BREAKING: state Supreme Court drops SURPRISE bad news for Republicans

Democracy Watch with BTC & Marc Elias
4 Apr 202412:57

Summary

TLDRIn the 100th episode of Democracy Watch, the hosts celebrate their milestone and discuss recent positive developments in the fight for voting rights, particularly in red states. They highlight the Montana Supreme Court's decision to strike down four voter suppression laws and the potential impact on upcoming elections. The conversation also touches on the significant role of abortion rights on state ballots, predicting it to be a key issue in the 2024 elections, especially in Montana, Nevada, Florida, and Arizona, where ballot measures could sway voter turnout and election outcomes.

Takeaways

  • πŸŽ‰ This is the 100th episode of Democracy Watch, marking a significant milestone for the series and its commitment to informing viewers about democratic issues.
  • πŸ™Œ The first 99 episodes have garnered 60 million views, showcasing the substantial interest and engagement from the audience in matters of democracy.
  • πŸ‘ The work of Mark Elias and his team at Elias Law Group and Democracy Docket is highlighted for their dedication to protecting democracy and their efforts in educating the public.
  • πŸ›οΈ The Montana Supreme Court made a landmark decision by striking down four voter suppression laws, asserting that they violated the state's constitution.
  • πŸ“œ The ruling in Montana is particularly significant as it applied heightened scrutiny to laws that restrict voting rights, potentially serving as a model for other courts nationwide.
  • πŸ—³οΈ The impact of the Montana ruling will likely be crucial for the re-election of Senator John Tester, as it supports the voting rights of young, college, and Native American voters.
  • 🀰 The pending abortion referendum is expected to have major political implications, especially in states where abortion rights have been restricted or are under threat.
  • πŸ₯ The abortion issue is considered a Kryptonite for the Republican Party, as it has historically led to increased voter turnout and support for pro-choice candidates.
  • 🌟 The importance of voting rights and abortion rights as central issues in the upcoming elections is emphasized, potentially influencing the outcomes of both Senate and Presidential races.
  • πŸŽ‚ A special thank you is extended to Mark Elias, and a celebration of the 100th episode of Democracy Watch is marked with a cake presentation.

Q & A

  • What is the significance of the 100th episode of Democracy Watch?

    -The 100th episode of Democracy Watch is significant as it marks a milestone for the series, highlighting its commitment to informing viewers about issues related to democracy, particularly focusing on the courts' role in upholding democratic processes. The episode also serves as a testament to the audience's interest in such topics, despite mainstream media's assumption that people may not care about these issues.

  • What does the host appreciate about Mark Elias and his team's work?

    -The host appreciates Mark Elias and his team's dedication to protecting democracy and their significant, yet underrecognized, impact. The host credits their work as a key factor in the potential survival of democracy, especially in the context of the upcoming elections in November 2024.

  • What were the four voter suppression laws struck down by the Montana Supreme Court?

    -The Montana Supreme Court struck down four voter suppression laws, which included eliminating election day registration, prohibiting the use of student IDs as acceptable forms of ID for voting, banning the mailing of ballots to new voters who are not yet registered, and outlawing ballot collection, particularly affecting Native American voters living on reservations.

  • How does the Montana Supreme Court's decision on voter suppression laws serve as a model for other courts?

    -The Montana Supreme Court's decision is a model for other courts because it applied heightened scrutiny to laws that restrict voting rights, demonstrating a strong stance in favor of protecting the fundamental right to vote and setting a precedent for other jurisdictions to follow.

  • What is the critical U.S. Senate race mentioned in the context of Montana?

    -The critical U.S. Senate race mentioned is the re-election of John Tester from Montana. The host suggests that the Montana Supreme Court's ruling on voter suppression laws will be integral to his ability to win, particularly by enabling young voters, college voters, and Native American voters to participate in the electoral process.

  • Why is the abortion referendum expected to have a significant political impact in the upcoming elections?

    -The abortion referendum is expected to have a significant political impact because it is a highly contentious issue that can drive voter turnout. The host suggests that the referendum could particularly benefit Democratic candidates in states where the Republican Party has traditionally struggled with the issue of abortion rights.

  • How does the host view the potential impact of the abortion referendum on John Tester's re-election in Montana?

    -The host believes that the abortion referendum will be an enormous boon for John Tester's re-election prospects. Montana is described as a pro-choice state, and the host suggests that the issue of abortion rights will be center stage, along with voting rights, in motivating voters to turn out for Tester.

  • What was the notable outcome of the recent election in a deeply red district in Florida?

