Lawrence: Trump defense's lone witness Robert Costello was 'utterly contemptuous'
Summary
TLDRIn an unprecedented courtroom scene, the transcript reveals a tense confrontation between Judge Juan Merchan and defense attorney Robert Costello, who displayed contempt towards the judge's rulings. Costello's disrespectful behavior, including audibly expressing frustration and rolling his eyes, led to the judge clearing the courtroom. The incident underscores the importance of decorum in a court setting and highlights the judge's authority to maintain it. The jury, who had previously shown respect for the judge, were likely influenced by Costello's actions, which could impact the trial's outcome.
Takeaways
- 🚨 The courtroom was unexpectedly cleared by Judge Juan Merchan, an action rarely heard and even more rarely executed.
- 🎤 Defense attorney Robert Costello openly disrespected Judge Merchan, which is considered highly unusual and unprofessional behavior for a witness.
- 👥 The jury, who typically develops a strong respect for the judge in a multi-week trial, likely did not appreciate Costello's behavior.
- 🗣️ Judge Merchan's authority was challenged by Costello's audible 'Jeez' and his attempt to 'strike' his own testimony, which is not within a witness's power.
- 👮♂️ The court officers had to intervene, showing remarkable professionalism in managing a chaotic situation caused by a contemptuous witness.
- 📝 The court transcript, while generally reliable, is not always perfect and can sometimes miss or misrepresent crucial words or exchanges.
- 🤔 Michael Cohen chose not to hire Robert Costello as his criminal defense attorney, possibly due to a lack of trust.
- 😲 The audience and press were initially resistant to leaving the courtroom when asked, highlighting the gravity of the situation.
- 👉 Costello's conduct was deemed 'contemptuous' by Judge Merchan, who put him on notice that further disrespect would not be tolerated.
- 🕒 The incident caused a significant disruption, with the courtroom being cleared and then re-opened, impacting the flow of the trial.
- 📉 Costello's actions may have negatively affected the perception of the Trump defense team and could potentially influence the jury's opinion.
Q & A
What unusual event occurred in the courtroom that led to the judge clearing it?
-The unusual event was the contemptuous behavior of the witness, Robert Costello, who openly disrespected the judge's rulings and expressed his frustration audibly, which led Judge Juan Merchan to clear the courtroom.
Why was the courtroom cleared and what was the reaction of the people present?
-The courtroom was cleared due to Robert Costello's disrespectful behavior towards the judge. There was confusion and some resistance, especially from the press who are typically allowed to stay for proceedings. The court officers had difficulty clearing the room, and there was back-and-forth argument between the press and the court.
What was the role of Robert Costello in the trial?
-Robert Costello was the second and last witness called by the defense for Donald Trump. His testimony was crucial as it represented the entirety of the Trump defense in the trial.
How did Michael Cohen's decision not to hire Robert Costello reflect on Costello's behavior in court?
-Michael Cohen testified that he did not hire Robert Costello because he did not trust him, believing Costello would inform Rudy Giuliani and Donald Trump about anything Cohen might tell him. This lack of trust could be related to Costello's contemptuous behavior in court.
What was the significance of the word 'Jeez' in the transcript?
-The word 'Jeez' was significant because it was Robert Costello's audible expression of frustration with the judge's ruling, which was considered disrespectful and led to a confrontation with the judge.
How did Judge Merchan respond to Costello's behavior?
-Judge Merchan responded sternly, asking Costello if he was staring him down and then ordering the courtroom to be cleared. He later put Costello on notice that his conduct was contemptuous and threatened to remove him from the stand and strike his entire testimony.
What is the typical relationship between a judge and the jury in a courtroom?
-The judge is typically seen as the leader of the courtroom community. A good trial judge keeps things moving efficiently, accommodates the jury, and treats them as the most important people in the room, often earning their respect and gratitude.
Why was the court reporter unable to capture all the events in the transcript?
-The court reporter was unable to capture all the events due to the chaotic nature of the courtroom clearing and the high-speed at which events were unfolding, which is unusual even for daily transcripts in a trial.
What was the role of the court officers in handling the situation?
