Judge denies Letitia James' effort to reject Trump's $175M bond

Fox News
22 Apr 202413:40

Summary

TLDRThe video script revolves around the legal challenges faced by a former president, presumably Donald Trump, in relation to a civil fraud case and a $175 million bond. The court upholds the bond despite a challenge, and the former president expresses his views on the situation, suggesting a political motivation behind the case. He criticizes the judge's understanding of the financial aspects and argues that the case is part of a 'witch hunt' to hinder his political campaign. The summary also touches on the former president's activities, such as attending an event in North Carolina to honor wounded veterans, emphasizing his continued public service amidst legal issues. The narrative suggests a broader context of perceived political bias in the legal proceedings and a coordinated effort to affect the outcome of federal elections.

Takeaways

  • 📜 The transcript discusses a civil fraud case involving a former president, highlighting a $175 million bond that was questioned but ultimately upheld by the court.
  • 💼 Letitia James, who campaigned on financial regulation, is mentioned as challenging the bond and the bonding company involved, which is based in California.
  • 🤝 There was a collaborative hearing where lawyers for the former president and the state attorney general's office reached an agreement regarding the bond.
  • 💰 The former president claims to have put up $175 million in cash as collateral, which will remain in a Charles Schwab account under the control of an insurance company.
  • 📋 The insurance company agreed to provide monthly statements to the attorney general's office to prove the balance remains at $175 million.
  • 🗣️ The former president argues that the case is politically motivated to hinder his campaign activities and that he is the leading candidate against Biden.
  • 🚫 He criticizes the judge, suggesting that the judge is conflicted and that the case is an unfair attempt to interfere with federal elections.
  • 📉 The former president also discusses legal expenses and tax deductions, indicating that he was indicted over a payment to a lawyer that was categorized as a legal expense.
  • 🏢 The bonding company in question was scrutinized for its ability to pay the bond if needed, but it was confirmed that they hold $175 million of the president's collateral.
  • 📉 The former president asserts that he underestimated assets, contrary to the allegations, and that the judge did not understand the case's financial aspects.
  • 🌐 The transcript suggests a broader narrative of political witch hunts and media bias, with the former president claiming that his high poll numbers indicate public support despite the challenges.

Q & A

  • What is the subject of the civil fraud case mentioned in the transcript?

    -The civil fraud case involves a dispute over a $175 million bond posted by the former president, which is being questioned by Letitia James, the New York Attorney General.

  • What was the outcome of the challenge to the $175 million bond?

    -The court ruled that the bond will stand, rejecting the challenge from the New York Attorney General's office.

  • What was the agreement reached between Trump's lawyers and the State Attorney General's Office regarding the bond?

    -The agreement was that the cash collateral of $175 million will remain as cash in a Charles Schwab account, with exclusive control given to an insurance company. There will be no attempts to withdraw the money, and monthly statements will be provided to the Attorney General's Office to prove the balance remains at $175 million.

  • What is the former president's claim regarding the bond and his company?

    -The former president claims that he put up $175 million in cash as collateral to secure the bond through a California-based company and that the bond is valid.

  • What was the role of Judge Arthur Engoron in this case?

    -Judge Arthur Engoron presided over the hearing and ruled in favor of the bond standing, despite questions raised about the management of the account and the underwriting company.

  • What is the former president's stance on the legal expenses and the indictment?

    -The former president argues that he was indicted over a legal expense payment to a lawyer, which he believes was unfairly targeted and politically motivated.

  • Why does the former president believe the case is part of a 'witch hunt'?

    -He believes it is an attempt to keep him off the campaign trail due to his high poll numbers and the public's understanding that it is a politically motivated effort.

  • What is the former president's claim about the Federal Election Commission's view on the case?

    -He claims that the Federal Election Commission doubted the case and didn't bring it, suggesting that it is not a legitimate concern.

  • What is the significance of the 'Access Hollywood' tape question mentioned in the transcript?

    -The 'Access Hollywood' tape question is likely referring to a previous scandal involving the former president, and the way he addresses it is compared to how he is handling the current legal situation.

  • What does the former president suggest is the reason for the timing of the case against him?

    -He suggests that the case was brought after he announced his run for president, implying that it is part of a coordinated effort to hinder his campaign.

  • How does the former president describe his current public standing despite the legal challenges?

    -He claims that his poll numbers are higher than ever, indicating that the public supports him and understands that the legal challenges are a 'witch hunt'.

