There's an 'ethical reckoning' that has to take place with DA Bragg: Ex-FBI director

Fox Business
3 May 202407:31

Summary

TLDRThe transcript discusses the ongoing trial involving former President Trump, where he is accused of mislabeling a payment to Stormy Daniels as legal fees, which prosecutors allege as fraud. Stormy Daniels' lawyer refutes the claim, stating it was not hush money but consideration for a contract. Chris Swecker, a former Assistant FBI Director, criticizes the prosecution as politically motivated and unethical, suggesting that the case is built on exaggerated legal theories and could damage public faith in the criminal justice system. Swecker also addresses the judge's gag order on Trump, calling it unconstitutional and politically biased. He predicts that if the case goes to a jury, it's likely to result in a hung jury due to the lack of credible evidence and the politically charged nature of the prosecution.

Takeaways

  • 📜 The transcript discusses the ongoing trial involving former President Trump, specifically the 11th day of the so-called hush money trial.
  • 💥 Stormy Daniels' lawyer provided bombshell testimony, denying that the payment from Michael Cohen was hush money, but rather 'consideration' in a legal context.
  • 🚨 Prosecutors allege that Trump committed fraud by mislabeling the payment as legal fees.
  • 🤔 Chris Swecker, a former Assistant FBI Director, criticizes the prosecution as an embarrassment and politically motivated, suggesting it could damage faith in the criminal justice system.
  • 💭 Swecker describes the case as a house of cards, with Michael Cohen being a pivotal but potentially untrustworthy witness due to his motivations and past lies.
  • 🤬 Trump is said to be appealing the judge's gag order, which he claims is unconstitutional and hinders his ability to speak freely as a presidential candidate.
  • 🎭 The discussion suggests that the judge's actions are politically motivated and that the legal proceedings are biased against Trump.
  • 🤔 There is speculation that the case could result in a hung jury, with at least one fair-minded juror expected to leave politics at the door.
  • 📉 Swecker rates the Alvin Bragg case as the least credible prosecution that Trump is facing, implying there are other cases with more substantial merit.
  • 📚 A Boston University law professor is referenced, who also criticizes the prosecution as unethical and based on exaggerated legal theories.
  • ⏳ The expectation is set that the trial will continue for several more weeks, with an upcoming decision on immunity from the Supreme Court anticipated.

Q & A

  • What is the nature of the case that former President Trump is returning to court for?

    -Former President Trump is returning to court for the 11th day of the so-called hush money trial, which involves allegations of fraud related to payments made to Stormy Daniels.

  • What did Stormy Daniels' lawyer claim regarding the payment from Michael Cohen?

    -Stormy Daniels' lawyer denied that the payment from Michael Cohen was hush money, stating it was 'consideration,' a legal term for something given in return for a promise to abide by a contract.

  • What is the allegation against Trump in this case?

    -Prosecutors allege that Trump committed fraud by mislabeling the payment to Stormy Daniels as legal fees.

  • What does Chris Swisher, the former Assistant FBI Director, think about the prosecution of this case?

    -Chris Swisher believes the prosecution is an embarrassment, a result of selective prosecution based on exaggerated legal theories, and that it reeks of politics.

  • How does Swisher describe the impact of this case on the public's perception of the criminal justice system?

    -Swisher suggests that this case has caused many people in the country to lose faith in the criminal justice system, as it appears to be improperly influenced by politics.

  • What is the significance of Michael Cohen's potential testimony in this case?

    -Michael Cohen's testimony is pivotal to the case, as he is the linchpin witness. However, Swisher suggests that his known biases and history of dishonesty could weaken the prosecution's case.

  • What does Swisher predict will happen after Michael Cohen testifies?

    -Swisher predicts that the defense will make a motion for a directed verdict after Cohen's testimony, suggesting that a fair-minded judge would do so, as the case should not go to a jury.

  • How does Swisher rate the credibility of the Alvin Bragg case against other potential cases that President Trump may face?

    -Swisher rates the Alvin Bragg case as the least credible prosecution, considering it unethical and politically motivated.

  • What does Swisher think about the judge's gag order on President Trump?

    -Swisher criticizes the judge's gag order as unconstitutional and politically motivated, arguing that it unfairly restricts Trump's ability to respond while other candidates, like Joe Biden, face no such restrictions.

  • What is the potential outcome Swisher foresees if the case goes to a jury?

