Special counsel blasts judge’s jury instruction request in Trump documents case

CNN
3 Apr 202407:55

Summary

TLDRThe transcript discusses Special Counsel Jack Smith's legal strategy in response to Judge Aileen Cannon's requests for jury instructions in the classified documents case involving former President Donald Trump. Smith objects to the hypothetical scenarios proposed by Cannon, arguing they have no legal basis and could distort the trial. The discussion highlights the tension between the court and the prosecution, with suggestions that Smith may seek Cannon's recusal due to her inexperience and the potential impact on the trial process.

Takeaways

  • 📜 Special Counsel Jack Smith is challenging Judge Aileen Cannon's requests for jury instructions that align with Donald Trump's claims regarding the classified documents case.
  • 🔍 Smith's filing asserts that Trump's reliance on the Presidential Records Act is unfounded and concocted post-hoc, rather than based on facts.
  • 🎯 The special counsel's office is critical of Judge Cannon's order asking for briefs on two scenarios: one assuming presidential authority over classified records and another assuming the ability to declassify documents.
  • 🤨 Jack Smith expresses concern that these hypothetical scenarios, if presented to the jury as facts, could distort the trial's outcome.
  • 📝 The filing from Smith's office indicates a strong disapproval of the judge's approach, setting the stage for a potential appeal or request for recusal.
  • 🚨 Legal analysts find the judge's decisions confusing and unlawful, noting that they are uncharacteristic of standard legal procedures.
  • 🧐 Judge Cannon's inexperience is suggested as a possible reason for the unusual rulings, which could have significant implications for the case's progression.
  • ⏳ The potential for delay is present due to the possibility of an appeal, despite a trial date being set.
  • 📆 Unresolved rulings and foundational issues yet to be addressed by Judge Cannon could further postpone the trial.
  • 🚠 The stakes are high as错误的 jury instructions could lead to an irreversible outcome if the jury is swayed based on these instructions.
  • 🗣️ Despite criticisms, some legal professionals describe Judge Cannon as a measured and impartial figure in the courtroom, unlikely to show bias or partisanship.

Q & A

  • What is the main issue that Special Counsel Jack Smith is confronting with Judge Aileen Cannon?

    -Special Counsel Jack Smith is confronting Judge Aileen Cannon over her requests for jury instructions that embrace Donald Trump's claims that he had the authority to take the documents with him when he left the White House. Smith argues that these claims are not based on any facts and are a post-hoc justification.

  • How does Jack Smith describe the basis of Trump's claim regarding the Presidential Records Act?

    -Jack Smith describes the basis of Trump's claim regarding the Presidential Records Act as not based on any facts, but rather a post-hoc justification that was concocted more than a year after he left the White House.

  • What is the significance of the filing that Jack Smith's office made overnight?

    -The overnight filing from Jack Smith's office is significant because it indicates a growing frustration with Judge Aileen Cannon and her handling of the classified documents case. It also sets the stage for a potential appeal and possibly a motion to recuse the judge from the case.

  • What are the two scenarios that Judge Aileen Cannon asked for jury instructions on?

    -Judge Aileen Cannon asked for jury instructions on two scenarios: one where the President has the authority under the Presidential Records Act to possess these classified records, and another where Donald Trump had broad authority as President to declassify documents.

  • Why is Jack Smith concerned about the jury instructions proposed by Judge Aileen Cannon?

    -Jack Smith is concerned because he believes that the proposed jury instructions could distort the trial. He argues that if the jury is read on these two scenarios as if they are facts, it could lead to an acquittal, which he sees as unlawful and not based on the correct interpretation of the law.

  • What is the potential impact of Jack Smith's filing on the trial timeline?

    -The filing could potentially delay the trial as it may lead to an appeal. However, even with a set trial date, there are many rulings that Judge Cannon has yet to decide on, which could further postpone the trial.

  • What is the significance of the term 'double jeopardy' in this context?

    -Double jeopardy refers to the legal protection against being tried twice for the same crime. If the jury is given erroneous instructions and they acquit, an appeal can be made on those grounds. However, if the trial proceeds and results in an acquittal, double jeopardy would apply, preventing any future retrial for the same charges.

  • What is the role of the Espionage Act in this case?

    -The Espionage Act is the law under which Donald Trump is charged, and it has been in existence for 100 years. Jack Smith argues that Judge Cannon's proposed jury instructions do not align with the requirements of this Act.

