uh making exceptions to some

06:11

of the current limitations of uh uh the

06:14

inability for Iranians to let's say send

06:16

money back home because as you know

06:18

under the current sanctions it's

06:20

impossible to transfer money we are only

06:21

limited to some digital currency that

06:24

could be at least uh an exception to the

06:26

rule to make it easier for us to support

06:28

families at home especially our working

06:30

force if they want to go on strike not

06:32

to remain completely uh you know

06:36

impoverished and unable to actually do

06:38

that and there are many other elements I

06:40

know there there are too many details to

06:42

discuss in one short interview but there

06:43

are many ways to equal the the playing

06:45

field for the Iranians and that could be

06:48

a a dual element of pressure from uh

06:50

from in the interior of the country as

06:52

well as external pressure this could be

06:54

a recipe that could lead to a successful

06:57

uh

06:58

transition obviously uh a lot of

07:01

speculation about what Israel's response

07:03

will be to this unprecedented missile

07:05

strike do you think it would be uh a

07:09

smart strategy for Israel to launch an

07:12

attack directly into Iran as some of the

07:15

more uh right-wing members of the

07:18

cabinet apparently want to

07:20

do you know I cannot speculate as to

07:23

what would be the decision inter inter

07:27

internally uh at the level of cabinet

07:29

and what's been decided and I know

07:31

there's a lot of back and forth uh

07:33

between different countries that are

07:34

Consulting with the Israeli government

07:36

but I can tell you one thing at the end

07:38

of the day I think that bib Netanyahu

07:40

Muhammad bin Salman and many others in

07:42

the region know that we cannot only

07:45

remain focus on again what can happen or

07:48

not and whether or not this could

07:50

escalate Beyond I think everybody in the

07:53

region understand that so long as the

07:55

regime and its nature is constantly

07:58

creating Havoc towards more extremism

08:01

more radicalism more instability more

08:04

threats uh we cannot contemplate any

08:06

solution other than uh dealing only with

08:09

the status quo we need to start

08:11

strategically Thinking Beyond the status

08:13

quo these are the kind of discussions I

08:15

had uh recently uh at least last year

08:18

when I was in Israel uh visiting that

08:21

country and what I've been talking about

08:23

with uh uh foreign countries in Europe

08:26

and the United States whether

08:27

legislators or in government there has

08:30

to be

08:31

ultimately uh a fundamental shift in

08:34

overall policy as they deal with the

08:36

Islamic regime in Iran and that would

08:38

mean that rather than staying only

08:40

focused on how do we respond or what's

08:43

proportional response and what are the

08:45

uh collateral uh elements because we

08:48

know people are suffering we know

08:49

Iranians are suffering Israelis are

08:51

suffering Palestinians are suffering but

08:53

all because of of this regime so the

08:56

only remedy ultimately while we are

08:59

looking at the immediate response is a

09:01

general shift in in policy that is the

09:03

only way we can get out of this mess and

09:06

solve really a problem for the region in

09:09

terms of stability and peace and of

09:10

course beyond that uh what could rectify

09:14

what the regime from its beginning has

09:16

derailed which is peace and stability in

09:18

our

09:19

region what is your message to President

09:22

Biden because clearly America's role in

09:24

this will be absolutely

09:27

crucial I think this Administration

09:29

needs to realize that uh uh what has

09:32

happened in terms of appeasement when

09:34

you're releasing money to this regime it

09:37

only emboldens it to do even more of

09:40

what it's done I wonder if this had not

09:42

happened about a year ago uh as a

09:45

continuation of attempt of reaching

09:47

another nuclear deal with Iranians or

09:50

paying ransoms for release of their

09:51

hostages but there are not that that

09:54

factor did not directly contribute to

09:56

the Hamas attack against Israel uh these

09:58

are the kind of question that needs to

09:59

be really answered and I haven't had any

10:03

response to this question heard here in

10:05

Washington it's not too late I mean look

10:08

at it the the Abraham Accords what was

10:11

uh going on in a very positive way the

10:13

regime very astutely tried to sabotage

10:16

it and again cleverly using his proxies

10:18

because it every time wants to take

10:20

credit for it without being accountable

10:22

for it this is the time to finally keep

10:24

the regime accountable and I don't think

10:26

that the policy of appeasement works it

10:29

only emboldens the regime and the

10:30

consequences is more suffering for the

10:32

people there needs to be now strong

