Alvin Bragg threatens Trump with contempt charges for violating gag order
Summary
TLDR在这段视频脚本中,讨论了曼哈顿地区检察官对前总统特朗普提起的藐视法庭动议,因其违反了法官对其发布的封口令,发布了三条涉及两位已知证人和他的刑事审判的社交媒体帖子。检察官办公室要求对特朗普每违反一次封口令罚款1000美元,并警告说,未来的违规行为不仅可以处以额外罚款,还可能面临最长30天的监禁。节目中还提到了陪审团选拔过程中的一些挑战,包括多位潜在陪审员因无法保持公正而被排除。此外,讨论了法官可能存在的偏见问题,以及对特朗普的不公正对待。参与者们表达了对当前司法程序的担忧,并认为这对特朗普来说是一次具有挑战性的法律斗争。
Takeaways
- 📜 曼哈顿地区检察官已向法庭提交动议,要求对前总统特朗普持有藐视法庭罪,理由是特朗普违反了法官对他实施的封口令,并通过社交媒体发布了与两位已知证人及其刑事审判有关的三条帖子。
- 💸 检察官办公室要求对特朗普每违反一次封口令罚款1000美元,并警告说,未来的违规行为不仅可以通过额外罚款来惩罚,还可以通过最多30天的监禁来惩罚。
- 🚫 有观点认为,对特朗普的封口令是一种非常不美国的做法,因为它限制了言论自由,而与此同时,其他涉案人员如迈克尔·科恩却没有受到同样的限制。
- 🤔 陪审团选拔过程中,超过一半的潜在陪审员被排除,其中包括一些表示无法公正和客观评判前总统的人。
- 🧐 一些陪审团成员表示,由于工作冲突或个人对特朗普的不满,他们无法保持公正。
- 👥 讨论中提到,法官的女儿曾在卡玛拉·哈里斯的团队工作,这可能表明存在利益冲突。
- 🇺🇸 有评论认为,这种做法是在试图通过法庭程序来干扰特朗普的政治活动,类似于试图将他与乔·拜登置于同一起跑线。
- 🚨 有关特朗普可能因违反封口令而面临监禁的讨论,引起了对他作为被告权利的担忧。
- 👮♂️ 一些参与者认为,检察官试图通过刑事化的行为来惩罚特朗普,即使这些行为可能并不构成犯罪。
- 🤝 讨论中还提到了陪审团成员的多样性问题,暗示了对公正审判的担忧。
- 📉 整个讨论反映了对当前司法程序和政治动机的广泛质疑,以及对美国司法公正性的担忧。
Q & A
曼哈顿地区检察官为何向法院提起对前总统特朗普的藐视法庭动议?
-曼哈顿地区检察官提起藐视法庭动议是因为特朗普违反了法官对他施加的封口令,通过社交媒体发表了与两个已知证人及其刑事审判有关的三篇帖子。
检察官要求对特朗普违反封口令的行为进行怎样的处罚?
-检察官要求对特朗普的每项违规行为罚款1000美元,并且警告说,如果未来继续违反法庭的限制,不仅可以处以额外的罚款,还可能面临最长30天的监禁。
在陪审团选拔过程中,有多少人表示他们无法公正和客观地评判前总统?
-在陪审团选拔过程中,有六个人表示他们无法公正和客观地评判前总统。
为什么有陪审团成员因为工作冲突而被排除?
-有一位29岁的陪审团成员因为工作冲突被排除,尽管她表示她不是前总统的粉丝。
在讨论中,有人提到了对特朗普的不公正对待,这包括哪些方面?
-讨论中提到的不公正对待包括:大多数陪审团成员可能对特朗普有偏见,法官被认为有利益冲突,以及检察官试图通过封口令限制特朗普的言论自由。
为什么有人认为封口令是对美国价值的违背?
-有人认为封口令是对美国价值的违背,因为它限制了特朗普的言论自由,而这是美国宪法第一修正案所保障的基本权利。
法官的女儿与本案有何关联,为什么这会引起争议?
-法官的女儿是一家数字媒体公司的高级执行官,该公司从包括卡玛拉·哈里斯在内的多位民主党人那里获得了数千万的资金。这引起了争议,因为有人认为这构成了利益冲突。
为什么有人认为这场审判是不应该发生的?
