'Extraordinary': Hear what happened in court as Trump tried to delay his criminal trial
Summary
TLDRA New York appeals court judge has denied former President Donald Trump's motion to delay the criminal trial related to hush money payments, marking another defeat in a series of attempts to delay or derail the proceedings. Trump's legal team has been aggressive in their defense, but their motions have been swiftly rejected by the courts. The case is set to move forward, with the defense facing the challenge of walking a fine line between making legitimate arguments and risking being seen as frivolous or untimely.
Takeaways
- đ« A New York appeals court judge denied former President Donald Trump's motion to delay the criminal trial related to hush money payments.
- đ The trial is scheduled to begin on Monday, with Trump's legal team making multiple attempts to delay or derail it.
- đ„ Trump has previously tried to exclude testimony from Michael Cohen, his former lawyer and fixer, which was denied last month.
- đ« Trump's attempts to exclude testimony from Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal, as well as motions to exclude virtually every piece of prosecution evidence, have also been denied.
- âïž The defense argues that the trial judge should recuse himself due to alleged impartiality, but the judge and appellate courts have found no evidence to support this.
- đ The defense's main argument is seeking another chance to appeal decisions that have already been made, which the district attorney's office argues is not how the process works.
- đ The pace of the hearings and filings has been rapid, with three hearings and three defeats for Trump's team within three days.
- đ€ There is speculation that Trump may try to take his case to the Supreme Court, especially given the upcoming hearing on presidential immunity.
- đ Trump's recent social media posts, where he called potential witnesses 'sleaze bags', could potentially violate the gag order.
- đ The judges and appellate courts are taking Trump's appeals seriously but have been swiftly denying them, showing little appetite to delay the trial.
Q & A
What was the primary focus of the recent court hearing involving Donald Trump?
-The primary focus of the recent court hearing was on Trump's motion to delay the criminal trial related to hush money payments and attempts to get the judge to recuse himself from the case.
How did the appeals court respond to Trump's attempts to delay the trial?
-The appeals court denied Trump's motion to delay the trial, marking another instance where his attempts to postpone the legal proceedings have been unsuccessful.
What was the argument presented by Trump's attorney for seeking more time?
-Trump's attorney argued for more time to file additional defense motions and to challenge the gag order, claiming that the judge was biased due to his daughter's potential connections to Democratic campaigns.
What was the Manhattan District Attorney's response to the claims of bias and the request for a delay?
-The Manhattan District Attorney's office argued that the claims of bias were unfounded and that the way things were being handled was standard procedure, emphasizing that the trial should proceed as scheduled.
What previous attempts has Trump made to influence the trial's proceedings?
-Trump has previously made attempts to exclude testimony from Michael Cohen and Stormy Daniels, as well as to exclude virtually every piece of prosecution evidence, including those related to the catch and kill scheme. He has also demanded the trial judge recuse himself.
How did the court accommodate the urgency of the Trump case?
-The court rearranged its schedule and even converted the basement of a courtroom into a makeshift bench to accommodate the oral arguments, showing the seriousness with which they were taking the case.
What was the legal panel's perspective on the pace and nature of Trump's filings?
-The legal panel found the pace and nature of the filings to be outrageous, with multiple hearings and defeats in a short span. They noted that the motions were being swiftly rejected by the courts, indicating a lack of appetite within the judiciary to delay the trial.
What potential next steps could Trump take in his legal strategy?
-Trump could potentially take his case to the Supreme Court, especially given that they are hearing a related issue on presidential immunity. However, it is uncertain whether this would result in a delay of the state court trial.
Could Trump's social media posts about the witnesses be considered a violation of the gag order?
-Yes, Trump's directç§°ćŒ of the witnesses as 'sleaze bags' could be seen as a violation of the gag order, which could prompt the District Attorney to take action to enforce the order in court.
What is the significance of Trump's attempts to delay the trial?
-The attempts to delay the trial are seen as desperate efforts to postpone the legal proceedings, which could be interpreted as an attempt to exhaust all possible legal avenues to delay justice.
What is the potential impact of Trump's legal strategy on his credibility?
-Continuously filing motions that are swiftly rejected could potentially harm Trump's credibility before the court, as it might create a 'boy who cried wolf' scenario where the judge starts to disregard his pleas.