10:34

leadership we need the same kind of

10:36

leadership that we saw between Roosevelt

10:38

and Churchill at the end of the second

10:40

world war we need to have the same

10:42

result that Ronald Reagan and Margaret

10:43

Thatcher had to put an end to the Soviet

10:46

communist system in in Russia today we

10:49

need the same kind of strong leadership

10:51

emanating from the free West Western

10:53

World in support of democracy and

10:55

freedom and human rights in a country

10:57

that could be the pivotal element in

10:59

changing everything that this regime has

11:02

done to divert us from that from that

11:04

Rail and I think Iran is going to be the

11:06

most important strategic partner to key

11:08

countries in the area Israel Saudi

11:11

Arabia and others to bring about that

11:13

change and we need to work with one

11:14

another and I hope that the world

11:16

leaders will finally decide uh to

11:19

consider this uh issue very seriously

11:22

and I stand ready to present to them our

11:24

viewpoints on behalf of my compatriots

11:26

of how they can best find a solution

11:29

that is win-win which is in the interest

11:31

of the Iranian people but also in their

11:33

own interest whether it's National

11:34

Security or even down the line economic

11:38

interest Grand prce pvi really good to

11:41

talk to you thank you very much indeed

11:42

for taking the time thanks for having me

11:45

again

11:48

Pierce well going down to my panel to

11:50

debate this Jake yuger Joe Walsh and

11:52

Emily shraer uh let me start with you

11:54

Joe W because you were giving me a bit

11:55

of uh hammer on X formerly Twitter

11:58

yesterday because I tweeted in reaction

12:01

to What had happened that I I wanted

12:03

Israel to show restraint and I feared

12:07

that Netanyahu wouldn't do that now just

12:10

to clarify what I meant I didn't mean

12:12

there should be no response I just

12:14

wanted that response not to be just

12:16

going all guns blazing into Iran because

12:20

I I genuinely fear that might uh

12:23

accelerate this into a a much more

12:25

catastrophic situation but you feel very

12:28

strongly don't you could tell that you

12:30

believe Israel is always the one when it

12:33

gets attacked that is urged so restraint

12:35

and they shouldn't be told to do

12:38

that pierce really good to be with you

12:40

and uh I apologize if in my Twitter

12:44

response to you if I got personal I

12:46

apologize I didn't mean it my my beef

12:49

wasn't with what you said that Israel

12:53

should show restraint because I actually

12:55

agree with that my beef was the timing

12:58

of that tweet and so many others Israel

13:01

was under attack the uh missile the you

13:05

know the alarms were going off in

13:07

Jerusalem missiles were raining down on

13:09

Israel and it just didn't seem Pierce

13:13

like that was the proper time while

13:16

Israel is being attacked to come out and

13:18

say Israel needs to show restraint um I

13:22

agree with the sentiment of what you

13:24

said I just didn't think it was the

13:26

proper time until we knew Pierce how

13:29

many of those missiles might have gotten

13:31

through Andor killed

13:34

Israelis right fair enough um let me go

13:36

to Jen uh Jen it's it's very complex

13:40

situation this in fact the whole

13:42

Regional issues are very complex and we

13:44

have of course at the same time the

13:46

situation in Gaza but Jen when you see

13:49

what Iran did to Israel what do you

13:52

think Israel's response should

13:55

be uh their response should be nothing

13:58

uh they should leave well enough alone

14:01

Joe Biden uh with a rare uh Victory here

14:04

H in being right about the situation

14:07

deescalate right now Israel obviously

14:09

started this uh and by then I don't mean

14:12

we can get into oh my God their proxies

14:15

and Hamas but then the occupation and we

14:17

can go all the way back to 1948 what I

14:19

mean specifically is uh they attacked

14:22

Iran basically on its home soil by

14:25

attacking the consulate killing their

14:26

top General Etc it was an act of Prov a

14:29

it was meant to get Iran to retaliate

14:32

Netanyahu who has been dying for a war

14:34

with Iran for about two decades now he

14:37

definitely started this it left Iran

14:39

absolutely no choice but to respond and

14:41

they responded in a way that basically

14:44

showed their hand which was we don't

14:46

want a war they gave 72-hour notice it

14:49

took the drones several hours to get

14:51

there if Iran wanted to do damage inside

14:53

Israel it would not have done this type

14:56

of attack at all this was Iran basically

14:58

saying look we have to appease our

15:00

domestic uh audience here and tell them

15:02

oh we were tough and struck Israel back

15:05

but they knew they were going to get no

15:06

casualties so we had a Tit for Tat we

15:09

should leave it alone right now if