-The court officers played a crucial role in calmly and professionally clearing the courtroom and managing the confusion among reporters. They acted as a team and were able to get everyone out and then back into the courtroom within five minutes.
How did the audience and press react to the order to clear the courtroom?
-The audience and press were initially resistant, with some arguing that they had a right to be in the courtroom. There was back-and-forth argument, and the court officers had to repeatedly instruct people to step out.
What was the final outcome of the confrontation between Judge Merchan and Robert Costello?
-After the courtroom was cleared and the situation was discussed privately, Costello was put on notice by Judge Merchan for his contemptuous conduct. The judge threatened to remove him from the stand and strike his entire testimony if he continued his behavior.
Outlines
👨⚖️ Unprecedented Courtroom Dismissal by Judge Merchan
The script describes an extraordinary event in a courtroom where Judge Juan Merchan, in an unusual display of anger, orders the courtroom to be cleared due to the disrespectful behavior of a defense witness, Robert Costello. The witness, a former federal prosecutor, openly disrespects the judge's authority by reacting audibly to sustained objections with a dismissive 'Jeez,' and later suggests 'striking' his own testimony, a prerogative solely of the judge. This conduct is considered highly unusual and disrespectful within the courtroom setting, where the judge is the ultimate authority and is typically treated with the highest respect by all participants, including the jury and the media.
📝 The Impact of Courtroom Decorum on the Jury
This paragraph delves into the repercussions of a witness's inappropriate conduct in court, particularly focusing on how it might be perceived by the jury. It highlights the importance of a witness's demeanor and respect for the court's proceedings, as it can significantly influence the jury's opinion. The narrative recounts an incident where Robert Costello, the sole witness for the Trump defense, exhibits a lack of decorum by expressing frustration with the judge's rulings, which is captured by the court transcript. The incident leads to Judge Merchan clearing the courtroom, a rare event that underscores the severity of the witness's misconduct and its potential negative impact on the jury's perception of the defense.
🚨 Judge Merchan's Stern Rebuke and Courtroom Protocol
The script details Judge Merchan's stern rebuke of Robert Costello for his contemptuous behavior in court. After clearing the courtroom, the judge addresses Costello directly, reminding him of the proper decorum expected in court and the consequences of his actions. Judge Merchan makes it clear that he is the only one with the authority to strike testimony and that showing disrespect, such as rolling one's eyes or giving side comments, will not be tolerated. The judge's admonishment serves as a reminder of the gravity of courtroom proceedings and the necessity for all participants to maintain a high standard of conduct.
📜 The Aftermath of Contemptuous Behavior in Court
Following the incident of contempt in Judge Merchan's courtroom, the script describes the aftermath and the judge's decision to put Robert Costello on notice for his behavior. The judge warns Costello that any further attempts to undermine his authority will result in his removal from the stand and the striking of his entire testimony. This action underscores the seriousness with which the court treats contemptuous behavior and the potential consequences for those who fail to adhere to courtroom decorum. The court officers' professionalism in handling the situation is also highlighted, as they successfully clear and then re-admit the press to the courtroom.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Courtroom
💡Judge Juan Merchan
💡Clear the Courtroom
💡Contempt
💡Witness
💡Objection
💡Defense Lawyer
💡Jury
💡Michael Cohen
💡Court Transcript
💡Legal Etiquette
Highlights
Judge Juan Merchan's courtroom was unusually cleared, a rare event in legal proceedings.
The retired New York City judge in the audience had never had to clear his courtroom during his career.
In a multi-week trial, the courtroom becomes a community with the judge as its leader.
A good trial judge is efficient, accommodating to the jury, and treats them with respect.
Jurors often express strong positive feelings, such as 'I loved the judge', towards their trial judge.
The Trump defense's entire case rested on the testimony of attorney Robert Costello.
Robert Costello, a former federal prosecutor, was considered by Michael Cohen for his criminal defense but not hired.
Costello's behavior on the witness stand was disrespectful and drew the judge's ire.
Costello audibly objected to the judge's decision with an exclamation of 'Jeez', showing his disrespect.
Judge Merchan was visibly shocked by Costello's outburst and addressed it directly.
Costello's conduct led to a discussion about proper decorum in Judge Merchan's courtroom.
