Oh no...there's a season 2 of Velma :/

Saberspark

30 Apr 202417:51

Summary

TLDRThe video script offers a candid critique of the so-called 'Velma Season 2', expressing dissatisfaction with the show's writing, character development, and pacing. The reviewer compares the experience of watching the series to witnessing a train wreck, feeling compelled to see it through despite its lack of appeal. They criticize the contrived nature of the storyline and the obnoxious portrayal of Velma, who is depicted as a self-insert character for the show's creator, Mindy Kaling. The pacing is described as too fast, making it difficult to connect with the characters or their evolution. The reviewer also addresses the issue of Warner Brothers advertising the show as having two seasons while only compensating the artists for one, highlighting the exploitation of creative talent. Amidst the critique, there is a brief endorsement for MeUndies, praising the comfort and quality of their products. The script concludes with a plea for more sincerity and creativity in future adaptations of beloved franchises, rather than the obnoxious and insincere approach taken with Velma.

Takeaways

💥 The speaker describes their experience with 'Velma Season 2' as akin to watching a car wreck, feeling compelled to see it through despite the negative experience.
📺 The show was originally intended as one season but was marketed as two, which the speaker criticizes as a way to take advantage of the artists involved.
🔥 A spoiler alert is given, revealing that Velma dies in the finale, killed by Scrappy Doo, a character who appears unexpectedly in the show.
📉 The speaker expresses strong dissatisfaction with the show's writing, character development, and pacing, feeling that it is contrived and lacks sincerity.
🎭 The character of Velma is described as obnoxious and self-inserted, with the speaker preferring the creator's earlier work on 'The Office'.
👙 The speaker transitions to a sponsored segment about MeUndies, praising the brand for its comfort, style, and sustainable practices.
👕 MeUndies offers a variety of styles and sizes, aiming to provide a comfortable fit for everyone, which the speaker appreciates.
👻 Returning to the topic of 'Velma', the speaker discusses the chaotic introduction of new characters and the lack of depth in their development.
📉 The show's animation is noted to have its moments of quality, but the visual appeal does not compensate for the lack of engaging storytelling.
🤷‍♀️ The speaker argues that race swapping in the show is not the issue; it's the poor character writing and lack of likability that detracts from the series.
👻 The finale reveals the existence of ghosts and an afterlife, with Velma becoming a ghost, which could potentially set up a second season.

Q & A

What is the reviewer's main issue with the show 'Velma'?
-The reviewer's main issue with 'Velma' is the writing, particularly the contrived and obnoxious nature of the characters, dialogue, and story.
How does the reviewer describe the character development in the show?
-The reviewer feels that the character development is rushed and insincere, with the show telling rather than showing the characters' evolution.
What is the controversy surrounding the number of seasons produced for 'Velma'?
-The controversy is that Warner executives called one season of the show 'Season Two,' which is seen as misleading and unfair to the artists who were paid for only one season.
What is the reviewer's opinion on the inclusion of Scrappy Doo in the show?
-The reviewer finds the inclusion of Scrappy Doo as a meta-commentary on the show's attempt to improve ratings, and finds it amusing that Velma is killed by Scrappy.
How does the reviewer perceive the pacing of the show?
-The pacing of the show is described as being at 'neck break speeds,' making it difficult for the reviewer to absorb the characters, their stakes, motives, or growth.
What is the reviewer's stance on the visual aspects of the show?
-The reviewer acknowledges that the show has visually appealing moments, with some fluid and good animation, but feels that the visual aspects are not the main issue with the show.
Why does the reviewer believe that the show 'Velma' is not a good representation of the Scooby-Doo franchise?
-The reviewer feels that 'Velma' lacks the fun and sincerity that characterizes the Scooby-Doo franchise, instead being full of itself and obnoxious.
What is the reviewer's opinion on the character Velma in the show?
-The reviewer finds the character Velma to be obnoxious, unlikable, and lacking any significant character growth throughout the season.
How does the reviewer feel about the handling of the character Fred in the show?
-The reviewer notes that Fred's character shows some improvement and growth, making him more empathetic and sweet towards his friends compared to the first season.
What does the reviewer suggest as an alternative show to 'Velma'?
-The reviewer suggests watching 'Mr. Incorporated' as a more nuanced take on the Scooby-Doo franchise that feels both different and familiar.
What is the reviewer's final verdict on 'Velma Season 2'?
-The reviewer concludes that 'Velma Season 2' is not worth checking out, describing it as a car crash in slow motion with a high body count.

Outlines

00:00

📺 'Velma' Season 2 Critique: A Train Wreck of a Show

The speaker begins by comparing watching 'Velma' Season 2 to witnessing a car crash or building demolition, an event that is shocking yet hard to ignore. They express their dissatisfaction with the show's second season, which they argue was mislabeled as a second season by Warner executives, when in fact it was a single season. The speaker criticizes this as a corrupt practice that shortchanges the artists involved. They were initially indifferent to the show's conclusion but became compelled to watch after seeing a spoiler revealing Velma's death. The summary goes on to detail the speaker's issues with the show's writing, pacing, character development, and contrived plot. They also discuss their feelings about the inclusion of Scrappy Doo and the implications for the show's future.

05:02

🩲 MeUndies Endorsement: Comfort and Style for Everyone

The speaker transitions from discussing 'Velma' to promoting MeUndies, a brand of comfortable and stylish underwear. They share their personal experience with the brand, emphasizing the quality and comfort of the products, and how they have replaced their old, worn-out underwear with MeUndies. The speaker highlights the brand's variety of styles, sizes, and commitment to sustainability and fair labor practices. They also mention MeUndies' loungewear collection and the soft, breathable fabric that feels like a warm hug. The promotion includes a discount offer for the audience and a humorous acknowledgment of the speaker's focus on comfort.

