Alvin Bragg threatens Trump with contempt charges for violating gag order

Fox News
16 Apr 202411:10

Summary

TLDR在这段视频脚本中,讨论了曼哈顿地区检察官对前总统特朗普提起的藐视法庭动议,因其违反了法官对其发布的封口令,发布了三条涉及两位已知证人和他的刑事审判的社交媒体帖子。检察官办公室要求对特朗普每违反一次封口令罚款1000美元,并警告说,未来的违规行为不仅可以处以额外罚款,还可能面临最长30天的监禁。节目中还提到了陪审团选拔过程中的一些挑战,包括多位潜在陪审员因无法保持公正而被排除。此外,讨论了法官可能存在的偏见问题,以及对特朗普的不公正对待。参与者们表达了对当前司法程序的担忧,并认为这对特朗普来说是一次具有挑战性的法律斗争。

Takeaways

  • 📜 曼哈顿地区检察官已向法庭提交动议,要求对前总统特朗普持有藐视法庭罪,理由是特朗普违反了法官对他实施的封口令,并通过社交媒体发布了与两位已知证人及其刑事审判有关的三条帖子。
  • 💸 检察官办公室要求对特朗普每违反一次封口令罚款1000美元,并警告说,未来的违规行为不仅可以通过额外罚款来惩罚,还可以通过最多30天的监禁来惩罚。
  • 🚫 有观点认为,对特朗普的封口令是一种非常不美国的做法,因为它限制了言论自由,而与此同时,其他涉案人员如迈克尔·科恩却没有受到同样的限制。
  • 🤔 陪审团选拔过程中,超过一半的潜在陪审员被排除,其中包括一些表示无法公正和客观评判前总统的人。
  • 🧐 一些陪审团成员表示,由于工作冲突或个人对特朗普的不满,他们无法保持公正。
  • 👥 讨论中提到,法官的女儿曾在卡玛拉·哈里斯的团队工作,这可能表明存在利益冲突。
  • 🇺🇸 有评论认为,这种做法是在试图通过法庭程序来干扰特朗普的政治活动,类似于试图将他与乔·拜登置于同一起跑线。
  • 🚨 有关特朗普可能因违反封口令而面临监禁的讨论,引起了对他作为被告权利的担忧。
  • 👮‍♂️ 一些参与者认为,检察官试图通过刑事化的行为来惩罚特朗普,即使这些行为可能并不构成犯罪。
  • 🤝 讨论中还提到了陪审团成员的多样性问题,暗示了对公正审判的担忧。
  • 📉 整个讨论反映了对当前司法程序和政治动机的广泛质疑,以及对美国司法公正性的担忧。

Q & A

  • 曼哈顿地区检察官为何向法院提起对前总统特朗普的藐视法庭动议?

    -曼哈顿地区检察官提起藐视法庭动议是因为特朗普违反了法官对他施加的封口令,通过社交媒体发表了与两个已知证人及其刑事审判有关的三篇帖子。

  • 检察官要求对特朗普违反封口令的行为进行怎样的处罚?

    -检察官要求对特朗普的每项违规行为罚款1000美元,并且警告说,如果未来继续违反法庭的限制,不仅可以处以额外的罚款,还可能面临最长30天的监禁。

  • 在陪审团选拔过程中,有多少人表示他们无法公正和客观地评判前总统?

    -在陪审团选拔过程中,有六个人表示他们无法公正和客观地评判前总统。

  • 为什么有陪审团成员因为工作冲突而被排除?

    -有一位29岁的陪审团成员因为工作冲突被排除,尽管她表示她不是前总统的粉丝。

  • 在讨论中,有人提到了对特朗普的不公正对待,这包括哪些方面?

    -讨论中提到的不公正对待包括:大多数陪审团成员可能对特朗普有偏见,法官被认为有利益冲突,以及检察官试图通过封口令限制特朗普的言论自由。

  • 为什么有人认为封口令是对美国价值的违背?

