It Begins⦠Texas Sends More Migrants to NYC
Summary
TLDRThe video script discusses the ongoing migrant crisis in New York City, highlighting the tension between the city's commitment to providing shelter and the practical limitations it faces. It touches on the Texas governor's plan to send more asylum seekers to New York, the city's eviction of migrants from shelters after 30 or 60 days, and the ensuing protests from activists. The script also explores the political implications, the city's lawsuit against bus companies transporting migrants, and the complexities of navigating humanitarian aid within a strained system. It concludes by questioning the impact of activism on the crisis and the need for a more effective solution.
Takeaways
- π¨ The Texas governor plans to continue sending migrants to sanctuary cities, including New York, causing potential issues as thousands continue to arrive weekly.
- ποΈ Local residents in New York are pressuring the city to shut down shelters deemed inhumane, which could leave new arrivals without accommodation.
- π New York City leaders are not stopping evictions for adult migrants who have reached their shelter limit, leading to a 'revolving door' situation in the shelter system.
- π The city's lawsuit against bus companies transporting migrants has led to a decrease in arrivals from 4,000 to 1,300 people per week.
- π€ Mayor Adams has been critical of both the Texas governor's actions and the local hypocrisy regarding shelter provision and migrant care.
- πΌ Mayor Adams is implementing laws with limited resources and facing criticism despite efforts to address the crisis.
- π€ There is a debate over the duration people should stay in shelters, with some advocating for permanent stays and others supporting time limits to accommodate new arrivals.
- π The city's shelters are so full that there are lines of people waiting for re-admittance after eviction, highlighting the strain on resources.
- π Activists are upset with the city's decision to shut down the initial Texas bus program, claiming it has complicated their efforts to assist new arrivals.
- π³οΈ Polling shows that 80% of New Yorkers are in favor of the right to shelter, but there is local resistance when shelters are placed in specific neighborhoods.
- π The city is caught in a cycle of protests against new shelters and pushback when people are unable to stay in them, revealing a conflict between compassion and practicality.
Q & A
What is the main issue discussed in the video script regarding migrants in New York City?
-The main issue discussed is the ongoing migrant crisis in New York City, where thousands of migrants are arriving weekly and the city is struggling to provide adequate shelter and resources, leading to conflicts and evictions from shelters.
What is the Texas governor's stance on sending migrants to New York City?
-The Texas governor has vowed to continue sending migrants to New York City, calling the residents hypocrites for their protests against shelters and claiming that the city is not adequately caring for the migrants.
What is the city's response to the Texas governor's actions?
-New York City's mayor, Eric Adams, has criticized the Texas governor's actions as cowardly and has taken legal action against bus companies involved in transporting migrants, aiming to limit the number of people arriving in the city.
Why are there protests and conflicts over the establishment of new shelters in New York City?
-There are protests and conflicts because local residents often view new shelters as inhumane and believe they contribute to increased crime and strain on public resources, leading to opposition whenever a new shelter is proposed.
What is the 'right to shelter' policy in New York City, and why is it controversial?
-The 'right to shelter' policy in New York City mandates that the city provide temporary shelter to anyone in need. It's controversial because it puts pressure on the city's limited resources and leads to a revolving door situation where people are evicted after a certain period to make room for new arrivals.
How has the city's lawsuit against bus companies affected the flow of migrants into New York City?
-The lawsuit has resulted in some bus companies ceasing their operations, reducing the number of migrants arriving in the city. However, it has also led to a more scattered and unpredictable arrival of migrants, complicating efforts by humanitarian organizations to assist them.
What is the city's current approach to dealing with the shelter crisis?
-The city is attempting to balance the need to provide shelter with the limitations of its resources. This includes enforcing evictions after a certain period and trying to manage the flow of migrants into the city through legal actions against transport companies.
What is the role of activism in the current migrant crisis in New York City?
-Activism plays a significant role, with some groups protesting against shelter evictions and others advocating for more permanent solutions. However, the script suggests that activism has become a trend, leading to conflicting demands and making it difficult for the city to find a satisfactory solution.
How does the script describe the public's perception of the migrant crisis and the city's response?
-The script describes a divide in public perception, with many New Yorkers supporting the right to shelter in principle but opposing specific shelter locations in their neighborhoods. It suggests that there is a disconnect between the compassion people express for migrants and the actual support for solutions in their communities.