-有人认为这场审判是不应该发生的,因为他们认为这是出于政治动机,旨在阻碍特朗普的政治活动,并通过法律程序对他进行诽谤和打压。
在讨论中,有人提到了特朗普在宾夕法尼亚州筹款,这与审判有什么关系?
-在讨论中,有人提到特朗普在宾夕法尼亚州筹款,这与审判有关,因为有人认为这是特朗普被法院牵制的同时,他正在积极进行政治活动,这被视为对特朗普的选举干预。
讨论中提到的'波士顿马拉松案'的动议是什么,它与本案有何相似之处?
-讨论中提到的'波士顿马拉松案'的动议是辩方试图改变审判地点,理由是在当地无法获得公正的审判。这与本案相似,因为本案中也有关于审判地点和陪审团成员能否保持公正的讨论。
为什么有人认为这场审判让人感觉不像是美国的作风?
-有人认为这场审判让人感觉不像是美国的作风,因为它涉及到对前总统的不公正对待,限制言论自由,以及可能存在的利益冲突,这些都与美国人通常理解的公正和法治原则相悖。
Outlines
😀 曼哈顿地方检察官对前总统特朗普提起藐视法庭指控
曼哈顿地方检察官对前总统特朗普提起藐视法庭的指控,因为他违反了法官对他施加的封口令,通过社交媒体发布了与两位已知证人及他的刑事审判相关的三篇帖子。检察官办公室要求对特朗普每违反一次封口令罚款1000美元,并警告说,未来的违规行为不仅可以通过额外罚款来惩罚,还可以通过最多30天的监禁期来惩罚。此外,提到了迈克尔·科恩和斯托米·丹尼尔斯的案件,以及陪审团选拔过程中的一些挑战和公众对此案件的不同反应。
😠 讨论封口令的合理性和对特朗普的法律行动
讨论集中在封口令的合理性上,以及对特朗普可能的法律行动。提到了迈克尔·科恩没有受到封口令的限制,可以自由地进行媒体采访,而特朗普则不能。此外,讨论了检察官试图让法官判定特朗普藐视法庭,以及对特朗普的不公平对待,包括限制他参加儿子的高中毕业典礼等个人活动。还提到了法官的女儿与民主党有财务联系的问题,以及这对案件可能产生的影响。
😤 公众对案件的看法及陪审团选拔的困难
讨论了公众对此案的看法,以及陪审团选拔过程中的困难。一些潜在的陪审团成员表示,由于工作冲突或认为自己无法公正地评判前总统,他们无法担任陪审团。此外,讨论了人们对特朗普在政治和法律问题上立场的看法,以及这对选举可能产生的影响。还提到了特朗普在宾夕法尼亚州筹款活动,以及人们对他被法庭程序束缚的看法。
Mindmap
Keywords
💡藐视法庭
💡封口令
💡社交媒体帖子
💡罚款
💡监禁
💡陪审团选拔
💡公正性
💡证人
💡审判
💡政治偏见
💡选举干预
Highlights
曼哈顿地区检察官已向法院提交动议,要求将前总统特朗普以藐视法庭罪名拘留,理由是特朗普违反了法官对他实施的禁言令,并通过发布三条社交媒体帖子涉及两名已知证人和他的刑事审判。
检察官要求对特朗普每违反一次禁言令罚款1000美元,并警告未来违反禁言令的行为不仅可以通过额外罚款来惩罚,还可以通过最多30天的监禁期来惩罚。
陪审团选拔过程中,超过一半的候选人被排除,律师们在询问坐在陪审团席上的潜在陪审员。
有观点认为,该审判本不应该发生,而且存在潜在的偏见,因为法官被认为与案件有利益冲突。
一些潜在的陪审员表示他们无法公平和客观地评判前总统,其中一人因为有许多共和党朋友而认为自己无法公正。
一位女士认为特朗普受到了公平对待,并在法庭上表示没有人可以凌驾于法律之上。
有陪审团成员表示,他们认为陪审团对总统的看法相当分歧,尽管这是在民主党主导的曼哈顿。
一位29岁的陪审团成员因为工作冲突而被免职,尽管她不是前总统的粉丝。
讨论了关于对特朗普的藐视法庭指控,特别是关于他最近发布的三条社交媒体帖子,这些帖子被认为是违反了禁言令。
检察官正在努力让法官认定特朗普藐视法庭,因为他违反了对他的禁言令。
有人指出,与特朗普不同,迈克尔·科恩没有禁言令的限制,可以在媒体上自由发言而不必担心伪证罪的指控。
讨论了禁言令的合法性和必要性,以及它对特朗普表达自己观点的影响。
一些参与者认为禁言令是对美国价值的违背,并对法官的公正性表示怀疑。
法官的女儿是一家专注于数字媒体的公司的高管,该公司从包括卡玛拉·哈里斯在内的多位民主党人那里获得了数千万的资金。
讨论了特朗普是否会因为坚持自己的权利而挑战法官的权威。
有人担心审判可能会影响特朗普参加儿子的高中毕业典礼,如果因此被监禁,这将被视为惩罚性措施。
讨论了特朗普在宾夕法尼亚州筹款的同时,却在法庭上受到限制,这被视为对他的选举干预。
一些参与者认为,美国人民意识到了正在发生的事情,并且他们认为这是不公平的,与他们成长的国家不符。