    -Swisher anticipates at least a hung jury, with one or two fair-minded jurors who would vote reasonably and leave their politics at the door.

  • What does Swisher suggest about the motivation behind the prosecution of this case?

    -Swisher suggests that the prosecution, led by Alvin Bragg, is motivated by a desire for personal political reputation within certain circles rather than a genuine pursuit of justice.

  • What is the expected duration of this trial according to the discussion?

    -The trial is expected to continue for several more weeks, with significant cross-examination and potential legal motions to follow.

Outlines

00:00

📝 Trump's Hush Money Trial and Legal Controversy

The first paragraph discusses the ongoing legal issues surrounding former President Trump, specifically focusing on the so-called hush money trial. It highlights the testimony of Stormy Daniels' lawyer, who refutes the claim that a payment made was hush money, instead arguing it was 'consideration' in a legal context. The discussion involves the potential mislabeling of the payment as legal fees, which prosecutors allege to be an act of fraud. Chris Swisher, a former Assistant FBI Director, is brought in to provide his perspective, criticizing the prosecution as politically motivated and potentially damaging to the public's faith in the criminal justice system. The conversation also touches on the defense's strategy and the anticipation of Michael Cohen's testimony, suggesting it could weaken the prosecution's case due to his reputation as a biased and unreliable witness. The segment concludes with Trump's criticism of the judge's gag order, which he deems unconstitutional and a hindrance to his campaign.

05:03

🤔 The Impact of Political Bias on Trump's Legal Challenges

The second paragraph continues the discussion on Trump's legal battles, with a focus on the perceived political bias in the justice system, particularly in New York. The speaker argues that the judge's gag order against Trump is unwarranted and reflects a systemic slant against Trump due to his political stance. The conversation suggests that despite the legal challenges, Trump remains a strong candidate, leading in the polls against Biden. The paragraph also anticipates the potential outcomes of the trial, with the speaker expressing doubt that the case would be fairly decided by a jury without being influenced by political bias. The summary acknowledges the possibility of a hung jury due to the presence of fair-minded jurors. Finally, the discussion briefly compares the credibility of different legal cases against Trump, rating the current case as the least credible and hinting at the potential consequences for the prosecutor, Alvin Bragg, after the trial concludes.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Hush Money Trial

The 'Hush Money Trial' refers to the legal proceedings involving former President Trump, where he is accused of mislabeling a payment to Stormy Daniels as legal fees, which prosecutors allege to be a cover-up for the actual nature of the payment. This is central to the video's narrative as it discusses the ongoing trial and its implications.

💡Stormy Daniels

Stormy Daniels is an adult film actress whose lawyer's testimony is a focal point in the trial discussed in the video. Her lawyer denies that the payment from Michael Cohen was hush money, claiming it was 'consideration', a legal term for something given in return for a promise to abide by a contract. Daniels' involvement is integral to understanding the allegations against Trump.

💡Michael Cohen

Michael Cohen is a former lawyer for Donald Trump who is central to the hush money allegations. In the video, it is mentioned that he made a payment to Stormy Daniels, which is a key piece of evidence in the trial. His potential testimony and its impact on the case are discussed, highlighting his role as a pivotal figure in the proceedings.

💡Prosecutors

Prosecutors in this context are the legal professionals bringing the case against Trump, alleging fraud by mislabeling the payment to Daniels. Their approach and the allegations they make are a significant part of the video's discussion, as they shape the legal narrative and public perception of the trial.

💡Chris Swecker

Chris Swecker is a former Assistant FBI Director, Agent, and Attorney who provides commentary in the video. His insights and opinions on the trial, the conduct of the prosecutors, and the potential outcomes are used to provide a critical perspective on the case and its implications for the justice system.

💡Alvin Bragg

Alvin Bragg is mentioned as a prosecutor in the case, and the video suggests that he may be pursuing the case for political reasons. His role and the criticism directed at him are important for understanding the controversy surrounding the trial and the perceived motivations behind it.

💡Political Reputation

The concept of 'political reputation' is discussed in relation to the prosecutors' motivations. It is suggested that some may be pursuing the case to enhance their standing within their political circles, which is a key criticism of the prosecution's approach and is tied to the broader theme of political influence on the justice system.