Judge Merchan put Costello on notice for his contemptuous behavior, threatening to strike his testimony.
The courtroom was cleared due to the press and audience's resistance to leaving, showing the gravity of the situation.
The court officers had to perform an unexpected task, demonstrating their professionalism and efficiency.
Michael Cohen testified that he did not hire Costello due to a lack of trust.
Cohen believed Costello would inform Giuliani and Trump about anything he shared with him.
Transcripts
GO TO IT.
I CAN'T WAIT TO SEE.
>> THANK YOU FOR GETTING ME IN
THE COURTROOM.
>> CLEAR THE COURTROOM.
YOU CAN SPEND YOUR LIFE WORKING
IN COURTROOMS AND NEVER HERE
THOSE WORDS.
AND IF YOU HAVE SPENT TIME IN
THE COURTROOM IT WOULD FEEL ALL
THE MORE IMPOSSIBLE THAT YOU
ARE HEARING CLEAR THE COURTROOM
AND YOU HEAR THEM SAID
REPEATEDLY AND LOUDLY AND MOST
SHOCKINGLY OF ALL, ANGRILY BY
JUDGE JUAN MERCHAN AS WE DID
TODAY.
AT 4:01. AS I WAS WALKING OUT
OF THE COURTROOM, I ASKED A
RETIRED NEW YORK CITY JUDGE WHO
WAS IN THE AUDIENCE, HOW MANY
TIMES HE HAD TO CLEAR THE
COURTROOM WHEN HE WAS A JUDGE.
HIS ANSWER WAS WHAT I EXPECTED.
NEVER.
IN A MULTI-WEEK TRIAL THE
COURTROOM BECOMES A COMMUNITY.
EVERYONE GETS TO KNOW EACH
OTHER VISUALLY, AT LEAST.
THE MEMBERS OF THE NEWS MEDIA
MAKE FRIENDS AT OTHER NEWS
ORGANIZATIONS.
THE JURY BECOMES VERY FAMILIAR
WITH ALL THE LAWYERS AND THEY
KNOW WHICH OF US ARE THE
REGULARS AND WHO ARE THE
TOURISTS POPPING IN FOR A DAY.
AND THE LEADER OF EVERY
COURTROOM COMMUNITY IS THE JUDGE.
JUDGE.
HE OR SHE SITS ABOVE US ALL AT
A HIGHER ALTITUDE AS A SYMBOL
OF THE AUTHORITY THAT THE JUDGE
ACTUALLY DOES HAVE. A GOOD
TRIAL JUDGE WHO KEEPS THINGS
MOVING EFFICIENTLY DOESN'T
WASTE TIME AND IS SOLICITOUS OF
THE TREES NEEDS AND DOES
EVERYTHING HE OR SHE CAN TO
ACCOMMODATE THE JURY AND TREATS
THE JURY AS THE MOST IMPORTANT
PEOPLE IN THE ROOM. USUALLY HAS
THE RESPECT AND THE GRATITUDE
OF THAT JURY, AND LATER AFTER
THE TRIAL WHEN JURORS WILL BE
ASKED ABOUT THE JUDGE, THEIR
SHORTHAND QUICK ANSWER OFTEN IS
, I LOVE HIM.
OR I LOVE HER. LOVED THE JUDGE.
IT'S VERY COMMON.
THE JURY IN JUDGE JUAN
MERCHAN'S COURTROOM HAS EVERY
REASON TO FEEL ANY POSITIVE
THING THAT A JUROR HAS FELT
ABOUT THEIR TRIAL JUDGE.
AND SO I KNOW FROM EXPERIENCE
AS WELL AS I KNOW ANYTHING
ABOUT COURTROOM LIFE THAT THE
JURY DID NOT LIKE IT ONE BIT
TODAY WHEN THE ONLY TESTIFYING
WITNESS THAT THE TRUMP DEFENSE
IS GOING TO CALL DECIDED TO
OPENLY DISRESPECT THE JUDGE
THAT THE JURY RESPECTS
SOULFULLY.
ROBERT COSTELLO WAS THE SECOND
WITNESS CALLED BY THE DEFENSE
AND OUR LAST WITNESS.
THERE ARE TO BE ANYMORE
WITNESSES.