Outlines
đ Court Rulings and Trump's Legal Strategies
The paragraph discusses the legal proceedings involving Donald Trump, focusing on the denial of his motion to delay the criminal trial related to hush money payments by a New York Appeals Court Judge. It highlights Trump's repeated attempts to delay or derail the trial, including seeking a change of venue, challenging the gag order, and trying to exclude testimony from key witnesses like Michael Cohen, Stormy Daniels, and Karen McDougal. The summary emphasizes the swift rejection of these motions by the judiciary and the upcoming trial despite Trump's continued efforts to seek legal recourse.
đ Legal Analysts Discuss Trump's Motions and Prospects
This paragraph features a discussion among legal analysts and experts about the implications of Trump's legal strategies. They analyze the recent rejection of his motions by the courts and the potential for further legal action, such as appealing to the Supreme Court. The conversation touches on the potential impact of the Supreme Court hearing on presidential immunity, the likelihood of the Supreme Court intervening, and the legal and strategic considerations for Trump's defense team. The analysts also discuss the potential consequences of Trump's public statements about the witnesses, which could be seen as violating the gag order.
Mindmap
Keywords
đĄDonald John Trump
đĄNew York Appeals Court
đĄHush Money
đĄRecuse
đĄMichael Cohen
đĄStormy Daniels and Karen McDougal
đĄCatch and Kill Scheme
đĄGag Order
đĄSupreme Court
đĄPresidential Immunity
đĄLegal Panel
Highlights
A New York appeals court judge denied Donald Trump's motion to delay Monday's hush money criminal trial.
This is the second time in two days that the appeals court denied a Trump attempt to delay the trial.
Trump's legal team sought more time to pursue a change of venue motion.
The Manhattan District Attorney's Office argued against the delay, stating that it is not how these things work.
Trump has made multiple attempts to delay or derail the trial, including demanding the trial judge recuse himself for the second time.
Trump tried to exclude testimony from his former lawyer and fixer, Michael Cohen, which was denied last month.
Trump's motion to exclude testimony from Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal was also denied.
The heart of the case involves the catch and kill scheme, and Trump has attempted to exclude virtually every piece of prosecution evidence.
Despite being a criminal defendant, Trump has the right to delay justice while also complaining about the timing of the charges.
Trump has shown up for numerous pretrial hearings, even though he was not required to, and has been raising money off them.
The Trump team's latest argument focuses on trying to get the judge to recuse himself from the case due to perceived impartiality.
The argument for recusal is based on claims that the judge's daughter could potentially profit from her work with Democratic campaigns.
Trump's main argument is the desire for another chance to appeal the denial of presidential immunity in a separate federal criminal case.
The appellate judge asked many questions, but the main argument from Trump's side is that the lower court did not follow the correct procedure.
The court had to rearrange tables and chairs in the basement of a courtroom to accommodate the trial starting on Monday.
This is the first time such accommodations have been made, showing the seriousness with which the court is taking the case.
Legal analysts believe that Trump's repeated attempts to delay the case are desperate and that the judiciary is not inclined to move the trial.
There is speculation that Trump may take his case to the Supreme Court in an attempt to delay the trial further.
Trump's social media posts, where he calls potential witnesses sleaze bags, may violate the gag order.
The district attorney's office is expected to address the violation of the gag order by Trump in court.
Trump's actions could be seen as trying to bait the judge into showing bias, but the judge is unlikely to take the bait.
The judge and appellate courts are determined to ensure the trial goes forward as scheduled despite the repeated motions for delay.
