HEATED Israel Debate: Destiny Vs. Omar Baddar

Breaking Points
3 May 2024120:34

Summary

TLDRThe provided transcript captures a tense and insightful debate on the Israel-Palestine conflict, focusing on the roles of Hamas and the Israeli government, the impact of international law, and the broader implications for peace and justice in the region. The discussion delves into the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, the history of violence and occupation, and the international community's response, including the controversial issue of the Israeli blockade. It highlights the differing perspectives on the conflict, with one side arguing for the necessity of ending the occupation and the other emphasizing the threat posed by Hamas. The conversation also touches on the influence of the United States, the role of the Arab states, and the potential pathways to a resolution that respects the rights and aspirations of both Israelis and Palestinians.

Takeaways

  • 📜 The debate centers around the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, focusing on the role of Hamas, international law, and the concept of peace versus justice in the region.
  • 🏭 The situation in Gaza is described as unlivable, with allegations of Israel's blockade contributing to a humanitarian crisis, including starvation and poor living conditions.
  • 🤝 The discussion touches on the history of violence and the role of surrounding Arab states in the conflict, including their abandonment of the Palestinian cause.
  • 🔫 There's a mention of the militarized response to campus protests in the United States, with a debate on whether these protesters are advocating for peace or demonstrating anti-Semitic sentiments.
  • 🇮🇱 The Israeli government's policy is criticized for its treatment of Palestinians, with claims of it breaking international law and committing atrocities.
  • 🚫 The concept of a double standard is raised, particularly regarding free speech and the reaction to protests, with some arguing that pro-Palestinian protests are unfairly demonized.
  • 🛡️ Stephen argues for the necessity of removing Hamas from power, stating that it's essential for any peace process, while Omar emphasizes the need for a just resolution and the right to resistance.
  • 🕊️ The idea that Palestinians want justice, not just peace, is highlighted, with a discussion on the various interpretations of a peaceful resolution, including one-state and two-state solutions.
  • 🏛️ The role of the United States and international community is examined, with calls for greater moral clarity and action to address the perceived imbalance of power and human rights abuses.
  • 📉 There's a discussion on the impact of the conflict on the global stage, including the potential for Israel to face international isolation and legal repercussions, such as charges before the International Criminal Court (ICC).
  • 🚨 The importance of acknowledging the complexity of the conflict and the need for a multifaceted solution that addresses the concerns of both Israelis and Palestinians is emphasized.

Q & A

  • What is the main issue being discussed in the transcript?

    -The main issue discussed is the ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestine, with a focus on the role of Hamas, international law, and the debate over peace versus justice in the region.

  • What does the term 'international law of arm conf' refer to?

    -The term likely refers to the 'international law of armed conflict,' which governs the conduct of armed forces during warfare.

  • What is the position of the speaker who argues that 'people want justice'?

    -The speaker suggests that the conflict is not just about achieving peace but also about addressing the underlying issues of injustice, which they believe are causing the ongoing conflict.

  • Why does the speaker mention Gaza as 'unlivable'?

    -The speaker refers to Gaza as 'unlivable' due to the harsh living conditions, which they attribute to the Israeli government's policies and the blockade imposed on the region.

  • What does the speaker mean by 'the numbers are so poor'?

    -This likely refers to the speaker's view that despite the severity of the conflict, the international response or the number of people affected does not reflect the actual scale of the crisis.

  • What is the debate about the role of the United States in the conflict?

    -The debate involves the extent of U.S. support for Israel, with one side arguing that the U.S. provides unconditional support, which influences Israel's policies towards Palestine.

  • What is the significance of the 'right of return' mentioned in the transcript?

    -The 'right of return' is a principle that would allow Palestinian refugees and their descendants to return to the homes and lands from which they or their ancestors were displaced.

  • What does the term 'BDS' stand for and what is its relevance in the discussion?

    -BDS stands for 'Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions,' a movement promoting various forms of boycott against Israel until it meets its obligations under international law.