THE FIRST WITNESS WAS A PURE
LEGAL WHO WORKS WITH THE TRUMP
DEFENSE TEAM TO INTRODUCE A
SPREADSHEET THAT HE CREATED OF
A LIST OF PHONE CALLS.
THAT WITNESS DID NOT PROVIDE
ANY TESTIMONY IN THE CASE AND
THAT WITNESS WILL NOT BE QUOTED
BY ANYONE. SO THE ENTIRE TRUMP
DEFENSE COMES DOWN TO THE
TESTIMONY OF ATTORNEY ROBERT
COSTELLO. ROBERT COSTELLO, WHO
USED TO WORK AS A FEDERAL
PROSECUTOR FOR RUDY GIULIANI AS
HIS BOSS.
HE WAS ONE OF THE LAWYERS
MICHAEL COHEN CONSIDERED
RETAINING FOR HIS CRIMINAL
DEFENSE AFTER THE FBI EXECUTED
SEARCH WARRANTS AT HIS HOME AND
HOTEL, AND, IN HIS OFFICE WHICH
WAS LOCATED EXACTLY 20 FLOORS
ABOVE WHERE I AM SITTING RIGHT
NOW IN THIS FAST OFFICE
BUILDING IN ROCKEFELLER CENTER.
MICHAEL COHEN DECIDED NOT TO
HIRE ROBERT COSTELLO.
AND TODAY ANYONE COULD SEE WHY.
FOR ONCE THE WORST CRIMINAL
DEFENSE LAWYER IN THE ROOM WAS
NOT ONE EMPLOYED BY DONALD
TRUMP.
I HAVE NOT SEEN A WORST
CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYER THAN
ROBERT COSTELLO OR A STUPIDER
ONE.
BASED ON JUST WHAT WE SAW HIM
DO ON THE WITNESS STAND TODAY
IN COURT.
TRUMP CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYER
DID THE QUESTIONING.
ALMOST ALL OF THE OBJECTIONS
WERE SUSTAINED INSTANTLY WHO
MAKES QUICK DECISIONS.
BUT BECAUSE HE ANSWERED
QUESTIONS QUICKER THAN THAT,
HIS ANSWERS WERE ENTERED IN THE
RECORD AS THE OBJECTION WAS
BEING RAISED.
IS THAT A TERM THAT MR. GIULIANI
USED.
>> OBJECTION.
>> MOVE TO STRIKE.>> STRICKEN.
STRICKEN MEANS THAT THE ONE
WORD ANSWER, YES, CANNOT BE
USED AS EVIDENCE BY THE JURY.
ROBERT COSTELLO DID NOT LIKE
THE OBJECTIONS.
THAT'S NOT UNUSUAL FOR WORKERS
AS WITNESSES TO HAVE THEIR OWN
OPINION ABOUT THE OBJECTIONS.
BUT IT'S VERY UNUSUAL FOR THEM
TO IN ANY WAY VOICE THAT
OPINION ABOUT THE OBJECTIONS ON
THE WITNESS STAND.
ATTORNEY MICHAEL COHEN HAD
FEELINGS ABOUT THE OBJECTIONS
WHEN HE WAS ON THE WITNESS
STONE BUT HE BEHAVED IN A
PROFESSIONAL WAY FOR LAWYER
TESTIFYING UNDER OATH IN COURT.
THAT'S NOT A COMMENT ON MICHAEL
COHEN'S CREDIBILITY.
SIMPLY HIS MANNER AS A WITNESS,
WHICH WAS FULLY RESPECTFUL OF
THE PROCESS.
FULLY RESPECTFUL OF THE JUDGE
AT ALL TIMES AND FULLY
RESPECTFUL OF DONALD TRUMP'S
CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYER CROSS-
EXAMINING HIM, TO WHICH MICHAEL
COHEN'S MOST FREQUENT ANSWER
WAS YES OR REPEATEDLY.
AND HERE IS WHAT WE ALL SAW AND
HEARD SOMETHING WE'VE NEVER
SEEN BEFORE.
LITTLE DID WE KNOW THERE WAS
MORE TO COME AFTER THIS.
