STOP WASTING YOUR MONEY!!! Same PC... DIFFERENT COST!

JayzTwoCents
6 May 202425:55

Summary

TLDRThe video script revolves around a detailed comparison of two computer builds with identical components, except for the motherboard, RAM, storage, and cooling system. The expensive build utilizes high-end parts, such as a $579 motherboard and a $349 AIO cooler, while the cheaper build opts for more cost-effective options, like a $169.99 motherboard and a $99 AIO cooler. Despite the significant price difference of $1,300, the performance difference between the two systems is minimal, with the most expensive component, the motherboard, offering the least value for the price. The script emphasizes the importance of careful consideration when selecting components to avoid overspending, particularly on motherboards and coolers. It suggests that for most consumers, a $200 motherboard and a mid-range graphics card would suffice, and that the performance gains from more expensive components are often negligible for everyday use and gaming.

Takeaways

  • 💡 Building a computer can easily lead to overspending on parts that don't significantly impact performance.
  • 💻 The video demonstrates two builds with identical CPUs but different tiers of other components to show the cost-to-performance ratio.
  • 💰 A high-end motherboard can cost significantly more without providing a proportional increase in performance.
  • 🔥 Expensive components like the top-tier motherboards and AIO coolers can lead to an inefficient use of funds.
  • 🚀 For most users, a $200 motherboard is sufficient, and there's no need to look at higher MSRP graphics cards for the 4070 range.
  • 🌡️ Differences in BIOS settings and motherboard quality can lead to slight performance variations, but they are often minimal.
  • 📈 In gaming tests, the performance difference between the high-end and entry-level builds was minimal, often within a few percentage points.
  • 🛠️ The video suggests that for a balanced build, one can save on motherboards, coolers, RAM, and storage without sacrificing much performance.
  • 💾 Storage speed can be a significant cost factor, but for many users, the difference in real-world use is negligible, especially for gaming.
  • 🔧 Overclocking can help match performance between cheaper and more expensive components, but it requires additional knowledge and effort.
  • ⚙️ The choice of components can be confusing, and the video aims to guide builders on where to save and where to invest for optimal value.

Q & A

  • What is the main theme of the video?

    -The main theme of the video is to demonstrate how one can waste money when building a computer by comparing two builds with the same components but different price points for each component.

  • What are the two brands of motherboards used in the video for comparison?

    -The two brands of motherboards used for comparison are ASUS and Gigabyte.

  • What is the price difference between the two motherboards used in the video?

    -The price difference between the two motherboards is around $400 to $420, with the ASUS being the more expensive one.

  • What is the performance difference in terms of percentage between the two builds when running Cinebench R23 multicore?

    -The performance difference in terms of percentage between the two builds when running Cinebench R23 multicore is approximately 4.3%.

  • What is the FPS difference between the two builds when playing Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p?

    -The FPS difference between the two builds when playing Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p is 2.9%.

  • What is the role of BIOS settings in the performance of a CPU?

    -BIOS settings play a crucial role in the performance of a CPU by allowing for adjustments in power, temperature headroom, and thermal velocity boost, which can affect how long and how high the core clocks can go.

  • What component was identified as the easiest to overspend on in a PC build?

    -The motherboard was identified as the easiest component to overspend on in a PC build.

  • What is the price difference between the two builds before tax?

    -The price difference between the two builds before tax is exactly $1,300.

  • What is the video's recommendation for a reasonable price cap for a motherboard in a standard build?

    -The video recommends capping out at around $200 for a motherboard in a standard build.

  • What is the视频中提到的最便宜的组件是什么?

    -最便宜的组件是Gigabyte的Z790 UD主板,价格为$169.99。

  • 在视频中,哪种存储驱动器被认为性价比较高,且对大多数用户来说性能足够?

    -Samsung 970 Evo Plus,作为Gen 3的驱动器,提供了3500 MB/s的速度,被认为性价比较高,对大多数用户来说性能足够。

  • 视频中提到的两种不同价格的CPU冷却器在性能上有何差异?