Outlines

00:00

🏛️ Civil Fraud Case and Bond Challenge

The first paragraph discusses a civil fraud case where a judge, previously involved with a president, has ruled on a new challenge concerning a $175 million bond posted by Trump. The court decided that Trump's bond would stand despite objections. The former president, Trump, commented on the situation, mentioning an ongoing trial led by Letitia James, who campaigned against him and questioned the legitimacy of the bonding company used for the $175 million. Trump emphasized that he posted the cash as collateral and that the Attorney General's office had concerns about the account management and access. Both parties agreed that the cash collateral would remain in a Charles Schwab account under the exclusive control of the insurance company, with no withdrawals allowed and monthly statements provided to the Attorney General's office to ensure the balance remains at $175 million. The attorney representing Trump stated that the cash was sufficient and that the judge quickly realized the Attorney General's misunderstanding. Trump also criticized the situation, calling it a 'legal x dance' and expressing his belief that the case was politically motivated to keep him off the campaign trail.

05:02

🤔 Judge's Conflict and Trump's Innocence

The second paragraph focuses on Trump's claims of unfair treatment by a judge, who he believes is conflicted. Trump argues that he should be allowed to campaign and questions the legitimacy of the case against him. He points out that despite the case being presented to various agencies and law enforcement groups, no action was taken by the federal elections, suggesting they found no wrongdoing. Trump criticizes the case as an attempt to make it a state issue, even though it is federal, and accuses it of being part of a coordinated effort against him, including the involvement of a Democrat-leaning law firm. He also mentions the 'Access Hollywood' tape and defends his actions, stating that he was indicted over a payment to a lawyer, which he views as a standard legal expense. Trump insists that he is innocent and that the case is part of a 'witch hunt' to hinder his political campaign, but asserts that his poll numbers remain high as the public understands the situation.

10:05

🎤 Trump's Messaging and Public Perception

The third paragraph involves a discussion about Trump's messaging and how it is perceived by the public. It suggests that Trump is effectively communicating his stance on various issues, contrasting his approach with that of President Biden. The paragraph also touches on the timing of the case against Trump, implying that it was brought forth after he announced his intention to run for president, suggesting political motivations. The discussion includes commentary on the coordination of efforts against Trump, including the involvement of a prosecutor from the Department of Justice and a law firm known for its Democratic affiliations. The paragraph concludes with a reflection on Trump's resilience and ability to maintain popularity despite facing legal and political challenges, highlighting his recent public appearance in support of wounded veterans.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Civil Fraud Case

A civil fraud case refers to a legal dispute where one party accuses another of fraudulent actions, typically involving financial matters. In the video's context, it is a case against the former president involving allegations of financial misconduct. The theme revolves around the legal proceedings and the defense's stance on the accusations.

💡$175 Million Bond

A bond in a legal context is a form of security or guarantee for a financial obligation. The $175 million bond mentioned in the transcript signifies a substantial financial guarantee put up by the former president as part of the legal proceedings. It is a key point of contention in the case, with questions raised about the source and management of the funds.

💡Judge Arthur Engoron

Judge Arthur Engoron is the presiding judge in the civil fraud case discussed in the video. His role is pivotal as he rules on the legal challenges and the validity of the bond. The script suggests that the former president's team questions the judge's understanding and handling of the case.

💡Specialty Insurance Company

This refers to the company that underwrote the $175 million bond for the former president. The company is central to the narrative as it is the entity that would be responsible for paying out the bond if required. Concerns were raised about the company's financial stability and the management of the collateral account.

💡

💡Collateral

Collateral is an asset or property put up to secure a loan or as a guarantee for the fulfillment of an obligation. In this case, the former president is said to have posted cash as collateral to secure the bond. The management and accessibility of this collateral are subjects of scrutiny in the video.

💡Attorney General Letitia James

Letitia James is the Attorney General of New York who is involved in the case against the former president. She is portrayed in the video as an adversary questioning the legitimacy of the bond and the financial dealings of the former president's company.

💡Tax Deduction

A tax deduction is a reduction in an individual's taxable income, which can result in a lower tax liability. The video references a legal expense that was not deducted as a tax deduction, implying that the financial transaction in question was legitimate and not subject to tax benefits.

💡Legal Expense

Legal expenses are costs associated with legal representation and services. In the context of the video, the term is used to describe a payment made to a lawyer, which becomes a point of contention in the case. The former president argues that the payment was a legitimate legal expense.

💡Indictment

An indictment is a formal charge or accusation of a serious crime, made by a prosecutor or a grand jury. The video discusses the former president's indictment in relation to a payment made to a lawyer, which is central to the legal case against him.