QUESTION, I'D LIKE TO TAKE A
LOOK AT THE SECOND PARAGRAPH OF
THAT EMAIL.
TO SEE WHERE IT SAYS THE
QUESTION OF TIMING IS PREMATURE?
YEAH, I SEE THAT.
WHAT DID YOU MEAN BY THAT.
OBJECTION.
>> SUSTAINED.
>> JEEZ.
>> I WAS IN THE LAST ROW AND I
COULD HEAR ROBERT COSTELLO SAY
THAT ALL THE WAY BACK THERE
ABOUT THE OBJECTION.
THAT WAS HIS ATTITUDE TOWARD
THE OBJECTION.
AND THAT WAS HIS ATTITUDE ABOUT
THE JUDGE SUSTAINING THE
OBJECTION. THAT WAS HIS OBJECTION TO THE
THAT WAS HIS OBJECTION TO THE
JUDGE SUSTAINING THE OBJECTION.
JUDGE MERCHAN WAS SHOCKED.
WE'VE NEVER SEEN JUDGE MERCHAN
SHOCKED BEFORE.
AND EMIL BOVE TRIED TO RACE
PAST THE MOMENT WITH ANOTHER
QUESTION THAT GOT ANOTHER
OBJECTION AND WAS SUSTAINED AND
JUDGE MERCHAN LEANED ACROSS THE
BENCH AND RAISED HIS VOICE
LOOKING DIRECTLY AT THE WITNESS
, RIGHT THERE, AND SAID, I'M
SORRY?
WHAT DID YOU JUST SAY. AFTER A
SILENCE, JUDGE MERCHAN, IN AN
AGITATED BUT NOT ANGRY WAY
SAID, I'M SORRY?
MEANING, WHAT DID YOU JUST SAY.
HE KNEW WHAT HE SAID.
HE SAID JEEZ.
AND THAT DREW ATTENTION.
THE JUDGE DREW THAT ATTENTION
IN A BIG WAY.
THAT LINE THAT I JUST TOLD YOU
FROM JUDGE MERCHAN SAYING , I'M
SORRY?
I'M SORRY?
THAT DOES NOT APPEAR IN THE
COURT TRANSCRIPT BECAUSE TOO
MUCH WAS HAPPENING IN THE
COURTROOM FOR THE COURT REPORTER
, WHO HAD NEVER SEEN ANYTHING
LIKE THIS. THIS IS SOMETHING
THAT PEOPLE WHO DEAL WITH COURT
TRANSCRIPTS FOR MANY YEARS NOW,
ESPECIALLY TRANSCRIPTS PRODUCED
AT HIGH SPEED LIKE THE DAILY
TRANSCRIPTS IN THIS TRIAL.
THEY FREQUENTLY HAVE SMALL AND
UNIMPORTANT HEIRS.
WORDS LEFT OUT.
WORDS THAT ARE INCORRECT.
FOR EXAMPLE, IN THAT SAME
TRANSCRIPT EARLIER, WHEN ROBERT
COSTELLO WAS INTRODUCED IN THE
TRANSCRIPT AS A WITNESS, THE
TRANSCRIPT INCORRECTLY SAYS
ROBERT J COSTELLO, A WITNESS
CALLED ON BEHALF OF THE PEOPLE.
THAT IS WRONG.
ROBERT COSTELLO WAS CALLED ON
BEHALF OF THE DEFENSE.
AND THE LAWYERS ON BOTH SIDES
CAN USE AND WORK WITH THIS
TRANSCRIPT WITHOUT SUFFERING
ANY HARM FROM THOSE SMALL TYPOS
THAT THEY RECOGNIZE AND OTHER
OCCASIONAL WORDS LEFT OUT.
BUT THAT SOMETHING YOU HAVE TO
KNOW ABOUT THESE TRANSCRIPTS.
THIS TRANSCRIPT IS AMAZING.
I'VE NEVER SEEN A TRANSCRIPT
MAKE A MISTAKE ON ANY CRUCIAL
EVIDENTIARY WORD HER TESTIMONY.
BUT THE RELEVANT FACTOID ABOUT
THIS SIMPLY THAT THESE
TRANSCRIPTS CAN SOMETIMES BE
SLIGHTLY WRONG.
