🚨 Trump gets SURPRISE bad news in New York trial

The Legal Breakdown with BTC & Glenn Kirschner
6 Apr 202415:36

Summary

TLDR在《法律解析》节目中,讨论了特朗普在纽约欺诈案中以1.75亿美元的保证金获得保释,但提供保证金的保险公司可能没有资格。纽约总检察长Tish James对此提出异议,并要求更多信息,例如该公司是否有足够现金来支付保证金,或者特朗普提供了什么抵押品。听证会定于4月22日举行,届时可能会揭示更多关于保证金性质的信息。

Takeaways

  • 📜 特朗普在纽约欺诈案中以1.75亿美元的保证金获得保释,但提供保证金的公司可能没有资格给予他保释。
  • 🏛️ 纽约总检察长蒂什·詹姆斯可能开始查封特朗普的财产,但具体情况尚未确定。
  • 🤵 80岁的亿万富翁唐·汉基是提供保证金的汉基集团的负责人,但他在纽约州没有授权或许可从事此类业务。
  • 🚫 蒂什·詹姆斯已经提交了一份例外通知,对汉基集团提供的保证金提出异议,并要求提供更多信息。
  • 📅 法官恩戈隆已经安排在4月22日就这一问题举行听证会,届时可能会要求汉基披露其公司是否有足够的现金来支付1.75亿美元的保证金。
  • 💰 汉基集团目前手头有约1.38亿美元现金,按照专家的说法,通常公司发行的保证金应该是其现金余额的10%,这意味着汉基公司可能存在风险。
  • 🤔 如果汉基集团的资产不足以覆盖特朗普败诉的损失,那么接下来会发生什么还是未知数。
  • 🔄 特朗普可能会获得额外的10天时间来寻找新的保险公司,以满足法院的要求。
  • 🎭 特朗普声称自己赢得了上诉,而法官恩戈隆没有接受上诉法院的裁决,但这种说法更像是特朗普自己的幻想。
  • 💔 特朗普的支持者是最受苦的群体,他们的生活并没有因为特朗普的政策而得到改善,反而不断被特朗普利用和欺骗。

Q & A

  • 特朗普在纽约欺诈案中是如何获得175百万美元保证金的?

    -特朗普通过一家名为Hanky集团的保险公司获得了175百万美元的保证金,该公司由80岁的亿万富翁Don Hankey领导。

  • 为什么纽约检察长Tish James可能对特朗普的保证金采取行动?

    -因为提供保证金的保险公司Hanky集团并未获得在纽约州发布保证金的授权或许可,Tish James已提交了一份例外通知,对所发布的保证金提出异议,并要求提供更多信息。

  • Hanky集团的背景是什么?

    -Hanky集团由Don Hankey领导,他通过参与高利率的次级汽车贷款以及每天高达250辆车的回收,积累了相当一部分财富。

  • 法官Engoron在这个案件中扮演了什么角色?

    -法官Engoron为这个保证金问题设定了一个听证会,日期定在4月22日,届时可能会要求Don Hankey披露有关其公司是否有足够的现金来支付1.75亿美元保证金的信息。

  • 如果Hanky集团无法证明其有足够的资金来支付保证金,会发生什么?

    -如果Hanky集团无法证明其资金充足,法官Engoron可能会要求特朗普找到另一家保险公司来提供足够的保证金,否则Tish James可能会开始查封特朗普的财产。

  • 特朗普对上诉法院的裁决有何看法?

    -特朗普声称他赢得了上诉,而法官Engoron没有接受上诉法院的裁决,并声称Engoron法官已经失控。但这是一种错误的理解,因为上诉法院对Engoron法官的某些决定做了一些修改,而Engoron法官也相应地进行了调整。

  • 特朗普的支持者如何看待他的行为?

    -特朗普的支持者可能会相信他的说辞,但事实上,特朗普一直在利用和操纵他们,让他们为他的政策和个人利益买单。

  • 特朗普在任期内的主要立法成就是什么?

