First Take reacts to L.A. Times' controversial article on Kim Mulkey & LSU

ESPN
1 Apr 202411:15

Summary

TLDRThe transcript discusses the media's portrayal of LSU head coach Kim mki, particularly focusing on a controversial Los Angeles Times column that depicted an LSU vs UCLA matchup in sexist terms. The coach vehemently defended her players against the negative and sexist portrayal, emphasizing the harm in labeling young athletes as 'dirty debutants.' The conversation also touches on the coach's past actions and the responsibility of the media to uphold editorial standards, with calls for apologies and retractions. The incident underscores broader issues of sexism in sports journalism and the power dynamics between media and sports figures.

Takeaways

  • 📰 The Washington Post published a profile on LSU head coach Kim mki, which was criticized by Moi as a hit piece.
  • 💬 Moi expressed her disapproval of the Los Angeles Times' portrayal of LSU vs UCLA game as a battle between good and evil, calling it sexist and incorrect.
  • 🀬 Moi defended her young players against the media's negative and sexist portrayal, challenging the use of the term 'dirty debutants'.
  • 👥 The discussion highlighted the importance of responsible journalism, especially when covering young athletes.
  • 🏆 Kim mki's coaching career was mentioned, emphasizing her success with no season having less than 20 wins.
  • 🏀 The conversation touched on the broader issue of sexism in sports media and the challenges faced by women in athletics.
  • 🀔 The script pointed out that the negative coverage could have been more damaging if it came from a neutral or national publication.
  • 🧐 The dialogue questioned the motives behind the negative coverage and the editorial process that allowed such an article to be published.
  • 🙅‍♀ The Los Angeles Times' apology and revision of the article were discussed, with opinions on whether it was sufficient.
  • 🌟 Despite recent controversies, the conversation acknowledged the need for coaches like Kim mki to stand up for their players.
  • 🔍 The script concluded with a call for reflection on all sides, including the media's responsibility and the actions of coaches in the past.

Q & A

  • What was the nature of the Washington Post profile on LSU head coach Kim mki?

    -The Washington Post profile on LSU head coach Kim mki was a retrospective of her career, but it did not include any new revelations. It was described by Moi as a hit piece in a statement she made prior to its publication.

  • How did Kim mki respond to the Los Angeles Times column that portrayed LSU's matchup against UCLA?

    -Kim mki strongly criticized the Los Angeles Times column, calling it sexist, awful, and wrong. She objected to the portrayal of the game as a reckoning between good and evil and took issue with the term 'dirty debutants' used to describe her young players.

  • What was the public's reaction to the Los Angeles Times article?

    -The public reaction included support for Kim mki, with some agreeing that the article was sexist and inappropriate, especially in its portrayal of young female athletes.

  • What did the discussion on the show imply about the term 'dirty debutants'?

    -The discussion implied that the term 'dirty debutants' was a sexist and derogatory way to describe young female athletes, which was seen as inappropriate and offensive.

  • How did the panelists on the show address the issue of sexism in sports journalism?

    -The panelists acknowledged the sexism displayed in the Los Angeles Times article and agreed that it was wrong. They also discussed the broader issue of how women are portrayed in the sporting space and the need for better representation and respect.

  • What was the context of the previous criticism Kim mki had faced?

    -Kim mki had faced previous criticism for her anticipated response to a Washington Post article and for her past treatment of players, particularly in relation to their personal lives and lifestyles.

  • How did the panelists discuss the role of editors in the publication of controversial articles?

    -The panelists discussed that editors are responsible for ensuring that articles meet editorial standards before they are published. They pointed out that the Los Angeles Times article should have been rejected by the editorial team due to its sexist content.

  • What was the panel's view on the Los Angeles Times' apology and retraction?

    -The panel felt that the Los Angeles Times' apology and retraction were insufficient. They believed that a more formal apology and a commitment to prevent such incidents in the future were necessary.

  • How did the panelists relate the situation to past incidents in sports media?

    -The panelists related the situation to past incidents where sports media has made controversial comparisons, such as describing games as battles between 'Catholics versus convicts'. They highlighted a pattern of problematic portrayals in sports journalism.

  • What was the significance of the discussion on Kim mki's coaching career?

    -The discussion on Kim mki's coaching career was meant to highlight her accomplishments and success, emphasizing that her track record should not be overshadowed by the controversies surrounding her personal interactions with players and media.

  • What did the panel suggest as a lesson for Kim mki moving forward?

    -The panel suggested that while Kim mki was right to defend her players in this instance, she should also reflect on her past actions and how she has treated her players, ensuring that she maintains a standard of respect and fairness in her coaching approach.