  • How does the legal analyst describe Judge Aileen Cannon's experience and performance?

    -The legal analyst suggests that Judge Aileen Cannon's inexperience is showing, as she is making decisions and rulings that have no basis in the law and are causing confusion among legal experts.

  • What is the potential strategy behind Jack Smith's actions?

    -Jack Smith's actions indicate a readiness to appeal and possibly ask for Judge Cannon's recusal from the case. His frustration suggests that he is preparing for such a move, given the series of unlawful orders or decisions that have been made.

  • How does the New York criminal case relate to the current situation?

    -The New York criminal case is mentioned in the context of an expanded gag order and Donald Trump's public criticism of the judge. It is used to discuss the judge's impartiality and how he operates in a courtroom, which is relevant to understanding the potential challenges and dynamics in the current case.

  • What are the implications of the judge's rulings on foundational aspects of the case?

    -The judge's rulings on foundational aspects, such as the Classified Information Procedures Act, are crucial as they set the stage for the trial. The lack of rulings on these foundational aspects contributes to the uncertainty and potential delays in the trial process.

Outlines

00:00

📜 Special Counsel's Response to Judge's Request on Classified Documents Case

The first paragraph discusses Special Counsel Jack Smith's strategic move to challenge Judge Aileen Cannon's requests for jury instructions in the classified documents case. Smith criticizes the judge's proposal for instructions that embrace Donald Trump's claims of authority to take the documents with him upon leaving the White House. The filing emphasizes that Trump's reliance on the Presidential Records Act is unfounded and concocted post-hoc. Smith's frustration is palpable as he argues against the inclusion of hypothetical scenarios that could distort the trial and sets the stage for a potential appeal, indicating his readiness to request the judge's recusal due to her unconventional and unlawful decisions.

05:01

🚨 Potential Delays and Legal Strategies in Classified Documents Case

The second paragraph focuses on the potential implications of Jack Smith's frustrations and the strategic legal moves in the ongoing classified documents case. It highlights the possibility of delays in the trial process due to a potential recusal request for Judge Cannon and the complexities arising from numerous pending rulings. The discussion includes the impact of the judge's inexperience, the significance of the jury instructions, and the legal desperation to address these issues before the trial. The conversation also touches on the New York criminal case and the expanded gag order, with insights into the judge's impartiality and his conduct in the courtroom based on previous experiences.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Special Counsel

The term 'Special Counsel' refers to an attorney appointed to investigate or prosecute cases of significant public importance, often involving government officials. In the context of the video, Jack Smith is the Special Counsel taking on the case involving classified documents and is seen expressing frustration towards the judge's decisions.

💡Presumptions in Law

Presumptions in law are assumptions made by the courts that a fact is true unless proven otherwise. In the video, Jack Smith argues against the judge's proposed jury instructions that seem to presume Donald Trump's authority over the documents, which he claims has no basis in law.

💡Presidential Records Act

The Presidential Records Act (PRA) is a U.S. law that governs the preservation and disposal of presidential records created and received by the president and his staff during their time in office. The video discusses Trump's claim that he had the authority to take the documents with him under the PRA, which the Special Counsel disputes.

💡Espionage Act

The Espionage Act is a set of U.S. federal laws that protect national defense-related information from unauthorized disclosure. The video mentions that Donald Trump is charged under the Espionage Act, which has been in existence for 100 years, rather than the Presidential Records Act.

💡Jury Instructions

Jury instructions are the legal guidelines provided to jurors before they begin deliberations to help them understand the law and their role in deciding the case. In the video, the judge's request for jury instructions that embrace Trump's claims is seen as problematic and potentially distorting the trial's outcome.

💡Recusal

Recusal refers to the act of a judge or jurist withdrawing from a case due to a perceived conflict of interest or other circumstances that might compromise the impartiality of the judicial process. The video suggests that Jack Smith may be considering asking for the judge's recusal due to her decisions that seem unlawful and out of the ordinary.

💡Double Jeopardy

Double jeopardy is a legal principle that prevents a person from being tried twice for the same crime following a valid conviction or acquittal. In the video, it is mentioned that if the jury is given erroneous instructions and they acquit, an appeal can be made, but once a jury is sworn in, the double jeopardy rule would apply, making it crucial to address these issues before the trial proceeds.

💡Gag Order

A gag order is a legal order issued by a court or judge prohibiting or limiting public communication about a case or legal matter. In the video, Donald Trump's comments about the judge and the expanded gag order are discussed, indicating that there are restrictions on what can be said publicly about the case.