💡Campaign Trail

The campaign trail refers to the period and process of campaigning by individuals running for political office. The video suggests that the legal proceedings are affecting the former president's ability to campaign, which is a significant aspect of his current political activities.

💡Witch Hunt

A witch hunt is a term used to describe an investigation or pursuit with the intent of finding fault or prosecuting individuals for political reasons rather than based on evidence. In the video, the former president alleges that the legal case against him is a politically motivated witch hunt intended to hinder his political activities.

Highlights

Judge Arthur Engoron rules on a new challenge in the civil fraud case against former President Trump, rejecting an attempt to reject Trump's $175 million bond.

Trump claims he has another trial going on involving New York Attorney General Letitia James, who is questioning the bonding company behind the $175 million bond.

During the hearing, lawyers for Trump and the state attorney general's office reach an agreement about the bond, addressing concerns about the account holding Trump's collateral and the bonding company's ability to pay if needed.

The cash collateral Trump posted will remain at a Charles Schwab account, with exclusive control given to an insurance company and no withdrawals allowed. Monthly statements will be provided to the attorney general's office.

Trump argues the case is a politically motivated "witch hunt" by the Biden administration to keep him off the campaign trail as he runs for president.

Trump claims he did nothing wrong, arguing that if the case was so strong, federal agencies would have pursued it instead of the state.

Trump criticizes Judge Engoron for not understanding the case, saying he had no idea what was going on and questioned the judge's competence.

Trump claims he was indicted over a legal expense payment to his former lawyer Michael Cohen, arguing it was a baseless charge.

Trump says the case is an attempt to bankrupt him and remove Secret Service protection, part of a coordinated effort by Democrats.

Trump argues that if he was not a threat to the regime, the case would have gone away.

Trump's attorney argues the case should have been brought by the business division to handle the complex financial issues, not Engoron.

Trump claims he actually underestimated assets, contrary to the prosecution's argument that he overestimated them.

Trump says the case is an attempt to build a false narrative against him, disputing the valuation of his assets.

Trump compares the case to the "Access Hollywood" tape scandal, arguing he is being unfairly targeted.

Trump says despite the legal battles, his poll numbers remain high as the public recognizes the case as a politically motivated witch hunt.

Trump was honored by the Independence Fund for his support of wounded veterans, continuing to serve the public amid the legal challenges.

Transcripts

00:00

E

00:00

WILL MOVE ON.

00:00

THE OTHER HALF OF THE STORY.

00:04

>> NOW TO THIS.

00:07

THE JUDGE AND FORMER

00:08

PRESIDENT ----------------------

00:08

--------------------------------

00:09

-------------------------'S

00:10

CIVIL FRAUD CASE HAS RULED ON A

00:11

NEW CHALLENGE FROM --

00:12

WHEN I DO HAVE TRUMP'S

00:16

$175 MILLION BOND REJECTED.

00:16

THE COURT SAYS HIS BOND WILL

00:19

STAND.

00:19

HERE'S WHAT THE FORMER PRESIDENT

00:20

HAD TO SAY AHEAD OF THAT RULING

00:22

THIS MORNING.

00:24

>> WE HAVE ANOTHER TRIAL GOING

00:26

ON RIGHT NOW.

00:26

LETITIA JAMES LETITIA JAMES.

00:27

SHE CAMPAIGNED ON THE FACT --

00:30

AND IT HAS TO DO WITH THE BOND

00:34

OF $175 MILLION.

00:34

SHE DOESN'T WANT ME TO

00:36

PARTICIPATE WITH FINANCIAL

00:38

COMPANIES IN NEW YORK.

00:39

WE HAVE A COMPANY BASED IN

00:40

CALIFORNIA.

00:41

I PUT OUT 175 MILLION IN CASH.

00:45

SHE IS QUESTIONING THE BONDING

00:46

COMPANY.

00:49

>> HERE WITH MORE, LYDIA.

00:53

>> THERE HAVE BEEN MANY

00:54

APPEARANCES IN HEARINGS BEFORE

00:56

JUDGE ARTHUR ENGORON DURING THE

00:59

COURSE OF THIS CIVIL FRAUD TRIAL

01:02

FOR THIS ONE STANDS OUT BECAUSE

01:04

THE PARTIES WERE SURPRISINGLY

01:06

COLLABORATIVE.

01:07

THE HEARING LASTED FOR ABOUT AN

01:08

HOUR.