  • What is the argument regarding the 'demonization' of protesters?

    -The argument is that there is a double standard where protesters against Israeli policies are often portrayed negatively, while those who support Israeli actions are not given the same scrutiny.

  • Why does the speaker mention the 'great March of return'?

    -The 'great March of return' is a series of protests in Gaza where Palestinians demanded their right to return to the lands from which they were displaced. The speaker refers to it to highlight the non-violent nature of the protests and the response from the Israeli military.

  • What is the controversy over the Israeli military's use of 'human shields'?

    -The controversy stems from allegations that the Israeli military has used Palestinian civilians as human shields during military operations, which is considered a violation of international humanitarian law.

Outlines

00:00

😀 Introduction to the Debate on Israel-Palestine Conflict

The video script opens with a discussion on the Israeli-Palestine conflict, highlighting the longstanding nature of the issues and the complexity of finding peace. The speaker criticizes the double standards in how the conflict is handled and the portrayal of Palestinians. The introduction also sets the stage for a debate between two individuals with contrasting views on the situation, Omar Badar and Stephen Benell Jr., and mentions the recent protests and responses on various campuses.

05:00

👉 Discussion on Campus Protests and Free Speech

The conversation shifts to the topic of campus protests, with a focus on the militarized and vigilante responses to these demonstrations. The speakers debate the validity of these reactions, the concept of free speech, and the alleged double standards when it comes to supporting peaceful protests versus condemning violent ones. The discussion also touches on the portrayal of protesters and the impact of the Israeli-Palestine conflict on American policy and campus dynamics.

10:01

🤔 Analyzing the Right to Resistance and BDS Movement

The discussion delves into the right to resistance and the role of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement. It explores the legality and morality of boycotting Israel, the various political solutions proposed by protesters, and the end goals of the BDS movement. There is a debate on whether the BDS movement is inherently anti-Semitic or a legitimate form of protest against Israeli policies.

15:03

🏛️ The One State Versus Two State Debate

The speakers engage in a debate about the feasibility and implications of a one-state solution versus a two-state solution. They discuss the current Israeli government's stance, the historical context of the conflict, and the challenges of achieving a peaceful resolution. The conversation also addresses the international community's role and the potential consequences of continued occupation and conflict.

20:04

🚨 Addressing the Conduct of War and Atrocities

The focus of the discussion turns to the conduct of war by Israel, with references to specific incidents and the broader context of military operations. The speakers debate the legitimacy of Israel's actions, the concept of proportionality in military responses, and the impact of these actions on civilian populations. There is also a critique of the Israeli government's policies and the international response to the conflict.

25:05

📉 The Impact of the Conflict on Palestinian Lives

The conversation emphasizes the human cost of the conflict on Palestinians, discussing the conditions in Gaza and the West Bank. The speakers address the issues of home demolitions, the reduction of Palestinian populations in certain areas, and the impact of the occupation on daily life. The discussion also touches on the international community's role in perpetuating the conflict through financial and political support.

30:07

🏢 The Blockade and Its Humanitarian Consequences

The speakers debate the reasons behind the blockade on Gaza and its humanitarian consequences. They discuss the restrictions on goods, the impact on the civilian population, and the strategic motivations behind the blockade. The conversation also explores the conditions that would lead to the lifting of the blockade and the potential outcomes for the region.

35:07

🕊️ The Path to Peace and the Role of External Intervention

The discussion concludes with thoughts on the path to peace and the potential role of external intervention. The speakers consider the need for a change in Israeli policy, the impact of US military funding, and the conditions required for a just and lasting resolution to the conflict. They also reflect on the importance of recognizing the humanity of all involved and the potential for a future where Palestinians and Israelis can coexist peacefully.