    -有人认为封口令是对美国价值的违背,因为它限制了特朗普的言论自由,而这是美国宪法第一修正案所保障的基本权利。

  • 法官的女儿与本案有何关联,为什么这会引起争议?

    -法官的女儿是一家数字媒体公司的高级执行官,该公司从包括卡玛拉·哈里斯在内的多位民主党人那里获得了数千万的资金。这引起了争议,因为有人认为这构成了利益冲突。

  • 为什么有人认为这场审判是不应该发生的?

    -有人认为这场审判是不应该发生的,因为他们认为这是出于政治动机,旨在阻碍特朗普的政治活动,并通过法律程序对他进行诽谤和打压。

  • 在讨论中,有人提到了特朗普在宾夕法尼亚州筹款,这与审判有什么关系?

    -在讨论中,有人提到特朗普在宾夕法尼亚州筹款,这与审判有关,因为有人认为这是特朗普被法院牵制的同时,他正在积极进行政治活动,这被视为对特朗普的选举干预。

  • 讨论中提到的'波士顿马拉松案'的动议是什么,它与本案有何相似之处?

    -讨论中提到的'波士顿马拉松案'的动议是辩方试图改变审判地点,理由是在当地无法获得公正的审判。这与本案相似,因为本案中也有关于审判地点和陪审团成员能否保持公正的讨论。

  • 为什么有人认为这场审判让人感觉不像是美国的作风?

    -有人认为这场审判让人感觉不像是美国的作风,因为它涉及到对前总统的不公正对待,限制言论自由,以及可能存在的利益冲突,这些都与美国人通常理解的公正和法治原则相悖。

Outlines

00:00

😀 曼哈顿地方检察官对前总统特朗普提起藐视法庭指控

曼哈顿地方检察官对前总统特朗普提起藐视法庭的指控,因为他违反了法官对他施加的封口令,通过社交媒体发布了与两位已知证人及他的刑事审判相关的三篇帖子。检察官办公室要求对特朗普每违反一次封口令罚款1000美元,并警告说,未来的违规行为不仅可以通过额外罚款来惩罚,还可以通过最多30天的监禁期来惩罚。此外,提到了迈克尔·科恩和斯托米·丹尼尔斯的案件,以及陪审团选拔过程中的一些挑战和公众对此案件的不同反应。

05:01

😠 讨论封口令的合理性和对特朗普的法律行动

讨论集中在封口令的合理性上,以及对特朗普可能的法律行动。提到了迈克尔·科恩没有受到封口令的限制,可以自由地进行媒体采访,而特朗普则不能。此外,讨论了检察官试图让法官判定特朗普藐视法庭,以及对特朗普的不公平对待,包括限制他参加儿子的高中毕业典礼等个人活动。还提到了法官的女儿与民主党有财务联系的问题,以及这对案件可能产生的影响。

10:01

😤 公众对案件的看法及陪审团选拔的困难

讨论了公众对此案的看法,以及陪审团选拔过程中的困难。一些潜在的陪审团成员表示,由于工作冲突或认为自己无法公正地评判前总统,他们无法担任陪审团。此外,讨论了人们对特朗普在政治和法律问题上立场的看法,以及这对选举可能产生的影响。还提到了特朗普在宾夕法尼亚州筹款活动,以及人们对他被法庭程序束缚的看法。

Mindmap

Keywords

💡藐视法庭

藐视法庭是指一个人违反法庭的命令或规则,对法庭的权威构成挑战。在视频中,曼哈顿地方检察官提出动议,要求将前总统特朗普视为藐视法庭,因为他违反了法官对他实施的“封口令”,通过社交媒体发表了与已知证人和其刑事审判相关的帖子。

💡封口令

封口令是一种法庭命令,禁止案件当事人在审判期间公开讨论案件相关的信息。视频中提到,特朗普因违反封口令而受到指控,这表明法庭试图限制与案件相关的公共言论,以保证审判的公正性。