Transcripts
MACHINATION MACHINE THAT IS
DONALD JOHN TRUMP LATE TODAY, A
NEW YORK APPEALS COURT JUDGE
DENIED HIS MOTION TO DELAY
MONDAY'S HUSH MONEY, CRIMINAL
TRIAL AND APOLOGIES FOR NOT
PREFACING THAT WIDTH. STOP ME
IF YOU'VE HEARD THIS BEFORE
BECAUSE YOU HAVE, HERE'S THE
HEADLINE FROM JUST TWO DAYS
AGO, APPEALS COURT DENIES AND
OTHER TRUMP ATTEMPT TO DELAY
TRIAL. AGAIN, THAT WAS MONDAY,
SEEKING MORE TIME TO PURSUE A
CHANGE OF VENUE MOTION. DID
YESTERDAY AND ASKING FOR MORE
TIME TO CHALLENGE THE GAG
ORDER. THEIR CLIENT IS UNDER
TODAY. IT GOT EVEN RICHER WITH
ONE ON TRUMP ATTORNEY ARGUING
FOR MORE TIME TO FILE MORE
DEFENSE MOTIONS TO WHICH STEVEN
WU ARGUING FOR THE MANHATTAN
DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
SAID WAS SIMPLY NOT THE WAY
THESE THINGS WORK. WE'RE GOING
TO LEAVE THAT FOR LEGAL PANEL
TO SORT OUT IN A MOMENT. ONE
THING THOUGH IS CLEAR THESE
LAST THREE MOTIONS ARE ONLY THE
MOST RECENT ATTEMPTS TO DELAY
OR DERAIL THINGS LAST WEEK, YOU
FOLLOW THE MOTION DEMANDING THE
TRIAL JUDGE RECUSED HIMSELF FOR
THE SECOND TIME. THE FIRST WAS
LAST SUMMER. HE HAS ALSO TRIED
TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY FROM HIS
ONETIME LAWYER AND FIXER,
MICHAEL COHEN THAT WAS DENIED
LAST MONTH. AS WAS HIS MOTION
TO DO THE SAME FOR STORMY
DANIELS AND KAREN MCDOUGAL AND
MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE VIRTUALLY
EVERY PIECE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE, INCLUDING ON THE
CATCH AND KILL SCHEME, WHICH AT
THE HEART OF THE CASE. AND WE
SHOULD POINT OUT AS A CRIMINAL
DEFENDANT, EVEN ONE WHO ONCE
TOLD POLICE AND I QUOTE, PLEASE
DON'T BE TOO NICE TO CRIMINAL
SUSPECTS. THE FORMER PRESIDENT
HAS EVERY RIGHT TO DO WHAT HE
IS DOING, EVERY RIGHT TO TRY TO
DELAY JUSTICE EVEN WHILE
COMPLAINING AS HE DID YET AGAIN
TODAY ON HIS SOCIAL NETWORK
THAT HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN
CHARGED THREE YEARS AGO INSTEAD
OF DURING THE CAMPAIGN. AND
EVEN OF COURSE, THOUGH HE'S
SHOWN UP FOR NUMEROUS PRETRIAL
HEARINGS IN THIS AND OTHER
TRIALS. NONE OF WHICH HE WAS
REQUIRED TO AND RAISING MONEY
OFF THEM ALL THE WHILE SO MORE
ON TONIGHT'S RULING FROM CNN'S
KARA SCANNELL, WHO JOINS US
NOW. SO WHAT IS THE LATEST
ARGUMENT FROM THE TRUMP TEAM?
THIS VIOLIN?
>> SO TODAY'S ISSUE, AS YOU
SAID, THAT YOU WERE OTHER
ISSUES EARLIER IN THE WEEK
TODAY, THE FOCUS WAS ON TRYING
TO GET THE JUDGE TO RECUSE
HIMSELF FROM THE CASE. THE SAME
ARGUMENTS WE HAVE HEARD IN THE
LOWER OF ARGUMENT WHERE THEY
SAY THAT THE JUDGE IS IMPARTIAL
BECAUSE HIS DAUGHTER COULD
POTENTIALLY PROFIT BECAUSE OF
WORK OR COMPANY DOES FOR
DEMOCRATIC CAMPAIGNS. THE OTHER
ARGUMENT WAS THIS, JUDGE, JUDGE
MORE SEAN HAD DENIED TRUMP'S
EFFORTS TO TRY TO DELAY THE
TRIAL UNTIL THE SUPREME COURT
RULED ON PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY
IN A COMPLETELY SEPARATE CASE
AT THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL
CHARGES. THEY'RE APPEALING THAT
AND THEY WANTED THE JUDGE THE
APPELLATE JUDGE, TO PUT THE
TRIAL AND HOLD FOR THAT. I
MEAN, THE THE APPELLATE JUDGE
ASKED A LOT OF QUESTIONS HERE
ERROR, BUT TRUMP'S MAIN
ARGUMENT WAS THEY JUST WANT
ANOTHER BITE AT THE APPLE FOR
SOME OF THIS THE DA'S SAYING,
YOU'RE NOT EVEN FOLLOWING THE
RIGHT PROCEDURE HERE. THESE ARE
THINGS YOU CAN APPEAL UNTIL THE
CASE IS OVER. WHAT WAS
INTERESTING IS WE ACTUALLY
HEARD FROM A LAWYER FOR THE
COURT TODAY WHO'S SPEAKING ON
BEHALF OF JUDGE MORE SEAN TO
THIS ISSUE OF RECUSAL SAYING
THAT THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO
EVIDENCE, NO PROOF THAT HE
STANDS TO BENEFIT BECAUSE OF
HIS DAUGHTER'S JOB. AND THE
JUDGE PRETTY SWIFTLY DENIED
THIS IN THERE ARE SOME SPECIAL
ACCOMMODATION MADE TODAY IN THE
COURT. WHAT HAPPENED?