01:09

DURING THAT TIME, THE LAWYERS

01:11

FOR TRUMP IN THE STATE ATTORNEY

01:12

GENERAL'S OFFICE CAME TO AN

01:13

AGREEMENT ABOUT THE BOND.

01:16

QUESTIONS THAT SWIRLED AROUND

01:16

THE COMPANY UNDERWRITING THE

01:18

BOND.

01:20

MY SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY.

01:22

IT ALWAYS MAINTAINED THAT TRUMP

01:23

POSTED CASH AS COLLATERAL TO

01:26

SECURE THE BOND.

01:27

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL RAISED

01:28

QUESTIONS ABOUT HOW THAT ACCOUNT

01:29

WAS MANAGED AND WHO HAD ACCESS

01:32

TO IT.

01:32

AND WHETHER NIGHT SPECIALTY

01:33

COULD PAY THE BOND IF NEEDED.

01:36

TO ADDRESS THOSE CONCERNS, HERE

01:38

IS WHAT BOTH SIDES AGREED.

01:39

THE CASH THAT TRUMP PUT UP AS

01:41

COLLATERAL WILL REMAIN AS CASH

01:44

AT A CHARLES SCHWAB ACCOUNT.

01:45

NOT INSURANCE WILL HAVE

01:46

EXCLUSIVE CONTROL OF THAT

01:47

ACCOUNT.

01:47

NO ONE WILL TRY TO WITHDRAW THE

01:50

MONEY.

01:51

MONTHLY STATEMENTS TO THE

01:52

ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE ON THE

01:54

COURT PROVING THAT THE BALANCE

01:57

REMAINS $175 MILLION.

01:57

WE GOT TO SPEAK TO THE ATTORNEY

02:01

WHO HAS COUNSEL FOR THE FORMER

02:02

PRESIDENT.

02:03

HERE IS OUR REACTION AFTER THE

02:05

HEARING.

02:06

>> MISS JAMES ONE OF THE

02:07

ARGUMENT SAY THAT OUR CASH ISN'T

02:08

GREEN ENOUGH.

02:11

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL THAT

02:12

JUDGE REALIZED QUICKLY THAT THEY

02:12

HAD NO IDEA WHAT THEY WERE

02:14

TALKING ABOUT.

02:15

WE CAME TO AN AGREEMENT THAT

02:16

EVERYTHING WOULD BE THE SAME.

02:19

AND THAT WAS IN IT.

02:20

THIS IS WHERE YOUR TAXPAYER

02:21

DOLLARS ARE GOING.

02:27

>> BREAKING NEWS.

02:27

THE FORMER PRESIDENT FOR

02:28

SPEAKING.

02:28

COURT IS OVER FOR THE DAY.

02:29

LET'S WATCH.

02:34

>> THANK YOU.

02:35

>> THEY CALL IT A LEGAL X DANCE.

02:39

LEGAL EXPENSE IN THE BOOKS.

02:43

ANOTHER THING THAT WASN'T SAID

02:45

IS, WE NEVER DEDUCTED IT AS A

02:47

TAX DEDUCTION.

02:49

THAT TAKES -- MOST PEOPLE WANT

02:50

TO DEDUCT EVERYTHING.

02:54

BUT THEY CALL FOR PAYMENT TO A

02:57

LAWYER, A LEGAL EXPENSE IN THE

03:00

BOOKS.

03:01

THEY THEN COLLECT CONSTRUCTION.

03:02

THEY DIDN'T SAY YOU ARE BUILDING

03:04

A BUILDING.

03:04

THEY CALLED A PAYMENT TO A LAW

03:06

YEAR -- BECAUSE AS YOU KNOW,

03:12

COHEN IS A LAW YEAR THAT

03:13

REPRESENTED A LOT OF PEOPLE OVER

03:14

THE YEARS.

03:14

I AM NOT THE ONLY ONE.

03:16

AND WASN'T VERY GOOD IN A LOT OF

03:18

WAYS IN TERMS OF HIS

03:20

REPRESENTATION.

03:21

BUT HE REPRESENTED A LOT OF

03:23

PEOPLE.

03:25

HE PUTS IN AN INVOICE OR

03:28

WHATEVER, A BELL.

03:28

THEY CALL IT A LEGAL EXPENSE.

03:30

I GOT INDICTED FOR THAT.

03:32

WHAT ELSE WOULD YOU CALL IT?

03:34

NOBODY HAS BEEN ABLE TO SAY WHAT

03:36

YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO CALL IT.

03:38

IF A LAW YOU'RE PUTS A BILL OR

03:39

INVOICE, AND YOU PAY THE BILL,

03:41

IT'S A LITTLE LINE THIS VERY

03:44

SMALL LITTLE LINE.