💡Dirt Bag Witness

The term 'Dirt Bag Witness' is used to describe Michael Cohen, implying that he is an unreliable witness due to his dislike for Trump and his history of lying. This characterization is significant as it questions the strength of the prosecution's case and the credibility of its key witness.

💡Gag Order

A 'Gag Order' is a legal restraint that prevents certain parties from discussing the case publicly. In the video, Trump criticizes the judge's imposition of a gag order on him, arguing that it is unconstitutional and politically motivated. The discussion around the gag order highlights concerns about free speech and the fairness of the legal process.

💡Cross Examination

Cross Examination is a legal process where a witness is questioned by the opposing counsel. In the context of the video, it is suggested that Michael Cohen's motivations and credibility will be rigorously tested during this phase of the trial, which could significantly impact the outcome of the case.

💡Jury

The 'Jury' refers to the group of citizens who will ultimately decide the outcome of the trial if it proceeds to that stage. The video discusses the potential for a hung jury, indicating that there may be members who will vote based on the evidence rather than political bias, which is crucial to the theme of seeking a fair judicial process.

Highlights

Stormy Daniels' lawyer denies the payment from ex-Trump lawyer Michael Cohen was a hush money payment, calling it 'consideration' instead.

Prosecutors allege Trump committed fraud by labeling the payment as legal fees.

Former Assistant FBI Director Chris Swecker calls the prosecution an 'embarrassment' and 'selective prosecution' based on exaggerated legal theories.

Swecker criticizes the prosecution as 'patently improper' and 'reeks of politics', causing people to lose faith in the criminal justice system.

Swecker predicts the defense will 'destroy' Michael Cohen on cross-examination, questioning his motivations and credibility as a witness.

Trump slams the judge's gag order as 'unconstitutional' and 'totally conflicted', preventing him from testifying.

Swecker calls the judge 'clearly political' and criticizes the gag order as inappropriate, arguing it contributes to the perception of a slanted justice system in New York.

Swecker believes the case should not go to a jury and expects a motion for a directed verdict after Cohen's testimony.

If the case does go to a jury, Swecker predicts at least one or two fair-minded jurors will vote reasonably, resulting in a hung jury.

Swecker rates the Alvin Bragg case as the least credible of the prosecutions Trump is facing.

Daniels' lawyer also testified about Michael Cohen's depression and his belief that he might be a danger to himself.

Cohen's mental state and motivations to testify could be a focus on cross-examination.

The case is expected to continue for several more weeks.

Trump continues to do well and is leading Biden in the polls despite the ongoing legal challenges.

Many independent-minded people are questioning the legitimacy of the prosecution and where it is headed.

The prosecution is being criticized for wasting taxpayer money.

There is a call for an ethical reckoning with the prosecutors once the case is over.

People want to see the criminal justice system work fairly and without political influence.

Transcripts

00:00

.

00:00

THAT IS GREAT.

00:01

CHERYL.

00:02

THANK YOU SO MUCH.

00:03

MEANWHILE, FORMER PRESIDENT

00:03

TRUMP RETURNING TO COURT THIS

00:05

MORNING FOR AN 11th THE DAY OF

00:07

THE SO CALLED HUSH MONEY TRIAL.

00:09

BOMBSHELL TESTIMONY YESTERDAY AS

00:11

STORMY DANIELS' LAWYER TOOK THE

00:13

STAND, DENYING THE PAYMENT FROM

00:16

EX TRUMP LAWYER MICHAEL COHEN

00:19

WAS A HUSH MONEY PAYMENT.

00:21

HE SAID THIS, QUOTE, IT WAS NOT

00:22

A PAYOFF AND IT WAS NOT HUSH

00:24

MONEY.

00:25

IT WAS CONSIDERATION.

00:26

CONSIDERATION IS A LEGAL TERM

00:29

FOR WHEN SOMEBODY GIVES IN

00:31

RETURN FOR A PROMISE TO YOU

00:32

ABIDE BY A CONTRACT.

00:35

PROSECUTORS ALLEGE TRUMP

00:36

COMMITTED FRAUD BY LABELING THE

00:38

PAYMENT LEGAL FEES.

00:39

JOINING ME IS FORMERRER

00:41

ASSISTANT FBI DIRECTOR, AGENT

00:43

AND ATTORNEY, CHRIS SWECKER.

00:44

THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE THIS

00:45

MORNING.

00:46

HOW DO YOU SEE THIS?