What are the challenges faced by humanitarian organizations in assisting migrants in New York City?
-Humanitarian organizations face challenges such as a lack of standard procedures for migrant arrivals due to the city's legal actions against transport companies, limited resources to assist a growing number of migrants, and the difficulty of tracking and providing aid to migrants who are arriving at various locations throughout the city.
What is the implication of the 'right to shelter' policy on the city's ability to manage its resources and provide long-term assistance to migrants?
-The 'right to shelter' policy, while intended to provide immediate assistance, may hinder the city's ability to manage its resources effectively and provide long-term support. It creates a situation where migrants are evicted after a short period, potentially before they can secure work or integrate into society, leading to a cycle of dependency and limited opportunities for improvement.
Outlines
π Conflict Over Migrant Shelters in New York City
The video script discusses the ongoing migrant crisis in New York City, highlighting the tension between Texas' policy of sending migrants to sanctuary cities and New York's struggle to accommodate them. The speaker mentions the Texas governor's promise to continue bussing migrants to New York, despite local resistance and the city's limited resources. New York City's mayor, Adams, is criticized for evictions of adult migrants who have reached their shelter limit, while also being accused of hypocrisy for his stance on shelters contributing to neighborhood issues. The script touches on the city's failed attempt to repeal the right to shelter requirements, leading to a 'revolving door' situation at shelters. The mayor's response to Texas' threats includes calling the Texas governor a coward and suing bus companies involved in transporting migrants, which has resulted in a significant decrease in arrivals. However, the underlying issue remains the city's inability to provide long-term solutions for asylum seekers amidst political and activist pressures.
π€ The Paradox of Activism and Asylum Seeker Support
This paragraph delves into the complexities surrounding the treatment of asylum seekers in New York City. It describes the city's lawsuit against bus companies for transporting migrants, which has led to a reduction in arrivals but also criticism from activists. The city's shelters are portrayed as full and ill-equipped for the influx, leading to evictions that contradict the right to shelter laws. The script mentions the city's demand for $700 million in damages from bus companies and the challenges faced by humanitarians in tracking and assisting new arrivals due to the lack of a standard procedure. The paragraph also highlights the public's divided opinion on shelter policies, with some advocating for permanent shelter and others supporting time limits to accommodate new arrivals. The mayor's efforts to manage the crisis within legal constraints and limited resources are contrasted with the ongoing activism and the city's struggle to find a balanced approach.
ποΈ The Struggle with Temporary Shelter Solutions
The script addresses the controversy over New York City's shelter system for migrants, which is strained by the high volume of new arrivals. It explains that the city's shelters are designed for temporary stays, leading to evictions after 30 or 60 days, a policy that has been criticized as cruel and inhumane. The video points out the discrepancy between the city's laws, which mandate a right to shelter, and the practical limitations of providing long-term housing for an unlimited number of people. It also discusses the challenges faced by migrants who have filed asylum paperwork but are waiting for work permits, leaving them unable to support themselves. The paragraph highlights the city's dilemma in trying to abide by the law while managing limited resources and the resulting public backlash, which includes protests against both the establishment and closure of shelters.
π’ The Impact of Activism on Asylum Seeker Policies
The final paragraph of the script explores the role of activism in shaping the city's response to the migrant crisis. It describes how activism has led to conflicting demands and outcomes, with protesters advocating both for the removal of shelters and for the extension of shelter stay limits. The video suggests that activism has become a trend, with some activists opposing any government action without considering the broader implications. It criticizes the city's approach to the crisis, which has resulted in a 'revolving door' of shelter stays and evictions, and questions whether the activism is exacerbating the problem for asylum seekers. The script concludes by questioning the effectiveness of activism when it overshadows the practical needs of the migrants and the city's capacity to support them.
Mindmap
Keywords
π‘Sanctuary cities
π‘Shelter system
π‘Right to shelter
π‘Activists
π‘Mayor Eric Adams
π‘Bus program
π‘Evictions
π‘Activism
π‘Humanitarian crisis
π‘Legal actions
Highlights
Texas governor's plan to continue busing migrants to sanctuary cities, including New York.
Thousands of migrants arriving in New York City weekly, causing strain on local shelters.
Local residents pressuring city to shut down shelters they consider inhumane.
Community groups opposed to the construction of a 3,000-bed migrant shelter on 8 acres of ball fields.