    -In a recent election in a deeply red district in Florida, a Democrat won a State Legislative race, which the host attributes to the power of the abortion issue on the ballot. This demonstrates that even in traditionally Republican areas, the issue of abortion can sway voters.

  • How does the host assess the potential impact of the abortion referendum on the Senate race in Florida?

    -The host assesses that the abortion referendum will make the Senate race in Florida a true tossup. Despite the state's general rightward shift, the host believes that the referendum, combined with the unpopularity of the incumbent Republican senator and internal divisions within the Florida Republican Party, will significantly benefit the Democratic candidate.

  • What is the host's prediction for the Senate race in Arizona with the introduction of an abortion ballot measure?

    -The host predicts that the introduction of an abortion ballot measure in Arizona will shift the Senate race decidedly in favor of the Democratic candidate. The host suggests that the measure will energize the electorate, particularly those from the more libertarian wing of the Republican Party in Arizona, and that this energy will benefit Democrats both in the Senate race and potentially in the presidential race as well.

  • How does the host describe the character and political stance of the Arizona Republican candidate for Senate, Kari Lake?

    -The host describes Kari Lake as an election denier with extreme political views, who has not moderated her stance despite mainstream media's expectations. The host also mentions her association with controversial figures like Mike Lindell, suggesting that her true colors will be revealed again during the campaign.

Outlines

00:00

πŸŽ‰ Celebrating 100 Episodes of Democracy Watch

This paragraph marks the 100th episode of Democracy Watch, a significant milestone celebrated by thanking viewers for their continued support and interest in the series. The host acknowledges the lack of mainstream media coverage on such topics, emphasizing the importance of their work. The first 99 episodes have garnered 60 million views, reinforcing the need to challenge mainstream narratives. The host expresses gratitude towards Mark and his team for their dedication to protecting democracy, highlighting their significant yet underappreciated impact. The conversation then transitions into discussing recent positive developments in the courts of some traditionally conservative states.

05:01

πŸ›οΈ Montana Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling

In this paragraph, the discussion focuses on the Montana Supreme Court's decision to strike down four voter suppression laws, which were found to violate the state's constitution. The laws included eliminating election day registration, prohibiting the use of student IDs for voting, banning mail ballots to new voters, and outlawing ballot collection, particularly affecting Native American voters. The host emphasizes the significance of this ruling not only for Montana but as a model for other courts nationwide. The conversation also touches on the implications of this decision for an upcoming US Senate race in Montana, suggesting that it could be crucial for the re-election of Senator John Tester.

10:02

πŸ—³οΈ The Impact of Abortion Referendums on State Elections

This paragraph delves into the political implications of pending abortion referendums in the November elections, particularly in Montana, Nevada, and Florida. The host posits that these referendums could significantly influence Senate and Presidential races, as abortion rights have proven to be a decisive issue in past elections. The discussion highlights the potential boost for Senator John Tester's re-election chances in Montana due to the state's pro-choice leanings. The conversation also explores the surprising shift in Alabama's political landscape, where a pro-choice Republican candidate won a state house seat by a significant margin. The paragraph concludes with speculation on the potential for Democrats to gain ground in traditionally red states due to the abortion referendums.

πŸ“Š Arizona's Abortion Ballot Measure and its Political Ramifications

The final paragraph discusses the announcement of a ballot measure on abortion rights in Arizona, which is expected to have a significant impact on the state's political landscape. The host suggests that this initiative could tilt the scales in favor of Democrats in both the Senate and Presidential races. The paragraph also touches on the controversial figure of Kari Lake, an election denier, and the strong Democratic candidate Ruben Gallego. The host argues that the abortion initiative could energize voters and potentially sway the traditionally red state towards Democrats. The segment ends with a celebration of Democracy Watch's 100th episode, complete with a congratulatory cake for the hosts.

Mindmap

Keywords

πŸ’‘Democracy Watch

Democracy Watch is the title of the series being discussed in the transcript. It is a program that monitors and reports on issues related to democracy, particularly focusing on the courts' role in upholding democratic principles. In the context of the video, Democracy Watch has reached its 100th episode, highlighting its significant contribution to raising awareness about the state of democracy.

πŸ’‘Mainstream Media

The term 'Mainstream Media' refers to the traditional mass media platforms such as newspapers, television, and radio that are widely consumed by the general public. In the transcript, it is criticized for not covering certain topics that Democracy Watch addresses, suggesting a perceived gap in the media landscape regarding comprehensive reporting on democratic issues.