15:10

Israel goes back and hits Iran again

15:13

then there's going to be no end to this

15:15

then Iran is going to have to respond

15:16

and this time it's going to be real and

15:18

people are going to die in Israel it's a

15:20

terrible disastrous idea they should

15:22

definitely stop right

15:24

now okay Emily Sher I can see you uh

15:28

well I would say not entirely agreeing

15:30

with what you just

15:32

heard yes I I strongly disagree as you

15:35

can imagine I think the entire premise

15:37

of asking Israel to exercise restraint

15:40

rather than deterrence is a fundamental

15:42

part of the problem here I mean as the

15:44

Crown Prince mentioned the Islamic

15:46

Republic has been doing this for many

15:48

many years it's a fundamental premise of

15:50

the regime since 1979 they have been

15:53

sworn to Israel's destruction they have

15:55

been sworn to America's destruction this

15:57

is a fundamental value of the Islamic

15:59

Republic and not only that but I find it

16:01

very interesting what uh Chen is saying

16:04

right now because uh the majority of the

16:05

Iranian people both inside and outside

16:07

of Iran disagree with him in fact there

16:10

are thousands and thousands of Iranians

16:12

who wish that Israel will assist the

16:14

people of Iran in bringing down this

16:16

regime we are not going to see a better

16:18

future in the Middle East for the Arab

16:20

Muslims for the Iranians or for the

16:23

Israelis in the Middle East until there

16:25

is regime change in Iran and to say that

16:27

Israel started this is prop posterous

16:29

it's not Israel that has a countdown to

16:31

the destruction of Israel in the center

16:33

of their largest city that's Iran it's

16:35

Iran who has made hating Israel a

16:37

fundamental premise of the regime an

16:39

obsessive hatred an obsessive irrational

16:42

hatred that they have taken money from

16:44

the people of Iran and poured hundreds

16:46

of millions of dollars into terrorist

16:48

proxy organizations on the borders of

16:50

Israel in order to ultimately destruct

16:53

and destroy the state of Israel I also

16:55

want to add one more thing about the

16:57

consulate that's important to note that

16:58

it was not in fact a consulate was an

17:00

Annex of the consulate and even if it

17:02

was a consulate under international law

17:04

it is permissible to strike when it's

17:07

being used as a military headquarters to

17:08

plan and conduct terrorist operations

17:10

Israel is in a state of War we're in a

17:12

state of war with a proxy of the Islamic

17:14

Republic of Iran Hamas and that is what

17:17

that commander who was killed in that

17:19

strike was doing there so this is a

17:21

legitimate Target even though Israel

17:23

hasn't officially claimed

17:25

responsibility okay I'm going to bring

17:27

Joe in in a moment I just want to Jen

17:29

you were laughing at one stage there

17:30

what were you laughing at yeah yeah I

17:33

mean look a lot of absurd things were

17:34

said there uh like any mention of the

17:37

Crown Prince I mean the guy's the the

17:40

son of a former dictator of Iran he has

17:43

zero credibility with the Iranian people

17:45

look I the Iranian regime is that's

17:47

absolutely disaster he is the most he is

17:51

the most popular figure of any Iranians

17:53

are you are you

17:54

Iranian ask the Iranians yourself it's

17:57

very very clear while there

18:01

the vast majority of them the vast

18:03

majority of them do support the show is

18:05

she just going to talk over me because

18:06

we can keep doing this all day long let

18:08

me answer the questions so first of all

18:10

the idea that they want their dictator

18:11

back is hilarious second of all but the

18:14

thing that I laughed out loud at is

18:15

she's like oh the Iranian people want

18:17

Israel to bomb them do they do they

18:20

that's the most Preposterous thing I

18:21

have ever people

18:23

want it's actually not there are

18:25

multiple polls that show that I

18:27

personally think it's crazy multip show

18:30

that they want to B by there have been

18:33

that they support that they support

18:35

Israeli strikes that they support

18:37

Israeli strikes on regime irgc and

18:40

regime sites

18:42

exclusively on

18:44

irgc yes the majority of the Iranian

18:47

people support regime change the

18:50

majority of the Iranian people support

18:52

regime change I find it disgraceful that

18:55

you are laughing at the suffering of 0

18:59

islamist dictatorship no there are women

19:02

who are being dragged Away by the

19:04

morality police as the Crown Prince

19:05

mentioned there is a second front of

19:07

this war and it is against thean people

19:09

internally is that funny to you funny to

19:12

you that women are being time is she

19:15

just going to talk 90% time I do is that

19:18

funny let me just respond real quick do

19:20