03:45

I DON'T KNOW IF YOU CAN WRITE

03:47

MORE THAN TWO WORDS.

03:47

IT'S NOT LIKE YOU CAN TELL A

03:48

LIFE STORY.

03:51

THEY MARKET DOWN TO A LEGAL

03:53

EXPENSE.

03:53

THIS IS BUT I GOT INDICTED OVER

03:55

IT.

03:55

I GOT INDICTED -- I'M THE

03:59

LEADING CANDIDATE MEETING BIDEN

04:00

AND BEATING THE REPUBLICANS NOW.

04:01

I HAVE THE NOMINATION.

04:04

THIS IS WHAT THEY TRY TO TAKE ME

04:05

OFF THE TRAIL FOR.

04:09

THE CHECK IS BEING PAID TO A LAW

04:11

YEAR.

04:12

HE IS A LAWYER OR WAS A LAWYER.

04:14

ALSO, THE THINGS HE GOT IN

04:17

TROUBLE FOR WHERE THINGS THAT

04:19

HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH ME.

04:20

HE GOT IN TROUBLE AND WENT TO

04:22

JAIL.

04:22

THIS HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH ME.

04:24

THIS HAD TO DO WITH THE TAXICAB

04:27

COMPANY WHICH HE OWNED WHICH IS

04:28

SOMETHING HE OWNED.

04:30

BORROWING MONEY AND A LOT OF

04:31

THINGS THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO

04:33

WITH ME.

04:33

HE REPRESENTED A LOT OF PEOPLE

04:34

OVER THE YEARS.

04:39

BUT THEY TAKE THIS PAYMENT, AND

04:40

THEY CALL IT A LEGAL EXPENSE.

04:42

YOU HEARD IT TODAY FOR THE FIRST

04:43

TIME.

04:44

THIS IS WHAT I GOT INDICTED

04:45

OVER.

04:46

THIS IS WHAT TOOK ME OFF AND

04:47

TAKES ME ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL.

04:50

BECAUSE I SHOULD BE IN GEORGIA

04:52

AND NOW.

04:52

I SHOULD BE IN FLORIDA NOW.

04:54

I SHOULD BE IN A LOT OF

04:55

DIFFERENT PLACES RIGHT NOW

04:56

CAMPAIGNING.

04:57

I'M SITTING HERE.

04:58

THIS WILL GO FOR A LONG TIME.

05:01

IT'S VERY UNFAIR.

05:02

THE JUDGE IS CONFLICTED AS YOU

05:03

KNOW.

05:04

IT'S VERY UNFAIR WHAT'S GOING

05:05

ON.

05:06

I SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO CAMPAIGN.

05:09

WHOEVER HEARD OF THIS?

05:10

GOT INDICTED FOR THAT.

05:11

PEOPLE IN THE COURT, I CAN'T

05:14

BELIEVE IT.

05:16

THIS IS THE CASE.

05:17

WE DID NOTHING WRONG.

05:17

THE OTHER THING IS, IF THIS IS

05:21

SUCH A GREAT CASE, BUT I THE

05:23

SOUTHERN DISTRICT RING AT WHO

05:25

LOOKED AT IT?

05:27

FIND IT IN THE NUMEROUS OTHER

05:30

AGENCIES AND LAW ENFORCEMENT

05:31

GROUPS LOOK AT IT?

05:32

BECAUSE IT WAS SHOWN TO

05:33

EVERYBODY.

05:34

VERY IMPORTANTLY, WIDEN THE

05:36

FEDERAL ELECTIONS DO ANYTHING

05:39

ABOUT IT?

05:39

THIS IS FEDERAL.

05:40

IT'S NOT STATE.

05:40

THEY ARE TRYING TO MAKE IT A

05:42

STATE CASE.

05:43

IT'S NOT STATE.

05:45

AS NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE I

05:47

BELIEVED HER NEVER HAPPENED

05:48

BEFORE.

05:49

THIS HAS NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE

05:49

WITH A STATE TRIAL.

05:52

INSERTING ITSELF IN FEDERAL

05:54

ELECTIONS.

05:54

NOBODY HAS EVER SEEN IT.

05:57

FEDERAL ELECTIONS TOOK A TOTAL

05:58

PASS ON IT.

06:01

THEY SAID ESSENTIALLY, NOTHING

06:02

WAS DONE WRONG, OR THEY WOULD

06:04

HAVE DONE SOMETHING ABOUT IT.