💡Classified Information

Classified information refers to data that is considered sensitive or critical to national security and is therefore kept confidential from unauthorized access or disclosure. The video revolves around a case involving classified documents, emphasizing the importance of handling such information according to the law.

💡Judicial Process

The judicial process refers to the procedures and steps taken by the courts to resolve legal disputes, including trials, hearings, and appeals. The video discusses various aspects of the judicial process, such as jury instructions, the potential for a judge's recusal, and the impact of a gag order on public perception.

💡Legal Analysts

Legal analysts are professionals who assess and provide insights into legal matters, often offering expert opinions on complex issues. In the video, legal analysts are discussing the case and the judge's decisions, contributing to the public's understanding of the legal proceedings.

Highlights

Special Counsel Jack Smith is challenging Judge Aileen Cannon over her requests for jury instructions that embrace Donald Trump's claims.

Smith argues that Trump's reliance on the Presidential Records Act is a post-hoc justification without any facts.

The Special Counsel's office is frustrated with an order from Judge Cannon asking for jury instructions on two different scenarios.

Both scenarios proposed by Judge Cannon are seen as potentially distorting the trial by the Special Counsel.

Judge Cannon's order asks for instructions assuming broad authority for the President and Trump to declassify documents.

Jack Smith's filing criticizes the inclusion of hypothetical scenarios not based in law.

The filing suggests that Judge Cannon is trying to inject the Presidential Records Act into the case, which is not the charge against Trump.

Trump is charged with the Espionage Act, a law over 100 years old, not the Presidential Records Act.

Legal analysts are puzzled by the unusual rulings and decisions from Judge Cannon.

Jack Smith's frustration indicates a potential setup for asking Judge Cannon to be recused from the case.

The case is facing delays due to the potential appeal and unresolved rulings.

The jury instructions are seen as heavily tailored in favor of Trump and an acquittal.

The issue with the jury instructions is critical and cannot be appealed later, necessitating immediate action.

The filing from Jack Smith shows a sense of urgency to address the issue before the trial proceeds.

The New York criminal case and an expanded gag order are also mentioned, with Trump criticizing the judge on social media.

The judge in question is described as down the middle, not biased, and very measured in his courtroom.

Judge Cannon's experience is questioned, and her decisions are seen as out of the ordinary.

The transcript discusses the potential impact of the judge's decisions on the legal process and the Espionage Act charge.

Transcripts

00:01

OUT OF A MEETING WITH THE

00:02

PRESIDENT. SO WHAT CAUSED THIS

00:03

TENSE MOMENT AND WHAT OBSERVERS

00:05

SEE AS SPECIAL COUNSEL, JACK

00:07

SMITH BURSTING WITH FRUSTRATION

00:10

HIS MAJOR MOVE OVERNIGHT TO

00:12

PUSH BACK ON THE JUDGE

00:13

OVERSEEING THE MAR-A-LAGO

00:14

DOCUMENTS CASE. ZARA IS OUT

00:16

I'M JOHN BERMAN WITH KATE

00:19

BALDWIN. THIS IS CNN NEWS

00:20

CENTRAL

00:31

>> OVERNIGHT

00:32

>> SPECIAL COUNSEL, JAMITH,

00:33

TAKING ON THE JUDGE, OVERSEEING

00:34

THE CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS, CASE

00:36

IN A NEW WAY, CONFRONTING JUDGE

00:38

AILEEN CANNON OVER HER REQUESTS

00:40

FOR JURY INSTRUCTIONS THAT

00:42

EMBRACED DONALD TRUMP'S CLAIMS

00:44

THAT HE HAD BROUGHT AUTHORITY

00:45

TO TAKE THE DOCUMENTS WITH HIM

00:46

WHEN HE LEFT THE WHITE HOUSE S

00:50

THIS, WRITING THIS IN PART IN

00:51

THE FILING THE COURT SHOULD BE

00:53

AWARE AT THE OUTSET THAT

00:54

TRUMP'S ENTIRE EFFORT TO RELY

00:56

ON THE PRA, THE PRESIDENTIAL

00:57

RECORDS ACT IS NOT BASED ON ANY

00:59

FACTS. IT IS A POST-HOC

01:02

JUSTIFICATION THAT HAS

01:04

CONCOCTED THAT WAS CONCOCTED

01:05

MORE THAN A YEAR AFTER HE LEFT

01:07

THE WHITE HOUSE ALSO, THIS

01:09

SAYING THERE IS NO BASIS IN LAW

01:11

OR FACT FOR TH

01:12

PRESUMPTION THE COURT SHOULD

01:15

REJECT TRUMP' TO

01:15

INVENT ONE AS A VEHICLE TO

01:18

INJECT THE PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS

01:19

ACT INTO THIS CASE. LET'S GET

01:21

OVER TO CNN, ZACH COHEN FOR

01:22

MUCH MORE ON THE ZAK, THERE WAS

01:24

A LOT TO READ IS THIS CAME IN

01:26

WHILE EVERYONE WAS SLEEPING.