    -特朗普在任期内的主要立法成就是一项针对百万富翁和亿万富翁的税收减免政策。

  • 特朗普如何利用他的支持者?

    -特朗普通过转移支持者的注意力到其他群体,比如移民、少数族裔等,同时利用他们的信任和金钱来推进自己的利益。

  • 特朗普的政策对他的支持者有何影响?

    -特朗普的政策并没有实质性地改善他的支持者的生活质量,反而让他们在经济上更加困难,同时还要不断地为他的政治活动捐款。

  • 特朗普的商业行为有哪些争议?

    -特朗普的商业行为包括特朗普酒、特朗普赌场、特朗普水、特朗普牛排、特朗普大学等,其中特朗普大学被认定为是欺诈行为。

Outlines

00:00

🔍 特朗普纽约欺诈案保证金问题

该段落讨论了特朗普在纽约欺诈案中以1.75亿美元的保证金获得保释的情况。然而,提供保证金的保险公司可能没有资格为特朗普提供保释。纽约总检察长Tish James对此提出了异议,并要求提供更多信息,例如该公司是否有足够的现金来支付1.75亿美元的保证金,以及如果没有现金,特朗普提供了何种抵押品来确保这笔保证金。目前,这个问题已经引起了法律界的关注,因为这是一个没有太多先例的法律领域。

05:00

🤔 特朗普的保证金是否足够?

这一段讨论了如果报道准确,即保险公司只有大约1.3亿至1.4亿美元的流动资金,那么他们将把整个业务押在特朗普身上,仍然无法覆盖整个保证金的成本。如果确定Knight Specialty保险公司不足以覆盖特朗普败诉的损失,接下来会发生什么还是未知数。但可以猜测,如果法官判定该保险公司的保证金不足,特朗普可能会再获得10天的时间去寻找另一个愿意提供足够资产支持的保险公司。

10:01

😔 特朗普对支持者的利用与欺骗

本段内容指出特朗普对支持者的利用和欺骗。尽管特朗普知道案件尚未上诉,但他仍然对他的支持者宣扬自己已经赢得上诉。特朗普利用他的平台、言辞和魅力,让那些容易上当的人交出他们的钱。他的政策并没有改善支持者的生活,但他们仍然不断地向他捐款。特朗普的整个生活基本上是对那些相信他的人的欺骗。

15:03

📢 持续关注特朗普诉讼案的最新进展

最后一段强调了对特朗普诉讼案进展的持续关注,包括纽约欺诈案中的保证金问题是否被接受。主持人承诺将继续报道相关事件,并邀请观众订阅他们的频道以跟进最新情况。

Mindmap

专家意见与汉基集团现金对比
保证金发行与现金比例
现金及流动性问题
汉基集团的财务状况
汉基集团及其负责人
保证金提供者
听证会安排
提出异议
要求披露财务信息
对汉基集团的调查
纽约总检察长詹姆斯的介入
法律行动
特朗普在纽约欺诈案中以1.75亿美元的保证金获释
主要事件
保证金与现金持有量的关系
汉基集团的财务能力
法院对保证金的接受程度
法院的裁决
保证金问题
特朗普对支持者的态度
政策与税收减免
对支持者的利用
特朗普大学与NFTs
特朗普媒体的下滑
特朗普的商业行为
特朗普的策略
潜在后果
对特朗普政策的盲目支持
支持者的经济状况
操纵与利用
社会分裂与仇恨的煽动
特朗普对支持者的影响
特朗普支持者
对民主党的攻击
对宪法和法治的不敬
特朗普的政治策略
11月选举的重要性
社会团结与理解的呼吁
选举与社会变革
政治前景
社会影响
法律解析节目内容梳理
Alert

Keywords

💡诉讼保释金

诉讼保释金是指在法律诉讼中,被告人为了获得暂时的自由而支付的一定数额的钱款。在视频中,唐纳德·特朗普在纽约的欺诈案件中需要支付1.75亿美元的保释金,但提供保释金的保险公司可能没有资格提供这笔保释金。