💡社交媒体帖子

社交媒体帖子是指在社交媒体平台上发布的信息或评论。在视频中,特朗普因在社交媒体上发表与案件相关的帖子而被指控违反封口令,这些帖子被认为可能影响审判的公正性。

💡罚款

罚款是一种法庭可以施加的经济惩罚,用于处罚违反法庭命令的行为。视频中提到,检察官要求对特朗普违反封口令的行为处以每次1000美元的罚款。

💡监禁

监禁是法庭可以施加的一种刑事惩罚,涉及将个人限制在监狱或拘留所中。视频中提到,如果特朗普继续违反封口令,检察官要求法庭考虑对其实施监禁,最长可达30天。

💡陪审团选拔

陪审团选拔是审判过程中的一个环节,旨在从一组候选人中挑选出公正无私的陪审团成员。视频中提到,陪审团选拔过程中有超过一半的人被排除,这表明寻找合适的陪审团成员具有一定的挑战性。

💡公正性

公正性是指在法律程序中保持公平和无偏见的重要性。视频中多次提到公正性,强调了法庭需要确保审判过程中的所有参与者,包括陪审团成员,都能够公正无私地进行判断。

💡证人

证人是在法庭上提供证词的人,他们的证词对于案件的判决至关重要。视频中提到了两位已知证人,迈克尔·科恩和斯托米·丹尼尔斯,他们与特朗普的案件有关。

💡审判

审判是法庭审理案件并作出判决的过程。视频中讨论了特朗普的审判,包括法庭程序、陪审团选拔以及可能的法律后果。

💡政治偏见

政治偏见是指基于个人或团体的政治立场而形成的预设立场或看法。视频中讨论了法官可能存在的政治偏见问题,以及这种偏见如何可能影响到审判的公正性。

💡选举干预

选举干预是指通过非法手段影响选举过程或结果的行为。视频中提到,有人试图通过法律程序限制特朗普的行动,以影响即将到来的选举,这是一种潜在的选举干预。

Highlights

曼哈顿地区检察官已向法院提交动议,要求将前总统特朗普以藐视法庭罪名拘留,理由是特朗普违反了法官对他实施的禁言令,并通过发布三条社交媒体帖子涉及两名已知证人和他的刑事审判。

