HEATED Israel Debate: Destiny Vs. Omar Baddar
Summary
TLDRThe provided transcript captures a tense and insightful debate on the Israel-Palestine conflict, focusing on the roles of Hamas and the Israeli government, the impact of international law, and the broader implications for peace and justice in the region. The discussion delves into the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, the history of violence and occupation, and the international community's response, including the controversial issue of the Israeli blockade. It highlights the differing perspectives on the conflict, with one side arguing for the necessity of ending the occupation and the other emphasizing the threat posed by Hamas. The conversation also touches on the influence of the United States, the role of the Arab states, and the potential pathways to a resolution that respects the rights and aspirations of both Israelis and Palestinians.
Takeaways
- 📜 The debate centers around the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, focusing on the role of Hamas, international law, and the concept of peace versus justice in the region.
- 🏭 The situation in Gaza is described as unlivable, with allegations of Israel's blockade contributing to a humanitarian crisis, including starvation and poor living conditions.
- 🤝 The discussion touches on the history of violence and the role of surrounding Arab states in the conflict, including their abandonment of the Palestinian cause.
- 🔫 There's a mention of the militarized response to campus protests in the United States, with a debate on whether these protesters are advocating for peace or demonstrating anti-Semitic sentiments.
- 🇮🇱 The Israeli government's policy is criticized for its treatment of Palestinians, with claims of it breaking international law and committing atrocities.
- 🚫 The concept of a double standard is raised, particularly regarding free speech and the reaction to protests, with some arguing that pro-Palestinian protests are unfairly demonized.
- 🛡️ Stephen argues for the necessity of removing Hamas from power, stating that it's essential for any peace process, while Omar emphasizes the need for a just resolution and the right to resistance.
- 🕊️ The idea that Palestinians want justice, not just peace, is highlighted, with a discussion on the various interpretations of a peaceful resolution, including one-state and two-state solutions.
- 🏛️ The role of the United States and international community is examined, with calls for greater moral clarity and action to address the perceived imbalance of power and human rights abuses.
- 📉 There's a discussion on the impact of the conflict on the global stage, including the potential for Israel to face international isolation and legal repercussions, such as charges before the International Criminal Court (ICC).
- 🚨 The importance of acknowledging the complexity of the conflict and the need for a multifaceted solution that addresses the concerns of both Israelis and Palestinians is emphasized.
Q & A
What is the main issue being discussed in the transcript?
-The main issue discussed is the ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestine, with a focus on the role of Hamas, international law, and the debate over peace versus justice in the region.
What does the term 'international law of arm conf' refer to?
-The term likely refers to the 'international law of armed conflict,' which governs the conduct of armed forces during warfare.
What is the position of the speaker who argues that 'people want justice'?
-The speaker suggests that the conflict is not just about achieving peace but also about addressing the underlying issues of injustice, which they believe are causing the ongoing conflict.
Why does the speaker mention Gaza as 'unlivable'?
-The speaker refers to Gaza as 'unlivable' due to the harsh living conditions, which they attribute to the Israeli government's policies and the blockade imposed on the region.
What does the speaker mean by 'the numbers are so poor'?
-This likely refers to the speaker's view that despite the severity of the conflict, the international response or the number of people affected does not reflect the actual scale of the crisis.
What is the debate about the role of the United States in the conflict?
-The debate involves the extent of U.S. support for Israel, with one side arguing that the U.S. provides unconditional support, which influences Israel's policies towards Palestine.
What is the significance of the 'right of return' mentioned in the transcript?
-The 'right of return' is a principle that would allow Palestinian refugees and their descendants to return to the homes and lands from which they or their ancestors were displaced.
What does the term 'BDS' stand for and what is its relevance in the discussion?
-BDS stands for 'Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions,' a movement promoting various forms of boycott against Israel until it meets its obligations under international law.
What is the argument regarding the 'demonization' of protesters?
-The argument is that there is a double standard where protesters against Israeli policies are often portrayed negatively, while those who support Israeli actions are not given the same scrutiny.
Why does the speaker mention the 'great March of return'?
-The 'great March of return' is a series of protests in Gaza where Palestinians demanded their right to return to the lands from which they were displaced. The speaker refers to it to highlight the non-violent nature of the protests and the response from the Israeli military.
What is the controversy over the Israeli military's use of 'human shields'?