01:27

WHAT ELSE IS A SPECIAL COUNSEL

01:28

SAYING HERE?

01:29

>> YEAH. OKAY. THIS SIMMERING

01:32

FRUSTRATION THAT WE'VE BEEN

01:33

SENSING FROM JACK SMITH TOWARDS

01:34

AILEEN CANNON, THE JUDGE IN

01:35

THIS CASE SEEMED TO COME TO A

01:36

HEAD LAST NIGHT IN THIS FILING

01:38

FROM THE SPECIALEL'S

01:39

OFFICE, THEY ARE TAKING ISSUE

01:41

WITH THIS ODD ORDER FROM AILEEN

01:43

CANNON THAT CAME IN ABOUT LAST

01:45

MONTH, AND IT ASKS BOTH SIDES

01:47

TO SUBMIT BRIEFS FOR THESE JURY

01:50

INSTRUCTIONS OUTLINING TWO

01:52

DIFFERENT SCENARIOS. ONE,

01:52

OUTLINING IS A JURY

01:54

INSTRUCTIONS THAT ASSUMES THAT

01:55

THE PRESIDENT HAS THE AUTHORITY

01:57

UNDER THE PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS

01:58

ACT E E THESE CLASSIFIED

01:59

RECORDS AND THE SECOND

02:00

ONE IS A SCENARIO WHERE IT

02:03

ASSUMED THAT DONALD TRUMP HAD

02:04

BROAD AUTHORITY AS PRESIDENT TO

02:07

DECLASSIFY DIFFERENT DIFFERENT

02:08

DOCUMENTS BOTH OF WHICH JACK

02:10

SMITH ARGUES COULD QUOTE

02:12

DISTORT THE TRIAL. IF THE JURY

02:14

IS SORT OF READ IN ON THESE ON

02:16

THESE TWO SCENARIOS AS IF THEY

02:17

ARE FACT, AS YOU READ IN THE

02:20

INTERESTS, DO I MEAN, HE TAKES

02:20

SERIOUS ISSUE WITH AILEEN

02:21

CANNON SORT OFSSUMPTION THAT

02:23

BOTH OF THESE SCENARIOS SHOULD

02:25

BE IN THE JURY'S MINDS AS THEY

02:27

HEAR TESTIMONY. ONCE AN OR IF

02:30

AND WHEN THIS CASE GOES TO

02:30

TRIAL

02:31

>> ZACH, THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR

02:32

THAT

02:34

>> ALL RIG US NOW, CNN

02:36

LEGAL FORMER CHIEF

02:37

ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF

02:38

THE MANHATTAN DISTRICT

02:40

ATTORNEY'S OFFICE. KAREN

02:40

FRIEDMAN, AGNIFILO KAREN, THIS

02:42

FILING OVERNIGHT FROM JACK

02:45

SMITH IN SOME OF THE LANGUAGE

02:46

YOU CAN READ, THE FRUSTRATION.

02:48

IT'S ZIPPY SAYING, COME ON.

02:50

>> LIKE NO

02:52

>> ONE TAKES THIS SERIOUSLY.

02:53

HOW CAN YOU MAKE US FILE

02:55

SOMETHING LIKE THIS? WHAT DO

02:57

YOU READ IN HERE

03:00

>> LOOK, IT'S NOT UNUSUAL FOR

03:02

TO ASK THE PARTIES FOR

03:05

PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS

03:07

BEFORE A TRIAL.

03:08

>> BUT WHAT

03:09

>> IS UNUSUAL IS SHE POSED TO

03:11

HYPOTHETICAL SCENARIOS, BOTH OF

03:14

WHICH HAVE NO BASIS IN THE LAW.