    -两种冷却器分别是价值$99的Cooler Master Master Liquid和更贵的Ryzen 360 ARGB。尽管Ryzen 360 ARGB有更多的高级功能,如显示屏和磁性连接器,但两者在保持CPU温度方面的性能是可比的。

Outlines

00:00

🌟 Introduction to the PC Building Challenge

The video begins with the host at Micro Center, excited about spring and ready to embark on a PC building challenge. The goal is to demonstrate how one can waste money on unnecessary high-end components. The host outlines the plan to build two PCs with identical CPUs, motherboards, and other components, but with different price points to show the cost and performance differences. The expensive build will use top-tier parts, while the budget build will opt for more affordable options. The host emphasizes the importance of making smart choices when building a PC to avoid overspending.

05:01

💸 The Cost of Over-Spending on PC Components

The host discusses the financial implications of choosing high-end components over more budget-friendly options. After revealing the components and their prices for both the expensive and budget builds, it's clear that a significant amount can be saved by opting for less expensive parts. The expensive build totals to $3,429.92 before tax, which the host argues is an inefficient use of funds given the performance difference between the two builds. The cheaper build, using more cost-effective parts, totals to $2,129 before tax, showcasing a $1,300 difference that could fund an additional mid-tier computer build.

10:02

🛠️ Building and Testing the PCs

The host builds both PCs and puts them to the test. Despite the cheaper PC having a slower RAM speed and a less expensive motherboard, the performance differences are minimal in most real-world applications and gaming scenarios. CPU tests show a small percentage difference in multicore and single-core performance, with the expensive PC performing slightly better. However, gaming tests reveal that the帧率 (FPS) differences are negligible, with the cheaper PC performing almost as well as the expensive one, even in demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 and F1 2024.

15:03

🔥 The Impact of Motherboard and BIOS Settings

The video delves into the technical aspects affecting the performance of the two PCs. The host explains how different motherboards and their BIOS settings can influence CPU performance. The Asus motherboard used in the expensive build is more aggressive in its power and thermal settings, allowing for higher and longer-lasting core clock speeds. In contrast, the Gigabyte motherboard in the cheaper build is less aggressive, offering slightly lower performance but at a much lower cost. The host suggests that with a bit of tweaking, such as overclocking or adjusting BIOS settings, the cheaper build could match the performance of the expensive one.

20:04

🎮 GPU Performance and the Importance of RAM Speed

The host explores the GPU performance in both builds and notes that the GPU in the expensive build runs slightly hotter and faster, which could account for the minor FPS differences in gaming tests. However, by adjusting the GPU's core clock in the cheaper build, the host is able to achieve similar FPS to the expensive build. The host also highlights that the slower RAM speed in the cheaper build could impact gaming performance, especially in games with heavy AI and NPC rendering. Despite this, the host argues that the performance difference does not justify the price discrepancy and suggests that minor adjustments could minimize the gap.

25:05

💡 Final Thoughts on PC Component Selection

In the conclusion, the host advises viewers on how to make smart choices when selecting PC components. The message is clear: one can achieve high-end performance without breaking the bank. The host emphasizes that motherboards and coolers are areas where significant cost savings can be made without compromising on quality. The host also cautions against the allure of top-tier, high-priced components, suggesting that they often do not offer a proportionate increase in performance. The video ends with a call to action for viewers to share their tips on saving money when building a PC.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡i7 40 14700 K

The i7 40 14700 K refers to a specific model of Intel's Core i7 processor, which is a central processing unit (CPU) for computers. In the video, it is used as a consistent component in both high-end and entry-level PC builds to demonstrate the impact of other varying components on overall performance and cost.

💡Z790 Motherboard

A Z790 motherboard is a type of computer motherboard that uses the Intel Z790 chipset, designed for high-end desktop platforms. The video discusses the cost difference between various Z790 motherboards and how the choice can significantly affect the total cost of a PC build without necessarily improving performance proportionally.

💡4070 TI Graphics Card

The 4070 TI is a model of graphics processing unit (GPU) used in gaming PCs for rendering images, animations, and video. The video compares high-tier and entry-level PCs, both using the same 4070 TI GPU to show that overspending on other components does not significantly enhance the performance in gaming or other GPU-intensive tasks.

💡RAM

RAM, or Random Access Memory, is the hardware in a computer that stores data that the processor uses for short-term data manipulation. The video emphasizes the cost-to-performance ratio of RAM, noting that while faster RAM can improve performance, the cost difference may not be justified for most users.

💡Storage

Storage in the context of the video refers to the data storage devices used in a computer, such as solid-state drives (SSDs) or hard disk drives (HDDs). The script discusses the cost of high-end storage solutions compared to more affordable options and their impact on the overall cost and performance of a PC build.