Outlines

00:00

📰 Media Criticism and Kim Mulkey's Response

This paragraph discusses the recent media coverage of LSU head coach Kim Mulkey, specifically addressing two articles from the Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times. The Washington Post article is described as a retrospective of Mulkey's career without new revelations, while the Los Angeles Times piece is criticized by Mulkey for portraying LSU's game against UCLA in a sexist manner, labeling it as a battle between 'good versus evil'. The discussion emphasizes Mulkey's defense of her young players against such characterizations and the subsequent apology and revision of the Los Angeles Times article. The conversation also touches on the broader implications of the media's role in shaping public perception, especially regarding the treatment of female athletes.

05:01

🏀 The Impact of Biased Reporting on Sports

The second paragraph delves into the consequences of biased reporting in sports journalism, particularly focusing on the Los Angeles Times' portrayal of the LSU-UCLA matchup. The panelists agree that the language used was inappropriate and sexist, with one panelist expressing disappointment in the lack of editorial oversight. The discussion also explores the concept of 'dirty debutants' and the societal expectations of young women, contrasting the negative portrayal with the traditional southern debutante ball. The conversation further examines the potential damage that could have been caused if the article had been published by a neutral or national publication, emphasizing the importance of journalistic integrity and responsibility.

10:03

🌟 Kim Mulkey's Coaching Career and Personal Matters

This paragraph provides an overview of Kim Mulkey's impressive coaching career, highlighting her 24 years of experience, four-time championship wins, and consistent record of achieving over 20 game wins each season. It also touches on the controversies surrounding her relationship with her players, as detailed in a book by Brittney Griner, and the public's perception of her coaching style. The discussion acknowledges Mulkey's recent defense of her players against media bias but also calls for introspection regarding her past actions and treatment of players. The conversation suggests that while Mulkey has shown growth in supporting her team, there are still unresolved questions about her past behavior and the need for continued self-improvement.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Kim Mulkey

Kim Mulkey is the head coach of the LSU (Louisiana State University) basketball team. She is a prominent figure in college basketball, known for her successful coaching career and her strong personality. In the transcript, Mulkey is defending her players against a negative portrayal in the media, specifically in articles from the Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times.

💡Media Criticism

Media criticism refers to the analysis and evaluation of the content, practices, and effects of various forms of media, often focusing on the accuracy, fairness, and impact of reporting. In this context, the term is used to describe the negative portrayal of Kim Mulkey and her team in the Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times, which Mulkey and others in the transcript argue were biased and inappropriate.

💡Sexism

Sexism is prejudice or discrimination based on a person's sex or gender, often manifesting in the form of stereotypes, unequal treatment, or devaluation of individuals due to their gender. In the transcript, sexism is discussed as a central issue in the media's portrayal of the LSU basketball team, with the term 'dirty debutants' being criticized for its sexist implications and the overall negative depiction of the female players.

💡Public Image

Public image refers to the perception or impression that the public has about a person, organization, or entity. It is shaped by media portrayals, public relations, and personal actions. In the context of the transcript, Kim Mulkey is concerned with the public image of her and her team, as she believes the media's portrayal is inaccurate and harmful.

💡Journalistic Standards

Journalistic standards are the ethical guidelines and professional practices that journalists and media outlets follow to ensure the accuracy, fairness, and credibility of their reporting. These standards include principles such as objectivity, fact-checking, and avoiding harm. In the transcript, the discussion revolves around whether the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post adhered to journalistic standards in their coverage of Kim Mulkey and her team.

💡Coaching Record

A coaching record refers to the historical performance of a coach in their sport, typically measured by wins, losses, and other achievements. In the transcript, Kim Mulkey's coaching record is mentioned as evidence of her success and expertise in college basketball, despite the controversies surrounding her.

💡Player Relationship

Player relationship refers to the interactions and dynamics between a coach and the athletes they mentor. It encompasses aspects such as support, communication, and the handling of personal and professional issues. In the transcript, the nature of Kim Mulkey's relationship with her players is discussed, particularly in the context of how she has been perceived to treat them, including issues related to their personal lives and public image.

💡Media Bias

Media bias occurs when media outlets present information in a way that favors one side or perspective over another, often due to personal, political, or institutional influences. It can manifest in the selection of stories, the framing of issues, or the use of language that conveys a particular viewpoint. In the transcript, media bias is discussed in relation to the Los Angeles Times' coverage of the LSU and UCLA basketball game, with the argument that the portrayal was unfairly biased against LSU.