💡纽约州总检察长

纽约州总检察长是纽约州政府的法律代表,负责保护州的法律利益和居民的权利。在视频中,纽约州总检察长Letitia James对Hanky集团提供的保释金提出异议,并要求提供更多信息以证明该公司是否有能力支付这笔保释金。

💡财产查封

财产查封是指法院为了确保判决能够得到执行,对被告的财产进行控制的一种法律手段。在视频中,如果Hanky集团不能提供足够的资金或抵押品来保证保释金,那么纽约州总检察长可能会开始查封特朗普的财产。

💡听证会

听证会是法庭程序的一部分,允许双方当事人在法官面前提出证据和论点,以便法官做出裁决。在视频中,法官Engoron安排了一次听证会,以解决关于Hanky集团提供的保释金是否有效的争议。

💡流动性

流动性是指企业或个人能够迅速转换为现金而不会造成损失的资产的能力。在视频中,Hanky集团的流动性成为关注焦点,因为它涉及到公司是否有足够的现金来支付特朗普的1.75亿美元保释金。

💡抵押品

抵押品是指为了获得贷款或保证而提供的资产,如果债务人未能履行义务,债权人有权占有这些资产。在视频中,如果Hanky集团没有足够的现金来支付保释金,那么人们关心的是特朗普可能提供了什么样的抵押品来确保这笔保释金。

💡欺诈案件

欺诈案件是指涉及故意欺骗他人以获得金钱或其他利益的法律案件。在视频中,特朗普面临的纽约欺诈案件是指他被指控在商业活动中进行了欺诈行为。

💡保险公司

保险公司是指提供各种保险服务的公司,包括财产保险、人寿保险、健康保险等。在视频中,Hanky集团作为一家保险公司,为特朗普提供了保释金保险,但其资格受到质疑。

💡亿万富翁

亿万富翁是指拥有至少十亿美元资产的个人。在视频中,Don Hankey被描述为一位80岁的亿万富翁,他是Hanky集团的负责人,该集团为特朗普的保释金提供保险。

💡法律专家

法律专家是指在法律领域具有深厚知识和经验的专业人士,他们对特定法律问题有深入的理解和分析能力。在视频中,法律专家对Hanky集团发行的保释金提出了质疑,并提供了关于保释金发行惯例的专业意见。