检察官要求对特朗普每违反一次禁言令罚款1000美元,并警告未来违反禁言令的行为不仅可以通过额外罚款来惩罚,还可以通过最多30天的监禁期来惩罚。

陪审团选拔过程中,超过一半的候选人被排除,律师们在询问坐在陪审团席上的潜在陪审员。

有观点认为,该审判本不应该发生,而且存在潜在的偏见,因为法官被认为与案件有利益冲突。

一些潜在的陪审员表示他们无法公平和客观地评判前总统,其中一人因为有许多共和党朋友而认为自己无法公正。

一位女士认为特朗普受到了公平对待,并在法庭上表示没有人可以凌驾于法律之上。

有陪审团成员表示,他们认为陪审团对总统的看法相当分歧,尽管这是在民主党主导的曼哈顿。

一位29岁的陪审团成员因为工作冲突而被免职,尽管她不是前总统的粉丝。

讨论了关于对特朗普的藐视法庭指控,特别是关于他最近发布的三条社交媒体帖子,这些帖子被认为是违反了禁言令。

检察官正在努力让法官认定特朗普藐视法庭,因为他违反了对他的禁言令。

有人指出,与特朗普不同,迈克尔·科恩没有禁言令的限制,可以在媒体上自由发言而不必担心伪证罪的指控。

讨论了禁言令的合法性和必要性,以及它对特朗普表达自己观点的影响。

一些参与者认为禁言令是对美国价值的违背,并对法官的公正性表示怀疑。

法官的女儿是一家专注于数字媒体的公司的高管,该公司从包括卡玛拉·哈里斯在内的多位民主党人那里获得了数千万的资金。

讨论了特朗普是否会因为坚持自己的权利而挑战法官的权威。

有人担心审判可能会影响特朗普参加儿子的高中毕业典礼,如果因此被监禁,这将被视为惩罚性措施。

讨论了特朗普在宾夕法尼亚州筹款的同时,却在法庭上受到限制,这被视为对他的选举干预。

一些参与者认为,美国人民意识到了正在发生的事情,并且他们认为这是不公平的,与他们成长的国家不符。

讨论了陪审团成员的构成,以及他们对特朗普的看法,包括那些可能因为个人背景而倾向于支持或反对他的人。

Transcripts

00:05

'S FOR A SPEED TO RENEW THE

00:07

THREAT WAS THERE AND NOW IT IS

00:09

BEING CARRIED OUT MANHATTAN

00:11

DISTRICT ATTORNEY HAS NOW FILED

00:13

A MOTION TO HOLD FORMER

00:14

PRESIDENT TRUMP AND CONTEMPT OF

00:16

COURT CLAIMING HE VIOLATED THE

00:17

GAG ORDER FROM THE JUDGE AND

00:19

DIDN'T LIKE IMPOSED ON HIM BY

00:23

PUBLISHING THREE SOCIAL MEDIA

00:24

POSTS RELATING TO TWO KNOWN

00:26

WITNESSES AND HIS CRIMINAL TRIAL

00:27

HERE NEW YORK.

00:31

>> Harris: WITH MICHAEL COHEN

00:34

AND STORMY DANIELS.

00:35

THEY'RE URGING THE MANHATTAN

00:36

JUDGE TO ALSO WARN DONALD TRUMP

00:38

THAT FUTURE VIOLATIONS OF THIS

00:40

GAG ORDER CAN BE PUNISHED NOT

00:42

ONLY WITH ADDITIONAL FUNDS BUT

00:44

WITH THE TERM OF INCARCERATION

00:46

OF UP TO 30 DAYS.

00:49

IT IS ONLY TUESDAY, DAY TWO OF

00:51

THE TRIAL.

00:53

THIS IS "OUTNUMBERED."

00:55

I AM HARRIS FAULKNER HERE WITH

00:56

EMILY COMPAGNO.

00:57

JOINING US TODAY IS FROM

01:04

"FOX & FRIENDS," RACHEL CAMPOS

01:07

DUFFY, AND FOX NEWS CONTRIBUTOR

01:10

BOARD CERTIFIED PHYSICIAN AND

01:12

AUTHOR OF THE NEW HIP BOOK "LOVE

01:14

BOMB" DR NICOLE SAPHIER.

01:18

ALSO HOST OF THE BEN FERGUSON

01:21

PODCAST, WITH TED CRUZ PARKER

01:23

HESSE, BEN FERGUSON HIMSELF.

01:24

ALL GREAT STUFF YOU HAVE TO PUT

01:27

YOUR LIFE.

01:27

LET US GO STRAIGHT TO ERIC SHAWN

01:30

WHO IS LIFE OUTSIDE THE

01:32

NEW YORK STATE SUPREME COURT

01:33

WITH MORE ON THE JURY SELECTION

01:37

WHICH WERE NOT SUCCESSFUL

01:38

YESTERDAY, THEY KICKED UP WITHIN

01:40

50 PEOPLE YESTERDAY AFTER

01:42

LOOKING AT 96 PEOPLE.

01:45

>> YES, THERE WAS MORE THAN

01:45

HALF KICKED OUT.

01:48

THE LAWYERS ARE QUESTIONING THE

01:50

POTENTIAL JURORS AS THEY SIT IN

01:52

THE JURY BOX.

01:52

IT DOES NOT SEEM LIKE IT IS

01:54

GOING ANY BETTER THAN IT IS

01:57

YESTERDAY.

01:57

WE FIND OUT THAT THE DISTRICT

01:58

ATTORNEY WANTS TO HOLD THE

01:59

FORMER PRESIDENT IN CONTEMPT OF

02:02

COURT.