00:47

>> YEAH, I THINK A VERY LIBERAL

00:50

BOSTON UNIVERSITY LAW PROFESSOR

00:51

PRETTY WELL SUMMED IT YOU, HE

00:53

SAID THIS PROSECUTIONS IS AN

00:55

EMBARRASSMENT OF PROSECUTION

00:57

ETHICS APPARENT SELECTIVE

01:00

PROSECUTION, BASED ON

01:03

EXAGGERATED LEGAL THEORIES, SO

01:07

ALLEGATIONS.

01:07

THIS MAKES ALVIN BRAGG BASICALLY

01:09

THE BARNEY FIFE OF PROSECUTORS

01:12

ACROSS THE COUNTRY.

01:13

THIS WAS A PATENTLY IMPROPER,

01:16

ILLEGAL PROSECUTION TO BEGIN

01:18

WITH AND REEKS OF POLITICS AND

01:22

CAUSED MANY PEOPLE IN THIS

01:23

COUNTRY TO REALLY SHATTER THEIR

01:26

FAITH IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE

01:28

SYSTEM.

01:28

THIS JUST ISN'T HOW THE CRIMINAL

01:30

JUSTICE SYSTEM IS SUPPOSED TO

01:31

WORK AFTER 40 YEARS, I'VE NEVER

01:33

SEEN ANYTHING LIKE THIS.

01:34

MARIA: THAT'S WHAT WE'RE

01:35

GETTING FROM ALL INDEPENDENT

01:37

MINDED PEOPLE THAT I SPEAK WITH,

01:38

CHRIS, THAT THEY CAN'T FIND THE

01:40

CRIME, THEY DON'T UNDERSTAND

01:41

WHERE THIS IS GOING.

01:43

THIS IS A LOT OF TAXPAYER MONEY.

01:45

SO DO YOU THINK ALVIN BRAGG

01:47

CARES?

01:48

DO YOU THINK THERE WILL BE ANY

01:49

ACCOUNTABILITY FOR ALL OF THIS?

01:50

HOW DO YOU THINK THIS PLAYS OUT?

01:53

>> YEAH, I DON'T THINK HE CARES.

01:54

I MEAN, HE'S ONE OF THESE SERIES

01:57

OF TIN HORN PROSECUTORS WHO WANT

01:58

A NOTCH IN THEIR BELT FOR THEIR

02:01

OWN POLITICAL REPUTATION WITHIN

02:02

THEIR CIRCLES.

02:02

I DON'T THINK HE CARES.

02:03

AT SOME POINT I THINK THERE'S AN

02:06

ETHICAL RECKONING THAT HAS TO

02:08

TAKE PLACE WITH HIM.

02:09

I KNOW THE DEFENSE IS SALIVATING

02:11

FOR MICHAEL COHEN TO GET ON THE

02:12

STAND BECAUSE THIS WHOLE CASE IS

02:14

PIT ON A HOUSE OF CARDS BUT HE'S

02:17

THE LINCHPIN AND HE'S WHAT WE

02:18

CALL IN THE PROSECUTION -- IN

02:20

LAW ENFORCEMENT A DIRT BAG

02:23

WITNESS, HATES TRUMP, PROVEN

02:26

LIAR, IMPROPER MOTIVATIONS,

02:28

BASED ON A PROSECUTION THAT

02:31

REEKS OF POLITICS AS I SAID

02:33

EARLIER.

02:34

SO ALVIN BRAGG DOESN'T CARE BUT

02:35

I THINK A LOT OF PEOPLE IN THIS

02:37

COUNTRY REALLY DO CARE.

02:38

I THINK A MOUNTING NUMBER OF

02:39

PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY REALLY DO

02:41

CARE.

02:41

THEY WANT TO SEE THE CRIMINAL

02:42

JUSTICE WORK THE WAY IT'S

02:44

SUPPOSED TO AND DRAIN POLITICS

02:46

RIGHT OUT OF IT.

02:47

MARIA: THAT'S RIGHT.

02:48

THEY WANT HONESTY AND THEY WANT

02:50

A FAIR JUDICIAL SYSTEM.

02:52

NO DOUBT ABOUT IT.

02:53

THAT'S ONE OF THE REASONS THAT

02:54

TRUMP CONTINUES TO DO WELL AND

02:56

BEATING JOE BIDEN.