-The controversy stems from allegations that the Israeli military has used Palestinian civilians as human shields during military operations, which is considered a violation of international humanitarian law.
Outlines
😀 Introduction to the Debate on Israel-Palestine Conflict
The video script opens with a discussion on the Israeli-Palestine conflict, highlighting the longstanding nature of the issues and the complexity of finding peace. The speaker criticizes the double standards in how the conflict is handled and the portrayal of Palestinians. The introduction also sets the stage for a debate between two individuals with contrasting views on the situation, Omar Badar and Stephen Benell Jr., and mentions the recent protests and responses on various campuses.
👉 Discussion on Campus Protests and Free Speech
The conversation shifts to the topic of campus protests, with a focus on the militarized and vigilante responses to these demonstrations. The speakers debate the validity of these reactions, the concept of free speech, and the alleged double standards when it comes to supporting peaceful protests versus condemning violent ones. The discussion also touches on the portrayal of protesters and the impact of the Israeli-Palestine conflict on American policy and campus dynamics.
🤔 Analyzing the Right to Resistance and BDS Movement
The discussion delves into the right to resistance and the role of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement. It explores the legality and morality of boycotting Israel, the various political solutions proposed by protesters, and the end goals of the BDS movement. There is a debate on whether the BDS movement is inherently anti-Semitic or a legitimate form of protest against Israeli policies.
🏛️ The One State Versus Two State Debate
The speakers engage in a debate about the feasibility and implications of a one-state solution versus a two-state solution. They discuss the current Israeli government's stance, the historical context of the conflict, and the challenges of achieving a peaceful resolution. The conversation also addresses the international community's role and the potential consequences of continued occupation and conflict.
🚨 Addressing the Conduct of War and Atrocities
The focus of the discussion turns to the conduct of war by Israel, with references to specific incidents and the broader context of military operations. The speakers debate the legitimacy of Israel's actions, the concept of proportionality in military responses, and the impact of these actions on civilian populations. There is also a critique of the Israeli government's policies and the international response to the conflict.
📉 The Impact of the Conflict on Palestinian Lives
The conversation emphasizes the human cost of the conflict on Palestinians, discussing the conditions in Gaza and the West Bank. The speakers address the issues of home demolitions, the reduction of Palestinian populations in certain areas, and the impact of the occupation on daily life. The discussion also touches on the international community's role in perpetuating the conflict through financial and political support.
🏢 The Blockade and Its Humanitarian Consequences
The speakers debate the reasons behind the blockade on Gaza and its humanitarian consequences. They discuss the restrictions on goods, the impact on the civilian population, and the strategic motivations behind the blockade. The conversation also explores the conditions that would lead to the lifting of the blockade and the potential outcomes for the region.
🕊️ The Path to Peace and the Role of External Intervention
The discussion concludes with thoughts on the path to peace and the potential role of external intervention. The speakers consider the need for a change in Israeli policy, the impact of US military funding, and the conditions required for a just and lasting resolution to the conflict. They also reflect on the importance of recognizing the humanity of all involved and the potential for a future where Palestinians and Israelis can coexist peacefully.
📝 Final Thoughts and Closing Remarks
In the final segment, the speakers summarize their positions and share their closing thoughts. They reiterate the complexity of the conflict, the importance of understanding different perspectives, and the need for a nuanced approach to finding a solution. The conversation ends with a call for continued dialogue and a commitment to seeking the truth amidst the challenges of the Israeli-Palestine conflict.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡International Law
💡Armed Conflict
💡Human Shields
💡Blockade
💡Settlements
💡Human Rights Organizations
💡Right of Return
💡Two-State Solution
💡Occupation
💡Hamas
💡Apartheid
Highlights
Debate on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, focusing on the role of Hamas, international law, and the concept of peace versus justice.
Discussion on the conditions in Gaza, described as 'unlivable,' and the humanitarian crisis due to alleged Israeli blockades.
Analysis of the impact of US policy on the conflict, including the provision of weapons and the stance on Israeli actions.
Critique of the double standards in how protesters and counter-protesters are treated on US college campuses.
Argument that the Israeli government's policies are contributing to the suffering and violence, rather than working towards peace.
Concerns about the demonization of protesters advocating for Palestinian rights, including progressive Jewish voices.