💡上诉

上诉是指当事人对法院的判决或裁定不满意,向上级法院申请复审的法律程序。在视频中,特朗普对纽约欺诈案件的判决提出了上诉,但上诉法院减少了他需要支付的保释金金额。

Highlights

特朗普在纽约欺诈案中以1.75亿美元的保证金获得保释,但提供保证金的保险公司可能没有资格给予他这笔保证金。

纽约总检察长蒂什·詹姆斯可能开始查封特朗普的财产。

80岁的亿万富翁唐·汉基是提供保证金的人,但他的公司汉基集团并未获得在纽约发布保证金的授权或许可。

蒂什·詹姆斯已经提交了一份例外通知,对汉基集团发布的保证金提出异议,并要求提供更多信息。

汉基集团据说是通过高利率的次级汽车贷款和每天高达250辆车的回收量积累了大量财富。

法官恩戈隆已经安排在4月22日就这一问题举行听证会,届时可能会要求汉基披露他是否有足够的现金来支付1.75亿美元的保证金。

如果汉基集团没有足够的现金,法院可能会询问他们接受唐纳德·特朗普提供的何种抵押品来保障这笔保证金。

法院是否有能力要求保险公司证明他们有足够的资金来支付特朗普如果输掉上诉的情况。

汉基的公司,夜特许公司,手头大约有1.38亿美元现金,但发行了价值1.75亿美元的保证金,这听起来不像是最佳实践。

如果夜特许保险公司的流动性不足以覆盖唐纳德·特朗普的损失,那么接下来会发生什么还是未知水域。

特朗普声称法官恩戈隆没有接受上诉法院的裁决,并且恩戈隆已经走投无路,这是特朗普的幻想。

特朗普的支持者是最受影响的人,他们不断被特朗普欺骗和利用。

特朗普的政策并没有使他的基本盘的生活得到实质性改善,但他们仍然不断地向他捐款。

特朗普利用他的平台、言辞和魅力,试图让那些容易上当的人交出他们的钱。

特朗普自称是假平民,他的唯一重大立法成就是为百万富翁和亿万富翁减税。

特朗普的税改并没有真正帮助中产阶级,他在中期选举前承诺的中产阶级减税表明了这一点。

特朗普通过贬低其他人,转移他的支持者的注意力,使他们忽视了真正的问题。

特朗普的支持者因为不是黑人、移民或同性恋而感到优越,而特朗普却在掏他们的口袋。

我们将密切关注特朗普的诉讼进程,包括纽约欺诈案中的保证金是否被接受。

Transcripts

00:00

you're watching the legal breakdown so

00:01

Glenn we found out a few days ago that

00:03

Trump was able to make bond in the New

00:05

York fraud case for $175 million but now

00:07

it looks like the actual bond company

00:09

may not be qualified to give him that

00:11

Bond so what happened here yeah not so

00:14

fast Donald it looks like AG Tish James

00:17

may be able to begin seizing his

00:19

property yet but it's an open question

00:22

so what happened is this um 80-year-old

00:25

billionaire uh don hanky is his name

00:29

head of the hanky group I don't know if

00:31

he has a partner named Panky but Hanky

00:33

Panky seems like it might be appropriate

00:35

given what we're learning so he is the

00:38

person who is is providing the bond or

00:41

the shity he's insuring the $175 million

00:45

for Donald Trump Well turns out he's not

00:48

authorized or licensed to post chity

00:51

Bonds in New York right of course Donald

00:54

Trump is doing business with somebody

00:56

who's not really authorized to engage in

00:59

the kind of business he's trying to

01:01

engage in so AG James has filed what's

01:03

called a notice of exception she's

01:06

lodging her disagreement or taking

01:09

exception with the shity bond that's

01:11

been posted and she is requesting more

01:15

information for example does this hanky

01:18

group the name of the company is

01:19

technically um night specialty and Don

01:23

hanky reportedly uh is a billionaire

01:26

courtesy of among other things um being

01:29

involved in subprime loans that are

01:32

given on cars at very high interest

01:35

rates and then he apparently was

01:37

repossessing as many as 250 cars a day

01:41

at one point sounds like that's how he

01:43

came into a good bit of his fortune yeah

01:46

in other words the exact kind of person

01:48

you would imagine Trump getting into

01:49

business with exactly so AG James has

01:54

requested more information she's she's

01:56

filed a notice of exception and judge

01:58

engoron has set a hearing on on this

02:02

issue on April 22nd and it looks like at

02:06

that time uh don hanky may be required

02:09

to disclose information about things

02:12

like whether he has sufficient cash on

02:14

hand to cover the

02:17

$175 million bond that he has issued um

02:22

and also if he doesn't have the cash on

02:24

hand what kind of collateral might he be

02:27

accepting from Donald Trump to secure

02:30

this Bond so it sounds like come April

02:32

22nd we're going to begin to get some

02:35

more information about the nature of

02:37

this Bond and whether it's something

02:39

that's actually acceptable to both AG

02:42

James because she's protecting the

02:45

pecuniary interest of the people of New

02:46

York she wants to make sure that you

02:49

know the the state of New York is able

02:51

to collect on the Judgment that was

02:55

issued against Donald Trump and whether

02:57

judge en Goron approves this Bond

03:00

Arrangement Glenn does the does the

03:03

court have the ability to have the

03:04

insurance company prove that they have

03:06

the means to cover Trump if he loses the

03:08

appeal you know it's a really um

03:11

interesting area of the law there's not

03:13

a lot of precedent on this issue this is

03:16

not the kind of thing that gets appealed

03:19

and then appell at courts are resolving

03:21

these kind of issues and filing opinions

03:24

that become precedent that everybody can

03:27

follow um but there are a lot of sort of

03:30

experts in this specialty in the area of