02:03

FILING A MOTION THAT COULD

02:04

ACTUALLY SEEK THE PRESIDENT

02:05

GOING BEHIND BARS IF IT

02:07

CONTINUES AND NOT CUT IT OUT.

02:11

IT BRINGS A MOTION TO COURT

02:14

ASKING THAT THE PRESIDENT BE

02:15

HELD IN CONTEMPT AND IT CENTERS

02:18

ON THREE SOCIAL MEDIA POSTS THAT

02:19

THE FORMER PRESIDENT MADE

02:21

RECENTLY.

02:22

THE PROSECUTOR SAYS THAT THEY

02:22

ARE IN VIOLATIONS OF THE GAG

02:26

ORDER.

02:27

THE OFFICE IS DEMANDING THAT

02:29

TRUMP BE FINED $1,000 FOR EACH

02:32

OF THESE CLOSINGS WHERE HE

02:32

ATTACKED MICHAEL COHEN AND

02:37

STORMY DANIELS.

02:37

HE CALLED THEM "TO SLEAZEBAGS

02:42

HAVE COST OUR COUNTRY DEARLY."

02:44

THEY SAY THAT THIS COURT SHOULD

02:47

ONE DEFENDED THE FUTURE

02:47

VIOLATIONS OF THE COURT'S

02:49

RESTRICTION ON EXTRAJUDICIAL

02:51

STATEMENT CAN BE PUNISHED NOT

02:53

ONLY WITH ADDITIONAL FINES BUT

02:54

ALSO WITH A TERM OF

02:56

INCARCERATION OF UP TO 30 DAYS.

03:02

>> WE HAVE A JUDGE WHO IS

03:05

TOTALLY CONFLICTED.

03:08

BUT THIS IS A TRIAL THAT

03:09

SHOULD'VE NEVER HAPPENED. TODAY4

03:15

POTENTIAL JURORS HAVE BEEN

03:16

EXCUSED AND SIX SAID THEY COULD

03:20

NOT FAIRLY AND IMPERSONALLY

03:21

JUDGE THE FORMER PRESIDENT.

03:24

ONE MAN WHO IS ORIGINALLY FROM

03:24

TEXAS THAT HE COULD NOT BE FAIR

03:26

BECAUSE THEY HAVE A LOT OF

03:28

REPUBLICAN FRIENDS.

03:29

A WOMAN SAID THAT TRUMP IS BEING

03:31

TREATED FAIRLY AND SHE TOLD THE

03:33

COURT THAT NO ONE IS ABOVE THE

03:36

LAW.

03:37

THEY TOLD FOX NEWS THIS MORNING

03:39

THAT SHE THINKS THE OPINION

03:40

AMONG THE JURY PEOPLE ARE FAIRLY

03:42

SPLIT ABOUT THE PRESIDENT.

03:44

SHE WAS SURPRISED ABOUT THAT

03:45

CONSIDERING THIS IS A DEMOCRATIC

03:47

MANHATTAN.

03:50

A 29-YEAR-OLD TOLD US THAT AS

03:51

FAR AS SHE WAS CONCERNED SHE IS

03:54

NOT A FAN OF THE FORMER

03:55

PRESIDENT AND SHE EXCUSED

04:01

BECAUSE OF A WORK CONFLICT.

04:03

>> Harris: THAT IS A LOT OF

04:04

INFORMATION FOR SOMEONE WHO WENT

04:06

THROUGH THE PROCESS OF JERRY

04:09

SELECTION.

04:11

WOW.

04:13

THANK YOU SO MUCH GREAT

04:14

REPORTING.

04:16

SO EMILY.

04:17

THE 29-YEAR-OLD, SHE IS OFF THE

04:19

LIST AND 50 OTHER PEOPLE -- 14

04:23

ALSO CANNOT BE IMPARTIAL BUT SHE

04:25

DECIDED THAT IT WAS BECAUSE OF

04:28

HER WORK COMMITMENTS.