💡Accountability in Media

Accountability in media refers to the responsibility that journalists and media outlets have to ensure their reporting is accurate, fair, and respectful. It involves acknowledging mistakes, correcting inaccuracies, and sometimes apologizing for the harm caused by their coverage. In the transcript, the conversation focuses on the accountability of the Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times in their coverage of Kim Mulkey and her team.

💡Sports Media

Sports media is a subcategory of mass media that focuses on sports-related content, including news, analysis, commentary, and live event coverage. It plays a significant role in shaping public perception of athletes and sports events. In the transcript, sports media is discussed in the context of its portrayal of college basketball, particularly the challenges and biases faced by female athletes and coaches.

💡Public Apology

A public apology is a formal statement in which an individual or organization acknowledges wrongdoing and expresses regret for their actions, often in response to public criticism or harm caused. It is a way of taking responsibility and attempting to restore trust or reputation. In the transcript, the discussion revolves around whether the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post should issue public apologies for their controversial coverage of Kim Mulkey and her team.

Highlights

Publication of the Washington Post profile on LSU head coach Kim mki, criticized by Moi as a hit piece.

Los Angeles Times releases a column portraying LSU vs UCLA matchup as good vs evil, which Moi denounces as sexist and incorrect.

Moi defends young athletes against the media's sexist portrayal, emphasizing the inappropriateness of calling them 'dirty debutants'.

The panel agrees with Moi's stance, recognizing the negative impact of the media's language on young female athletes.

Discussion on the implications of labeling one team as 'dirty' and the other as 'milk and cookies', highlighting the sexism and potential racial bias.

The importance of journalistic responsibility and editorial oversight before publishing articles, to prevent the spread of harmful narratives.

The potential for greater damage if the negative article had come from a neutral or national publication rather than the Los Angeles Times.

Kim mki's impressive coaching record, including being a four-time champion and a three-time coach of the year.

Criticism of Kim mki's past treatment of players and her defensiveness regarding their personal lives, as highlighted in a book by Britney Brer.

The necessity for Kim mki to reflect on her own actions and treatment of players in light of recent events and media scrutiny.

The role of the Los Angeles Times' bias as a home paper for UCLA, and how it may have influenced the column's portrayal of the matchup.

The broader issue of sexism and the challenges women face in the sports industry, brought to light by the situation.

The importance of learning from this situation and ensuring that media coverage is fair and respectful to all athletes.

The potential for the Los Angeles Times' mistake to overshadow other issues related to Kim mki, as the focus is on their error.

The need for accountability in journalism, especially when it comes to the portrayal of young athletes and their character.

The impact of this incident on the public's perception of both the media and the coach, and the lessons that can be learned for future interactions.