40:08

📝 Final Thoughts and Closing Remarks

In the final segment, the speakers summarize their positions and share their closing thoughts. They reiterate the complexity of the conflict, the importance of understanding different perspectives, and the need for a nuanced approach to finding a solution. The conversation ends with a call for continued dialogue and a commitment to seeking the truth amidst the challenges of the Israeli-Palestine conflict.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡International Law

International law refers to a set of rules and norms that govern the relations between states and international organizations. In the video, it is mentioned in the context of accusations against both Israel and Hamas for violating these laws, particularly in relation to the conflict in Gaza.

💡Armed Conflict

Armed conflict denotes a situation where there is a resort to armed force between states or non-state actors. The script discusses the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, highlighting the humanitarian issues and the violation of international law during armed conflict.

💡Human Shields

Human shields involve the use of civilians to protect military personnel or infrastructure from enemy attacks. The video script mentions allegations of this practice by both sides in the conflict, which is a war crime under international law.

💡Blockade

A blockade is a military action that prevents ships or aircraft from entering or leaving a country's ports or airspace. The script discusses the Israeli blockade of Gaza, which has been criticized for its humanitarian impact on the civilian population.

💡Settlements

Settlements refer to Israeli communities established in territories that have been occupied since the 1967 war. The script touches on the expansion of these settlements and their role in the ongoing conflict.

💡Human Rights Organizations

Human rights organizations are groups that work to promote and protect human rights at national and international levels. The video script cites these organizations' reports on the conflict, indicating their role in documenting potential human rights abuses.

💡Right of Return

The right of return is a principle that allows refugees to return to their homes. In the context of the video, it refers to the demand by Palestinian refugees to return to lands from which they or their ancestors were displaced, which is a contentious issue in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

💡Two-State Solution

A two-state solution is a resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that involves the establishment of two separate states for Israelis and Palestinians. The script discusses differing views on this solution and its feasibility.

💡Occupation

Occupation, in the context of the video, refers to the control and administration of Palestinian territories by Israel since the 1967 war. The term is used to describe the situation that has led to various human rights concerns and international disputes.

💡Hamas

Hamas is a Palestinian political organization with a military wing. It is a key player in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and is often at the center of discussions regarding violence, governance in Gaza, and peace negotiations.

💡Apartheid

Apartheid refers to a policy or system of segregation and discrimination based on race. In the video, it is used to describe the perceived nature of Israeli policies towards Palestinians, suggesting a comparison to the former South African regime's policies.

Highlights

Debate on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, focusing on the role of Hamas, international law, and the concept of peace versus justice.

Discussion on the conditions in Gaza, described as 'unlivable,' and the humanitarian crisis due to alleged Israeli blockades.

Analysis of the impact of US policy on the conflict, including the provision of weapons and the stance on Israeli actions.

Critique of the double standards in how protesters and counter-protesters are treated on US college campuses.

Argument that the Israeli government's policies are contributing to the suffering and violence, rather than working towards peace.

Concerns about the demonization of protesters advocating for Palestinian rights, including progressive Jewish voices.

Reports of violence against protesters, including the use of bear spray, fireworks, and physical assaults.

Debate on the effectiveness of boycotts, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) as a non-violent resistance strategy against Israel.

Controversy over the use of AI in identifying and targeting Hamas members by the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF).

Discussion on the historical context of the conflict, including the establishment of Israel and the displacement of Palestinians.

Arguments against the existence of a double standard when it comes to applying international law to Israel and Palestine.

Concerns about the Israeli government's approach to managing the conflict, including the treatment of Palestinian civilians.

Calls for international intervention to end the occupation and establish a just resolution for Palestinians.

Criticism of the United States' unconditional support for Israel and its impact on the peace process.

Discussion on the role of the media in shaping perceptions of the conflict and the need for balanced reporting.

Analysis of the impact of the conflict on regional stability and the potential for a peaceful resolution.

Debate on the feasibility of a two-state solution versus a one-state solution, and the challenges each presents.