💡Power Supply (PSU)

A power supply unit (PSU) provides the necessary power to a computer's components. The video mentions a 1,000-watt PSU as an example of a component that provides headroom for future upgrades, but also notes that a more expensive PSU does not necessarily translate to better performance for the system.

💡PC Build

A PC build refers to the process of assembling a custom personal computer from individual components. The video's theme revolves around PC building, specifically focusing on the cost and performance trade-offs when selecting high-end versus entry-level components.

💡Overspending

Overspending in the context of the video means investing more money in certain components than is necessary for the desired performance. The script emphasizes the concept of overspending on parts like the motherboard and cooler, where the price increase does not correlate with a proportional improvement in performance.

💡Performance

Performance in this video refers to how well a computer system operates and executes tasks, particularly in gaming and other demanding applications. The video aims to show that significant overspending on components like motherboards and coolers does not yield a corresponding increase in performance.

💡Efficiency

Efficiency in the video script pertains to the cost-effectiveness of PC components. It underscores the idea that a more expensive component does not automatically mean better efficiency or performance, and that buyers should consider the value they are getting for the price they pay.

💡Cooler

A cooler in the context of the video is a device used for cooling the CPU to maintain optimal performance and longevity. The video discusses the cost of high-end AIO (All-In-One) coolers versus more affordable options, noting that the price difference does not necessarily reflect a significant difference in cooling performance.

Highlights

The video discusses the cost and performance differences between two computer builds with identical CPUs but varying component quality.

The high-end build includes a top-tier motherboard, RAM, storage, and graphics card, while the entry-level build uses more cost-effective components.

The high-end build costs $3,429.92 before tax, while the entry-level build costs $2,129 before tax, showing a significant price difference.

Despite the price difference, the performance gap between the two builds is minimal, with the high-end build showing only a slight advantage in benchmarks.

The video demonstrates that overspending on components like motherboards and coolers can lead to inefficient use of funds.

The entry-level build uses a less expensive motherboard that still performs well, suggesting that high-priced motherboards are not always necessary.

The RAM speed difference between the two builds affects gaming performance, but the impact is minimal and may not justify the cost difference.

The video recommends that builders consider the real-world performance gains when choosing components, rather than simply opting for the most expensive options.

The entry-level build's power supply is a more cost-effective choice, with sufficient wattage for current and future upgrades.

The video suggests that a $200 motherboard is a reasonable upper limit for a real build, avoiding the high costs of more expensive models.

The performance difference between the two graphics cards is minimal, with the less expensive card offering nearly identical performance.

The video emphasizes the importance of balancing component quality and cost to build a high-end PC without unnecessary overspending.

The AIO coolers, even the less expensive ones, provide sufficient cooling for the CPUs used in both builds.

The video concludes that for most users, the entry-level build offers a better value for the cost, with only minor performance trade-offs.

The presenter advises viewers to carefully consider where to allocate their budget when building a PC, focusing on components that provide the most performance gains.

The video provides a comprehensive look at how to optimize a PC build for cost without significantly compromising on performance.