02:58

DANIELS' LAWYER ALSO TESTIFIED

03:00

THAT DESPITE DENYING HIS AM A --

03:06

AMBITION, MICHAEL COHEN WAS SO

03:08

DEPRESSED HE DIDN'T P LAND A JOB

03:09

IN TRUMP'S WHITE HOUSE HE

03:11

THOUGHT HE MIGHT BE A DANGER TO

03:13

HIMSELF, HE DETAILING A CALL

03:15

COHEN MADE ABOUT TRUMP.

03:16

WHAT MIGHT THIS MEAN ABOUT

03:19

COHEN'S MOTIVATIONS TO TESTIFY?

03:20

>> THIS IS GOING TO BE EXPOSED

03:22

ON CROSS EXAMINATION WHICH IS A

03:23

GREAT TOOL, IT'S GOING TO BE

03:26

GREAT THEATER.

03:27

THEY'RE GOING TO DESTROY HIM ON

03:29

THE WITNESS STAND.

03:31

HIS IMPROPER MOTIVATIONS, HADS

03:34

HIS ANTAGONISTIC RESENTIMENT

03:36

TOWARDS TRUMP FUELING THIS

03:37

MOTIVATION TO TURN ON HIM IN

03:41

THIS MANNER.

03:42

HE'S LIED AND LIED AGAIN.

03:44

HE'S BEEN PROSECUTED ALREADY.

03:46

I CAN'T BELIEVE THAT A

03:47

PROSECUTOR IS GOING TO PUT THIS

03:48

GUY ON THE STAND.

03:50

HE WILL DESTROY THEIR CASE.

03:51

MARIA: THEY'RE TRYING REALLY

03:53

HARD TO COME UP WITH OTHER

03:54

THINGS THAT TRUMP IS DOING

03:56

WRONG.

03:56

WHAT ABOUT THIS GAG ORDER?

03:58

CHRIS, I'VE GOT TO GET YOUR TAKE

04:00

HERE.

04:00

PRESIDENT TRUMP IS SLAMMING THE

04:03

JUDGE'S GAG ORDER AGAIN

04:04

YESTERDAY AS HE FACES FOUR MORE

04:07

ACCUSATIONS OF VIOLATING THIS

04:09

GAG ORDER.

04:09

WATCH THIS.

04:10

>> WE'RE GOING TO BE APPEALING

04:12

THE GAG ORDER.

04:13

I'D LOVE TO ANSWER THAT

04:14

QUESTION.

04:15

IT'S A VERY EASY QUESTION.

04:16

I'M NOT ALLOWED TO TESTIFY.

04:18

THIS JUDGE IS TOTALLY

04:20

CONFLICTED, HAS ME UNDER AN

04:23

UNCONSTITUTIONAL GAG ORDER.

04:25

NOBODY'S EVER THAT BEFORE.

04:28

EVERYBODY IS ALLOWED TO DO

04:29

WHATEVER THEY WANT TO US.

04:30

I'M NOT ALLOWED AS A

04:31

PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE, THE

04:32

LEADING CANDIDATE, THE

04:34

REPUBLICAN PARTY NOMINEE AND THE

04:35

ONE WHO IS LEADING BIDEN BY A

04:37

LOT.

04:38

MARIA: YOU KNOW, IT AMAZING TOE

04:42

THAT HE HAS A GAG ORDER TO BEGIN

04:44

WITH BECAUSE HE'S A PRESIDENTIAL

04:46

CANDIDATE IN A CAMPAIGN.

04:48

JOE BIDEN IS ALL OVER THE PLACE

04:50

ATTACKING TRUMP IN THE SWING

04:52

STATES, SAYING WHATEVER HE WANTS

04:53

AND TRUMP HAS TO WATCH EVERY

04:55

WORD.

04:55

>> YEAH, CLEARLY A POLITICAL

04:58

JUDGE.

04:58

I MEAN, HE'S IN THE ABYSS OF THE

05:02

POLITICS OF NEW YORK.

05:03

HE SHOULD HAVE STAYED OUT OF

05:06

THIS, THERE NEVER SHOULD HAVE

05:07

BEEN A GAG ORDER.

05:08

TRUMP IS PUGILISTIC.