πŸ’‘Voter Suppression

Voter suppression refers to the tactics or strategies used to influence the outcome of elections by discouraging or preventing certain groups of people from voting. In the context of the video, it is mentioned that the Montana Supreme Court struck down several voter suppression laws, indicating a significant legal victory in the fight against such practices.

πŸ’‘State's Constitution

A state's constitution is the fundamental legal document that outlines the structure, powers, and limitations of the government within that state. It serves as the supreme law and must be adhered to by all laws and regulations passed by the state. In the transcript, the Montana Supreme Court's decision to strike down voter suppression laws is based on their violation of the state's constitution.

πŸ’‘Native American Voters

Native American voters are the citizens of the United States who are members of the Native American tribes. They have historically faced unique challenges in exercising their voting rights, such as restrictions on ballot collection that disproportionately affect them. In the video, the banning of ballot collection is highlighted as an issue that specifically targets Native American voters in states like Montana.

πŸ’‘Abortion Referendum

An abortion referendum is a direct vote by the electorate on a proposal or law related to abortion rights. It is a mechanism through which citizens can express their opinion on the matter and influence policy. In the transcript, the pending abortion referendum is discussed as a significant political issue that could impact the outcomes of various elections, including Senate races.

πŸ’‘Political Implications

Political implications refer to the potential effects or consequences that a particular event, decision, or issue might have on the political landscape, including elections, policies, and public opinion. In the context of the video, the discussion revolves around how court decisions and referendums on issues like voter suppression and abortion rights could influence upcoming elections.

πŸ’‘John Tester

John Tester is a politician mentioned in the transcript who is up for re-election. His re-election prospects are discussed in the context of how certain issues, such as voting rights and abortion, could influence voter turnout and support.

πŸ’‘Krysten Sinema

Krysten Sinema is a U.S. Senator from Arizona mentioned in the transcript. She is characterized as an 'election denier' and is associated with controversial actions, such as her interactions with Mike Lindell. Her stance on various issues is discussed in relation to the political dynamics within Arizona.

πŸ’‘Ballot Initiative

A ballot initiative is a procedural tool used by citizens to propose new laws or amendments to the constitution, which are then put to a direct vote of the electorate. In the transcript, the discussion of a ballot initiative in Arizona relates to the protection of abortion rights, which is expected to significantly impact the political landscape in the state.

Highlights

Democracy Watch celebrates its 100th episode, emphasizing the importance of covering topics the mainstream media often overlooks.

The Montana Supreme Court struck down four voter suppression laws, setting a precedent for other courts nationwide.

The ruling in Montana is particularly significant for Native American voters, as it prevents the banning of ballot collection, which is crucial for their participation in elections.

The upcoming US Senate race in Montana is likely to be influenced by the recent court ruling, potentially aiding John Tester's re-election bid.

Abortion rights are expected to be a major political issue in the 2024 elections, with referendums on the matter appearing on ballots in several states.

The Democratic Party's stance on abortion rights could significantly boost their chances in traditionally red states like Montana and Alabama.

In Alabama, a pro-choice Republican candidate won a state house seat by a significant margin, indicating a shift in the political landscape.

Florida's Senate race is expected to be highly competitive, with the abortion referendum potentially swaying voters against the incumbent Republican, Rick Scott.

The Arizona Senate race could lean towards the Democrats due to the presence of a strong pro-choice ballot initiative and the controversial nature of the Republican candidate.

The impact of the Supreme Court's decision on abortion rights is expected to energize voters and have a significant effect on election outcomes.

The 100th episode of Democracy Watch is marked with a celebration, highlighting the show's commitment to informing the public about critical issues related to democracy.

The show's creators express gratitude to their viewers for their support and engagement, which has driven the series to reach this milestone.

Democracy Watch has amassed 60 million views over its first 99 episodes, demonstrating a substantial audience interest in the topics covered.

The Elias Law Group and Democracy Docket are recognized for their crucial work in protecting democracy and providing valuable information to the public.

The show's host, Brian Tyer Cohen, is praised for his visionary approach to educating the public about the stakes of democracy.

The importance of court battles in defending democracy is discussed, with the Montana Supreme Court's decision serving as a prime example.

The potential impact of the abortion referendum on various state elections is analyzed, suggesting it could significantly influence voter turnout and preferences.

The show emphasizes the role of informed voters in maintaining a healthy democracy and the importance of reliable sources of information.