06:06

THEY WOULD HAVE DONE SOMETHING

06:08

ABOUT IT.

06:09

THEY SAID NOTHING, AND THEY  

06:12

SAID --

06:13

BECAUSE THEY COULDN'T EVEN

06:13

BELIEVE IT.

06:15

IF YOU READ THEIR LETTER, THEY

06:17

COULDN'T EVEN BELIEVE IT.

06:18

THEY WERE INCREDULOUS.

06:21

AND YET, ALVIN BRAGG MAKES IT

06:22

OUT.

06:24

IF YOU LOOK, WHEN HE FIRST CAME

06:25

IN, HE DIDN'T WANT TO DO IT.

06:26

HE DIDN'T WANT TO DO IT.

06:29

WHAT POMERANTZ DID.

06:31

THAT IS BAD STUFF.

06:34

WHEN ARE THEY GONNA LOOK AT ALL

06:36

THE LIES THAT COHEN DID IN THE

06:37

LAST TRIAL.

06:40

CAN'T LYING IN THE LAST TRIAL.

06:41

HE CAUGHT LYING.

06:44

AND WHAT ARE THEY GONNA LOOK AT

06:46

THAT.

06:47

ANOTHER SUBJECT BECAUSE, JUST A

06:49

FEW BLOCKS AWAY, THEY HAD A

06:54

TRIAL, $175 MILLION.

06:55

THAT IS LETITIA JAMES.

06:56

IT'S ALL COMING OUT OF THE

06:56

WHITE HOUSE, BY THE WAY.

07:00

THE JUDGE ENGORON.

07:03

THE JUDGE DIDN'T KNOW ANYTHING.

07:04

HE DIDN'T KNOW ABOUT THE

07:07

SECURITY.

07:09

HE SAID -- IT DOESN'T GO DOWN

07:10

BECAUSE ITS CASH.

07:13

I PUT UP $175 MILLION IN CASH.

07:15

WE HAD A BONDING COMPANY DO IT.

07:16

HE CHALLENGED THE BONDING

07:18

COMPANY THAT MAYBE THE BONDING

07:19

COMPANY WAS NO GOOD.

07:22

WELL, THEY ARE GOOD.

07:23

THEY ALSO HAVE $175 MILLION OF

07:27

MY COLLATERAL.

07:28

THE JUDGE DIDN'T KNOW ANYTHING

07:29

ABOUT -- HE DIDN'T KNOW WHAT

07:31

$175 MILLION CASH MANAGER.

07:33

HE HAD NO IDEA WHAT ANYTHING

07:36

MEANT.

07:37

HE HAD NO IDEA WHAT HE DID IN

07:40

THE TRIAL.

07:42

AND HE CHARGED ME HUNDREDS OF

07:44

MILLIONS OF DOLLARS ON SOMETHING

07:45

WHERE I AM TOTALLY INNOCENT.

07:48

BUT IF YOU LOOK AT WHAT HAPPENED

07:50

TODAY, JUDGE ENGORON SHOULD NOT

07:52

HAVE DONE THAT.

07:52

HE SHOULD HAVE GONE TO THE

07:55

BUSINESS DIVISION WHERE THEY

07:57

HAVE COMPLEX BUSINESS TRIALS.

07:58

ACTUALLY, IT SHOULD HAVE NEVER

07:58

BEEN BROUGHT.

08:01

BECAUSE I DIDN'T OVERESTIMATE.

08:03

THEY SAID I OVERESTIMATED.

08:05

IF YOU LOOK AT THE NUMBERS, THEY

08:07

ARE UNDERESTIMATED.

08:09

I UNDERESTIMATED.

08:10

I DID THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT THEY

08:12

SAID.

08:13

THE REASON THAT THEY TRIED TO --

08:14

AND THEY DATED FOR FOR WRONG

08:16

NARRATIVE.

08:16

THEY DID THAT MILLION DOLLAR

08:21

ASSET $18 BILLION.

08:22

IN ORDER TO BUILD A NARRATIVE.

08:24

THEY WANT TO BUILD A NARRATIVE.

08:26

IF YOU LOOK -- I HAVE A COMPLETE

08:31

RECORD OF WHAT HAPPENED, JUDGE

08:32

ENGORON HAD NO IDEA WHAT WAS

08:35

GOING ON.

08:35

DIDN'T UNDERSTAND THE MOST

08:37

SIMPLE CONCEPTS.

08:38

THIS IS THE MAN THAT TOOK A CASE

08:40

AND SAID THIS IS WHY -- THEY ARE

08:43

MOVING OUT OF NEW YORK.