you find it funny that women that

19:21

Iranians are being oppress can I respond

19:23

all right

19:26

whatever all day long we're not gonna

19:28

all right all right so listen the

19:30

Iranian regime is terrible I don't want

19:33

Muslim fundamentalists in charge of Iran

19:34

and the people of Iran don't want Muslim

19:36

fundamentalists in charge of Iran so

19:38

saying that they're against the regime

19:39

is obvious that's not the point the

19:41

question is what are you going to do

19:43

about it if you said hey there's an

19:45

internal Revolution and they're

19:46

disgusted by the way that the Iranian

19:48

regime is treating women or its own

19:49

citizens and not giving them freedom I

19:52

totally agree but if you claim that they

19:54

want Israel to bomb Iran in order to

19:58

effectuate regime change you sound I

20:00

mean you s it's not even you don't even

20:02

sound like a lunatic you sound like

20:04

you're a comic or something you're

20:05

trying to make a joke that's why I'm

20:07

laughing no the Iranian people do not

20:09

want to be let me bring in let me bring

20:11

in Jo but furthermore all right let me

20:14

let me bring in Joe Joe's been waiting

20:15

very patiently Joe here's here's my

20:17

question for you about this I I I'm not

20:20

a conspiracy theorist by nature but let

20:22

me just put an idea out there about what

20:24

may be really going on here it doesn't

20:26

seem to me to be a coincidence that it

20:29

that October the 7th happened when it

20:31

did or that Iran chooses this moment to

20:34

attack Israel directly and that it may

20:36

all be linked to the Abraham Accords to

20:40

the normalization of relations between

20:41

Israel and many of the Middle Eastern

20:43

countries to the fact that Saudi Arabia

20:45

was on the verge of joining that

20:47

normalization of relations with Israel

20:50

and that for Iran this is the Ultimate

20:52

Nightmare and that through their proxy

20:55

tentacles in Gaza and Hamas uh they

20:59

facilitated what happened on October the

21:01

7th to cause and maybe deliberately

21:03

provoke Israel into what they would see

21:06

as an overreaction which would then lose

21:08

Global support and it may be that what

21:10

they've done with this missile strike

21:12

directly into Israel is part of a same

21:14

process deliberately goding Israel into

21:17

potentially overreacting which may

21:20

ultimately play into Iran's

21:22

hands uh Pierce I think you are spot on

21:26

my friend look it it it's silly to

21:29

engage in who started this first let's

21:32

not do that uh we all three of us agree

21:35

that Iran's ruling regime is an evil

21:37

regime the Iranian people deserve to

21:40

live in Freedom Pierce you're exactly

21:43

right look the answer is the only way we

21:47

get to peace in this region is when

21:50

Israel can partner with the moderate

21:52

Arab countries and

21:55

isolate isolate is Iran isolate Iran's

21:59

proxies and all the other islamists not

22:02

Muslims islamists who want to destroy

22:05

Israel Pierce which is why I agree with

22:08

chank on what Israel should do to what

22:11

happened over the weekend do nothing

22:14

ignore Iran finish the job in Gaza work

22:18

with the moderate Arab world to rebuild

22:21

Gaza and completely ignore Iran isolate

22:25

Iran that's the only way we're going to

22:27

get to peace

22:30

Emily I mean do you agree with that do

22:32

you not see the danger Emily that if

22:34

Israel does Now launch a massive Counter

22:37

Strike into Iran that it could actually

22:39

be doing exactly what Iran wants it to

22:43

do of course that's a distinct

22:45

possibility I think there are a lot of

22:47

options on the table when it comes to

22:49

any kind of response I know there's

22:50

already been some discussion this

22:51

morning about a Cyber attack there are a

22:53

number of different options that have

22:54

been put forward to the cabinet and it

22:56

remains to be seen what they will do

22:58

about it

22:58

I don't know if a military option is the

23:01

best option for a regime change in Iran

23:03

I've advocated for many years now that I

23:06

think that the Western governments have

23:08

an obligation and a duty to assist the

23:10

people of Iran what the Crown Prince was

23:12

mentioning about maximum support is

23:14

incredibly important the people of Iran

23:16

want this regime to fall and I do

23:18

believe that there is a way to do it

23:20

peacefully but it does require a lot of

23:23

effort on the part of the West and it

23:24

does require enforcement of sanctions

23:27

not just putting on on the books

23:28

enforcement of sanctions adding

23:30

additional sanctions choking this regime

23:32

out until they fall and also empowering

23:35

the people we had multiple uprisings

23:37

that have been quashed violently by the

23:40

Islamic Republic the people are ready we

23:43

need to support them and we haven't seen