Transcripts

00:00

this is democracy watch so Mark we've

00:02

got some rare good news from the courts

00:04

in a few very red States uh but first

00:07

before we start I want to note that this

00:08

is our 100th episode of democracy watch

00:11

so uh first off let me just say to the

00:13

viewers thank you for caring about this

00:15

stuff no one in the mainstream media

00:17

covers even one1 100th of this stuff

00:19

because I think they wrongly assume that

00:21

people don't care but you all watching

00:24

are a testament to the fact that they do

00:26

um the first 99 episodes of this series

00:28

got 60 million views so that is 60

00:30

million reasons to push back against

00:32

what the mainstream media is thinking on

00:34

this issue um and Mark I know that I can

00:36

speak on behalf of everybody watching

00:39

thank you for the work that you do so

00:41

much of what you and your team do to

00:43

protect democracy doesn't get the

00:44

recognition that it deserves but the

00:46

impact that you guys are having can't be

00:48

overstated um if and when our democracy

00:51

survives past November of 2024 it'll be

00:54

in large part thanks to you and your

00:55

team so again thank you for the work

00:57

that you're doing um and also for taking

00:59

time to speak directly to so many people

01:01

here on YouTube we're all better

01:02

informed because of you and we're all

01:04

Beyond appreciative that we've got you

01:07

and Elias Law Group and democracy docket

01:09

on our side and also that you haven't

01:12

taken up Lou dos on his offer to switch

01:14

sides for half a billion dollars no but

01:16

I am glad that when you that you had the

01:18

foresight to reach out to me when you

01:21

had a vision for this and everyone ought

01:22

to be be clear Brian is a Visionary when

01:25

it comes to uh making sure people

01:28

understand the stakes around democracy

01:30

not just in this series but in all of

01:32

the series and I hope everyone

01:33

subscribes to all of uh all of the

01:36

programming that he puts out but Brian

01:38

when you approached me you know I didn't

01:39

see it at first but you were entirely

01:41

right there is no place for people to go

01:45

and get good reliable day in day in week

01:48

out week out information about what is

01:51

happening to democracy in courts which

01:53

is one of the main battlefields of

01:55

democracy I mean if there's one thing we

01:56

learned after 2020 it is that the courts

02:00

play such a central role in free and

02:03

fair elections and in ensuring that we

02:05

have a peaceful transfer of power and

02:06

democracy and it was really your vision

02:09

that created this and I want to thank

02:11

you from the bottom of my heart for

02:12

everything you have done to help

02:15

conceive of this to help nurture it to

02:17

help build an audience for it and uh to

02:20

really educate everybody out there um uh

02:23

who has been listening well I I

02:25

appreciate that I think we're all better

02:26

off because of this series so um so

02:28

let's jump in to episode 100 here again

02:31

we've got some rare good news here from

02:33

the courts in some very red States so

02:35

Mark walk us through what just happened

02:37

in the Montana Supreme Court first yeah

02:39

so this is an amazing story and I really

02:42

think it's one of the underreported

02:44

stories in the mainstream media the

02:47

Montana Supreme Court struck down not

02:49

one not two not three but four voter

02:54

suppression laws in one ruling violating

02:57

that all four of them violated the

02:59

state's Constitution

03:00

this included eliminating election day

03:02

registration eliminating student IDs as

03:05

acceptable forms of ID to vote

03:08

prohibiting mailing ballots to new

03:10

voters who are eligible to vote on

03:12

Election Day but are not yet uh 2018

03:14

Banning ballot collection which is a

03:17

Lifeline for Native American voters in

03:20

the states who live on reservations when

03:23

when we talk about banning ballot

03:24

collection Republicans talk about

03:26

banning ballot collection or what they

03:27

call ballot harvesting in a state like

03:29

Montana what they are saying is they

03:31

don't want Native Americans to vote and

03:33

this is not just a landmark victory for

03:36

the voters of Montana it is a landmark

03:40

uh uh case in which the Montana Supreme

03:42

Court applied heightened scrutiny to

03:44

laws that restrict voting rights it is a

03:47

model opinion that courts around the

03:49

country can look at and I I'd be remiss

03:51

if I didn't point out that there is a

03:54

critical US Senate race it is likely

03:56

that the day after the election we will

03:58

wake up trying to figure out who

04:00

controls the US Senate and we will one

04:02

of the states we'll be looking at is

04:04

whether John tester was reelected from

04:06

the great state of Montana and this

04:08