10:06

🎭 Character Critique and Animation Praise in 'Velma'

The speaker returns to the topic of 'Velma,' discussing the show's character development and the animation quality. They express a dislike for most of the characters, finding them unlikable and their arcs underwhelming, with the exception of Fred, who shows some growth. The speaker appreciates the art direction and some moments of fluid animation, despite other parts appearing wonky. They also touch on the issue of race swapping in the show, stating it's not a problem, and emphasize that the real issue lies with the character writing. The speaker concludes their thoughts on the show's first season, suggesting that it does not feel like a tribute to the Scooby-Doo franchise but rather a threat, and they hope for a more sincere and immersive experience in future adaptations.

15:08

🚫 The Disappointment of 'Velma' Season 2 and Hopes for the Future

In the final paragraph, the speaker reiterates their disappointment with 'Velma' Season 2, describing it as not worth watching and lacking the charm and sincerity of the original Scooby-Doo franchise. They argue that the show feels obnoxious and self-important, with a lack of immersive and sincere moments that would allow viewers to connect with the story or characters. The speaker also addresses the potential for a second season, suggesting that it might happen due to the involvement of high-profile names like Mindy Kaling. They end with a call for Hollywood to take more risks and support creative artists in order to create a renaissance in entertainment, expressing hope that the future does not include another season of 'Velma' and instead sees a return to form with proper investment in artists.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Velma

Velma is a central character in the video, referring to the titular character of the animated series 'Velma'. The video discusses the character's portrayal in the show, criticizing the writing and character development, particularly highlighting Velma's unlikable traits and the controversy surrounding the character's death in the season finale.

💡Mindy Kaling

Mindy Kaling is the creator of the 'Velma' show, and her writing is a focal point of the critique. The video suggests that Kaling's work on 'The Office' was better received and implies that the writing for 'Velma' lacks the same quality, contributing to the show's perceived shortcomings.

💡Scooby-Doo

Scooby-Doo is a classic franchise that the 'Velma' series is based on. The video discusses how the 'Velma' show attempts to take a different approach to the characters and storylines but fails to capture the essence of the original, leading to a disconnect with fans of the franchise.

💡Scrappy Doo

Scrappy Doo is a character from the Scooby-Doo franchise who unexpectedly appears in 'Velma', contributing to the chaotic narrative. The video mentions Scrappy Doo's role as a surprising twist and the fact that he ends up killing Velma, which is a significant plot point that drives the reviewer's interest.

💡Character Arc

A character arc refers to the development and evolution of a character over the course of a story. The video criticizes the 'Velma' show for lacking meaningful character arcs, particularly for Velma, who remains obnoxious and unlikable throughout the series, which is a major point of dissatisfaction for the reviewer.

💡Animation Quality

The quality of animation in 'Velma' is discussed as a point of contention. While some scenes are praised for their fluidity and detail, others are criticized for being static or wonky. The inconsistency in animation quality is seen as a detraction from the overall viewing experience.

💡Pacing

Pacing refers to the speed at which the narrative of a show unfolds. The video criticizes the pacing of 'Velma' for being too fast, making it difficult for viewers to become invested in the characters or storylines. The rapid pace leaves little room for character development or emotional engagement.

💡Race Swapping

Race swapping is the practice of changing a character's race in an adaptation. The video mentions that the reviewer has no issue with race swapping in the context of the 'Velma' show, distinguishing it from other criticisms about character writing and development.

💡Sustainability

Sustainability is the focus on using resources in a way that does not deplete them or harm the environment. The video briefly touches on the show's use of sustainably sourced materials and ethical labor practices, which the reviewer appreciates as a positive aspect amidst the overall negative critique.

💡meundies

meundies is a brand of underwear and loungewear mentioned in the video as a sponsor. The script includes a promotional segment praising the comfort, quality, and sustainability of meundies products, serving as a contrast to the critical analysis of the 'Velma' show.

💡Artist Exploitation

Artist exploitation refers to the unfair treatment or underpayment of artists working on a project. The video discusses the controversy surrounding the payment structure for the 'Velma' show, where artists were paid for one season but the show was marketed as two, which the reviewer sees as a form of exploitation.

Highlights

The speaker compares watching the Velma series to witnessing a car wreck that is hard to look away from.

Warner executives are criticized for labeling one season of the show as two, which is seen as financially unfair to the artists.

The speaker was initially uninterested in the show's finale but became curious after seeing a spoiler on Twitter.

The character Velma is killed off by Scrappy Doo in a twist that compelled the speaker to watch the entire season.

The speaker expresses dissatisfaction with the writing, character development, and pacing of the show.

The character Velma is described as a self-insert character for the show's creator, Mindy Kaling.

The speaker feels that the relationship between Daphne and Velma lacks sincerity and depth.

The show's animation is praised for its fluidity, despite some static moments.

The speaker discusses the inclusion of Scrappy Doo as a meta-commentary on the need for ratings, which they find amusing.

The speaker argues that the show does not feel like a love letter to the Scooby-Doo franchise but rather a threat.

The possibility of a second season is mentioned, despite the speaker's belief that the show should not continue.

The speaker calls out the Hollywood tendency to greenlight projects based on attached names rather than creative merit.

The speaker ends with a hope for a return to form in entertainment, with proper investment and support for creative artists.

The speaker humorously transitions from discussing their underwear preference to talking about the show's content.

The speaker provides a sponsored message for MeUndies, praising their comfort and style variety.

The speaker criticizes the show's handling of character backstories and the introduction of too many characters.

The speaker discusses the show's visual appeal but emphasizes that it's not the main issue, which lies in the character writing.