讨论了陪审团成员的构成,以及他们对特朗普的看法,包括那些可能因为个人背景而倾向于支持或反对他的人。
Transcripts
'S FOR A SPEED TO RENEW THE
THREAT WAS THERE AND NOW IT IS
BEING CARRIED OUT MANHATTAN
DISTRICT ATTORNEY HAS NOW FILED
A MOTION TO HOLD FORMER
PRESIDENT TRUMP AND CONTEMPT OF
COURT CLAIMING HE VIOLATED THE
GAG ORDER FROM THE JUDGE AND
DIDN'T LIKE IMPOSED ON HIM BY
PUBLISHING THREE SOCIAL MEDIA
POSTS RELATING TO TWO KNOWN
WITNESSES AND HIS CRIMINAL TRIAL
HERE NEW YORK.
>> Harris: WITH MICHAEL COHEN
AND STORMY DANIELS.
THEY'RE URGING THE MANHATTAN
JUDGE TO ALSO WARN DONALD TRUMP
THAT FUTURE VIOLATIONS OF THIS
GAG ORDER CAN BE PUNISHED NOT
ONLY WITH ADDITIONAL FUNDS BUT
WITH THE TERM OF INCARCERATION
OF UP TO 30 DAYS.
IT IS ONLY TUESDAY, DAY TWO OF
THE TRIAL.
THIS IS "OUTNUMBERED."
I AM HARRIS FAULKNER HERE WITH
EMILY COMPAGNO.
JOINING US TODAY IS FROM
"FOX & FRIENDS," RACHEL CAMPOS
DUFFY, AND FOX NEWS CONTRIBUTOR
BOARD CERTIFIED PHYSICIAN AND
AUTHOR OF THE NEW HIP BOOK "LOVE
BOMB" DR NICOLE SAPHIER.
ALSO HOST OF THE BEN FERGUSON
PODCAST, WITH TED CRUZ PARKER
HESSE, BEN FERGUSON HIMSELF.
ALL GREAT STUFF YOU HAVE TO PUT
YOUR LIFE.
LET US GO STRAIGHT TO ERIC SHAWN
WHO IS LIFE OUTSIDE THE
NEW YORK STATE SUPREME COURT
WITH MORE ON THE JURY SELECTION
WHICH WERE NOT SUCCESSFUL
YESTERDAY, THEY KICKED UP WITHIN
50 PEOPLE YESTERDAY AFTER
LOOKING AT 96 PEOPLE.
>> YES, THERE WAS MORE THAN
HALF KICKED OUT.
THE LAWYERS ARE QUESTIONING THE
POTENTIAL JURORS AS THEY SIT IN
THE JURY BOX.
IT DOES NOT SEEM LIKE IT IS
GOING ANY BETTER THAN IT IS
YESTERDAY.
WE FIND OUT THAT THE DISTRICT
ATTORNEY WANTS TO HOLD THE
FORMER PRESIDENT IN CONTEMPT OF
COURT.
FILING A MOTION THAT COULD
ACTUALLY SEEK THE PRESIDENT
GOING BEHIND BARS IF IT
CONTINUES AND NOT CUT IT OUT.
IT BRINGS A MOTION TO COURT
ASKING THAT THE PRESIDENT BE
HELD IN CONTEMPT AND IT CENTERS
ON THREE SOCIAL MEDIA POSTS THAT
THE FORMER PRESIDENT MADE
RECENTLY.