AFTER JUDGE MERCHAN SAID I'M
SORRY THE SECOND TIME , BY
WHICH HE MEANT, PARDON ME?
WHAT DID YOU JUST SAY?
AND HE MEANT IT IN A
THREATENING MANNER, ROBERT
COSTELLO SAID, STRIKE IT.
YOU SOMETIMES SECURE LAWYERS
DURING CROSS-EXAMINATION ASK A
QUESTION AND STRIKE IT AND THEY
START OVER AGAIN.
AND IT DOESN'T MEAN THAT THE
QUESTION THEY STARTED GETS
STRICKEN FROM THE RECORD.
IT'S JUST A NOTE TO THEMSELVES
THAT THE QUESTION DIDN'T COME
OUT RIGHT AND LET ME START OVER
AGAIN.
IT'S LIKE THE LAWYER SAYING,
NEVER MIND, I'M NOT CAN ASK
THIS QUESTION I'M CAN ASK
ANOTHER QUESTION.
EVERYONE UNDERSTANDS THAT.
SO ROBERT COSTELLO'S LAWYER
CAME INTO SAY, STRIKE IT OVER
SOMETHING THAT EVEN HE AT THAT
POINT REALIZED HE NEVER SHOULD
HAVE SAID THAT WISEGUY JEEZ
ABOUT THE JUDGE.
PUBLICLY IN THE ROOM IN FRONT
OF THE JURY.
ATTACKING THE JUDGE SUSTAINING
AN OBJECTION.
IT WAS A LEVEL OF MADNESS BY A
WITNESS, WHO IS A CRIMINAL
DEFENSE LAWYER, THAT YOU COULD
ONLY WONDER WHETHER HE SHOULD
BE IMMEDIATELY SUBJECTED TO A
SOBRIETY TEST. HOW LOSS COULD
THAT HAPPEN?
THAT IS HOW OUT THERE AND CRAZY
AND OUT OF CONTROL THAT MOMENT
WAS FOR A CRIMINAL DEFENSE
LAWYER.
BUT IT GOT WORSE.
JUDGE MERCHAN IN HIS TYPICALLY
COME BOYS SHIFTED AND SAID
COUNSEL, LET'S TAKE A MINUTE.
THEN LED THE JURY OUT OF THE
ROOM WHERE THE JUDGE TURNED TO
THE WITNESS BESIDE HIM AND USED
A VOICE STERNER THAN ANYTHING
WE'VE HEARD FROM JUDGE MERCHAN.
>> MR. COSTELLO, I WANT TO --
I WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS PROPER
DECORUM IN MY COURTROOM.
BUT -- I'M SORRY, GO AHEAD.
I WANT TO DISCUSS PROPER
DECORUM IN MY COURTROOM.>>
RIGHT.
>> OKAY.
SO WHEN THERE IS A WITNESS ON THE STAND, IF YOU DON'T LIKE MY
THE STAND, IF YOU DON'T LIKE MY
RULING, YOU DON'T SAY JEEZ,
OKAY.
AND YOU AND THEN YOU DON'T SAY
STRIKE IT.
BECAUSE I'M THE ONLY ONE THAT
CAN STRIKE TESTIMONY IN THE
COURTROOM.
DO UNDERSTAND THAT?
>> I UNDERSTAND.
>> AND THEN, IF YOU DON'T LIKE
MY RULING, YOU DON'T GIVE ME
SIDE I AND YOU DON'T ROLL YOUR
EYES.
DO UNDERSTAND THAT?
DO UNDERSTAND THAT?
>> I UNDERSTAND THAT.
I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE
SAYING.
>> OKAY.
THANK YOU.
LET'S GET THE JURY BACK.
ARE YOU STARING ME DOWN?
>> NO.
I'M JUST WONDERING HOW --
>> CLEAR THE COURTROOM, PLEASE.
CLEAR THE COURTROOM.
>> DO YOU WANT ME TO ANSWER
YOUR QUESTION?
>> SIR, PLEASE.
>> STEP OUTSIDE, PLEASE.
STEP TO THE SIDE, AND WE ALL
BEGAN TO GET UP TO LEAVE THE
COURTROOM.