Reports of violence against protesters, including the use of bear spray, fireworks, and physical assaults.
Debate on the effectiveness of boycotts, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) as a non-violent resistance strategy against Israel.
Controversy over the use of AI in identifying and targeting Hamas members by the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF).
Discussion on the historical context of the conflict, including the establishment of Israel and the displacement of Palestinians.
Arguments against the existence of a double standard when it comes to applying international law to Israel and Palestine.
Concerns about the Israeli government's approach to managing the conflict, including the treatment of Palestinian civilians.
Calls for international intervention to end the occupation and establish a just resolution for Palestinians.
Criticism of the United States' unconditional support for Israel and its impact on the peace process.
Discussion on the role of the media in shaping perceptions of the conflict and the need for balanced reporting.
Analysis of the impact of the conflict on regional stability and the potential for a peaceful resolution.
Debate on the feasibility of a two-state solution versus a one-state solution, and the challenges each presents.
Transcripts
you're saying that Israel needs to allow
Hamas to stay there who's been breaking
international law of arm conf for 20
years as opposed to Hamas allowing the
Israeli government to stay there when
they breaking international law for even
longer than that it's not peace nobody
wants peace people want Justice oops
it's just War Gaza is unlivable anymore
too bad it can't support Palestinian
life people are starving it's just all
an accident it's crazy that the numbers
are so poor for a country that could
kill so many more people they're doing
things that no other countries there's a
Reason by the way which you will never
recognize why all of the surrounding
Arab states have abandoned the pales too
because their history has been one of
violence that first they've been
encouraged by the surrounding Nations
and used by them and then now they've
been abandoned once the other nations
that's a racist anti
Palestinian happy Friday everyone or
Thursday night if you're a premium
subscriber breakingpoints decom if you
want to get the show early to your inbox
I'm Emily jashinski and you probably
recognize uh the man sitting next to me
we are about to tee up a fascinating
debate I'm joined of course also by my
co-host my wonderful co-host Ryan grim
and these gentlemen that you see here
are not debating for the first time they
debated in the past maybe some of you
have watched that they sparred over the
question of Israel actually earlier this
year and then kind of subsequently
continued a bit of a back and forth so
we know that we're not going to settle
the debate once and for all here today
uh but I think what we want to do Ryan
is really push for more moral Clarity
push for more contrast as we reflect on
just this last week of absolutely
historic protests rocking uh dozens of
campuses across the the country so we
have two popular proponents of the
respective sides here and we're excited
to get into it yeah and to introduce
them both we've got uh to my right here
Omar badar he's a Palestinian American
uh political analyst who's been uh
following the situation in the Middle
East for many many years uh on the other
side uh we have Stephen benell Jr who's
better known by his streaming name Mr
barelli or whatever the or by like a
dozen different names from if you if you
guys watch the uh Norman finlin debate
um that kind of uh thrust Destiny as a
streaming name into this uh conversation
s we want to start with the campus
protest before getting uh to the war
itself this week saw a militarized uh
response over at VCU UT Austin uh
Colombia and the kind and a a vigilante
response at at
UCLA uh so just curious for your your
read in general enal on these protests
as they've unfolded and have you seen
any double standard when it comes to
kind of the the Free Speech Warriors
that we've seen uh championing the cause
of free expression on college campuses
now championing the cause of shooting
fireworks into peaceful encampments yeah
it's it's the double standard is
incredibly glaring I mean it you would
have to put on blinders to actually miss
it you have I think the these student
protesters are the conscience of this
country we are witnessing an absolutely
horrific situation unfolding on the
ground and American policy is to insist
on continuing to send endless weapons
unconditionally to a military force that
is mass slaughtering children by the
tens of thousands and these students are
saying we're taking a stand this is not
okay if we can't impact the policy
makers directly we're going to make sure
that our institutions and the money that
we're paying to these institutions is
not playing into this kind of Mass
Slaughter and what we witnessed like
from my perspective in a better world
cops would be going after the people who
are violating American law to make sure
that weapons can continue slaughtering
children rather than going after people
who are peacefully protesting
overwhelmingly peacefully protesting in
order to change that policy change
American Investment in it and you're
absolutely right you have a level of
demonization of these protesters um
constantly talking about them as if you
know it's just like anti-semitic mobs or
or whatever the people leading these