THE PROSECUTOR SAYS THAT THEY
ARE IN VIOLATIONS OF THE GAG
ORDER.
THE OFFICE IS DEMANDING THAT
TRUMP BE FINED $1,000 FOR EACH
OF THESE CLOSINGS WHERE HE
ATTACKED MICHAEL COHEN AND
STORMY DANIELS.
HE CALLED THEM "TO SLEAZEBAGS
HAVE COST OUR COUNTRY DEARLY."
THEY SAY THAT THIS COURT SHOULD
ONE DEFENDED THE FUTURE
VIOLATIONS OF THE COURT'S
RESTRICTION ON EXTRAJUDICIAL
STATEMENT CAN BE PUNISHED NOT
ONLY WITH ADDITIONAL FINES BUT
ALSO WITH A TERM OF
INCARCERATION OF UP TO 30 DAYS.
>> WE HAVE A JUDGE WHO IS
TOTALLY CONFLICTED.
BUT THIS IS A TRIAL THAT
SHOULD'VE NEVER HAPPENED. TODAY4
POTENTIAL JURORS HAVE BEEN
EXCUSED AND SIX SAID THEY COULD
NOT FAIRLY AND IMPERSONALLY
JUDGE THE FORMER PRESIDENT.
ONE MAN WHO IS ORIGINALLY FROM
TEXAS THAT HE COULD NOT BE FAIR
BECAUSE THEY HAVE A LOT OF
REPUBLICAN FRIENDS.
A WOMAN SAID THAT TRUMP IS BEING
TREATED FAIRLY AND SHE TOLD THE
COURT THAT NO ONE IS ABOVE THE
LAW.
THEY TOLD FOX NEWS THIS MORNING
THAT SHE THINKS THE OPINION
AMONG THE JURY PEOPLE ARE FAIRLY
SPLIT ABOUT THE PRESIDENT.
SHE WAS SURPRISED ABOUT THAT
CONSIDERING THIS IS A DEMOCRATIC
MANHATTAN.
A 29-YEAR-OLD TOLD US THAT AS
FAR AS SHE WAS CONCERNED SHE IS
NOT A FAN OF THE FORMER
PRESIDENT AND SHE EXCUSED
BECAUSE OF A WORK CONFLICT.
>> Harris: THAT IS A LOT OF
INFORMATION FOR SOMEONE WHO WENT
THROUGH THE PROCESS OF JERRY
SELECTION.
WOW.
THANK YOU SO MUCH GREAT
REPORTING.
SO EMILY.
THE 29-YEAR-OLD, SHE IS OFF THE
LIST AND 50 OTHER PEOPLE -- 14
ALSO CANNOT BE IMPARTIAL BUT SHE
DECIDED THAT IT WAS BECAUSE OF
HER WORK COMMITMENTS.
BUT IT IS INTERESTING HOW MANY
PEOPLE ARE SAYING THEY CANNOT BE
IMPARTIAL BUT IT'S NOT SHOCKING
TO YOU.
>> Emily: YES, I LIVE HERE AS
WELL WHICH IS WHY I HAVE
DIFFICULTY NOT BEING IMPARTIAL
BECAUSE THIS WHOLE THING IS
ABSURD AND NORMAL AMERICANS CAN
SEE THROUGH THIS IMMEDIATELY.
IT HEARKENS BACK FOR ME THE
BOSTON MARATHON, WHERE WAS THE
LARGEST POOL IN HISTORY AND THE
MOTION TO MOVE THE VENUE ARGUING
THAT THERE'S NO WAY THE PERSON
IS GOING TO GET A FAIR TRIAL
HERE THEY RESPONDED THAT IF HE
IS NOT GOING TO GET A FAIR TRIAL
HERE HE WOULDN'T GET A FAIR
TRIAL ANYWAY.
THE WHOLE POINT IS WHEN THEY ARE
ENOUGH AMERICANS WHO ARE GOING
THROUGH THAT RIGOROUS PROCESS
THAT THIS JUDGE HAS SAID IS THE
MOST THOROUGH QUESTIONNAIRE
THEY'VE EVER SEEN, AND THEY HAVE
FAITH IN THAT PROCESS AND IT
WILL SPIT OUT A GROUP OF
IMPARTIAL AMERICANS WHO ARE
DEDICATED TO DOING THE JOB.