Transcripts

00:00

oh it's springtime the skies are blue

00:03

the birds are chirping we're at Micro

00:06

Center it's a great

00:08

day we interrupt this video to bring you

00:10

a special message from iFix head no we

00:12

interrupt this Interruption with this

00:14

Interruption about new stuff from iix

00:15

head we should grab his card but

00:17

inventory sucks fix the inventory

00:19

problems with I fix it who don't drop it

00:23

can't fix that with I fix it just

00:25

kidding yes you can wish you could take

00:27

I fix it with you anywhere but your

00:28

pockets aren't big enough introducing

00:30

the new Mo and the new minnow take them

00:33

with you

00:34

anywhere so get I fix it for your loved

00:36

one or just get them for

00:39

yourself okay so we're at Micro Center

00:41

right now they're sponsoring today's

00:42

video I've had an idea of something I've

00:43

wanted to do for a while that I'm

00:45

finally going to get to do and I brought

00:47

the

00:48

truck because I need to make sure I have

00:50

enough room to bring all of it home

00:52

because what I want to do is I want to

00:54

show I I've talked about ways you can

00:56

waste money when building a computer

00:57

it's easy to waste money accident even

01:01

so what we're going to do is I've picked

01:03

a a tier of Parts where they're

01:06

basically the same so an i7 40 14700 k

01:12

um z790 motherboards the same 4070 TI

01:16

super tier of graphics card the same

01:18

amount of ram the same amount of storage

01:21

the same size power supply but what I've

01:23

done is with the exception of the case

01:25

and the CPU which are identical we are

01:28

going to be taking a top tier build

01:31

where we overspend on a motherboard and

01:34

we overspend on the graphics card and we

01:36

overspend on the RAM and we overspend on

01:38

the storage and we go topof the line on

01:40

that stuff and actually not quite as

01:42

topof the line as we could have with

01:43

like the motherboard I think the board I

01:44

chose was like 600 something bucks where

01:46

I could have gone as high as like $1,200

01:48

for the motherboard which is already

01:49

stupid even for a I9 processor and then

01:53

we're going to take the same

01:54

classification of Parts but at the more

01:57

entry level price point still sticking

01:59

with like a z7 90 chipset which to be

02:01

honest we could even go lower than that

02:02

if we wanted but then what we're going

02:04

to do is we're going to build the

02:05

systems and we're going to show you side

02:07

by side how much they cost and how much

02:10

performance you really do or

02:13

foreshadowing don't gain by overspending

02:16

on your parts so let's go inside right

02:18

now I'm going to grab the parts we'll

02:19

lay them out here on the bed of the

02:20

truck and we'll show you it it's kind of

02:23

eye opening how different the price

02:25

points are because let's just say you

02:26

could build another mid-tier computer

02:28

for the savings between one and the

02:31

[Music]