23:45

that from the Western World we haven't

23:47

seen that from Europe with their failure

23:48

to designate the irgc we haven't seen

23:50

that with the enforcement of sanctions

23:52

we haven't seen that with a very very

23:54

weak Iran policy from the Biden

23:57

Administration that that is something

23:59

that allows this regime to continue not

24:01

to mention of course releasing billions

24:03

of dollars in assets that is then going

24:04

to terrorist organizations throughout

24:06

the Middle East that disproportionately

24:08

harm and kill Arab Muslims in the region

24:11

so really Israel and the Arab world are

24:13

on the same page as you mentioned about

24:15

the Abraham Accords this is a major

24:17

threat to the Islamic Republic this is

24:19

what they're seeking to destroy they are

24:20

an anti-peace entity and so I think that

24:23

the Democratic Western world needs to

24:25

push back against that and they need to

24:27

empower the people of Iran increase the

24:29

pressure on the regime increase support

24:31

for the people and see if that can get

24:33

us to where we need to go with this

24:35

regime

24:37

falling okay Jen I mean I I was struck

24:39

by the fact that immediately uh racing

24:43

to the defense of Israel when these

24:45

missiles were fired were the British uh

24:48

but also Jordan uh Saudi Arabia you know

24:52

it was it was fascinating to watch the

24:54

geopolitics play out here how

24:56

significant do you think that was

25:00

yeah so there's a lot going on there

25:02

first of all when UK and us help Israel

25:05

knock down the drones in the missiles

25:06

I'm totally in favor of that I as you

25:09

know uh Pier I've been consistent on

25:11

this from day one I don't want any

25:12

civilians dying in Israel in Gaza and

25:15

Iran uh that's what I care about the

25:17

most and so we want to avoid war Saudi

25:20

Arabia has always hated Iran that's not

25:22

surprising look Israel actually could

25:24

unite a lot of the Arab countries

25:26

moderate or otherwise Saudi Arabia of

25:28

course is is not moderate they're also

25:29

fundamentalist uh Muslims they're also

25:31

dict dictators Etc but it you could

25:34

rally all those folks as long as you end

25:36

the occupation but if you're going to

25:37

continue the occupation for another 75

25:39

years 75 days Etc you're never going to

25:42

Rally any of those Arab countries yeah

25:44

you might get a deal with a dictator or

25:45

two because they have economic interests

25:48

on your side but you're not ever going

25:50

to get the people on your side and and

25:52

by the way in this conversation we're

25:53

actually finally getting to somewhere

25:55

productive look there's plenty of

25:56

disagreement I have with Emily on the

25:58

the money and the sanctions Etc but

26:00

overall think about it guys if you bomb

26:02

Iran do you think that makes regime

26:04

change more likely or less likely

26:07

obviously it makes it less likely

26:09

because it allows the regime to Rally

26:11

the Iran people it depends on what kind

26:13

of strike depends on what kind if you're

26:15

targeting an irgc site if you're

26:17

targeting a nuclear site you can't make

26:19

a blanket statement like that that's

26:20

massively

26:22

overpro there is a strategic military

26:25

option there is no there is no people on

26:29

Earth there are no people on Earth that

26:31

say oh it's okay to bomb our country as

26:33

long as you

26:34

bomb military or nuclear facilities or

26:37

anything like that no of course they're

26:39

going to think Israel bombed us you have

26:40

to bomb them back it's going to Rally

26:43

them around the I can't understand why

26:45

you can't

26:47

this it's so look guys I don't know

26:50

saying it it's thousands of

26:53

irans let me bring

26:56

bring let me bring in

26:59

let's clarify let's clarify let's

27:01

clarify okay so Emily says bombing Iran

27:04

is going to get the Iranian people on

27:06

Israel's side I say no what do you no to

27:09

be fair no no no to be wait a minute to

27:11

be fair what she said was it it depends

27:14

it depends what targets Israel targeted

27:17

in that eventuality it was purely

27:19

military targets nuclear targets and so

27:22

on not a point the Iranian appear are

27:27

you saying that the Iranian would be

27:28

like oh you targeted us but in the best

27:30

possible intentions we're so happy

27:33

Israel only our military facil no what

27:36

I'm sounds no what I'm saying is I think

27:39

Emily has a point there would clearly be

27:42

a different response I would imagine

27:44

from a lot of Iranian people if they the

27:48

civilians were not targeted I mean

27:50

there's a qualitative difference between

27:52

military targets and civilian targets

27:55

isn't

27:56

there barely because look it's all about

27:59

rhetoric you think the Iranian regime is

28:01