03:16

SHE'S TRYING TO INJECT THE

03:17

PRESIDENTIDS ACT WHICH

03:19

DONALD TRUMP IS NOT CHARGED

03:21

WITH VIOLATING THE PRESIDENTIAL

03:22

RECORDS ACT. HE'S CHARGED WITH

03:23

A LAW, THE ESPIONAGE ACT THAT

03:25

HAS BEEN IN EXISTENCE FOR 100

03:28

YEARS. AND THERE ARE MANY JURY

03:31

INSTRUCTIONS THAT OUR SAMPLES

03:34

ARE EXAMPLES THAT SHE COULD

03:34

HAVE DRAWN FROM, BUT NONE LOOK

03:36

ANYTHING LIKE THE HYPOTHETICALS

03:38

THAT SHE IS PROPOSING. AND IN

03:41

BOTH SCENARIOS, HE'S

03:43

ESSENTIALL TO THE JURY

03:46

THAT THIS DONA TRUMP CAN

03:47

DECIDE WHETHER HE CAN POSSESS

03:49

THESE HIGHLY CLASSIFIED

03:51

S. AIN EITHER

03:55

SCENARIO, THERE'S NO WAY THAT

03:56

YOU WOULD CONVICT TIM. AND SO

03:58

JACK SMITH IS FRUSTRATED SAYING

04:00

THAT'S NOT THE LAW HERE. AND

04:02

WHY ARE WE INSTRUCT? WHY ARE

04:03

YOU PROPOSING THAT WE GIVE AN

04:06

UNLAWFUL INSTRUCTIONTHE

04:08

JURY? AND SO HE'S ASKING H

04:09

TO RULE ONE WAY OR THE OTHER

04:11

BECAUSE HE'S CLEARLY GOING TO

04:13

HE'S SETTING THIS UP FOR AN

04:14

APPEAL AND I THINK ALTHOUGH HE

04:16

DOESN'T SAY IT IN HIS MOTION,

04:19

HIS FRUSTRATION INDICATES TO ME

04:21

THAT HE IS GETTING READY TO ASK

04:23

THAT SHE BE RECUSED FROM THIS

04:24

CASE. THIS IS JUST ONE OF A

04:27

SERIES OF STRANGE UNLAWFUL

04:29

WHETHER IT'S ORDERS OR

04:31

DECISIONS THAT SHE HAS MADE

04:33

THAT IS MADE LEGAL ANALYSTS

04:35

ACROSS THE COUNTRY SCRATCH

04:36

THEIR HEADS BECAUSE THEY MAKE

04:38

NO SENSE. THEY DON'T LOOK

04:40

ANYTHING LIKE WHAT PEOPLE ARE

04:42

USED TO OR WHAT'S IN THE LAW.

04:43

>> AND

04:44

>> SO SHE'S AN EXPERIENCED SHE

04:46

IS NOT A JUDGE WHO'S BEEN

04:48

AROUND FOR A LONG TIME AND I

04:48

THINK HER INEXPERIENCE IS

04:50

REALLY SHOWING BECAUSE SHE'S

04:52

JUST DOIS THAT HAVE NO

04:53

BASIS IN THE LAW AND PLAY THIS

04:55

PLAY THAT OUT FOR US. IF HE'S

04:58

SE FOR AN APPEAL, IF

04:59

THIS SIMMERING FRUSTRATION IS

05:01

SEEN AND YOU SEE THAT KIND OF

05:03

POTENTIALLY LEADING FOR HIM,

05:06

ASKING FOR HER TO BE RECUSED.

05:07

HOW WHAT DOES THAT DO TO THIS

05:10

IN TIE PROCESS?