08:44

BECAUSE THEY CAN'T BE SUBJECT --

08:47

PUT OUT OF BUSINESS.

08:49

THEY ARE MOVING OUT OF NEW YORK

08:51

BECAUSE OF IT.

08:53

JUDGE ENGORON HAD ABSOLUTELY NO

08:55

IDEA WHAT HAD HAPPENED.

08:56

HE DIDN'T REALIZE WE PUT UP 175.

08:59

WHEN HE FOUND OUT WE PUT IT UP,

09:00

HE SAID WHAT HAPPENS IF IT GOES

09:02

UP OR DOWN?

09:04

IT DOESN'T GO UP OR DOWN.

09:06

IT'S CASH THAT WE PUT UP, ALL

09:08

CASH.

09:09

VERY FEW PEOPLE COULD DO THAT.

09:10

THE DEAL WAS APPROVED.

09:14

WITH THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IF YOU

09:14

CAN BELIEVE THAT.

09:17

BUT THE DEAL WAS APPROVED.

09:19

SHE TRIED TO EMBARRASS EVERY

09:21

BODY AND TRIED TO EMBARRASS A

09:22

VERY GOOD BONDING COMPANY BY

09:23

SAYING THEY WO CREDIT WHERE

09:26

THEY.

09:26

THEY WERE CREDIT WORTHY.

09:28

WHAT WAS MORE IMPORTANT AS THEY

09:30

HAD A SECURITY, $175 MILLION

09:32

THAT I PUT UP.

09:34

THE POINT HERE IS THAT THE JUDGE

09:36

HAD NO IDEA WHAT WAS HAPPENING.

09:38

THIS IS THE SAME JUDGE THAT TWO

09:40

MONTHS AGO, THEY HAD A RULING

09:41

THAT SHOOK THE WORLD.

09:45

IT SHOOK THE WORLD.

09:46

EVERYONE KNOWS ACCORDING TO THAT

09:48

TRIAL, I DID NOTHING WRONG.

09:50

OVER HERE, I DID NOTHING WRONG

09:52

ALSO.

09:53

THIS IS A BIDEN WITCH HUNT TO

09:54

KEEP ME OFF THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL.

09:58

SO FAR, IT'S NOT WORKING,

09:59

BECAUSE MY POLL NUMBERS ARE

10:00

HIGHER THEY HAVE EVER BEEN

10:05

THROUGH THE PUBLIC UNDERSTANDS

10:06

THAT IT WAS A WITCH END.

10:09

>> MR. TRUMP, WHAT WAS IT LIKE

10:11

ABOUT THE "ACCESS HOLLYWOOD"

10:13

TAPE?

10:15

SPEAK TO THE PRESIDENT LAYING IT

10:16

OUT MUCH LIKE AN ATTORNEY WOULD.

10:18

MAKING HIS POINT ABOUT THIS  

10:21

CASE.

10:22

YOU KNOW, KAYLEIGH, THE ENTIRE

10:23

TIME WE WERE WATCHING, EVERYBODY

10:25

WANTS, LIKE, YEAH, WE GET THIS.

10:28

>> Kayleigh: HE IS ON MESSAGE.

10:30

THAT IF SOMEONE ON MESSAGE.

10:31

THINGS I HAVE IN MY NOTES.

10:35

THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

10:35

THERE DOUBTED THE CASE.

10:39

DIDN'T BRING THE CASE.

10:40

WHAT HAPPENED BETWEEN WE CAN'T

10:43

BRING THIS CASE, THE FACTS DON'T

10:44

MATCH THE LAW AND THE DAY, LAST

10:47

FEBRUARY WHEN ALVIN BRAGG BRINGS

10:48

THE CASE.

10:49

IN INTERVENING FACT HAPPEN FOR

10:51

DONALD TRUMP DECIDED TO RUN FOR

10:54

PRESIDENT.

10:54

IT IS MY BELIEF THAT PLAYED INTO

10:56

THIS.

10:56

HOW DID THIS CASE DEAD AS A

10:59

DOORNAIL, UNPRECEDENTED

11:02

ACCORDING TO A LAWYER.

11:04

WE BRING THAT CASE AFTER TRUMP

11:06

DECIDES TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT.

11:08

>> Joey: YOU SAID SOMETHING

11:10

EARLIER THIS HOUR.

11:11

YOU HAVE BEEN LOOKING FOR

11:12

CONNECTIVE TISSUE TO FURTHER THE

11:14

POLITICAL POINTS.