>> YEAH. I MEAN, THE COURT'S
CALENDAR WAS PRETTY PACKED THIS
AFTERNOON. THEY HAD ORAL
ARGUMENTS FROM OTHER CASES THAT
HAVE BEEN PENDING FOR AWHILE.
SO IN ORDER TO ACCOMMODATE THIS
GIVEN THE NATURE OF THE CASE,
THE TRIAL STARTING ON MONDAY,
THEY WENT INTO THE BASEMENT OF
A COURTROOM AND REARRANGE
TABLES AND CHAIRS TO CREATE A
BENCH FROM THE JUDGE, INCLUDING
PULLING OUT A PUFFY, BIG
PROCEDURAL CHAIR FOR THE JUDGE
ARRANGING TABLE SO THE LAWYERS
HAD PLACES TO ARGUE AND THEN
REPORTERS WERE SITTING ON
CHAIRS AND TABLES IN THE BACK
IT WAS REALLY EXTRAORDINARY.
AND WHAT I HEARD WAS THAT AS
THE FIRST TIME THEY'VE EVER
DONE THAT, BUT CLEARLY TAKING
ALL OF THESE APPEALS VERY
SERIOUSLY, EVEN THOUGH THEY'VE
ALL BEEN SWIFTLY DENIED, I WANT
TO BRING IN OUR LEGAL ANALYST
KAREN AGNIFILO AND ELIE HONIG
ELLIOTT, THE TEMPO OF THIS.
WHAT DO YOU MAKE OF IT? I MEAN,
THREE HEARINGS, THREE DAYS,
THREE DEFEATS THIS IS
RIDICULOUS.
>> LET'S JUST SAY THAT
STRAIGHT UP. I MEAN, WE TALKED
LAST WEEK, HENDERSON. I SAID
NEXT WEEK, MEANING THIS WEEK,
EXPECT TO SEE A FLURRY OF
MOTIONS
>> BUT THE
>> PACE AND THE NATURE OF THESE
FILINGS, IT'S OUTRAGEOUS. AND
LOOK, I HAVE DEFENDED AND WE'LL
DEFEND DONALD TRUMP'S RIGHT.
ANY DEFENDANTS RIGHT. TO
AGGRESSIVELY DEFEND HIMSELF,
BUT THESE MOTIONS, HE'S
BRINGING, FIRST OF ALL, OR
COMPLETELY OUT OF TIME. HE'S
ALREADY BROUGHT MOST OF THEM,
AS KARA SAID, THEY'VE ALREADY
BEEN REJECTED. NOW HE'S JUST
TRYING AGAIN AND THERE'S JUST
NOTHING TO THEM. AND IT'S
INTERESTING, ALMOST BORDERLINE
COMEDIC, TO SEE HOW QUICKLY
THEY'RE BEING REJECTED. WE'RE
SEEING COURTS OF APPEALS REJECT
THESE CASES IN 20 MINUTES, 45
MINUTES. SO THEY'RE TRYING TO
GIVE HIM HIS SAY, BUT THERE'S
NO APPETITE HERE IN THE
JUDICIARY TO MOVE THIS TRIAL.
>> AND KAREN, I MEAN, IS IT
DONE BECAUSE THERE'S ONLY
WEDNESDAY, SO THERE'S A COUPLE
OF MORE DAYS.