Transcripts

00:00

you're saying that Israel needs to allow

00:01

Hamas to stay there who's been breaking

00:03

international law of arm conf for 20

00:05

years as opposed to Hamas allowing the

00:07

Israeli government to stay there when

00:08

they breaking international law for even

00:09

longer than that it's not peace nobody

00:11

wants peace people want Justice oops

00:13

it's just War Gaza is unlivable anymore

00:15

too bad it can't support Palestinian

00:17

life people are starving it's just all

00:18

an accident it's crazy that the numbers

00:20

are so poor for a country that could

00:22

kill so many more people they're doing

00:23

things that no other countries there's a

00:25

Reason by the way which you will never

00:27

recognize why all of the surrounding

00:28

Arab states have abandoned the pales too

00:30

because their history has been one of

00:31

violence that first they've been

00:32

encouraged by the surrounding Nations

00:34

and used by them and then now they've

00:35

been abandoned once the other nations

00:37

that's a racist anti

00:40

Palestinian happy Friday everyone or

00:42

Thursday night if you're a premium

00:44

subscriber breakingpoints decom if you

00:45

want to get the show early to your inbox

00:48

I'm Emily jashinski and you probably

00:50

recognize uh the man sitting next to me

00:52

we are about to tee up a fascinating

00:54

debate I'm joined of course also by my

00:56

co-host my wonderful co-host Ryan grim

00:59

and these gentlemen that you see here

01:01

are not debating for the first time they

01:03

debated in the past maybe some of you

01:05

have watched that they sparred over the

01:07

question of Israel actually earlier this

01:09

year and then kind of subsequently

01:10

continued a bit of a back and forth so

01:13

we know that we're not going to settle

01:14

the debate once and for all here today

01:16

uh but I think what we want to do Ryan

01:18

is really push for more moral Clarity

01:20

push for more contrast as we reflect on

01:23

just this last week of absolutely

01:24

historic protests rocking uh dozens of

01:28

campuses across the the country so we

01:31

have two popular proponents of the

01:32

respective sides here and we're excited

01:34

to get into it yeah and to introduce

01:36

them both we've got uh to my right here

01:38

Omar badar he's a Palestinian American

01:41

uh political analyst who's been uh

01:43

following the situation in the Middle

01:44

East for many many years uh on the other

01:47

side uh we have Stephen benell Jr who's

01:50

better known by his streaming name Mr

01:53

barelli or whatever the or by like a

01:56

dozen different names from if you if you

01:59

guys watch the uh Norman finlin debate

02:02

um that kind of uh thrust Destiny as a

02:05

streaming name into this uh conversation

02:07

s we want to start with the campus

02:09

protest before getting uh to the war

02:11

itself this week saw a militarized uh

02:14

response over at VCU UT Austin uh

02:19

Colombia and the kind and a a vigilante

02:23

response at at

02:24

UCLA uh so just curious for your your

02:29

read in general enal on these protests

02:31

as they've unfolded and have you seen

02:33

any double standard when it comes to

02:36

kind of the the Free Speech Warriors

02:38

that we've seen uh championing the cause

02:40

of free expression on college campuses

02:42

now championing the cause of shooting

02:44

fireworks into peaceful encampments yeah

02:46

it's it's the double standard is

02:48

incredibly glaring I mean it you would

02:49

have to put on blinders to actually miss

02:51

it you have I think the these student

02:54

protesters are the conscience of this

02:56

country we are witnessing an absolutely

02:58

horrific situation unfolding on the

02:59

ground and American policy is to insist

03:02

on continuing to send endless weapons

03:04

unconditionally to a military force that

03:06

is mass slaughtering children by the

03:08

tens of thousands and these students are

03:10

saying we're taking a stand this is not

03:11

okay if we can't impact the policy

03:13

makers directly we're going to make sure

03:16

that our institutions and the money that

03:17

we're paying to these institutions is

03:18

not playing into this kind of Mass

03:20

Slaughter and what we witnessed like

03:23

from my perspective in a better world

03:26

cops would be going after the people who

03:28

are violating American law to make sure

03:29