03:33

bonds that have to be posted for large

03:35

money judgments in civil cases I was I

03:38

am not an expert in that area Brian but

03:40

I was trying to read up and learn as

03:41

much as I can one of the experts in this

03:44

field said that ordinarily if a company

03:47

is going to issue a bond they should

03:50

only issue a bond for about 10% of the

03:53

Surplus cash they have on hand so the

03:56

next logical question is you know uh

03:59

hanky's company how much Surplus cash

04:03

does it have on hand well according to

04:05

some of the most recent reporting night

04:07

specialty hanky company has about $138

04:11

million cash on hand I'm no

04:14

mathematician but 10% of that would be

04:16

about 13 or4 million and yet they've

04:20

issued a bond for what $1

04:22

175 million doesn't sound like best

04:26

practices to me so yes I think all of

04:29

this will be fair game for Tish James to

04:32

inquire about for judge en Goron to then

04:36

um hold this hearing perhaps um ask for

04:40

sworn testimony from uh this Don hanky

04:44

or whoever it is that you know can

04:46

provide information about whether this

04:49

company is sufficiently solvent

04:51

sufficiently liquid that it you know

04:55

it's that it can responsibly and

04:57

appropriately issue this Bond to Donald

05:00

Trump okay well I mean first of all if

05:02

the reporting is correct and they're

05:03

liquid to the tune of about $130 $140

05:06

million then they would be staking their

05:08

entire business on Donald Trump and

05:10

still wouldn't be able to cover the

05:12

entire cost of the bond so if it turns

05:14

out that night specialty insurance

05:15

company is not Solen enough to cover the

05:18

losses if Donald Trump loses appeal what

05:20

would happen next uncharted waters but I

05:24

can give it my best guess um so remember

05:27

how you know the appell Court just sort

05:30

of gratuitously out of thin air reduced

05:34

the amount that Donald Trump had to put

05:35

up um from $464 million almost half a

05:40

billion dollars to $175 million without

05:44

explanation without Authority and

05:46

without analysis I think Justice is

05:49

still licking its wounds from that one

05:52

and they extended by 10 days the

05:54

deadline for Donald Trump to put up that

05:56

poultry amount of 175 million that they

05:59

reduced it to I suspect if there is a

06:02

dispute and a hearing that um determines

06:06

judge en Goron rules that no this Bond

06:10

issued by KN specialty is not going to

06:12

cut it he would probably give Trump

06:15

another 10 days would be my best guess

06:18

to come up with another insurer another

06:21

bondsman who's willing to put up a bond

06:24

appropriately that is backed by

06:26

sufficient assets and then at the end of

06:29

that 10-day period Well we are back to

06:32

seeing Tish James begin to seize Donald

06:35

Trump's property to satisfy the Judgment

06:38

yeah that was going to be my next

06:39

question whether you think he's going to

06:40

get the full 10 days to seek a new Bond

06:42

or if it's going to be kind of one

06:44

strike and you're out because he did

06:45

have the ability to find a company that

06:48

would be able to satisfy this bond

06:49

amount if it turns out that Knight

06:51

specialty insurance company isn't

06:53

solvent enough to do it then then

06:55

couldn't the argument be made that he's

06:56

already had this opportunity to do it

06:58

and he came up short

07:00

absolutely but when has Donald Trump

07:02

ever gotten just one strike before

07:05

accountability visits him he gets more

07:08

than three strikes he could be at bat

07:11

for a full day swinging away and never

07:14

making contact with a dang ball and it

07:17

seems like whether it's you know an

07:19

unlimited number of violations of gag

07:22

orders or an unlimited number of delays

07:25

in his criminal cases you know nobody in

07:28

a position of author Authority ever

07:30

seems to say you're out Glenn Trump has

07:34

come out and claimed uh based on this

07:37

very court case that uh that he won

07:40

appeal in this case and that judge and

07:42

Goran didn't accept the appeals Court's

07:44

ruling and that and Goron has gone Rogue

07:47

those were his exact words can you

07:49

respond to that yeah this is uh Donald

07:52

Trump living in his own little fictional

07:56

World there were some um there were some

07:59