04:29

BUT IT IS INTERESTING HOW MANY

04:30

PEOPLE ARE SAYING THEY CANNOT BE

04:31

IMPARTIAL BUT IT'S NOT SHOCKING

04:33

TO YOU.

04:35

>> Emily: YES, I LIVE HERE AS

04:37

WELL WHICH IS WHY I HAVE

04:40

DIFFICULTY NOT BEING IMPARTIAL

04:41

BECAUSE THIS WHOLE THING IS

04:43

ABSURD AND NORMAL AMERICANS CAN

04:44

SEE THROUGH THIS IMMEDIATELY.

04:48

IT HEARKENS BACK FOR ME THE

04:50

BOSTON MARATHON, WHERE WAS THE

04:52

LARGEST POOL IN HISTORY AND THE

04:54

MOTION TO MOVE THE VENUE ARGUING

04:55

THAT THERE'S NO WAY THE PERSON

04:56

IS GOING TO GET A FAIR TRIAL

04:59

HERE THEY RESPONDED THAT IF HE

05:00

IS NOT GOING TO GET A FAIR TRIAL

05:02

HERE HE WOULDN'T GET A FAIR

05:03

TRIAL ANYWAY.

05:06

THE WHOLE POINT IS WHEN THEY ARE

05:08

ENOUGH AMERICANS WHO ARE GOING

05:09

THROUGH THAT RIGOROUS PROCESS

05:10

THAT THIS JUDGE HAS SAID IS THE

05:12

MOST THOROUGH QUESTIONNAIRE

05:13

THEY'VE EVER SEEN, AND THEY HAVE

05:15

FAITH IN THAT PROCESS AND IT

05:16

WILL SPIT OUT A GROUP OF

05:21

IMPARTIAL AMERICANS WHO ARE

05:23

DEDICATED TO DOING THE JOB.

05:24

THE REASON WHY THEY ARE SAYING

05:27

INCARCERATION IS BECAUSE THE

05:29

PROSECUTION IS ARGUING THAT THIS

05:30

RISES TO A CRIMINAL LEVEL, THEY

05:33

FEEL THAT TRUMP WILL NOT STOP

05:35

VIOLATING THE GAG ORDER UNLESS

05:38

HE IS INCARCERATED IN NACHES

05:39

GIVEN A BUNCH OF FINES.

05:43

SO THIS IS A PUNITIVE DECISION

05:45

IF THE JUDGE INDEED GOES THROUGH

05:47

WITH IT.

05:48

I HAVE BEEN AT A MILLION

05:50

SCHEDULED HEARINGS WHERE

05:52

CRIMINAL AND CIVIL WHERE OF MANY

05:54

THINGS COME INTO PLAY AND THE

05:56

JUDGE ACQUIESCES INCLUDING

05:57

LETTING PRISONERS OUT TO ATTEND

05:59

SUCH THINGS SUCH AS FUNERALS OR

06:02

ANYTHING THE LIKE.

06:03

SO IF HE IS NOT ABLE TO ATTEND

06:06

THE HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION IT IS

06:09

PUNITIVE AND IT HAS NO PLACE

06:10

HERE SOMEWHERE IN MANHATTAN.

06:14

>> Harris: SO, BEN I AM SURE

06:16

YOU ARE SEEING THAT PARTICULAR

06:17

ISSUE AS WELL, WILL TRUMP TEMPT

06:21

THE JUDGE AND SAY DO WHAT YOU

06:23

GOT TO DO I'M GOING?

06:25

>> Ben: POSSIBLY.

06:26

BUT IF YOU ARE LOOKING AT THE

06:29

FACTS AS TRUMP, AND 90% OF THE

06:31

PEOPLE IN THE JURY POOL HAS

06:33

VOTED AGAINST YOU, YOU HAVE A

06:35

JUDGE WHO IS GIVING DONATIONS TO

06:37

DEMOCRATS AND THE DAUGHTER

06:40

WORKED FOR KAMALA HARRIS, AND

06:40

YOU ALSO HAVE PEOPLE WHO HAVE

06:43

RAISED OVER A HUNDRED THOUSAND

06:43

DOLLARS SAYING IF YOU GO WITH ME

06:47

I AM GOING AFTER TRUMP.