that weapons can continue slaughtering

03:31

children rather than going after people

03:33

who are peacefully protesting

03:34

overwhelmingly peacefully protesting in

03:36

order to change that policy change

03:38

American Investment in it and you're

03:39

absolutely right you have a level of

03:41

demonization of these protesters um

03:44

constantly talking about them as if you

03:46

know it's just like anti-semitic mobs or

03:48

or whatever the people leading these

03:49

protests there's very significant

03:51

portion of progressive young Jewish

03:54

people who are the leaders of of in in

03:57

many cases of some of these protests

03:58

groups from if not now and Jewish voice

04:01

for peace and and many others and they

04:04

are on the receiving end of tremendous

04:05

hate and violence and nobody talks about

04:07

that and as you mentioned what we're

04:08

witnessing in UCLA is absolutely

04:10

horrifying these protesters being

04:12

attacked by you know bear spray and

04:15

fireworks and some of them being beaten

04:16

up and you see like some serious

04:18

injuries but because the climate in this

04:20

country is one in which one side gets

04:22

demonized that empowers and emboldens

04:24

the response not just from police but

04:26

also from Vigilantes and I just want to

04:28

Note One Last Thing um just because

04:31

Stephen is here and I think it's really

04:33

relevant is there's a person that I know

04:36

uh named Simone Zimmerman and who she's

04:39

in town today for an intercept event

04:40

that's right and she's one of the most

04:43

conscientious and decent human beings

04:44

that you'll ever meet and she knows

04:48

personal people um in her life who have

04:50

lost loved ones on October 7th from the

04:51

attack um that Hamas carried out and she

04:54

was horrified by that by that attack and

04:56

she's equally horrified by Israel's

04:58

response and the Mass Slaughter and

05:00

she's one of those people who is

05:01

fighting for a better future for

05:02

Palestinians and Israelis and she was at

05:05

uh at Passover Cedar at Colombia joining

05:09

the protesters and talking about how

05:11

beautiful it is that she's in that setup

05:13

and Stephen quote tweeted that tweet and

05:15

said that he would like to donate

05:17

thousands of gallons of kosine

05:19

presumably so these people can set

05:20

themselves on fire and it's just such an

05:22

ugly and distasteful thing to say and

05:24

I'm genuinely curious of what you're

05:26

thinking when you tweet things like that

05:27

everybody celebrated Bushell doing his

05:29

prot people want to protest that way

05:31

then God help them I guess yeah this is

05:33

not about Bush though but let's keep

05:34

going in response to that because Omar

05:36

set up an interesting position here

05:38

between anti-semitic mobs and peaceful

05:40

protesters so are what is what we're

05:42

seeing on these campuses anti-semitic

05:44

mobs or is it peaceful protesters from

05:46

your perspective Stephen uh from my

05:48

perspective I mean it really depends on

05:49

which series of videos that you watch I

05:51

think from an American perspective it

05:52

really shouldn't matter if they're

05:53

anti-semitic mobs or if they're

05:55

protesting foreign policy or whatever in

05:56

the United States we don't have hate

05:57

speech laws you should be allowed to say

05:59

really whatever you want want in protest

06:01

uh assuming you're not violating any uh

06:03

social or whatever the ordinances are I

06:04

know like for some college campuses

06:06

you're not allowed to block Pathways or

06:07

you can't uh protest if they've got

06:09

events planned for graduations or

06:10

whatever uh and as long as you're not

06:12

disrupting the piece in a way where

06:13

you're like you can't blur loudspeakers

06:15

I think on college campuses as long as

06:16

you're folling the laws you'll be able

06:17

to protest however you want but if you

06:18

are say what we saw from NYPD and LAPD

06:21

actually last night if you're violating

06:23

laws University rules even with an

06:25

encampment if you broke into the Hall

06:28

like they did and have been barric up in

06:30

there what did you make of the NYPD

06:31

respons just at colia for example the I

06:34

like to wait till the dust settles on

06:35

this because I hear so many different

06:36

things about how students were all being

06:37

pro uh peaceful I've seen obviously the