ruling will be integral to the ability

04:12

of John tester to be able to win of

04:14

young voters of college voters of Native

04:16

American voters being able to

04:18

participate in the electoral process

04:20

well on the topic of issues coming out

04:22

of the course that are going to have

04:23

major political implications can you

04:25

discuss the pending abortion referendum

04:27

that will likely appear on the November

04:28

ballot

04:30

yeah so look I mean I I think this is

04:33

I'm sure you've covered this across your

04:35

channels the Kryptonite of the

04:37

Republican Party um is the issue of

04:40

abortion the thing they have not been

04:42

able to figure out is what to do when

04:45

abortion in any way shape or form is on

04:48

the ballot even even in the recent uh

04:51

election uh uh where IVF was a sort of a

04:54

side issue you saw a Democrat win a

04:57

State Legislative race um uh uh you know

05:01

in a deep in a deeply red District in a

05:03

deeply Red State in Florida uh it's

05:06

going to be on the ballot in Montana it

05:08

will be on the ballot in in um in Nevada

05:11

it will almost certainly be on the

05:12

ballot and Republicans have no answer to

05:15

this um you know they wanted they fought

05:18

for decades to get a Supreme Court to

05:21

overturn uh a woman's right to control

05:23

her own body and have access to Safe um

05:27

abortion uh care and now are reaping

05:30

this at The Ballot Box and it will play

05:32

a critical role in several States in

05:36

2024 I'm going to ask you to put your

05:38

pundit hat on a little bit but how much

05:40

of a boon will that referendum be for

05:41

John tester's re-election prospects in

05:43

your opinion because you were just

05:44

talking about the importance that that

05:46

Montana's uh senate election is going to

05:48

have I think it'll be an enormous Boon

05:50

for John tester I think it'll be an

05:51

enormous Boon for a number in a number

05:53

of Senate States including presidential

05:55

rates but you look at Montana Montana is

05:58

a is a red state but it is also a very

06:01

very pro-choice State you know the

06:03

Republicans in the west are not the kind

06:05

of Republicans you see in Alabama or

06:07

Mississippi these are Republicans often

06:10

times because they want less government

06:11

involvement in their lives and abortion

06:14

rights fits Center uh Center Square with

06:18

their conception of individual liberty

06:20

and and and freedom and the guy he's

06:23

running against um you know is not from

06:25

Montana and it does not fit the state I

06:28

think John tesar is going to win and I

06:30

think the issue of voting rights will be

06:33

Center Stage the fact that Republicans

06:35

tried to disenfranchise people and the

06:37

issue of abortion rights will be center

06:39

stage in turning out voters who might

06:41

otherwise think ah the presidential race

06:43

is not really going to come down to

06:45

Montana but I need to show up and vote I

06:48

think what's what's ironic is you

06:49

mentioned that Montana Republicans

06:51

aren't Alabama Republicans even Alabama

06:53

Republicans are are pro are pro-choice

06:56

um Marilyn L just flipped a seat in

06:59

Alabama state house by a by a margin of

07:01

25 points compared to the Republican who

07:03

held it before her and she ran her

07:05

campaign again a in Alabama in like deep

07:08

red Alabama predicated on abortion and

07:11

IVF so even Alabama Republicans are more

07:15

liberal on this issue than anybody would

07:16

have ever imagined so uh you know to to

07:19

your earlier point we did get that

07:20

similar news out of Florida that the

07:22

abortion referendum would appear on the

07:24

November ballot do you believe that that

07:26

puts Democrats within Striking Distance

07:28

in that state despite it's long-standing

07:30

move to the right over these last couple

07:32

decades okay first of all I think that

07:35

that race was going to be tighter than

07:36

people thought before and let's just

07:38

remember Rick Scott who is the incumbent

07:40

Republican senator he has never won his

07:42

elections by wide margins I mean he six

07:46

years ago he won by one tenth of 1% he

07:48

won the center one tenth of 1% Rick

07:51

Scott is a fundamentally flawed

07:54

individual that the people of Florida

07:56

don't like he also perpetuated the

07:58

largest Medicare fraud against the

08:00

country and was levied like a I think it

08:01

was a $1.7 billion fine uh at the time

08:04

which was the largest fine the doj has

08:06

ever levied against anyone because he

08:08

committed Medicare fraud when he was the

08:10

when he was the CEO of Columbia HCA

08:12

Hospital correct right so let's just

08:14

start with that so before everyone says

08:17

you know this race was gonna be a a

08:20

blowout Republican race that was never

08:22

true but let me tell you this abortion

08:25

ballot initiative being on the being on