>> YEAH, THERE'S TWO MORE
BUSINESS DAYS. I THINK WE'RE
GOING TO SEE MORE ACTIVITY.
THIS IS DESPERATE. THE NUMBER
OF TIMES HE'S BEEN TRYING TO
DELAY THIS CASE THE DA'S OFFICE
SAID IT WAS AT LEAST TEN TIMES.
JUDGE, MORE SEAN HAS EVEN PUT
IN HIS ORDERS THAT THE
DEFENDANT HERE IS TRYING TO
DELAY THIS CASE. THE JUDGES AND
THE APPELLATE COURTS KNOW THAT
THIS IS NOT JUST ABOUT WHATEVER
THE MOTIONS ABOUT WHETHER IT'S
PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY OR A GAG
ORDER, IT'S ALSO AN EFFORT TO
DELAY THE TRIAL AND NOT HAVE IT
GO FORWARD. SO THEY'RE GONNA DO
EVERYTHING THEY CAN TO MAKE
SURE THAT THAT DOES NOT HAPPEN.
THIS CASE HAS BEEN SCHEDULED
FOR A LONG TIME AS ELIE SAID,
MANY OF THESE MOTIONS HAVE BEEN
MADE ALREADY IN MANY OF THESE
THINGS HAVE BEEN DECIDED. YES,
HE DOES HAVE A RIGHT TO DO IT,
BUT AT A CERTAIN POINT, THEY
BECOME FRIVOLOUS AND THEY
BECOME UNTIMELY, AND THEY'VE
ALREADY BEEN AND DECIDED HE HAS
TO WATCH THAT. HE HAS TO WALK A
FINE LINE BETWEEN MAKING TOO
MANY MOTIONS OVER AND OVER
AGAIN. THE SAME THING. I THINK
THE WILDCARD HERE IS IF HE GOES
TO THE SUPREME COURT, TRIES TO
GET THEM TO STOP IT BECAUSE
WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT IT AND TEN
DAYS, THEY'RE HEARING THE VERY
ISSUE THAT HE WANTS TO APPEAL.
THE ISSUE OF PRESIDENTIAL
IMMUNITY AND THAT'S BEING
HEARD ON AN EXPEDITED BASIS.
AND SO HE COULD GO TO THE
SUPREME COURT AND SAY, LOOK,
CLEARLY THE JUDGE HERE, IT IS
BIASED AGAINST ME. I'VE ALREADY
MADE SEVERAL RECUSAL MOTIONS
ABOUT HIS DAUGHTER. HE'S
GAGGING ME, BUT HE DOESN'T GAG
THE WITNESSES AND THE PRESIDENT
CENTRAL IMMUNITY IS AN ISSUE
THAT YOU'RE HEARING IN TEN
DAYS TIME, AND HE WON'T EVEN
GIVE ME TEN DAYS. I THINK HE'S
GOING TO POTENTIALLY PACKAGE IT
ALL UP AND SEE IF TAKE A SHOT
THERE AND SEE IF HE CAN GET AN
EAR OR SOMEBODY WHO HAS NO
CHANCE I WOULD SAY LEGALLY
KNOW, BUT IN THIS SUPREME
COURT, IT'S HARD TO PREDICT
ANYMORE WHAT THEY MAY OR MAY
NOT DO. I DON'T THINK LEGALLY
THERE'S A BASIS FOR IT. THIS
IS STATE-COURT. THIS IS NOT
FEDERAL, AND THIS IS COMPLETELY
SEPARATE PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY
SHOULDN'T APPLY HERE BECAUSE
THIS IS ALL PERSONAL. THIS IS
HIS PERSONAL ATTORNEY
>> YES. SOME OF THESE WERE THE
CHECKS WERE WRITTEN WHILE HE
WAS PRESIDENT, BUT THEY WERE
PERSONAL CHECKS ABOUT PERSONAL
BUSINESS. THIS SHOULDN'T HAVE
ANYTHING TO DO WITH
PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY. SO IT
SHOULDN'T HAVE ANY MERIT OR
SHOULDN'T HAVE ANY LEGS, BUT
THAT'S I THINK HIS LAST
DESPERATE PROCESS OF FOLLOWING
IT OUT WITH THE SUPREME COURT
OR GONEN SUPREME COURT THAT
WOULD THAT AUTOMATICALLY DELAY
JURY SELECTION ON MONDAY?