going to tell their local population hey

28:03

guys don't sweat it it was just a

28:04

military site no they're going to RI

28:06

people up I think it's deeply

28:07

counterproductive it helps the mulas it

28:09

helps the grand Ayatollah if you bomb

28:12

Iran in any way shape or form do you

28:14

think that if America was bombed we'd be

28:16

like oh no it's okay they hit a military

28:18

Target so we're now in favor of the

28:19

country who bombed us there's a 0% let

28:22

me bring let me bring in let me bring in

28:25

Jo let me bring in Joe

28:28

let me let me we must let Joe have a

28:30

have a have a say Joe no and and I I'll

28:32

be brief Pierce thanks I just think what

28:35

happened this weekend and I say this as

28:38

someone who is off the charts pro Israel

28:41

what happened this weekend presents an

28:44

opportunity for Israel and and I think

28:47

turning the other cheek right now and

28:49

ignoring Iran right now is a huge signal

28:53

of strength I really do there are people

28:56

around the world who hate Israel who are

29:00

just waiting for Israel to bomb and

29:03

attack Iran don't give them that isolate

29:07

Iran ignore them and focus on what you

29:10

need to focus on

29:13

Israel problem here is that if Israel

29:16

doesn't respond sorry the problem here

29:18

is that if Israel doesn't respond in

29:19

some capacity maybe it's a Cyber attack

29:22

maybe it's some other method that we

29:23

haven't thought of yet I don't know but

29:25

if Israel does nothing this also is not

29:28

the right response because doing nothing

29:30

emboldens the regime we need to deter

29:32

the regime not just Israel but the

29:34

entire Western World this is a a

29:36

disgusting islamist human rights VI that

29:39

its own

29:41

people addressed maybe it can be done

29:43

through S you talk

29:45

about but that's not up to Israel

29:48

alone okay Emily here's my question for

29:51

you is it not a deterrence that Iran

29:54

fires off all these missiles including

29:56

ballistic missiles Cruise missil and so

29:58

on and none of them landed I mean barely

30:01

nothing worked it was all neutralized by

30:06

uh not just Israel's Iron Dome but also

30:09

by its uh other countries and their

30:12

defenses in the region but it was a

30:15

complete failure operationally now it

30:17

may well be that Iran intended it not to

30:20

be that successful hence the warnings

30:22

that they gave to the Americans to the

30:24

Saudis and so on it may be it was all

30:26

performative in that sense but the

30:28

reality is Israel's defenses unlike on

30:31

October the 7th they stood up

30:34

magnificently well is that not in itself

30:37

a pretty unnerving deterrent to to

30:39

enemies who want to try and do this

30:41

thing is that you can try but you won't

30:44

succeed well I think there's no question

30:46

it was a spectacular failure on the part

30:49

of the Islamic Republic with 99% of

30:51

their projectiles being shot down by a

30:53

coalition of countries however when it

30:55

comes to deterrence the Islamic Republic

30:58

knows full well that they can fire 10

30:59

times the amount as they themselves have

31:01

promised to do and overwhelm the missile

31:03

defense system so that isn't really uh

31:06

an accurate response and I also want to

31:07

add that what the Islamic regime did in

31:10

this instance by launching this by

31:12

escalating the conflict is actually a

31:14

sign of weakness of the regime itself I

31:16

mean they have rallied around bashing

31:19

Israel as a as a tool to you know try to

31:22

get people to their side and to show

31:24

that they are under attack for many many

31:25

years this is a tactic that they did

31:27

even with the Irani Iraq war they were

31:29

wildly unpopular and so they started a

31:30

war that being said you can see that in

31:34

the timidness of their strike and the

31:36

fact that Hezbollah which is an arm of

31:38

the Islamic Republic in Lebanon didn't

31:39

go full out on Israel although they also

31:42

fired Rockets um that they are not

31:44

prepared and that could be for a number

31:46

of different reasons uh but I don't

31:48

think that they are looking for a full

31:49

out war with Israel right now despite

31:51

that they they did escalate the

31:54

situation and I think that Israel has an

31:56

obligation uh to deter them and to

31:58

respond strongly and ensure that this

32:00

type of thing does not respond again or

32:02

does not occur again I'm sorry all right

32:04

I'll come to Jen in a moment but Joe

32:06

you'll you don't agree with that no

32:08

Emily look I agree that Iran is vastly

32:12

weakened after this weekend but man you

32:15

you bomb them you go after that regime

32:19

militarily you will do nothing but

32:21

embolden them they are weakened so keep

32:23

them on this path show your strength

32:26

look at them and look the other way and

32:28

