Engineer reacts to Baltimore bridge collapse
Summary
TLDRIn a detailed discussion, structural engineer Ken Davis analyzes the collapse of a nearly 3-kilometer-long bridge after a cargo ship collision. He explains that the bridge was up to code, suggesting the accident was due to a ship malfunction rather than structural issues with the bridge. Davis highlights the challenges of rebuilding such a significant commuter route, estimating a two-year reconstruction timeline.
Takeaways
- 🌉 The bridge collapse was a shocking event, with the structure being nearly 3 kilometers long.
- 🏗️ The bridge was up to code and had no structural issues prior to the accident.
- 🚢 The cargo ship was errant and went off track, striking the bridge pier which provides critical support.
- 🔍 The cause of the bridge collapse is still under investigation with agencies like the NTSB and FBI involved.
- 🤔 Structural engineer Ken Davis suspects a failure on the ship rather than the bridge itself.
- 🚢 The ship's systems, including main engines and thrusters, may have failed, causing it to veer off course.
- 🚨 There was a Mayday or warning call made prior to the collision, indicating the ship was in distress.
- 💡 The bridge was built in 1977 when container ships were much smaller than today's vessels.
- 🔧 Modern engineering practices include designing structures with redundancy to withstand unexpected impacts.
- 🛠️ Rebuilding a bridge of this size could take more than two years, considering the complexity and importance.
- 🚧 The bridge was a major commuter route with 35,000 vehicles using it daily, highlighting the impact of its closure.
Q & A
What is Ken Davis' profession and the name of his company?
-Ken Davis is a structural engineer and the owner of KH Davis Engineering, consultants in Toronto.
What was the reported cause of the bridge collapse according to officials?
-The officials reported that the bridge was up to code and there were no structural issues with it before the incident.
How long is the bridge that collapsed?
-The bridge that collapsed is nearly 3 kilometers long.
What does Ken Davis speculate caused the bridge to collapse like a pile of dominoes?
-Ken Davis speculates that the bridge collapsed because the cargo ship went off track and hit one of the bridge piers, which provide support for the entire structure.
What type of bridge is described in the transcript, and how does its structure contribute to the collapse?
-The bridge is described as a through truss bridge, which is a large, continuous structure. Its design means it relies on support from individual supports as well as adjacent spans, so if a part of it collapses, the rest of it can come down as well.
What is Ken Davis' speculation about the ship's systems?
-Ken Davis speculates that there was a failure of some of the systems on the ship, possibly the main engines or thrusters, which caused the ship to veer off course and collide with the bridge pier.
What was the possible reason for the ship's lights flickering before the collision?
-While the exact reason is not clear, it's possible that someone on the ship was flashing lights to try to warn people, or it could have been a sign of a distress call indicating that there was a problem on board.
How has the size of container ships changed since the bridge was built in 1977?
-According to Ken Davis, container ships have more than doubled in size since the 1970s when the bridge was built.
What considerations might engineers take into account when designing structures like bridges?
-Engineers design structures with redundancy and the ability to withstand certain impacts. For example, they might design bridge supports to carry a certain amount of impact, considering the potential size of ships today.
How long does Ken Davis estimate it would take to rebuild a bridge of the size that collapsed?
-Ken Davis estimates that it would likely take more than a year, possibly around two years, to rebuild a bridge of that size.
What is the significance of the bridge that collapsed in terms of traffic?
-The bridge is a major commuter bridge with 35,000 vehicles crossing it every day to reach the port.
Outlines
🌉 Structural Analysis of Bridge Collapse
The first paragraph discusses the aftermath of a cargo ship colliding with a bridge, resulting in the bridge's collapse. Ken Davis, a structural engineer, shares his insights on the structural integrity of the bridge, which was reportedly up to code and had no structural issues. He explains the possible reasons for the collapse, such as the impact on a critical support pier and the bridge's continuous structure, which can lead to a domino effect if one part fails. Davis also speculates on the ship's potential mechanical failure and the possible reasons for the ship's lights flickering before the collision. He emphasizes the need for a thorough investigation to understand the exact cause of the accident.
🏗️ Bridge Design and Reconstruction
The second paragraph focuses on the challenges of bridge design and reconstruction in the wake of the collapse. Ken Davis discusses the considerations engineers must take into account when designing structures like bridges, including the anticipation of potential impacts and the incorporation of redundancy to prevent total collapse. He also addresses the evolution of ship sizes since the bridge's construction in 1977 and how modern, larger vessels may pose greater risks to infrastructure built to older standards. Davis estimates that the rebuilding of the nearly 3-kilometer long bridge could take up to two years, highlighting the scale of the project and the impact on the community that relies on the bridge for commuting and trade.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡structural engineer
💡cargo ship
💡bridge pier
💡concrete beam
💡through truss bridge
💡continuous structure
💡NTSB
💡ship lights
💡Mayday call
💡bridge code
💡rebuild
Highlights
Ken Davis, a structural engineer, provides expert analysis on the bridge collapse.
The cargo ship collision with the bridge occurred early morning.
Officials confirm the bridge was up to code with no structural issues.
The bridge, nearly 3 kilometers long, collapsed dramatically.
A YouTube video shows a time lapse of the bridge collapse.
The ship went off track, colliding with a critical bridge pier.
The failed support consisted of a heavy concrete beam on four legs.
The bridge's continuous structure design contributed to the extensive collapse.
The investigation involves multiple agencies, including the NTSB and the FBI.
Ken speculates the ship's systems may have failed, leading to the accident.
Ship lights were reported to be flickering moments before the collision.
The bridge was built in 1977, a time when container ships were smaller.