>> NO, ONLY IF THE SUPREME
COURT WERE TO STEP IN AND SAY,
HEY, PUT A HOLD ON THIS. I
AGREE WITH KARA. I THINK IF
THERE'S ONE MORE SHOT THAT
WOULD BE IT. I ALSO AGREE THAT
IT WILL LOSE ON SUBSTANCE.
THERE'S A LEGAL DOCTRINE
CALLED ABSTENTION, MEANING THE
FEDERAL RECORDS INCLUDING THE
US SUPREME COURT, ARE VERY
RELUCTANT TO STEP IN AND PAUSE
THINGS AT A TRIAL LEVEL, AT A
STATE COURT. AND I HAVE TO SAY
THIS
>> WHEN YOU'RE A
>> LAWYER, YOUR CREDIBILITY IS
EVERYTHING AND YOU GET TO A
POINT WHERE YOU START TO LOSE
IT WITH THE JUDGE. IT'S LIKE A
BOY WHO CRIED WOLF PHENOMENON.
IF YOU COME IN EVERY DAY TO
THREE TIMES A DAY AND SAY, OH,
MY GOSH, WE HAVE THIS
EMERGENCY. OH, MY GOSH. THIS IS
SUCH AN URGENT SITUATION. YOU
HAVE TO PAUSE IT. JUDGE, IS
GOING TO START TUNING YOU OUT
AND I THINK TRUMP'S TEAM NEEDS
TO CONSIDER THAT THE FORMER
PRISON SAY SHARED THE SOCIAL
MEDIA POSTS IN DEFENSE OF
HIMSELF FROM STORMY DANIELS,
FORMER ATTORNEY MICHAEL
AVINATAN IS IN PRISON RIGHT NOW
TRUMP ADDED HIS OWN COMMENTARY
CALLING DANIELS IS IN FORM OF
TRUMP FIXER MICHAEL COHEN,
QUOTE, SLEAZE BAGS. THEY BOTH
LIKELY WITNESSES AT THE TRIAL,
WOULD THAT VIOLATE THE GAG
ORDER?
>> 100%? YES. AND UP TILL NOW,
TRUMP HAD BEEN SORT OF CRAFTY
WHAT HE WAS DOING WAS TAKING
OTHER PEOPLE, SAYING THINGS
THAT WOULD HAVE VIOLATED THE
GAG ORDER AND JUST RE TWEETING
OR RETRIEVING THAT, WHICH
THERE'S MAYBE A GRAY AREA. BUT
NOW HE SAYS HE CALLS THE TWO
MAIN WITNESSES SLEAZE BAGS, AND
THIS IS A MOMENT OF TRUTH OR
THE DA THE DA NEEDS TO GO TO
THE JUDGE FIRST THING TOMORROW
MORNING, SAY THIS VIOLATES THE
GAG ORDER. YOU NEED TO DO
SOMETHING IF YOU DON'T ENFORCE
DISCIPLINE RIGHT NOW, IT'S
GOING TO GET AWAY FROM YOU.
>> YOU AGREE WITH THAT GUN?
>> YES. AND AT THE SAME TIME,
IT'S CLEAR THAT TRUMP IS
TRYING TO BAIT THE JUDGE. HE
WANTS MORE EVIDENCE TO GO TO
THE SUPREME COURT TO SAY HE'S
BIASED AGAINST ME AND THE JUDGE
IS NOT GOING TO TAKE THE BAIT.
SO THE JUDGE IS GOING TO DO
EVERYTHING HE CAN TO MAKE THIS
CASE GO. AND SO I THINK THOSE
THOSE QUESTIONS AN
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)
Trump hit with INSTANT bad news in NY court
Neal Katyal reveals why he 'strongly suspects' Trump will be convicted in hush money case
Breaking Trump News [9AM] 3/25/2024 | đ Œđđ œđ ±đ Č Latest Trump March 25, 2024
Judge rejects Trumpâs bid to get Georgia election case dismissed
Donald Trump guilty on all counts in hush money case
Trump trial begins with a bang: See the DAâs damning case to bust Trump for jailable felony