protests there's very significant
portion of progressive young Jewish
people who are the leaders of of in in
many cases of some of these protests
groups from if not now and Jewish voice
for peace and and many others and they
are on the receiving end of tremendous
hate and violence and nobody talks about
that and as you mentioned what we're
witnessing in UCLA is absolutely
horrifying these protesters being
attacked by you know bear spray and
fireworks and some of them being beaten
up and you see like some serious
injuries but because the climate in this
country is one in which one side gets
demonized that empowers and emboldens
the response not just from police but
also from Vigilantes and I just want to
Note One Last Thing um just because
Stephen is here and I think it's really
relevant is there's a person that I know
uh named Simone Zimmerman and who she's
in town today for an intercept event
that's right and she's one of the most
conscientious and decent human beings
that you'll ever meet and she knows
personal people um in her life who have
lost loved ones on October 7th from the
attack um that Hamas carried out and she
was horrified by that by that attack and
she's equally horrified by Israel's
response and the Mass Slaughter and
she's one of those people who is
fighting for a better future for
Palestinians and Israelis and she was at
uh at Passover Cedar at Colombia joining
the protesters and talking about how
beautiful it is that she's in that setup
and Stephen quote tweeted that tweet and
said that he would like to donate
thousands of gallons of kosine
presumably so these people can set
themselves on fire and it's just such an
ugly and distasteful thing to say and
I'm genuinely curious of what you're
thinking when you tweet things like that
everybody celebrated Bushell doing his
prot people want to protest that way
then God help them I guess yeah this is
not about Bush though but let's keep
going in response to that because Omar
set up an interesting position here
between anti-semitic mobs and peaceful
protesters so are what is what we're
seeing on these campuses anti-semitic
mobs or is it peaceful protesters from
your perspective Stephen uh from my
perspective I mean it really depends on
which series of videos that you watch I
think from an American perspective it
really shouldn't matter if they're
anti-semitic mobs or if they're
protesting foreign policy or whatever in
the United States we don't have hate
speech laws you should be allowed to say
really whatever you want want in protest
uh assuming you're not violating any uh
social or whatever the ordinances are I
know like for some college campuses
you're not allowed to block Pathways or
you can't uh protest if they've got
events planned for graduations or
whatever uh and as long as you're not
disrupting the piece in a way where
you're like you can't blur loudspeakers
I think on college campuses as long as
you're folling the laws you'll be able
to protest however you want but if you
are say what we saw from NYPD and LAPD
actually last night if you're violating
laws University rules even with an
encampment if you broke into the Hall
like they did and have been barric up in
there what did you make of the NYPD
respons just at colia for example the I
like to wait till the dust settles on
this because I hear so many different
things about how students were all being
pro uh peaceful I've seen obviously the
videos of like some of the stuff being
broken into um I I think that when it
comes to an analysis of how to respond
to these particular events I think that
the the the start and stop needs to be
what are the rules and regulations in
place because a lot of people will jump
in and start arguing well it's a public
area so they can be wherever they want
or do whatever they want without even
understanding the rules or regulations
in place um I think as a blanket rule I
don't know why this particular situation
would need any kind of unique analysis
uh it would be the same as all protest
if you're in a private college uh I
understanding as they can remove you
whenever they want it's private property
if you're in a state funded or public
university then there are certain areas
that are supposed to remain open to the
public and they can't remove you unless
you are uh not there in an ordinary
manner if you're disrupting some of
their event um I don't see anything
about these particular set of protests
that would call for any type of unique
analysis that escapes like that
fundamental rule to protest in the
United States uh yeah and your
fundamental rule then to quote tweet
with the Cy uh I thought it was insane
that you had delusional people
especially young children in the United
States that don't know the any part of
this conflict whatsoever which is
probably the vast majority of the people
protesting it um that people are
celebrating people setting themselves on
fire that is just unbelievable to me you
saw a guy do it in front of a I think um
one of the New York City cour houses for
the Trump stuff you saw uh the Aaron
Bushnell guy do it for who knows what
reason um I guess because you thought
the whole world wasn't already paying
attention to this issue and yeah the
idea of people ever celebrating
themselves in a democratic first world
country setting themselves on fire for
an issue that already has an unlimited
amount of international attention it's
unbelievably stupid to me yeah but how
does it relate to this particular
instance I mean this is a bunch of