THOSE OF US WHO KNEW THAT THE
JUDGE HAD FULL AUTHORITY TO
CLEAR THAT COURTROOM, HALF OF
THE REPORTERS TRIED TO STAY IN
THEIR SEATS AND SOME TRY TO
ARGUE WITH THE JUDGE.
ONCE SAID THAT THERE WAS A
PRESS LAWYER IN THE COURTROOM
AND INSIST THEY HAVE A RIGHT TO
BE IN THE COURTROOM.
AND FOR 2 PAGES OF COURT
TRANSCRIPTS, THERE ARE ENTRIES
WE NEVER SEEN BEFORE THE COURT
TRANSCRIPT QUOTING THE COURT
OFFICER SAYING, STEP OUT,
REPEATEDLY.
A PERSON IN THE AUDIENCE SAYING
WHY?
THIS IS AN OPEN COURTROOM.
THE COURT OFFICER SAYING THIS
IS NOT AN OPEN COURTROOM.
WE WILL ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS IN
THE HALLWAY.
PLEASE STEP OUT.
THIS IS A SUPREME COURT
COURTROOM.
A PERSON IN THE AUDIENCE.
THIS IS AN OPEN COURTROOM.
YOU CAN SPEND YOUR LIFE READING
COURT TRANSCRIPTS.
AND YOU WILL NEVER SEE THE ENTRY
, PERSON IN THE AUDIENCE AND
THAT PERSON SPEAKING.
THAT DOES NOT HAPPEN.
WHAT WE HAVE -- WHAT WE HAVE
FOR THE MINUTES THAT IT TOOK TO
CLEAR THAT COURTROOM, WHAT WE
HAD BEEN WAS CHAOS IN THE
COURTROOM.
ALL CAUSED BY THE WISEGUY ON
THE WITNESS STAND WHO DECIDED
HE WAS GOING TO SHOW THE JUDGE
THAT HE WAS SMARTER THAN THE
JUDGE.
AND WORSE FOR HIM AND THE TRUMP
DEFENSE, HE WAS GOING TO SHOW
THE JURY THAT HE THINKS HE'S
SMARTER THAN THEIR JUDGE.
AND IT IS VERY UNLIKELY THAT
THE JURY THINKS THERE'S ANYONE
IN THAT COURTROOM WHO IS AS
SMART AS THEIR JUDGE.
AFTER FIVE MINUTES IN THE
HALLWAY THAT SEEMED LIKE FOREVER
, WE WERE BROUGHT BACK INTO THE
COURTROOM HAVING NO IDEA WHAT
WAS SAID IN OUR ABSENCE BUT
KNOWING IT WAS ABOUT THE
WISEGUY ON THE WITNESS STAND.
THIS EVENING AT 7:27, THE FINAL
PAGES ARRIVED IN OUR INBOX AND
WE GOT TO SEE WHAT HAPPENED
WHEN JUDGE MERCHAN CLEARED THE
COURTROOM.
THE TRANSCRIPT SAYS, THE
COURTROOM IS CLEARED OF PEOPLE
IN THE AUDIENCE BY THE COURT
OFFICERS AT THIS TIME.
ALL RIGHT. LET THE RECORD REFLECT THAT
LET THE RECORD REFLECT THAT
IT'S NOW FIVE AFTER FOUR.
LET THE RECORD ALSO REFLECT
THAT THE COURT OFFICERS HAD
GREAT DIFFICULTY CLEARING THE
COURTROOM, BECAUSE THE
COURTROOM IS PRIMARILY MADE UP
OF THE PRESS AND I CAN
APPRECIATE THAT THE PRESS WANTS
TO BE PRESENT FOR EVERY PART OF
THESE PROCEEDINGS, THEREFORE
THIS RECORD IS NOT SEALED.
THE PRESS WILL HAVE ACCESS TO
THIS RECORD.
THE FACT THAT I HAD TO CLEAR
THE COURTROOM AND THAT THE
COURT OFFICERS, INCLUDING THE
CAPTAIN, HAD GREAT DIFFICULTY
CLEARING THE COURTROOM, AND
THAT THERE WAS ARGUMENT BACK
AND FORTH BETWEEN THE PRESS AND
INCLUDING COUNSEL FOR THE
PRESS, GOES TO WHY IT HAD TO
CLEAR THE COURTROOM IN THE
FIRST PLACE AND THAT IS, SIR,
YOUR CONDUCT IS CONTEMPTUOUS
RIGHT NOW.