06:48

IF YOU WALK INTO THAT ROOM AND

06:50

IT'S ALREADY STACKED AGAINST

06:52

YOU, THERE'S A CERTAIN POINT

06:54

WHERE YOU SAY OKAY, IF YOU ARE

06:55

GOING TO DO IT THIS WAY I AM

06:58

GOING TO GO TO MY SON'S

06:59

GRADUATION AND IF YOU ARE GOING

07:00

TO LOCK ME UP FOR THAT THEN GO

07:01

AHEAD AND DO IT.

07:09

BECAUSE I THINK IT IS INSANE WE

07:10

ARE HAVING THIS CONVERSATION,

07:11

BUT I ALSO TELLS YOU HOW MUCH

07:11

THEY ARE GOING AFTER HIM.

07:13

AND THE HIGHLIGHT FOR ME AND

07:14

WHAT MAKES ME THE MOST ANGRY IS

07:15

THE FACT THAT THE PRESIDENT IS

07:19

IN PENNSYLVANIA RAISING MONEY

07:20

RIGHT NOW WHILE THEY HAVE TIED

07:23

UP TRUMP IN COURT RIGHT NOW, AND

07:25

THAT HIS ELECTION INTERFERENCE.

07:30

>> Nicole: TO BEN POINT, I AM

07:32

GOING TO TALK ABOUT THE GAG

07:34

ORDER.

07:35

IT IS THE MOST UN-AMERICAN THING

07:36

I'VE EVER SEEN.

07:39

BUT ON THE FLIP SIDE YOU HAVE

07:40

THE JUDGE'S DAUGHTER WHO HAS A

07:42

HIGH LEVEL EXECUTIVE OF A

07:44

DIGITAL MEDIA COMPANY THAT IS

07:45

TAKING TENS OF MILLIONS OF

07:47

DOLLARS NOT JUST FROM

07:49

KAMALA HARRIS BUT MANY OTHER

07:50

DEMOCRATS.

07:50

AND THAT IS HOW SHE GETS HER

07:54

BREAD-AND-BUTTER SO YOU ARE

07:55

SILENCING TRUMP ON THE FAMILY OF

07:55

THE JUDGE AND THE DEA, BUT YOU

07:57

ARE NOT SENTENCING THE FAMILY

08:01

AGAINST THE FORMER PRESIDENT

08:02

HIMSELF.

08:03

IT IS VERY UN-AMERICAN AND IF

08:03

YOU CANNOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT BIAS

08:07

THAT YOU ARE PAYING ATTENTION.

08:09

>> Harris: ALLOW ME TO GET TO

08:10

THIS BEFORE I COME TO YOU  

08:13

RACHEL, THEY TALKED ABOUT THE

08:14

GAG ORDER ON THE FAULKNER FOCUS

08:17

IS TODAY LET'S WATCH.

08:19

>> YET THERE IS NO GAG ORDER

08:21

WHEN IT COMES TO MICHAEL COHEN

08:23

BUT THERE IS ONE FOR TRUMP.

08:25

THE REASON WHY THIS IS IMPORTANT

08:27

IS BECAUSE MICHAEL COHEN CAN DO

08:28

MEDIA INTERVIEWS AND SAY

08:30

WHATEVER HE WANTS WITHOUT

08:33

CONSEQUENCES BECAUSE HE IS NOT

08:35

UNDER PERJURY, AND SO THAT IS

08:40

PROBLEM NUMBER ONE.

08:41

NUMBER TWO IS AS WE SPEAK,

08:43

PROSECUTORS ARE CURRENTLY TRYING

08:45

TO GET THE JUDGE TO HOLD TRUMP

08:48

IN CONTEMPT FOR VIOLATING HIS

08:51

GAG ORDER.