Current bridge design codes are different than those from 1977.
Engineers design structures with redundancy to withstand impacts.
The bridge重建 is expected to be a long-term project, possibly over two years.
The bridge is a major commuter route for 35,000 vehicles daily.
Ken Davis emphasizes that the collapse was likely due to a faulty ship, not a faulty bridge.
The distress call indicates the ship operators were aware of a problem.
Transcripts
Ken Davis he is a structural engineer
and owner of KH Davis engineering
consultants in Toronto Ken uh as Tony
Grace was just reporting this cargo ship
struck the bridge early this morning but
we heard from officials there that this
bridge was up to code that there were no
structural issues with it so how does a
bridge nearly 3 kilometers long come
down then like a pile of dominoes mhm
well it's shocking to see the images of
what happened I was able to excuse me
see a YouTube video that showed sort of
a time lapse of the collapse and of
course it appears that the ship uh was
errant it uh went off track and I'm
guessing that it just plowed right into
the bridge Pier which of course provides
support for the entire structure um if
you look carefully at pictures of the
bridge before the accident you can see
that the support that failed consisted
of uh a very heavy conrete beam uh
supported on what initially might look
like two pillars but in actual fact
there's four and I'm thinking that if
there was an impact on one of those four
legs that would have created an
instability and caused that entire um
span to collapse um and the other reason
that it might have brought the whole
Bridge down is that this isn't just
a simple bridge that supported that
points um it's it's what's called a
through Trust Bridge it's a very large
one and the um the bridge itself relies
on support from not just the just just
individual supports but even from
adjacent spans so it's it's continuous
structure so if a part of it collapses
the rest of it can come down as well and
I'm I'm just going to ask crew if we can
upstairs perhaps put up those live
pictures if we have them of the
structure now in the water and I'm
wondering as we look at that thank you
um
given the large debris fied and the
number of levels of Investigation
including the NTSB the FBI is it going
to be difficult Ken to reach a
conclusion earlier early as to exactly
what happened how difficult will it be
um to put together the
evidence I don't think it's going to be
difficult at all um I suspect and I'm
only speculating of course I have no
knowledge but I suspect what's happened
is there was some kind of a failure of
some of the systems on the ship um it
just happens that I have some knowledge
of these ships and um there's uh of
course the main engines that Propel it
forward there's also thrusters that
allow the ship to move side to side and
I'm wondering especially in view of the
fact that it sounds like there was a a
Mayday or a warning ahead of time I'm
guessing that there was some sort of a
failure of one of the systems on board
the ship which caused it to Veer off
course and collide with the the with the
bridge pier and I think that probably
the investigation is going to show that
this wasn't because of a faulty Bridge
it was because of a faulty
ship could you give us some insight then
on to into why the ship lights may have
been flickering right before the ship
veered off Coast there have been reports
of lights flickering just mere moments
before the
Collision well no who knows um uh I I
know I I I really couldn't say speak to
that but would that be a human that was
flickering them would that be some sort
of mechanical or technical
breakdown well I guess it's possible
that somebody was flashing lights to try
to warn people but um I would think that
that would be fairly ineffective but the
fact that there was some sort of a
distress a distress call made uh
obviously that's a key aspect of of
what's going on here um so I suspect
that uh you know
um the uh people operating the ship
somehow knew that there was a problem
and they tried to warn authorities to
get people off the bridge and stop the
floor traffic Ken I'm going to squeeze
in one last question with you and that
um is about the age of this bridge we
understand that it was built in
1977 um again though we heard that there
were no structural issues that was
according to the the governor this
morning would a bridge today be built to
a different code than than it was in
1977 well the the current code would
surely be different than it was in
1977 um one aspect to this that occurred
to me was that you know back in
1977 uh the containerships were not as
large as they are today and I I Googled
just of my own curiosity this morning it
would appear that back in the
1970s uh these container ships were far
smaller uh than they are today um I
think today they're probably more than
double the size that they were in 1970
when this ship when this uh Bridge was
built and of course when we design
structures like this um Engineers you
know anticipate you know what if
something happens for example the dome
stadium in Toronto I believe you know
there's a lot of redundancy built into
that roof in the event that an airplane
were to crash into it we don't want the
whole roof to collap so it has to
maintain a certain structure so so in
the case of a bridge like this you would
expect that you'd want to design the
supports to be able to carry a certain
amount of impact um now of course the
size of impact that may have you know
been anticipated Back in 1970 may be
very very different than the size of
impact that actually occurred in a view
of the size of the ships that we have
today Ken hang tight I just do want to
ask you one other question but I want to
point out to our viewers that we are
looking at the river and we see the US
Coast Guard uh helicopters overhead
again as the search and rescue continues
so I lied Ken I got one more question
and that is we heard from the governor
that this is going to be a long-term
build rebuild of this bridge this is a
major commuter Bridge 35,000 Vehicles go
over this bridge every single day to the
port based on your experience how long
would it take to rebuild a bridge of
this size almost 3 kilometers long oh
boy it's going to be a long build I it
would be hard to imagine it would be
hard to imagine anything less than a
year I would say probably more like two
years it's going to be a long build Ken
thank you so much for being with us part
of our breaking news this morning Ken
Davis is a structural engineer and the
owner of KH Davis engineering
consultants in Toronto
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)
Baltimore bridge collapse timeline: What happened before, during and after
Experts discuss Baltimore bridge collapse investigation, early findings
How Bridge Engineers Design Against Ship Collisions
Everything we know about the Baltimore bridge collapse
RECAP: How did The Dali Ship crash into Francis Scott Key Bridge?
Demolition at Baltimore bridge collapse site