do what you need to do that they're weak

32:30

continue to isolate this only works this

32:34

only works if you have the Coalition of

32:36

other countries if you have the West

32:37

involved if you have countries that are

32:39

willing to enforce sanctions that are

32:41

willing to designate the irgc no they

32:43

don't it's been years and and Europe has

32:45

refused to designate the irgc they're

32:47

not enforcing sanctions the Biden

32:49

Administration is weaker than ever

32:51

they're releasing billions in frozen

32:52

assets over and over and over again

32:54

appeasement doesn't work every time we

32:56

appease this regime EX tions go up

32:58

nuclear proliferation goes up funding

33:00

for Terror let me bring let me bring in

33:02

Jen let me bring in Jen here Jen you're

33:05

shaking your head there do you not agree

33:07

with the principle the CR Prince said

33:08

the same thing that that appeasing Iran

33:11

in any way has turned out to be a

33:14

completely pointless

33:15

exercise yeah that's 100% wrong we had

33:18

Iran completely contained uh under Obama

33:21

uh we did a great deal we took the

33:23

uranium out of the country they had no

33:25

nuclear program then that idiot Trump

33:27

came along egged on by the idiot

33:29

Netanyahu and said oh let's get out of

33:31

the deal so they can start doing uranium

33:32

enrichment again that was such a

33:34

terrible idea and now Iran is more

33:37

emboldened and more dangerous because of

33:40

that right-wing mentality of always go

33:43

maximalist you think like that people

33:45

don't know that Israel will try to

33:47

obliterate Iran if they have a everybody

33:49

knows that okay everybody knows that

33:50

Israel has nukes everyone knows that

33:52

Netanyahu is a warmonger and will do

33:55

vicious things it's not like we can't

33:56

see Gaza no but you're not going to help

33:59

the people of Israel let alone America

34:01

which I want to come back to if you

34:03

start this giant war in the Middle East

34:04

here's what the people the government of

34:06

Israel I don't think understands at this

34:08

point they have they're in great danger

34:10

of losing the American people for the

34:12

first time in my life the leftwing can't

34:14

stand what they've done in Gaza but I

34:16

got news for you a ton of the right-wing

34:19

can't stand it either and here's what

34:20

we're all unified about we don't want to

34:23

go into another disastrous war in the

34:25

Middle East Maga doesn't want that

34:27

progresses don't want that the only

34:28

people who want that coming to you no no

34:31

it's not Israel wants the war America

34:34

doesn't want the war hasomed from day

34:36

one that is what the Islamic Republic

34:38

the little Satan is Israel and the big

34:40

Satan is the United States this is their

34:43

ideology motivated they are not

34:45

motivated by reason they're motivated by

34:49

extremism you are missing the point no

34:52

no we can talk over each other all day

34:54

saying no it doesn't change the reality

34:57

okay here's the reality America doesn't

34:59

want to go to war if if any government

35:02

official whether it's Biden or Trump if

35:04

anybody brings us to war they will pay a

35:06

massive political price and by the way

35:08

so will Israel if Israel drags us into

35:11

this War I guarantee you they lose

35:13

American Support whether you like it or

35:15

you don't and the polling indicates this

35:17

you're this close to losing the entire

35:19

right wing let alone the entire left

35:21

wing we're sick of Palestinians being

35:23

murdered with our money and now you want

35:25

to start a giant war in the Middle East

35:27

and have us fight for it here's how many

35:30

troops should go into a war in the midle

35:32

zero zero America doesn't need to fight

35:35

arguing about politics and popularity

35:37

that's isra wants if Israel wants to

35:40

start a war with Iran good luck to you

35:43

okay America should have nothing to do

35:45

with it nothing I'm sick of Israel

35:47

starting hostilities killing uh Muslim

35:50

people and then saying America pay for

35:52

it America fight for it zero should go

35:55

and zero dollars should go if if the

35:57

goal and I think all three of us can

35:59

agree to this if the goal is to defeat

36:02

Iran's ruling regime you have to be

36:06

smart and if you respond militarily

36:09

right now in a big way against this

36:12

regime that will not defeat them Emily

36:15

I'm with you on your endgame but we have

36:18

to be smart and it would be terribly

36:20

shortsighted right now if Israel

36:23

responded in kind we're on a path where

36:26

we can isolate think Israel is

36:28

considering even responding in

36:30

kind any sort of military response would

36:34

backfire on Israel right

36:37

now that's right Emily and don't you

36:40

don't want to do it to Israel don't

36:42

agreee with that but but I actually I