Transcripts

00:01

welcome back on Saturday the long

00:02

anticipated Washington Post profile on

00:04

LSU head coach Kim mki was published the

00:07

piece was a retrospective of M's career

00:10

and included no New Revelations though

00:13

Moi described it as a hitpiece in a

00:14

statement she made last week

00:16

anticipating its publication meanwhile

00:18

the Los Angeles Times released a column

00:21

which came out on Friday that portrayed

00:23

LSU's matchup against UCLA as a

00:25

reckoning between good versus evil with

00:28

Moi calling it sexist awful and wrong

00:31

the times apologize and Revis the

00:32

article here's Moi addressing the LA

00:34

Times piece you can criticize coaches

00:38

all you want that's our business you can

00:41

come at us and say you're the worst

00:43

coach in America I hate you I hate

00:44

everything about you we expect

00:47

that comes with the

00:50

territory but the one thing I'm not

00:53

going to let you

00:54

do I'm not going to let you attack young

00:57

people it was so sexist

01:01

and they don't even know

01:03

it it was good versus evil in that game

01:08

today

01:11

evil called us dirty debutants take your

01:14

phone out right now and Google dirty

01:17

debutant and tell me what it

01:19

says dirty

01:23

debutants are you kidding

01:26

me I'm not going to let you talk about

01:28

18 to 21 year old kids

01:31

in that

01:33

tone all right Shannon I'm going to

01:35

start with you what is your reaction to

01:37

all of this I agree I I've been on

01:41

record I'm not the biggest fan of Kim

01:42

Moi but she's absolutely right in this

01:44

situation it's sad because as she

01:47

mentioned these are 18 to 21 year old

01:48

these are college young ladies and you

01:50

think of them as dirty debutants Google

01:53

it I wish they had done what she had

01:55

asked them to do and see what it takes

01:57

you to now I understand I'm from the

01:59

south so I understand what a debutant

02:00

ball is uh there were what it is Stephen

02:03

as a young lady supposed to be a going

02:05

into adulthood and so they get all

02:07

dressed up and they they put on their

02:08

nice fancy gowns and off to they go and

02:11

you say dirty debutants and then you say

02:14

the others are milk and cookies really

02:16

for entrance formal entrance into

02:19

society that's the way lab yeah really

02:22

really I mean come on now is that is

02:24

that where we are now if you're going to

02:26

say the one program is but to to B take

02:30

it to this point because we we see what

02:32

it is sex is there's a a I am not going

02:35

to even say a tinge because when you say

02:37

one team is dirty and the other team is

02:38

milk and cookies really villains when

02:42

did it's almost like Stephen I know you

02:45

remember when they had Miami played

02:46

Notre Dame and it was the Catholics

02:48

versus the convicts yep and we we we see

02:50

where this is headed what what did you

02:53

hope to get out of that and Stephen A it

02:55

was so bad they had to do some

02:57

retractions but it had already it

02:59

already been printed so you can't pull

03:02

back what somebody has already read it's

03:04

kind of like when I'm in a courtroom

03:05

Stephen that we're in a courtroom and I

03:07

said something and you object I object

03:09

your honor and honor says objection

03:11

substain how do I make the jury unhear

03:14

what I heard what they heard right how

03:16

do you make people unread what they've

03:18

already read you've already called them

03:20

the dirty debutant you've already said

03:22

these inflammatory sexist things about

03:25

them and for that Stephen you can you

03:27

know more about this you were in the

03:29

journalism you were in the newspaper

03:30

business I'm assuming that when you

03:33

write a column it has to go to the

03:34

editor yes so the editor had to have

03:36

signed off on this and now goad an

03:39

editor's desk it's copy editor an

03:42

editor's desk it goes through like two

03:44

or three layers before it goes to print

03:46

that is true so and or now and you gonna

03:49

come out and say it didn't meet the

03:51

standard when after the fact Stephen

03:54

they just told me it goes to two or

03:55

three levels so it met the standard

03:57

enough to get out one time and then you

03:59

get the back glass and you hear what

04:00

comes from what you wrote or what you

04:02

allowed to now you said it didn't meet

04:05

the editorial standards and we're going

04:06

to you're going to have a retraction to

04:08

some of it it's too late Kim Moi is

04:11

exactly correct this thing should have

04:13

never been written I don't really know

04:15

what you hope to gain by saying talking

04:17

about 18 to 21 year old young ladies in

04:20

this capacity I don't get what they got

04:22

out of this but it was totally wrong and

04:25

she's absolutely right Kim Moi was

04:28

absolutely right

04:30

and she was right to point it out she

04:33

was right to point out what it was in

04:35

terms of the sexism that uh was was

04:38

displayed uh and she was also right to

04:41

challenge the media in attendant to pull

04:44

out their phones and look up deputes and

04:47

and what that means and what was trying

04:49

to be implied here here's what I would

04:51

tell you Shannon when it comes to the

04:53

newspaper industry and what the Los

04:55

Angeles Times should have done there is

04:58

always a boss there is always a leader

05:01

in everything that we do put Shannon up

05:03

on the screen so I can see him please

05:05

there's always that what happens is

05:08

whoever had the power to say quote it

05:12

did not meet the times editorial

05:15

standards should have went a step

05:17

further and apologized and said on

05:21

behalf of this paper that is not our

05:23

standard that was never supposed to be

05:25

in print it is something that we will

05:27

address we apologize

05:30

and we will make sure it does not happen

05:33

again very very simple they didn't go

05:35

that far they just stopped there and

05:37

that's where the mistake was what

05:39

happens is is that as damaging and as

05:41

bad as this as this was it would have

05:44

been significantly worse if it came from

05:47