05:13

HE WILL FIGHT EVERY TIME,

05:14

COUNSELOR TEAR PUNCH EVERY TIME

05:15

AND -- COUNTER PUNCH EVERY TIME

05:17

AND THE JUDGE IS THERE WITH HIM,

05:20

FIGHTING IT OUT.

05:21

HE'S NEEDS TO BE ABOVE ALL OF

05:23

THIS.

05:23

THIS ADDS TO THE APERNS THAT THE

05:26

JUSTICE -- APPEARANCE THAT THE

05:28

JUSTICE SYSTEM IN NEW YORK IS

05:29

SLANTED, THAT YOU CAN'T GET FAIR

05:31

JUSTICE IN NEW YORK IF YOUR

05:33

POLITICS DON'T FALL IN LINE.

05:34

MARIA: THIS IS EXPECTED TO GO

05:37

SEVERAL MORE WEEKS.

05:38

HOW ARE YOU EXPECTING THIS TO

05:39

PLAY OUT THEY DO YOU THINK

05:40

PRESIDENT TRUMP COULD FACE A

05:42

JURY AND GET CONVICTED BEFORE

05:45

THE ELECTION?

05:45

>> WELL, HE COULD.

05:47

BUT I THINK THEY WILL GET AT

05:50

LEAST ONE JUROR -- I JUST CAN'T

05:53

IMAGINE AFTER COHEN TESTIFIES,

05:54

AFTER ALL THE TESTIMONY, THE

05:56

JUDGE OUGHT TO -- THERE OUGHT TO

05:58

BE A MOTION FOR A DIRECTED

06:00

VERDICT AFTER -- AS SOON AS

06:02

COHEN -- RIGHT AFTER HE

06:03

TESTIFIES.

06:04

THE JUDGE CAN DO THAT.

06:05

AND THE DEFENSE WILL MAKE THAT

06:07

MOTION.

06:07

AND A FAIR MINDED JUDGE WOULD DO

06:09

JUST THAT.

06:10

IT SHOULD NEVER GO TO A JURY.

06:12

BUT IF IT DOES, I THINK THERE'S

06:13

AT LEAST ONE OR TWO JURORS THAT

06:15

WILL BE FAIR MINDED, THAT THEY

06:17

WILL DRAIN -- THEY WILL LEAVE

06:19

THEIR POLITICS AT THE DOOR AND

06:21

THEY WITH WILL VOTE THE WAY A

06:24

REASONABLE JUROR WOULD VOTE.

06:26

THIS IS A SELECTED PROSECUTION

06:28

BUT OUTS GOT NO EVIDENCE.

06:30

MARIA: SO YOU'RE EXPECTING A

06:33

HUNG JURY THEN HERE.

06:33

>> AT LEAST A HUNG JURY.

06:35

MARIA: CHRIS, I DON'T KNOW, IN

06:37

TERMS OF THE NEXT GROUP OF

06:40

ATTACKS AND POTENTIAL TRIALS

06:42

THAT THE PRESIDENT HAS TO FACE,

06:44

HOW WOULD YOU RATE THIS ONE, THE

06:46

ALVIN BRAGG CASE, VERSUS THE

06:49

OTHERS?

06:49

>> YEAH, THIS ONE'S -- THIS

06:53

ONE'S THE LEAST CREDIBLE

06:56

PROSECUTION.

06:56

THE ONE IN ATLANTA IS PRETTY

06:58

BAD, MISUSE OF CIVIL RICO.

07:02

THAT'S BECOME A CIRCUS.

07:03

THIS IS A CIRCUS AS WELCH I

07:07

WELL.I THINK ALVIN BRAGG WILL FE

07:10

RECKONING AFTER A IT'S OVER.

07:12

IT'S AN UNETHICAL PROSECUTION TO

07:14

BEGIN WITH.

07:16

THE LIBERAL LAW PROFESSOR I

07:21

CITED SAYS IT'S AN UNETHICAL

07:26

PROSECUTION.

07:27

MARIA: WE'RE WAITING FOR THE

07:28

IMMUNITY DECISION FROM THE

07:29

SUPREME COURT WHICH WE'LL

07:30

PROBABLY GET

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Связанные теги
Trump TrialHush MoneyStormy DanielsLegal FeesProsecution EthicsPolitical BiasCriminal JusticeFBILaw EnforcementTaxpayer MoneyJudicial SystemGag OrderNew York PoliticsElection Impact
Вам нужно реферат на русском языке?