06:39

videos of like some of the stuff being

06:40

broken into um I I think that when it

06:43

comes to an analysis of how to respond

06:45

to these particular events I think that

06:47

the the the start and stop needs to be

06:49

what are the rules and regulations in

06:50

place because a lot of people will jump

06:51

in and start arguing well it's a public

06:53

area so they can be wherever they want

06:54

or do whatever they want without even

06:55

understanding the rules or regulations

06:56

in place um I think as a blanket rule I

06:59

don't know why this particular situation

07:01

would need any kind of unique analysis

07:03

uh it would be the same as all protest

07:04

if you're in a private college uh I

07:06

understanding as they can remove you

07:07

whenever they want it's private property

07:08

if you're in a state funded or public

07:10

university then there are certain areas

07:11

that are supposed to remain open to the

07:13

public and they can't remove you unless

07:14

you are uh not there in an ordinary

07:16

manner if you're disrupting some of

07:17

their event um I don't see anything

07:19

about these particular set of protests

07:20

that would call for any type of unique

07:21

analysis that escapes like that

07:23

fundamental rule to protest in the

07:24

United States uh yeah and your

07:26

fundamental rule then to quote tweet

07:29

with the Cy uh I thought it was insane

07:31

that you had delusional people

07:33

especially young children in the United

07:34

States that don't know the any part of

07:36

this conflict whatsoever which is

07:37

probably the vast majority of the people

07:38

protesting it um that people are

07:40

celebrating people setting themselves on

07:42

fire that is just unbelievable to me you

07:44

saw a guy do it in front of a I think um

07:46

one of the New York City cour houses for

07:47

the Trump stuff you saw uh the Aaron

07:49

Bushnell guy do it for who knows what

07:51

reason um I guess because you thought

07:53

the whole world wasn't already paying

07:54

attention to this issue and yeah the

07:55

idea of people ever celebrating

07:57

themselves in a democratic first world

07:58

country setting themselves on fire for

07:59

an issue that already has an unlimited

08:01

amount of international attention it's

08:02

unbelievably stupid to me yeah but how

08:04

does it relate to this particular

08:05

instance I mean this is a bunch of

08:06

Jewish students celebrating with Pro

08:08

Palestinian students over Passover and

08:10

talking about a climate in which they're

08:11

coming together like why did you decide

08:13

to drag the the Bushnell thing into this

08:15

that's that's one I think it's funny

08:17

when people disingenuously load phrases

08:19

like oh all the Jewish people are

08:21

protesting with these people there are

08:22

so many Jewish people that's not true um

08:24

the last few research thing I saw I

08:25

think for 2023 shows like 90% of people

08:28

who are Jewish support the existence of

08:30

Israel so the idea that there's this

08:31

huge group of

08:32

Israel this is not about the existence

08:34

of Israel there's no question about the

08:35

fact that so many of these protest

08:37

leaders are in fact Jewish these groups

08:39

they're not imaginary they're not a

08:40

figment of your imagination you can

08:41

actually go see them and and look at how

08:43

large their Gatherings are how l l

08:45

voices have been the people who are

08:47

getting arrested in Congress so many of

08:48

them are progressive Jewish

08:50

organizations that are leading this

08:51

effort this is not about some broader

08:53

what are the the views of of American

08:55

Jews about the existence of Israel we're

08:56

just protest about the protest are about

08:59

ending the slaughter of the children of

09:01

Gaza that's what the protests are about

09:03

what do you mean what does it look like

09:04

what is the what is the end condition of

09:06

the the it's not just ending the

09:08

slaughter it's also stopping the

09:09

blockade it's also reaching a just

09:11

resolution to the Palestinian conflict

09:13

it's also probably the unlimited right

09:14

of Return of six million refugees it's

09:16

probably the dissolution of Israel as a

09:18

Jewish majority State it's probably the

09:20

create like I mean what all does that

09:21

entail you're conflating a ton of

09:23

different things a lot of these

09:24