a neutral publication or a national

05:50

publication if the USA Today or somebody

05:53

like that did it it would it would

05:55

resonate even further here's the reason

05:58

why the Los Angeles times you know who

06:00

they rooting for yeah the home paper of

06:02

course so you you Roo for the home paper

06:04

you see what I'm saying and so if you

06:05

get an opportunity to paint somebody as

06:07

the villain while you're you know you're

06:09

pristine and you're like the dove flying

06:11

in the sky you know nothing blemishes

06:14

you you can understand what their intent

06:18

was but they went too damn far and they

06:20

made that mistake had it been a national

06:22

publication all right or somebody that

06:24

was neutral if this was some paper in

06:27

New York or wherever that decided to

06:29

that it would have been far far more

06:32

damaging because where's the homerism

06:34

there there's no excuse for you to be

06:36

favoring one over the other in any kind

06:38

of fashion right but in the Los Angeles

06:41

Times that's the only thing that they

06:42

have to lean on with this mistake

06:44

getting to Moi let's understand

06:46

something about Moi here because she's

06:48

made news over the last week and a half

06:50

two weeks for several reasons okay

06:51

calling out the Washington Post before

06:53

the article came out and all of this

06:55

other stuff and it turned out to just be

06:57

you know a regurgitation of some of the

06:59

things we already knew her relation

07:01

Britney Brer and all of this other stuff

07:03

it ain't the greatest look in the world

07:05

but it was no surprise in the end Kim

07:08

Moi has been coaching in college

07:10

basketball for 24 years she's a

07:13

four-time champion she's a three-time

07:15

coach of the year do you know that she's

07:17

never had a season where she's loost

07:19

she's she's won less than 20 games every

07:22

single year of her career she's won more

07:25

than 20 games so there's no questioning

07:27

her about her coaching acent

07:30

only has been she's Elite so what do you

07:33

get to you get to the personal and

07:35

here's where the personal lies the

07:36

personal lies and her relationship with

07:40

players how it's perceived she has

07:43

treated some of her players particularly

07:46

her off-putting personality or approach

07:49

or whatever word you want to use to

07:51

their quote unquote sexuality this is

07:53

according to a book Britney grer wrote

07:56

according to excerpts according to

07:57

things that have been discussed in the

07:58

end

08:00

her turning around and being defensive

08:03

for on behalf of her players people will

08:06

look at her and say well at least you're

08:07

doing that these days because clearly

08:10

there were times in the past where we

08:11

wish you would have and you didn't right

08:15

you love she love she loved the players

08:17

but not the players lifestyle right and

08:19

so that's what that's what seemingly

08:20

annoyed her or what she tried to shy

08:23

away from or ask Britney to suppress

08:25

don't be so outwardly or so open about

08:27

it when she was around campus but that's

08:29

who Britney grinder chose to live her

08:31

life as and so I agree with you Stephen

08:33

A at least she did come to the defense

08:35

of her players in this situation and it

08:38

was rightfully so it's not quite to the

08:41

level of what Don IM said Stephen I know

08:43

you remember what he said it's not that

08:46

but there were the implications are

08:48

there when you refer to them because the

08:51

majority of LSU players are

08:53

African-Americans black and UCLA is is

08:57

seen as Lily White pris

08:59

the milk and cookies the wholesome while

09:02

these are dirty debutant but like I said

09:05

people at home if you didn't get an

09:07

opportunity Google and see what comes up

09:08

on your Google when you Google that word

09:11

yeah and now we we got to look at it for

09:13

what it is and again but also Kim Moi

09:15

needs to be there's a Learning lesson in

09:17

all of this as well as she continues to

09:21

excoriate what the Los Angeles Times did

09:25

what the Washington Post did it does

09:28

call upon her to look in the mirror

09:30

because we still got questions as to how

09:32

she treated Angel Reese at the beginning

09:33

of this season right and what was that

09:35

all about we know about the whole

09:37

Britney gr thing because Britney gr told

09:39

us there's a there's a few incidences

09:41

where in Shannon has pointed to weeks

09:43

ago when you went off about Kim Moi

09:46

where she gives you cause to pause

09:47

because of her dismissiveness when

09:49

Britney grer was stuck in Russia right

09:51

and we didn't know whether she was going

09:52

to be able to get you know you get get

09:54

out of there okay and you you were you

09:56

had hope for an elevated level of ensity

09:59

from Kimi that she did not give you and

10:02

then to come out and say well you know

10:04

what they got this article that's coming

10:06

out about me and they only gave us a

10:08

couple of days to respond when you know

10:10

they had been chasing you for two years

10:12

to interview you that doesn't make much

10:14

sense but in the end the Los Angeles

10:16

times has helped her this week because

10:19

they were clearly wrong in what they did

10:21

and the focus being on that sort of

10:25

limits the level of attention you're

10:26

throwing in Kim Mo's direction for a

10:28

pleth of other reasons so we can't

10:30

ignore that either I do want to say

10:32

Stephen the point about it being in La

10:34

the LA time specifically is a really

10:36

good point but I do think that this

10:37

article specifically highlights a lot of

10:39

the issues that women have dealt with in

10:41

the sporting space and Athletics in

10:43

general so um definitely a lot to learn

10:45

there with the situation um we'll see

10:47

what happens moving forward and not

10:49

absolving the Los Angeles Times and end

10:50

W I'm just saying all of us would

10:52

receive it a even more fiercely had it

10:56

come from a neutral exactly publication

10:58

yeah

10:59

La ain't neutral when it comes to UCLA

11:01

USC etc for sure that makes a lot of

11:08

[Music]

11:14

sense