modifications by the appell at court of

08:02

some of what judge en Goran had done but

08:05

judge en Goron adjusted accordingly he

08:08

didn't thumb his nose at the appell at

08:11

court that's more you know keeping in

08:13

line with how Donald Trump does business

08:16

and how some of his lawyers seem to do

08:19

business so this is Donald Trump's

08:21

fantasy world that he is forever pushing

08:24

on his base on his supporters you know

08:28

he's only able to fool the gullible but

08:30

he's able to fool them over and over and

08:33

over again and I think that's what these

08:36

claims are a product of and I think

08:38

what's worth pointing out to this point

08:39

is that Donald Trump knows better he

08:42

knows that he hasn't won appeal that

08:44

this case isn't even going to go to a

08:45

full appeal for probably another 6

08:47

months to a year and even if he doesn't

08:49

know he presumably has lawyers that are

08:51

smart enough to recognize that this case

08:52

hasn't gone to appeal but despite the

08:55

fact that he knows better he's still

08:56

perpetuating this Con on his own

08:58

supporters because he knows he can

09:00

exploit them he knows he can fool them

09:02

that's how much contempt he has for the

09:04

very people who are gullible enough to

09:06

your point to trust the guy and so like

09:09

you think that you know when when Trump

09:10

walks around attacking Democrats all day

09:12

that he has contempt for them the real

09:14

people he has contempt for the people he

09:16

show nothing but pure unadulterated

09:18

hatred for is his own supporters because

09:21

he comes out and just manipulates them

09:23

and exploits them and lies to them on a

09:25

daily basis and they just gobble it up

09:27

Brian in many ways the people who suffer

09:30

the most are Donald Trump's own

09:33

supporters they continue to empty their

09:35

pockets and most of them are not exactly

09:39

wealthy high dollar donors but you know

09:42

they're fooled by Donald Trump over and

09:44

over and over again the Democrats aren't

09:47

sending Donald Trump money now you know

09:49

they may have to suffer under Donald

09:51

Trump's policies when he was president

09:54

the first time and certainly we would

09:56

all suffer mightily if he ever made his

09:58

way back to the Oval Office but you know

10:01

I always try to sort of retain a healthy

10:04

dose of empathy for Donald Trump's

10:07

supporters I know it's hard and you know

10:09

I try at every opportunity to talk

10:12

across that divide as frustrating as it

10:15

can be because these are some of the

10:17

people who are suffering the most their

10:19

lives are not being made appreciably

10:22

better by any Trump policy and yet

10:26

they're also on top of that emptying

10:28

their pockets and sending him5 10 $20

10:32

over and over and over again and

10:34

according to the reporting they are

10:36

inundated with emails and text messages

10:39

saying give me more give me more give me

10:42

more and they often respond by giving

10:45

him more you know in America I I've

10:48

always said it's not us and them when it

10:51

comes to Americans it's just us

10:53

different kinds of us different flavors

10:56

of us um people with different

10:58

priorities ideologies but still it's all

11:01

us and I think we have to get back to

11:04

trying to treat everybody you know

11:08

understanding how everybody is suffering

11:11

the people who really care about the

11:13

rule of law and allegiance to the

11:14

Constitution and accountability are

11:16

suffering and the people who don't care

11:19

about that so much are still suffering

11:21

at the hands of Donald Trump so

11:24

hopefully come November we can you know

11:27

pull ourselves out of this morass this

11:29

Quagmire that Donald Trump and the

11:31

Republicans have put us in and make life

11:35

a little bit better for everybody

11:36

including the people who are perhaps

11:39

suffering most at the hands of Donald

11:41

Trump and you know he's a particularly

11:43

Insidious creature when it comes to

11:45

being able to exploit those very people

11:46

I mean his entire life has basically

11:49

been just a monument to being able to

11:51

screw people who believe him you know

11:53

who are who are gullible enough to

11:54

believe him I mean you look at you look

11:56

at everything from Trump wine Trump

11:58

casinos Trump uh uh Trump water Trump