protesters have varying views about this

09:26

some of them support a two-state

09:27

solution some of them support a one-

09:28

state solution but what's bringing

09:30

everybody together in this moment is a

09:32

realization that what Israel is doing to

09:34

Gaza is absolutely unconscionable that

09:36

you slaughter people at that scale that

09:37

Israel is clearly waging a war on the

09:39

civilian population of Gaza that's what

09:41

these people are upset about and they

09:42

want it to come to an end and the

09:43

specific thing that they're protesting

09:45

and maybe we'll we could actually find

09:47

something to agree on here because I've

09:48

seen you you describe yourself as kind

09:50

of a a moderate who like tries to you

09:52

know balance the the extremists on on

09:54

each side here so the specific thing the

09:56

protesters are arguing for at all of

09:58

these different campuses is uh opening

10:00

up the books of their basically the

10:02

hedge funds that run their universities

10:04

and divesting uh from firms that are

10:07

either linked to the war in Gaza or

10:09

linked to Israel uh more generally Brown

10:11

University uh reach an agreement with

10:13

its protesters that they would uh they

10:16

would abandon their encampment in

10:18

exchange for a vote in October to di to

10:21

divest from that that gets to the

10:23

question of resistance and the right the

10:25

right to resistance and so for years it

10:28

has been in the kind of policy of the

10:30

right here and a lot of the center here

10:32

in the United States to make it illegal

10:35

to try to ban people from participating

10:37

in boycotts or divestment efforts or

10:40

lobbying for sanctions uh against Israel

10:43

at the same time uh you say well armed

10:46

resistance is clearly you know off off

10:48

the table so if you if you rule out both

10:52

uh you you only leave people with one

10:54

option so even if you don't support

10:57

boycotting or divesting from Israel do

10:59

you support you know the right of people

11:02

here in the United States to like

11:04

to explicit um for how states have

11:08

banned some of the BDS participation as

11:10

a fundamental right to boycott I think

11:12

in the United States you should always

11:13

have the right to boycott everything

11:14

except for our currency I think um yeah

11:16

you have the right to boycot uh whatever

11:17

you want um I don't know why that should

11:20

ever be made illegal but I I know that

11:21

there are particular things BDS stuff

11:24

that I think States look at but um yeah

11:26

of course you should always have the

11:27

right I wish that the people that would

11:28

talk about conditioning uh support for

11:30

Israel though would also talk about

11:32

conditioning support for Palestine

11:33

because they are some of the highest

11:35

recipients of Aid in the world per

11:36

capita the United States contributes a

11:38

lot of that Aid it's interesting to me

11:39

that seems like we're always talking

11:41

about how we need to condition Aid to

11:42

Israel congratulations Congress Congress

11:44

just banned all funding of unra so yeah

11:48

have seen that well so actually because

11:50

Stephen raised an interesting point that

11:52

what's the kind of end goal of the

11:54

protesters after BD BDS in the service

11:56

of what you know what does that look

11:58

like a one state solution Cho the

11:59

minority well so you said earlier that

12:02

you know it's it sort of depends on

12:03

whatever video you're looking at that

12:04

this is an anti-semitic mob or peaceful

12:07

protesters and I think that's actually

12:09

true there's videos showing all kinds of

12:11

different things which is part of the

12:12

issue of piecing together these stories

12:13

via social media uh so if that if the

12:16

one state solution is kind of the

12:17

ultimate goal of the people that are

12:18

protesting for BDS um what is your like

12:22

do you think they're fundamentally

12:23

anti-semitic do you think they're

12:24

fundamentally are they from your

12:26

perspective just mistaken uh misguided

12:30

or are they

12:31

bigoted um I I don't care try trying to

12:35

sort out like the difference between

12:36

like anti-Semitism and anti-zionism is

12:38

almost impossible and in practice the

12:40

two look almost identical sometimes so

12:42

the obsession of trying to figure out

12:44

like what is the driving thing here