36:45

actually want to address something else

36:47

which is that you're saying America

36:48

doesn't want a war I agree with you what

36:50

you're arguing about here is a

36:51

popularity contest you're arguing about

36:53

elections I'm not talking about that I'm

36:55

talking about the future and the safety

36:56

of the United States I'm talking about

36:57

the future and the safety of the western

36:59

world and the future and the safety of

37:00

the state of Israel and the reality is

37:02

that we're dealing with a regime that is

37:03

not logical they are concerned by

37:06

extremist ideology that they're trying

37:08

to promote all around the world it is

37:10

not logical that is why appeasement

37:11

hasn't worked and it's not going to work

37:14

and we've been trying to do this for 45

37:16

45 years now and it hasn't worked so try

37:19

something different we need to have a

37:21

smarter a better approach in order to

37:23

bring down this regime and you saying oh

37:25

we shouldn't do X because of popularity

37:27

that's not the question America and the

37:30

west and Israel need to do what they

37:31

need to do in order to protect

37:33

themselves even if sometimes it's

37:34

unpopular now are we at that point today

37:36

with Iran I don't know that's not a

37:38

decision that I'm making but for you to

37:40

say oh because of popularity it doesn't

37:42

matter because of popular because of

37:44

Elections the people of Iran who are

37:45

suffering under this regime for 45 years

37:48

the people who are sitting in Evan

37:49

prison because they went to a protest a

37:50

year ago that doesn't matter shame on

37:53

you you want to lose American elections

37:57

uh and and then lose uh all money to

37:59

Israel go have at it hos but that's not

38:01

going to help Israel at all okay so stop

38:05

going in a counterproductive uh

38:07

Direction all of this warmongering is

38:10

totally counterproductive it hurts

38:11

Israeli citizens obviously Iranian

38:13

civilians would be hurt but America I

38:15

don't understand how Israel is our Ally

38:17

all they ever do is drag us into Wars

38:19

drag us into conflicts we the idea

38:21

America is not safe unless we attack

38:23

Iran is on the FR lines of the war that

38:25

will come to the United States front

38:27

lines of a war they started a front

38:30

lines of a war they started I don't see

38:32

how this has anything to do with

38:33

American interest

38:37

heard

38:40

America yeah I know what they say and

38:42

you say that they're not rational that's

38:44

actually not true if they were

38:46

irrational and they were religious

38:47

zealots and all that so they're actually

38:49

greedy and corrupt that's the thing that

38:51

drives them and they want to keep their

38:53

lives and they want to keep their money

38:54

and so that's why they gave us 72-hour

38:56

notice before they

39:03

I can't go on with people that

39:05

constantly talk over me all right if

39:06

they were zealots they would have done

39:08

what Netanyahu did it attack blindly and

39:10

with rage and just kill everything in

39:13

sight you want to talk about zealous

39:15

look at the Israeli settlers the

39:16

fundamentalists of Muslims Jews and

39:18

Christi world all of their own

39:22

citizens what are you talking about by

39:25

accident because they're clown what are

39:26

you talking about do nothing about IR do

39:28

you know nothing about how the Islamic

39:30

Republic works you seem to think Iranian

39:33

are fine with their regime Emily let me

39:36

give the last word to let me give the

39:38

last word to Joe yeah and Emily let me

39:41

slap chank with this one because you and

39:43

I are on the same side of this one um

39:46

Israel I tweeted this over the weekend

39:49

chank and I believe it an attack on

39:51

Israel is an attack on America plain and

39:54

simple Israel is no it's not hold on let

39:58

me finish my brother Israel is our best

40:00

friend on this planet they are our

40:02

closest Ally if Israel was hit by any

40:05

country in that region like over the

40:07

weekend America would be there to defend

40:10

it to defend Israel because they are our

40:12

best friend and shank America will

40:15

always be pro-israel

40:18

period no it

40:20

won't pro Israel right

40:23

now yes I don't know

40:26

why why

40:28

go ahead I do think Jen has made one Jen

40:31

made a powerful Point earlier which is

40:32

which is true which is the polling has

40:35

never been as negative as this towards

40:37

Israel in America in modern times so

40:40

there is no doubt that there is a

40:43

certainly amongst younger people in

40:45

America there is a growing sense of

40:47

unease about the special relationship

40:50

and that is undeniable from the polls so

40:52

anyway we got to leave it there a

40:53

fascinating debate thank you all very

40:55

much indeed I appreciate it thanks e