I AM PUTTING YOU ON NOTICE THAT
YOUR CONDUCT IS CONTEMPTUOUS.
IF YOU TRY TO STEER ME DOWN ONE
MORE TIME, I WILL REMOVE YOU
FROM THE STAND.
I WILL STRIKE HIS ENTIRE
TESTIMONY.
DO YOU UNDERSTAND ME?
>> YES, JUDGE.
I UNDERSTAND.
>> LISTEN TO THE QUESTION AND
ANSWER THE QUESTION.
>> CAN I SAY SOMETHING,
PLEASE?>> NO.
NO.
THIS IS NOT A CONVERSATION.
>> OKAY.
>> ALL RIGHT.
LET'S -- WE CAN BRING THE PRESS
BACK IN, PLEASE.
>> READY, YOUR HONOR?
>> YES, PLEASE.>> OKAY.
THE PRESS IS ENTERING THE
COURTROOM.
THAT TEAM OF ABLE COURT
OFFICERS, WHO ARE ALREADY DOING
AN EXTRAORDINARY, THE OTHER
BEYOND THE CALL OF DUTY, JOB,
BEGINNING FOR MANY OF THEM AT
6:30 A.M., HAD TO DO SOMETHING
TODAY AS A TEAM THAT THEY NEVER
EXPECTED THEY WERE GOING TO
HAVE TO DO.
CLEAR THAT COURTROOM.
THEY DID IT CALMLY, CORRECTLY,
USING THEIR AUTHORITY,
UNDERSTANDING THE CONFUSION
THAT MANY REPORTERS WERE
SUFFERING.
BUT THEY GOT US ALL OUT OF THAT
COURTROOM AND GOT US ALL BACK
IN THAT COURTROOM FIVE MINUTES
LATER.
THEY DID IT WITH REMARKABLE
PROFESSIONALISM.
IT IS JUST REMARKABLE HOW QUICKLY AND EFFICIENTLY THEY
QUICKLY AND EFFICIENTLY THEY
WENT INTO ACTION AS A TEAM OF
COURT OFFICERS FOR SOMETHING
THEY NEVER EXPECTED TO HAVE TO
DO IN THAT ROOM.
THEY HAD TO DO IT BECAUSE THE
ONLY WITNESS, THE ONLY WITNESS
TESTIFYING FOR DONALD TRUMP WAS
CONTEMPTUOUS FROM THE START.
AND SO IS ANGRY A MOMENT AS
THAT MOMENT WAS FOR JUDGE
MERCHAN, THE ANGER WAS A SMALL
FRACTION OF WHAT MANY OTHER
JUDGES WOULD HAVE LEGITIMATELY
SHOWN FOR THE UTTERLY
CONTEMPTUOUS WITNESS FOR THE
TRUMP DEFENSE.
MICHAEL COHEN TESTIFIED TO THE
JURY HE DID NOT HIRE ROBERT
COSTELLO BECAUSE HE DID NOT
TRUST THEM.
MICHAEL COHEN SAID HE BELIEVED
THAT ROBERT COSTELLO WOULD TELL
RUDY GIULIANI AND DONALD TRUMP
EVERYTHING MICHAEL COHEN MIGHT
TELL ROBERT COSTELLO.
ROBERT COSTELLO'S OBVIOUS
CONTEMPT FOR THE JUDGE PROBABLY
CONVINCED MOST OF THE JURORS
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)
'This is unbelievable': CNN reporter reacts to judge admonishing witness at Trump trial
Trump’s OWN Witness CRASHES HARD on Stand
Lawrence: Trump lawyers put an uncouth buffoon on the stand to defend an uncouth buffoon
Lawrence: Why Trump's lawyer called him the 'orange turd' during Stormy testimony
Judge Jeanine: This was Trump lawyer's 'big bang' during closing arguments
"Show Me Your Cards!" - Judge Threatens To Incarcerate Trump & Fines Him For Violating Gag Order