New York City leaders won't stop evictions for adult migrants who've reached their shelter limit.
Criticism of the 30 and 60-day shelter eviction policy as being counterproductive.
Reports of increased illegal activity and violence around migrant shelters.
Texas governor calling New Yorkers hypocrites for their reactions to shelters.
Mayor Adams also accused New Yorkers of hypocrisy regarding shelter protests.
New York City's attempt to repeal or modify right to shelter requirements faced backlash.
Activists' insistence on the right to shelter for everyone leads to a revolving door shelter system.
Mayor Adams' response to Texas governor's threats reflects frustration with the situation.
Mayor's office calls Texas governor a coward for offloading problems to other cities.
Lawsuit by Mayor Eric Adams against 17 bus companies for transporting migrants.
Activists upset about the city's lawsuit against bus companies, claiming it hinders their work.
City's shelters are full, leading to evictions and long lines of people waiting for re-admittance.
Critics argue that the shelter system is not designed for the number of people it's serving.
The city's struggle to balance providing temporary shelter with the unlimited number of asylum seekers.
Activism and protests against every decision made by the city, regardless of the outcome.
New York City council member's bill to end shelter stay limits, advocating for equity.
The paradox of activism leading to more problems in the shelter system and migrant crisis.
Transcripts
and know this I will continue to bust
those migrants to Sanctuary cities
across the United States of
America but oh they're going to New York
trust
me so this could be a huge problem
because as you can see from the lines
behind me thousands are still arriving
here in New York City every single week
yet local residents are pressuring the
city to shut down several shelters that
they say are inhumane which means if
Texas makes good on this threat the next
folks to arrive will have nowhere to St
but on the street from the outset
community groups did not like the idea
of usurping 8 Acres of ball fields for
3,000 bed migrant shelter it has not
gone away we're still dealing with this
every day as the migrant crisis
continues New York City leaders will not
stop evictions for adult migrants who've
reached their 30 or 60-day shelter limit
a shelter system in New York City was
created to stabilize people this rule
does exactly the opposite the 30 and
60-day shelter eviction roles are some
of the
[Applause]
[Applause]
cruestv fights and reports of illegal
activity the randles Island Park
Alliance says it's time for the city to
fold its tents remove the Cs and hit the
road when you see some of the hypocrisy
of people who are saying bring us your
tired you're weak your huddle masses
yearning to be free but not on my
[Music]
block so the Texas governor has vowed to
send more Asylum Seekers to New York
while calling everyone here A bunch of
Hypocrites but what nobody's talking
about is that mayor Adams recently said
the exact same thing also referring to
New Yorkers as Hypocrites for protesting
some of his shelters saying that the
shelter contribute to violence that they
occupy public resources and that they
are bad for the neighborhoods they're in
but at a recent press conference the
mayor just laughed it all off and what
else is he supposed to do just a couple
of weeks ago when the city tried to
repeal its right to shelter requirements
or modify them so that they wouldn't
have to provide an unlimited number of
people with temporary shelter activists
got upset there were rallies there were
protests there were accusations that the
mayor and his administration were cruel
and heartless and had no Humanity in
their souls even though the city doesn't
have the resources to house the entire
World which is impossible yet activists
were insistent on the right to shelter
applying to everyone which forced the
city to start kicking people out of its
shelters after 30 days just so new
Asylum Seekers could move in which is
something else activists are upset about
they want the shelters to be permanent
forever but since that's not possible
the shelter system is now a revolving
door operation leading many people to
question whether or not the Asylum
crisis is helping the very Asylum
Seekers who are stuck in it and that
brings us to the real reason why we have
an asylum crisis in this city to begin
with and it's because every single time
City lead tried to care for the people
everybody says we want to care for they
get blocked stopped fought against which
is shocking because polling consistently
shows that 80% of New Yorkers are in
favor of right to shelter but the Texas
governor is going to put that to the
test which means we're going to find out
pretty soon where the city stands on
this and know this I will continue to
bust those migrates to Sanctuary cities
across the United States of America
Adams needs something to do but this
crisis is about to come to an end in
just 6 months so this tells us
everything we need to know about why the
Asylum crisis is the way it is and it
also reveals that this entire crisis
isn't about the people that are coming
to New York City it's about politics and
if New York City is really a sanctuary
for immigrants why are the immigrants
who are here being treated the way that
they are getting kicked out of their
shelters at the same time we've got so
much activism going on here right now
that it is starting to conflict with
itself on the one hand we don't have
enough shelters on the other hand we
need more shelters there's also endless
debate on how long people should be able