THE REASON WHY THEY ARE SAYING
INCARCERATION IS BECAUSE THE
PROSECUTION IS ARGUING THAT THIS
RISES TO A CRIMINAL LEVEL, THEY
FEEL THAT TRUMP WILL NOT STOP
VIOLATING THE GAG ORDER UNLESS
HE IS INCARCERATED IN NACHES
GIVEN A BUNCH OF FINES.
SO THIS IS A PUNITIVE DECISION
IF THE JUDGE INDEED GOES THROUGH
WITH IT.
I HAVE BEEN AT A MILLION
SCHEDULED HEARINGS WHERE
CRIMINAL AND CIVIL WHERE OF MANY
THINGS COME INTO PLAY AND THE
JUDGE ACQUIESCES INCLUDING
LETTING PRISONERS OUT TO ATTEND
SUCH THINGS SUCH AS FUNERALS OR
ANYTHING THE LIKE.
SO IF HE IS NOT ABLE TO ATTEND
THE HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION IT IS
PUNITIVE AND IT HAS NO PLACE
HERE SOMEWHERE IN MANHATTAN.
>> Harris: SO, BEN I AM SURE
YOU ARE SEEING THAT PARTICULAR
ISSUE AS WELL, WILL TRUMP TEMPT
THE JUDGE AND SAY DO WHAT YOU
GOT TO DO I'M GOING?
>> Ben: POSSIBLY.
BUT IF YOU ARE LOOKING AT THE
FACTS AS TRUMP, AND 90% OF THE
PEOPLE IN THE JURY POOL HAS
VOTED AGAINST YOU, YOU HAVE A
JUDGE WHO IS GIVING DONATIONS TO
DEMOCRATS AND THE DAUGHTER
WORKED FOR KAMALA HARRIS, AND
YOU ALSO HAVE PEOPLE WHO HAVE
RAISED OVER A HUNDRED THOUSAND
DOLLARS SAYING IF YOU GO WITH ME
I AM GOING AFTER TRUMP.
IF YOU WALK INTO THAT ROOM AND
IT'S ALREADY STACKED AGAINST
YOU, THERE'S A CERTAIN POINT
WHERE YOU SAY OKAY, IF YOU ARE
GOING TO DO IT THIS WAY I AM
GOING TO GO TO MY SON'S
GRADUATION AND IF YOU ARE GOING
TO LOCK ME UP FOR THAT THEN GO
AHEAD AND DO IT.
BECAUSE I THINK IT IS INSANE WE
ARE HAVING THIS CONVERSATION,
BUT I ALSO TELLS YOU HOW MUCH
THEY ARE GOING AFTER HIM.
AND THE HIGHLIGHT FOR ME AND
WHAT MAKES ME THE MOST ANGRY IS
THE FACT THAT THE PRESIDENT IS
IN PENNSYLVANIA RAISING MONEY
RIGHT NOW WHILE THEY HAVE TIED
UP TRUMP IN COURT RIGHT NOW, AND
THAT HIS ELECTION INTERFERENCE.
>> Nicole: TO BEN POINT, I AM
GOING TO TALK ABOUT THE GAG
ORDER.
IT IS THE MOST UN-AMERICAN THING
I'VE EVER SEEN.
BUT ON THE FLIP SIDE YOU HAVE
THE JUDGE'S DAUGHTER WHO HAS A
HIGH LEVEL EXECUTIVE OF A
DIGITAL MEDIA COMPANY THAT IS
TAKING TENS OF MILLIONS OF
DOLLARS NOT JUST FROM
KAMALA HARRIS BUT MANY OTHER
DEMOCRATS.
AND THAT IS HOW SHE GETS HER
BREAD-AND-BUTTER SO YOU ARE
SILENCING TRUMP ON THE FAMILY OF
THE JUDGE AND THE DEA, BUT YOU
ARE NOT SENTENCING THE FAMILY
AGAINST THE FORMER PRESIDENT
HIMSELF.
IT IS VERY UN-AMERICAN AND IF
YOU CANNOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT BIAS
THAT YOU ARE PAYING ATTENTION.
>> Harris: ALLOW ME TO GET TO
THIS BEFORE I COME TO YOU
RACHEL, THEY TALKED ABOUT THE
GAG ORDER ON THE FAULKNER FOCUS
IS TODAY LET'S WATCH.