05:14

>> SO IT OBVIOUSLY WILL DELAY

05:15

IT BECAUSE HE WOULD JACK SMITH

05:18

WOULD FILE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

05:21

WITH THE 11th CIRCUIT COURT OF

05:24

TAKES TIME. BUT ALTHOUGH THERE

05:26

IS A TRIAL DATE SET FOR

05:28

THERE IS NO SCENARIO IN WHIC

05:30

THIS TRIAL WILL GO IN MAY

05:32

BECAUSE THERE ARE SO MANY

05:35

RULINGS THAT THIS JUDGE STILL

05:36

HAS NOT RULED ON, INCLUDING THE

05:39

CLASSIFIEDNFORMATION

05:40

PROCEDURES ACT AND OTHER

05:42

RULINGS THAT JUST ARE OUR

05:45

FOUNDATIONAL AND NEED TO BE

05:47

RULED UPON. SO THIS IS THIS

05:48

CASE IING ANYTIME IN

05:50

THE NEE. ANYWAY,

05:52

ALTHOUGH JUDGE CANNON HAS NOT

05:53

SAID THAT NOR HAE PUT OF

05:54

MORE A FUTURE TRIAL DATE ON THE

05:57

CALENDAR. I THINK JACK SMITH IS

05:59

NOT WORRIED. I WOULD ASSUME

06:01

ABOUT THE FACT THAT HIS APPEAL

06:02

WILL DELAY THINGS. AND ALSO

06:04

LOOK, HE HAS NO CHOICE AT THIS

06:06

POINT BECAUSE ONCE A JUROR, A

06:08

JURY IS SWORN, SOMETHING CALLED

06:11

JEOPARDY ATTACK MATCHES, WHICH

06:12

MEANS THAT THAT IF THEY IF SHE

06:16

DOES GIVE THESE ERRONEOUS

06:18

INSTRUCTIONS AND THEY ACQUIT,

06:19

HE CAN APPEAL THAT DOUBLE

06:21

JEOPARDY WILL APPLY, AND

06:23

THAT'S THE OVER

06:24

FOREVER. SO THIS IS THE KIND OF

06:26

ISSUE THAT YOU CAN'T APPEAL

06:27

LATER. SO IT HAS TO HAPPEN NOW.

06:30

AND THESE INSTRUCTIONS ARE

06:32

TAILORED SO MUCH IN FAVOR OF

06:34

TRUMP AND FOR AN ACQUITTAL THAT

06:38

BUT TO APPEAL THIS. CHOICE

06:40

>> NOW, IT'S ALMOST AN ACTIVE

06:41

LEGAL DESPERATION THAT WE'VE

06:42

GOT TO DO IT NOW OR NEVER,

06:43

KATE, YOU WANTED TO ASK ABOUT

06:44

THE NEW YORK CRIMINAL CASE,

06:45

JUST LEANING ON YOUR EXPERIENCE

06:47

COMES TO THIS EXPANDED

06:49

GAG ORDER AND DONALD TRUMP

06:50

CALLING OUT THE JUDGE ON

06:51

THROUGH SOCIAL YESTERDAY,

06:52

CALLING HIM A CORRUPT NEW YORK

06:54

JUDGE SAYING THERE'S VIRTUALLY

06:55

NEVER BEEN A MORE CONFLICTED

06:56

JUDGE, T ONE, YOU HAVE

06:58

BEEN BEFORE THIS JUDGE. YOU'VE

07:01

BEEN BEFORE MERCHAN BEFORE YOU

07:03

KNOW, THIS, JUDGE, HOW DOES HE

07:05

OPERATE IN A COURTROOM?

07:07

>> HE'S A VERY DOWN THE

07:10

MIDDLE, JUDGE. YOU NOBODY WOULD

07:11

SAY HE'S PRO DEFENSE OR PRO

07:14

PROSECUTION. HE'S LIKE, UH,

07:15

JUDGES JUDGE WRIGHT, HE CALLS

07:16

BALLS AND STRIKES. HE'S VERY

07:19

MEASURED. HE'S NO LOSE

07:21

HIS TEMPER. HE'S NOT ONE TO BE

07:23

FRIENDLY WITH PEOPLE. HE JUST

07:24

HE COMES IN HE DOES HIS JOB AND

07:28

HE DOES IT IN A UNDERSTATED

07:30

Y

07:32

TIGHT CONTROL OF HIS COURTROOM

07:34

AND SO HE IS SOMEONE WS

07:35

THE KINDA JUDGE YOU'D WANT ON

07:38

A CASE LIKE THIS TO CALL HIM

07:40

BIAS, TO CALL HIM SOMEBODY

07:42

WHO'S PARTISAN, THAT IS NOT

07:44

SOMETHING THAT THOSE OF US WHO

07:45

HAVE APPEARED BEFORE HIM FOR

07:48

YEARS, MANY YEARS, WHATEVER SAY

07:49

ABOUT THIS, JUDGE, YOU COULD

07:51

SAY THAT ABOUT SOME OTHER

07:52

JUDGES, BUT THIS IS NOT THAT

07:54

KIND

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

العلامات ذات الصلة
LegalBattleClassifiedDocsTrumpClaimsJuryInstructionsJudicialReviewEspionageActCourtroomDramaLegalFilingAppealProcessJudgeCannon
هل تحتاج إلى ملخص باللغة العربية؟