to stay in them some people want it to
be forever other people think that the
term limits we have are good because
those limits help the city free up
shelter space for new arrivals who come
every single week and now you've got a
situation where the mayor's extremely
frustrated he's implementing the laws
that were voted for and he's doing it
with the limited amount of resources
that the city has yet he's getting all
the blame for how these things work out
out but the mayor's response to the
Texas governor's threats is one many New
Yorkers will probably appreciate but
before we look at how New York City is
going to respond to this latest round of
threats it's important to understand the
Texas governor says he's going to
continue his bus program as long as the
country's border remains in its current
state that being said the mayor has a
few tools at his disposal to fight back
against another bus program and the
mayor's not taking the Texas governor's
criticism of him or his City lying down
first the mayor's office has called the
governor of Texas a coward for
offloading his problems to somebody else
to deal with and the mayor's office even
went so far as to mention that crime in
Texas under Greg evit has risen
exponentially since he started believe
who you want to on statistics like that
but the Adams Administration said it's
left to pick up the pieces of broken
policies that use people as political
ponds while maintaining that the city's
provided care for over 200,000 people
since this Crisis began in New York but
words aren't the only tool the mayor
plans to use in the face of this in
January mayor Eric Adams announced that
he is suing 17 bus companies for their
role in busing tens of thousands of
migrants from Texas to New York City
since a spring of 2022 today's lawsuit
so last year when Texas started busing
Asylum Seekers here to New York City
there was a massive surge in Immigration
numbers but the city ended up suing the
very bus companies on which those folks
were traveling in order to get them to
stop and this has worked because one of
the 16 companies involved in that
operation says they're not going to do
it anymore and the companies that wish
to continue transporting people here
face a blockade of some sort at the
actual bus terminal and they're limited
to just dropping off guests at one
specific location during specific times
with 48 Hours advance notice and what
used to effectively be a 24-hour 7-Day a
week operation is now limited to just a
few days a week and just a few hours but
here's where things get interesting in
New York it is illegal to transport
someone here so that they can take
advantage of the city's generous right
to shelter laws that's why the city city
thinks they've got standing to sue but
activists are actually upset that the
city shut down the busing program which
was costing the city money caring for
folks who may not have come here if they
weren't given a free ticket the city is
seeking more than $700 million from
these 17 bus companies to cover the cost
of carrying and Sheltering these
migrants as part of the lawsuit the city
was also requiring these companies to
post a monetary bond to start covering
the cost $700 million in Damages related
to care that's crazy but before we go
over why activists are upset the mayor
has been battling this program trying to
shut it down when the program was still
active 4,000 people a week were arriving
in the city those numbers are down
considerably to around 1,300 people a
week but if Texas does start sending
more people here that could change there
are more ways to get into New York City
than a bus that goes straight from Texas
to here you could take a bus part of the
way and then take another bus part of
the way plus there's roads Bridges
trains planes and it may be impossible
for the mayor to completely close off
the city's border to just one person
from one certain part of the world plus
there are people who would say that
that's illegal but wait till you hear
why activists are so upset with the
mayor for shutting down the initial
Texas bus program in the first place
Malo says he is against a lawsuit suing
these bus companies and adds it has made
their job more difficult when trying to
find new arrivals it's a little bit more
difficult for us to to get a grasp as to
where they going to exit so we're still
we're see you know that almost makes it
seem like the number of people coming
here remains unchanged because New York
is such an attractive destination with
so many things to help Asylum Seekers
that people would make the journey here
no matter what and even though it might
look like the mayor's plan to Block
Buses coming in from Texas is a win from
a political standpoint in practice it
means that people who are coming here
just have a harder time doing something
that they already had planned to do when
they left wherever it is they're from
and whereas in the past you had people
arriving at one specific part of this
very specific location now folks arrive
everywhere Penn Station Grand Central
various terminals here roads Planes
Trains and the limited resources that
humanitarians have to help are now being
spread even thinner but now since the
city's going to war with the companies
bringing people here there's no standard
procedure for dropping people off and
humanitarians have no way of knowing
where vulnerable folks are going to
arrive and they're now running around
the city at all hours of the day trying
to track down one person from here or
one person arriving here it's a big mess
and the most insane thing about this is
no matter how people end up arriving the
city's never had any plans to disqualify