Jewish students celebrating with Pro
Palestinian students over Passover and
talking about a climate in which they're
coming together like why did you decide
to drag the the Bushnell thing into this
that's that's one I think it's funny
when people disingenuously load phrases
like oh all the Jewish people are
protesting with these people there are
so many Jewish people that's not true um
the last few research thing I saw I
think for 2023 shows like 90% of people
who are Jewish support the existence of
Israel so the idea that there's this
huge group of
Israel this is not about the existence
of Israel there's no question about the
fact that so many of these protest
leaders are in fact Jewish these groups
they're not imaginary they're not a
figment of your imagination you can
actually go see them and and look at how
large their Gatherings are how l l
voices have been the people who are
getting arrested in Congress so many of
them are progressive Jewish
organizations that are leading this
effort this is not about some broader
what are the the views of of American
Jews about the existence of Israel we're
just protest about the protest are about
ending the slaughter of the children of
Gaza that's what the protests are about
what do you mean what does it look like
what is the what is the end condition of
the the it's not just ending the
slaughter it's also stopping the
blockade it's also reaching a just
resolution to the Palestinian conflict
it's also probably the unlimited right
of Return of six million refugees it's
probably the dissolution of Israel as a
Jewish majority State it's probably the
create like I mean what all does that
entail you're conflating a ton of
different things a lot of these
protesters have varying views about this
some of them support a two-state
solution some of them support a one-
state solution but what's bringing
everybody together in this moment is a
realization that what Israel is doing to
Gaza is absolutely unconscionable that
you slaughter people at that scale that
Israel is clearly waging a war on the
civilian population of Gaza that's what
these people are upset about and they
want it to come to an end and the
specific thing that they're protesting
and maybe we'll we could actually find
something to agree on here because I've
seen you you describe yourself as kind
of a a moderate who like tries to you
know balance the the extremists on on
each side here so the specific thing the
protesters are arguing for at all of
these different campuses is uh opening
up the books of their basically the
hedge funds that run their universities
and divesting uh from firms that are
either linked to the war in Gaza or
linked to Israel uh more generally Brown
University uh reach an agreement with
its protesters that they would uh they
would abandon their encampment in
exchange for a vote in October to di to
divest from that that gets to the
question of resistance and the right the
right to resistance and so for years it
has been in the kind of policy of the
right here and a lot of the center here
in the United States to make it illegal
to try to ban people from participating
in boycotts or divestment efforts or
lobbying for sanctions uh against Israel
at the same time uh you say well armed
resistance is clearly you know off off
the table so if you if you rule out both
uh you you only leave people with one
option so even if you don't support
boycotting or divesting from Israel do
you support you know the right of people
here in the United States to like
to explicit um for how states have
banned some of the BDS participation as
a fundamental right to boycott I think
in the United States you should always
have the right to boycott everything
except for our currency I think um yeah
you have the right to boycot uh whatever
you want um I don't know why that should
ever be made illegal but I I know that
there are particular things BDS stuff
that I think States look at but um yeah
of course you should always have the
right I wish that the people that would
talk about conditioning uh support for
Israel though would also talk about
conditioning support for Palestine
because they are some of the highest
recipients of Aid in the world per
capita the United States contributes a
lot of that Aid it's interesting to me
that seems like we're always talking
about how we need to condition Aid to
Israel congratulations Congress Congress
just banned all funding of unra so yeah
have seen that well so actually because
Stephen raised an interesting point that
what's the kind of end goal of the
protesters after BD BDS in the service
of what you know what does that look
like a one state solution Cho the
minority well so you said earlier that
you know it's it sort of depends on
whatever video you're looking at that
this is an anti-semitic mob or peaceful
protesters and I think that's actually
true there's videos showing all kinds of
different things which is part of the
issue of piecing together these stories
via social media uh so if that if the
one state solution is kind of the
ultimate goal of the people that are
protesting for BDS um what is your like
do you think they're fundamentally
anti-semitic do you think they're
fundamentally are they from your
perspective just mistaken uh misguided
or are they
bigoted um I I don't care try trying to
sort out like the difference between
like anti-Semitism and anti-zionism is
almost impossible and in practice the
two look almost identical sometimes so
the obsession of trying to figure out
like what is the driving thing here