08:27

the ballot at the same time that the

08:30

that the Florida Supreme Court

08:31

effectively Outlaws abortion in the

08:33

state you know this is it is bad for the

08:38

for the for the women of Florida it is

08:40

bad for the voters of Florida that the

08:41

Florida Supreme Court ruled the way they

08:43

did on abortion rights but I gotta tell

08:46

you if I'm Rick Scott I'm looking at

08:48

what my post Senate employment

08:49

opportunities are I think this dis I

08:52

think this uh this Senate race in

08:53

Florida now goes to toss up and I mean

08:56

that a true tossup uh between uh between

08:59

between uh uh between the two sides and

09:03

put on top of that and I've said this

09:04

before and like everyone just mark this

09:07

you know however you mark things on

09:08

YouTube Mark it and come back to this

09:10

after the election Donald Trump hates

09:13

Ronda santz the party in Florida is

09:17

divided the Florida Republican party is

09:20

not of one mind they are they are at war

09:22

with one another and when you take a

09:24

party at war with one another and you

09:26

have an unpopular governor and you have

09:29

an unpopular Senate candidate and you

09:30

have a turbocharge charged electorate

09:33

who is angry about what the state

09:35

supreme court has just done on abortion

09:37

and they have the means to to flip it at

09:39

60% you know Republicans in some states

09:42

tried to get a 60% threshold because

09:44

they thought they were being clever a

09:46

60% threshold for this initiative in

09:48

Florida is a dream for Democrats it is a

09:52

nightmare for Republicans because it is

09:54

going to turbocharge turnout like you

09:57

have never seen and those people turning

09:59

out are not going to be voting for Rick

10:01

scottt and finally on that point Arizona

10:04

organizers have announced that they have

10:06

enough signatures now for a ballot

10:08

measure on abortion protecting uh uh

10:10

protecting uh that in their state

10:11

constitution how important will that be

10:13

in a state that you've sounded the alarm

10:15

about quite a bit yeah same thing I mean

10:18

honestly you know let's just start with

10:21

the fact that kry lake is insane you

10:24

know the mainstream media wanted to

10:25

write and did write for several weeks

10:28

this you know Terry lake has gone

10:30

mainstream only to turn out that she's

10:32

actually as nuts as ever you know she's

10:35

still an election denier she's you know

10:38

hanging out with Mike Lindell in the in

10:40

the US Supreme in the US Supreme Court

10:43

and on top of all of that you have Ruben

10:45

gyo who's a very good candidate uh

10:47

running for Senate on the Democratic

10:48

side and like I said on top of that now

10:51

you will have likely a ballot initiative

10:54

on the ballot around abortion well Perry

10:57

Lake will show her true colors once

10:59

again with or without this initiative

11:01

but with this initiative you again have

11:03

the perfect storm of of energy coming

11:07

from people again a party that that is

11:11

from kind of a more libertarian Wing uh

11:15

in Arizona I I think this moves this

11:17

race decidedly to lean's Democrat in the

11:20

senate race I think it moves this race

11:22

to probably slightly leans Biden in the

11:25

presidential race um the fact that

11:28

abortion will be front Center in Arizona

11:30

is a gift to Democrats um up and down

11:34

the ballot in Arizona and you know the

11:37

the you know the conservatives on the

11:38

Supreme Court said that women are not

11:40

without uh without electoral power uh in

11:43

the dobs decision I think they didn't

11:45

know quite what they were writing but

11:47

they were 100% right and I think we're

11:48

going to see that in Montana in Florida

11:51

and in Arizona perfectly put we'll leave

11:53

it there mark uh one last thing here

11:56

just wanted to extend a little special

11:58

thank you here so I think we have we

12:00

have something that that uh that your

12:02

team is going to bring to you right now

12:04

to say just to say thanks here we have a

12:07

cake everyone there's a cake there's a

12:11

there's a look at this Sophie here with

12:12

the cake let's see you got you gotta

12:14

turn it a little bit more congrats on

12:17

100 hold on see it let's get this yeah

12:20

you could see it it's it's in there all

12:22

right there it is congrats on 100 it's

12:25

that's our cake Brian that's it and

12:28

we're g to celebrate and we're going to

12:29

eat the cake and everybody subscribe to

12:32

democracy docket subscribe to Brian's uh

12:35

Channel and make sure you keep watching

12:37

democracy watch because week in week out

12:40

we are telling you what you need to know

12:42

to stay informed about democracy in the

12:44

courts we'll leave it there I'm Brian

12:46

tyer Cohen and I'm Mark Elias this is

12:48

democracy

12:50

[Music]

12:56

watch