>> YET THERE IS NO GAG ORDER
WHEN IT COMES TO MICHAEL COHEN
BUT THERE IS ONE FOR TRUMP.
THE REASON WHY THIS IS IMPORTANT
IS BECAUSE MICHAEL COHEN CAN DO
MEDIA INTERVIEWS AND SAY
WHATEVER HE WANTS WITHOUT
CONSEQUENCES BECAUSE HE IS NOT
UNDER PERJURY, AND SO THAT IS
PROBLEM NUMBER ONE.
NUMBER TWO IS AS WE SPEAK,
PROSECUTORS ARE CURRENTLY TRYING
TO GET THE JUDGE TO HOLD TRUMP
IN CONTEMPT FOR VIOLATING HIS
GAG ORDER.
IT'S ONLY APPLICABLE TO THE
WITNESSES SO HE CAN TALK ABOUT
THE JUDGE ALSO OTHER PEOPLE BUT
NOT THE WITNESSES.
TO YOUR POINT, HARRIS, THE START
WITNESS IS HINGED ON ONE PERSON
WHO IS A KNOWN LIAR, IT MAKES IT
FRUSTRATING FOR A DEFENDANT
CANNOT TALK ABOUT IT.
>> Harris: SHE PREDICTED THIS
AND IT HAPPENED LESS THAN
24 HOURS LATER.
SHE SHOT IT COMING.
TRUMP IS IN A BOX.
AND I WONDER IF AMERICANS
REALIZE WHAT IS HAPPENING?
HOW WOULD YOU DESCRIBE IT?
>> Rachel: I THINK THEY DO.
TO YOUR POINT ABOUT THE ELECTION
INTERFERENCE, THEY ARE TRYING TO
PUT DONALD TRUMP AT THE SAME
SPEED AS JOE BIDEN.
THEY WANT TO TIE THEM UP IN
COURT AND MAKE SURE HE CANNOT DO
VALLEYS UNTIL 9:00 AT NIGHT
BECAUSE HE HAS TO BE IN COURT AL
DAY.
THEY ARE TRYING TO DEMORALIZE
HIM BY SAYING YOU CANNOT GO TO
YOUR CHILD'S GRADUATION AND
TREATING HIM LIKE HE IS A
CRIMINAL.
ALL OF THESE THINGS ARE UNFAIR,
AND TO YOUR POINT I DO THINK THE
AMERICAN PEOPLE KNOW THIS.
I THINK THEY BELIEVE THIS IS NOT
THE COUNTRY THE GROUP GREW UP
IN.
IN FACT THIS FEEL SUPER
COMMUNISTS AND WHEN DONALD TRUMP
BRINGS UP THE POINT ABOUT
COMMUNISM HE IS RIGHT.
YOU TALK ABOUT THE JURY, PUT IN
A HISPANIC WHO HAS LIVED IN
THOSE TYPE OF COUNTRIES, AND
THEY WILL PROBABLY VOTE IN FAVOR
OF TRUMP AND HOW ABSOLUTELY
UNJUST THIS IS.
THIS IS UNBELIEVABLE AND DOES
NOT FEEL LIKE AMERICA AND THE
AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE GOING TO
NOTICE.
MAYBE NOT THE PEOPLE IN
MANHATTAN BUT PEOPLE WHO ARE
VOTING ARE SEEING THIS FOR WHAT
IT IS.
>> Harris: YOU HEARD THAT
THERE WAS ONE JURY PERSON WHO
HAD A CONFLICT WITH HER JOB BUT
COULD NOT ALSO BE IMPARTIAL.
IT WAS SPLIT INSIDE WITH THAT
PROCESSING ROOM FOR PROSPECTIVE
JURORS.
SOME WERE FIRST THING IN BELIEF
THEY COULD BEFORE BUT MORE THAN
HALF SAID NO WE DO NOT THINK WE
CAN BE FAIR.
TO YOUR POINT THEY
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)
BREAKING UPDATE on prospect of jailing Trump for contempt in NY trial
'Threatening the president is a crime': Weissmann on why Trump may have violated his bail conditions
Breaking Down Trump’s Options to Pay $454M Civil-Fraud Penalty | WSJ
BREAKING: Jail on the table for Trump for contempt at criminal trial
Trump hit with SURPRISE, unexpected court loss
Ex-Trump official predicts Melania's behavior amid Trump criminal trial