12:01

Stakes Trump vodka Trump University was

12:04

a fraud I mean now you have these nfts

12:06

these shoes uh um Trump media which

12:10

right now is just is just on a downward

12:12

descent and so he uses his platform he

12:15

uses his words he uses his Charisma to

12:17

try to get these people you know people

12:19

again who who he's conned into believing

12:22

him to hand over their money and he does

12:24

it on a on a on a constant basis and at

12:27

the end of the day they're the ones that

12:28

are being screwed I mean he's the one

12:29

who presented himself as a fake populist

12:31

here and what did he do what was his

12:33

only major legislative accomplishment

12:35

when he was in office it was a tax cut

12:37

for Millionaires and billionaires that's

12:39

what he did he came out and said that he

12:41

wanted to help uh that he wants he said

12:43

his exact quote was he wants to be

12:44

greedy for the country he's he's rich

12:46

and so now he he used to be greedy for

12:47

himself now he wants to be greedy for

12:48

everybody else at the end of the day

12:50

what did he do he was greedy for the

12:52

very people who donated to his campaign

12:53

and nobody else and the way you know

12:55

that the way that you know that that tax

12:57

cut didn't actually help the middle

12:58

class is that just before midterms as a

13:01

as a little carrot to dangle he told

13:03

them okay well if if uh Republicans

13:05

maintain control of Congress then we'll

13:07

pass a middle class tax cut and so if if

13:10

middle class Americans had already

13:12

benefited from the initial tax cut that

13:15

he passed why would we need a middle

13:16

class tax cut if Americans are already

13:18

benefited from uh from a health care

13:21

plan that he had put forward why would

13:22

we need a healthcare plan that he was

13:24

promising if Americans had already

13:25

benefited from some infrastructure

13:27

package why would he need to promise

13:28

that stuff he never actually went

13:30

through with any of it it was all just

13:31

carrots that he was dangling for people

13:32

that were gullible enough to believe him

13:35

yeah we should never lose sight that it

13:37

is his base and his supporters who

13:40

suffer as much and in some ways more

13:43

than the rest of us and he has made

13:46

their lives no better but what he gives

13:48

them is he says your life may suck but

13:51

at least you're not black at least

13:53

you're not an immigrant at least you're

13:55

not gay those people immigrants he's now

13:58

taken into calling animals those people

14:01

are so beneath you that you should feel

14:04

better about yourself because you're not

14:07

them he gives them permission

14:09

encouragement even to hate the other and

14:13

for some people that at least gives them

14:17

some status in the eyes of Donald Trump

14:20

at least I'm not those people all the

14:23

while Donald Trump is picking their damn

14:27

Pockets right I mean that that was

14:29

perfectly put I think as long as as he

14:31

makes sure to train their eye on the

14:34

other people to your exact point people

14:36

of color gay people immigrants trans

14:38

people whatever it is anybody anybody

14:40

who he can punch down on as long as he

14:42

can train those people's ey whether it's

14:44

whether it's you know uh uh Financial

14:46

insecurity whatever it is if he can

14:48

focus them on somebody else some other

14:50

group and make them the root of all of

14:52

of their problems then he's happy and

14:54

then those people aren't training their

14:55

attention on the true problem which is

14:57

people like Donald Trump who use their

14:59

positions of power uh to pre on on those

15:02

who are weaker than them and so I think

15:04

that's what we're seeing right here so

15:06

uh with that said we'll of course stay

15:07

on top of whatever happens with Donald

15:09

Trump's prosecutions as they move

15:11

forward uh including whatever happens

15:13

with this uh the shy Bond and whether or

15:15

not it's accepted as part of the New

15:16

York fraud case that's happening right

15:18

now so with that said Glenn and I will

15:19

continue to cover this stuff if you want

15:21

to follow along please make sure to

15:22

subscribe the links to both of our

15:23

channels right here on the screen I'm

15:25

Brian Tyler Cohen and I'm Glenn kersner

15:27

you're watching the legal breakdown

15:31

[Music]