08:51

IT'S ONLY APPLICABLE TO THE

08:53

WITNESSES SO HE CAN TALK ABOUT

08:55

THE JUDGE ALSO OTHER PEOPLE BUT

08:57

NOT THE WITNESSES.

08:59

TO YOUR POINT, HARRIS, THE START

09:02

WITNESS IS HINGED ON ONE PERSON

09:03

WHO IS A KNOWN LIAR, IT MAKES IT

09:05

FRUSTRATING FOR A DEFENDANT

09:06

CANNOT TALK ABOUT IT.

09:09

>> Harris: SHE PREDICTED THIS

09:11

AND IT HAPPENED LESS THAN

09:14

24 HOURS LATER.

09:14

SHE SHOT IT COMING.

09:15

TRUMP IS IN A BOX.

09:18

AND I WONDER IF AMERICANS

09:20

REALIZE WHAT IS HAPPENING?

09:22

HOW WOULD YOU DESCRIBE IT?

09:23

>> Rachel: I THINK THEY DO.

09:26

TO YOUR POINT ABOUT THE ELECTION

09:28

INTERFERENCE, THEY ARE TRYING TO

09:30

PUT DONALD TRUMP AT THE SAME

09:31

SPEED AS JOE BIDEN.

09:32

THEY WANT TO TIE THEM UP IN

09:34

COURT AND MAKE SURE HE CANNOT DO

09:37

VALLEYS UNTIL 9:00 AT NIGHT

09:39

BECAUSE HE HAS TO BE IN COURT AL

09:42

DAY.

09:43

THEY ARE TRYING TO DEMORALIZE

09:44

HIM BY SAYING YOU CANNOT GO TO

09:46

YOUR CHILD'S GRADUATION AND

09:47

TREATING HIM LIKE HE IS A

09:50

CRIMINAL.

09:50

ALL OF THESE THINGS ARE UNFAIR,

09:52

AND TO YOUR POINT I DO THINK THE

09:54

AMERICAN PEOPLE KNOW THIS.

09:56

I THINK THEY BELIEVE THIS IS NOT

09:58

THE COUNTRY THE GROUP GREW UP

10:00

IN.

10:01

IN FACT THIS FEEL SUPER

10:02

COMMUNISTS AND WHEN DONALD TRUMP

10:04

BRINGS UP THE POINT ABOUT

10:06

COMMUNISM HE IS RIGHT.

10:07

YOU TALK ABOUT THE JURY, PUT IN

10:11

A HISPANIC WHO HAS LIVED IN

10:13

THOSE TYPE OF COUNTRIES, AND

10:14

THEY WILL PROBABLY VOTE IN FAVOR

10:17

OF TRUMP AND HOW ABSOLUTELY

10:21

UNJUST THIS IS.

10:22

THIS IS UNBELIEVABLE AND DOES

10:24

NOT FEEL LIKE AMERICA AND THE

10:25

AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE GOING TO

10:27

NOTICE.

10:27

MAYBE NOT THE PEOPLE IN

10:29

MANHATTAN BUT PEOPLE WHO ARE

10:31

VOTING ARE SEEING THIS FOR WHAT

10:32

IT IS.

10:33

>> Harris: YOU HEARD THAT

10:34

THERE WAS ONE JURY PERSON WHO

10:36

HAD A CONFLICT WITH HER JOB BUT

10:38

COULD NOT ALSO BE IMPARTIAL.

10:39

IT WAS SPLIT INSIDE WITH THAT

10:43

PROCESSING ROOM FOR PROSPECTIVE

10:45

JURORS.

10:45

SOME WERE FIRST THING IN BELIEF

10:47

THEY COULD BEFORE BUT MORE THAN

10:48

HALF SAID NO WE DO NOT THINK WE

10:50

CAN BE FAIR.

10:53

TO YOUR POINT THEY