11:16

WHO IS LEADING THE OPENING

11:17

STATEMENT TODAY AGAINST THE

11:19

PRESIDENT?

11:20

SPEAK ON THE NUMBER THREE UNDER

11:23

MERRICK GARLAND AT THE

11:23

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.

11:25

HE LEFT A CUSHY JOB AT THE

11:28

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE TO GO BE A

11:28

LINE PROSECUTOR IN A CITY

11:30

OFFICE.

11:31

THAT SHOWS HOW COORDINATED THIS

11:32

IS.

11:33

IT'S NOT JUST HIM.

11:34

THERE WAS A LAW FIRM HERE IN

11:36

NEW YORK CITY KNOWN AS A

11:37

DEMOCRAT LAW FIRM THAT HANDED

11:38

OVER A FEW OF ITS ATTORNEYS TO

11:40

HELP BRING CHARGES AGAINST

11:43

DONALD TRUMP.

11:44

THIS IS PART OF A WIDESPREAD AND

11:47

COORDINATED EFFORT.

11:47

EVERYONE KNOWS IT.

11:48

IT'S REALLY INTERESTING TO SEE

11:50

THIS MAN OUT THERE TODAY.

11:51

LOOK AT HOW SO MANY REPUBLICANS

11:54

CAN'T EVEN HANDLE A MINUTE OF

11:55

NEGATIVE COVERAGE FROM THE  

11:58

MEDIA.

11:58

THIS GUY HAS PEOPLE ATTEMPTING

11:59

TO BANKRUPT HIM.

12:00

YOU HAVE ACTUAL HOUSE MEMBERS

12:02

TRYING TO REMOVE SECRET SERVICE

12:04

PROTECTION FROM HIM.

12:05

HE KNOWS THAT IF HE WERE TO BE

12:08

NO THREAT TO THE REGIME, IT

12:09

WOULD ALL GONE AWAY AND EVERY

12:10

DAY HE GETS OUT THERE AND KEEPS

12:11

MAKING HIS CASE.

12:15

THAT DOES A LOT TO EXPLAIN WHY

12:16

YOU SO BELOVED BELOVED BY SO

12:16

MANY AMERICANS.

12:19

>> Joey: I WANT TO GO BACK TO

12:21

WHAT YOU SAID ABOUT HE IS ON

12:22

MESSAGE.

12:23

IF YOU ACCEPT THE PREMISE, WHAT

12:26

IS HAPPENING IN GEORGIA, THE

12:28

LAWSUITS IN NEW YORK AND THIS

12:29

TRIAL ARE POLITICALLY MOTIVATED.

12:30

THEY ARE GEARED TOWARD HELPING

12:32

PRESIDENT BIDEN WIN, WE

12:36

HAVE 2 MEN RUNNING FOR

12:36

PRESIDENT.

12:38

ON MESSAGE, PRESIDENT TRUMP IS

12:40

RUNNING THIS CAMPAIGN TO THE

12:41

AMERICAN PEOPLE IN A WAY LIKE HE

12:43

DIDN'T IN 2020 OR 2016.

12:46

YOU ARE I HAVE A MEETING WITH

12:48

LAKE AND RILEY'S FAMILY ARE

12:48

KEEPING THE BORDER OPEN.

12:52

OR YOU ARE LETTING CRIMINALS OUT

12:53

OF JAIL.

12:54

YOU ARE EITHER DONALD TRUMP OR

12:56

JOE BIDEN.

12:58

>> A REMINDER WHERE DONALD TRUMP

13:00

WAS THIS WEEKEND.

13:01

HE WAS IN NORTH CAROLINA

13:02

CELEBRATING THE LEGACY OF

13:04

WOUNDED VETERANS WITH THE

13:06

INDEPENDENCE FUND.

13:07

I'M HONORING HER HUSBAND IN THE

13:07

STRUGGLE HE'S GOING THROUGH.

13:11

AMIDST THIS CRIMINAL TRIAL BEING

13:13

PERSECUTED ON DIFFERENT LEVELS,

13:14

THAT MAN IS STILL SERVING THE

13:16

PUBLIC.

13:17

>> Harris: FOCUSED ON MERIT MES.

13:23

HE IS MO

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

العلامات ذات الصلة
Legal ChallengePresidential BondCivil FraudPolitical MotivesCourt RulingFinancial DisputeInsurance CompanyCampaign ImpactTax DeductionMedia CoveragePublic Perception
هل تحتاج إلى ملخص باللغة العربية؟