someone for applying for shelter so here
we have the city on the one hand winning
points politically but also hurting the
people it's supposed to care for by
making their lives tougher and if Texas
does decide to resume sending larger and
larger amounts of people to the city and
if the city continues resisting those
efforts by just making the journey
tougher while still offering the help
people the city is just going to end up
wasting the little resources that it
says it has and speaking of resources
the city's shelters are now so full you
have lines of people waiting to see if
the shelter system will reaccept them
for a place to stay because they've
started kicking people out can you
believe that shelter evictions in a
sanctuary City while at the same time
you've got activists in syst that the
people who have been evicted should be
allowed to stay forever and that we may
have too many shelters in the first
place which makes this the most
confusing development of this story so
far so behind me this is the line to get
into the reticketing facility at this
place everyone who's been evicted from a
shelter can get a plane ticket bus
ticket or help with a ride sharing app
to the destination of their choosing but
the reason there's a line here is
because evictions have started which has
activists fuming yet other activists are
upset that we have as many shelters as
we do for some reason the city says they
have to place these shelter limits
because they don't have room for
everyone just last week the city
received more than 1300 new arrivals
that's not going away so everyone
watching this knows the evictions are a
bad idea because they lead to what you
see back here but New York City's laws
stipulate that everyone gets a place to
stay on a temporary basis even if the
shelter system is full and when you
offer for a limited number of resources
to an unlimited number of people this is
the predictable result in fact the
shelter system is now tasked with doing
something it was never designed to do
the way that the shelter should be
operating is they should allow people to
move in and not force them to move out
until their time has come to its logical
conclusion meaning that they've gotten
the help they need to enter society yet
The Shelter Systems here have people
evicted after 30 days when a work permit
takes a minimum of 6 months and
obviously this is something that people
should be and are upset about but it's
bringing up a question is this the
city's only option they've got a lot of
resources but are they doing what they
have to do to abide by the law or is
this deliberately cruel we're still
dealing with this every day as the
migrant crisis continues New York City
leaders will not stop evictions for
adult migrants whove reached their 30 or
60-day shelter limit critics have called
the policy so here's the thing the
mayor's office spent 6 months with local
activist groups in court going over how
exactly to implement right to shelter
when these conditions persist and
putting up a no V sign on the city's
shelters and turning people away wasn't
an idea that was being considered yet
had the city gone and done that all of
the folks that you see here would have
had enough time in the shelter to get
the requisite assistance yet sadly many
of the folks getting let go that are now
here to plead their case for a shelter
extension are in no better position than
they were when they got here and that's
not what a homeless shelter is supposed
to do people are supposed to be better
when they leave not worse off in fact
part of the problem is that people that
are in line they've filed their Asylum
paperwork they've gotten everything set
up with a case worker but since Federal
Work authorization can take 6 to 8
months they're now waiting for that to
happen they can't provide for themselves
on their own and the second problem
we've got here is that since right to
shelter applies to the entire world a
potentially unlimited number of people
critics say this means nothing can ever
be done to address capacity issues at
the city's limited shelter resources
which is why we've got revolving
evictions which help nobody and what's
upsetting is that after 6 months of
negotiations this is the compromise
solution that we got right to shelter
Remains the law of the land yet it only
applies on a temporary basis and this is
the result yet now many of the very same
people who are in favor of the creation
of this very same system are now
activating against it calling the
mayor's actions cruel and inhumane
saying he's doing something wrong when
this is what was agreed on and a judge
is overseeing it people said it's
inhumane to put people out during the
winter time so now they say it's
inhumane to do it in the summertime it's
Humane to do in the springtime it's
inhumane to do in the fall time it's
always inhumane to have to not be able
to House
198,000 people unfortunately this is
what we see every single time the city
does anything if they need to build a
shelter somewhere there are always
protests there is always local push back
and then if people can't stay in the
shelter there's push back if new people
come and they don't have a place to stay
there's push back and as you'll soon see
even with lines of people on the street
there are still some people advocating
for certain shelters to go away entirely
which would just create more of this
which is very interesting because recent
polling shows that 80% of New Yorkers
are in favor of right to shelter just
not apparently when there is a shelter
or a facility in their particular
neighborhood that's always the wrong
location for some reason which reveals a