02:34

other okay so we got both our builds

02:36

here we'll kind of go over the expensive

02:37

build first yeah it may look like it's

02:39

sponsored by Asus remember this is

02:40

Microcenter stuff I just can't help it

02:42

that they're the most most expensive

02:43

Brands really we could have gone with

02:45

like an MSI Godlike but we didn't on

02:47

purpose because like I said a $1,300

02:49

motherboard or 12,200 whatever it is is

02:51

ridiculous so I went with the maxus z790

02:55

dark hero motherboard that came in at

02:58

$57 $9 for a motherboard like I said

03:02

they're both 14700 K the 14700 K here

03:05

was $369 at micr Center Ram I went with

03:11

uh was 339 bucks it's 32 GB of

03:15

6600 uh ddr5 from Corsair it's the

03:18

Dominator titanium they're it's

03:20

beautiful Ram but you know it's again

03:22

very expensive for storage we went with

03:24

a two terab drives for both this is the

03:26

t700 from crucial the t700 pro extremely

03:29

fast Drive um again kind of expensive

03:32

though cuz it is a top tier product that

03:34

came in at

03:37

$399 for that 2 TB Drive um yeah that's

03:42

what it came in at so anyway for power

03:45

supply we th000 watt for both of these

03:46

builds I wanted to build in some

03:48

additional Headroom for power usage in

03:50

the future so 1,000 Watts I thought was

03:52

good because we could step up from a

03:54

4070 TI super to a 4080 super 4090 in

03:56

the future maybe whatever next gen going

03:59

to your connector GPU ends up being but

04:01

that's the Thor 1000 wat platinum and

04:04

that costs and I always ignore the

04:06

stickers because it's never rings up at

04:08

that price $359 okay well that's what

04:10

the sticker said so

04:12

whatever and then for the cooler the

04:14

most expensive AIO I could find for 360

04:17

was the ryogen 360 argb and this uh came

04:20

in

04:21

at

04:23

$349 so that was a correct price on

04:25

there both of these builds are using

04:27

NZXT H9 cases I've got two of those

04:30

right here it's the flow for better air

04:31

flow they're in Black that's

04:33

$159 you can place hold that for any

04:36

case cost that you want so as long as

04:38

you factor in $100 $150 $200 whatever

04:41

your case is going to be um it's just a

04:44

box to Hold Your Parts and needs to have

04:46

good air flow that's what I chose

04:47

because I like the H9 flow so what was

04:50

the total on this this build came to a

04:53

grand total before tax of $3,429

04:59

and

05:00

92 the fact that we could spend

05:03

$3500 before tax or

05:06

$3,695 after tax and not have a 4080 and

05:10

not have an I9 shows you there was some

05:12

extremely inefficient use of funds so

05:15

let's look at the other build fun fact

05:17

this is how I fold paper this is how

05:18

Phil folds paper so I just thought to

05:20

point that out but anyway okay so again

05:23

the same i7 14700 K right there so that

05:26

was

05:27

$369 as we already know uh for the Ram

05:30

or excuse me for the motherboard on this

05:32

one I chose again a z790 udac from uh

05:35

gigabyte the ud brand has been around

05:37

for a long time in terms of like

05:39

gigabytes

05:40

portfolio now I use it all the way back

05:42

with like FX processors and AMD it's

05:44

always performed well so as long as we

05:46

keep the BIOS and stuff updated um it's

05:48

going to definitely give us better bang

05:49

for the buck that came in at

05:52

$169.99 versus the other one

05:55

$579 so as you can see there's a $400

05:58

$420 savings right there uh so for Ram

06:02

again I've got crucial right here this

06:03

is the ddr5 pro I love it it's no frills

06:06

there's no RGB or anything on there it's

06:08

just solid nand Micron uh chips in there

06:12

obviously cuz it's crucial 5600 uh megga

06:15

transfers per second CL 46 it's a good

06:18

set of ram it's plenty fast 5600 is more

06:21

than fast enough for most people uh and

06:24

that came in at a grand total of $159

06:27

you could save money if you want with a

06:29

32 gig and 32 gigs probably more than

06:31

enough for anybody but in this instance

06:33

I wanted to take on the position of the

06:36

buyer that's trying to build himself

06:38

like most people shopping in the $2,500

06:41

price point would be like a dream PCC

06:42

that's a lot of money so let's make sure

06:44

we get good parts and not completely go

06:46

bottom budget but feel like we have

06:48

parts that are going to last us for a

06:49

while so it's not the base 4,800 it's

06:51

5600 you could probably even push that a

06:53

little bit higher if you wanted our

06:55

drive is a 2 TB Samsung 970 Evo plus it

06:58

is a gen 3 Drive the other Drive is a

07:01

Gen 5 12,400 MBT per second this is

07:05

3,500 mby per second clearly it's one

07:08

quarter the speed of the other Drive

07:10

unfortunately most people are never

07:11

going to notice that speed difference

07:13

because it's very rare that you're ever

07:15

transferring files that are large enough

07:17

for that speed to really ever show and

07:20

when you're loading like textures and

07:21

stuff in games it's pulling a lot of

07:23

small files from different locations

07:25

you're very rarely going to notice a

07:26

difference between these two drives so I

07:28

would personally save some money going

07:29

gen 3 or maybe Gen 4 over a Gen 5 if

07:32

you're shopping at this price point this

07:33

drive cost us $239 you can even save

07:36

more money by going even lower spec if

07:38

you wanted by going say with the

07:40

in-house Inland brand uh or just a

07:43

smaller drive so again large enough

07:45

drives that we're not going to fill it

07:46

too quickly fast enough drives that

07:48

we're not going to feel like it's

07:49

slowing down our system we've talked

07:51

about how drives can be the number one

07:52

way to speed up a slow system especially

07:54

if you're still on a hard drive for some

07:56

odd

07:57

reason uh okay so that was actually a

08:00

little bit more expensive than I think I

08:01

personally should have gone but when you

08:03

see the price difference at the end

08:04

you'll still see we're doing all right

08:07

uh for our power

08:09

supply there goes our processor what is

08:11

it with j and dropping processors anyway

08:14

this is the pq1 m 880 plus gold modular

08:17

power supply from Deep cool deep cool is

08:19

a brand that's really been kind of

08:21

making uh well I guess making some waves

08:25

in the industry if you will they've got

08:26

a lot of really good products at

08:28

competitive price points so that's again

08:31

the th000 watt modular it's going to

08:32

give us all the same uh compatibility we

08:34

need for our graphics card to have a lot

08:36

of Headroom in the future and I think

08:38

this one might even be a PCI E5 uh with

08:41

a PCI E5 cable I can't remember if it

08:44

doesn't that will sort of suck but um

08:48

actually don't think this one has a Gen

08:50

5 we'll see when I open it up otherwise

08:53

we'll just have to use an adapter that's

08:54

going to stink but you can always change

08:56

a single cable easier than the whole

08:57

power supply and considering this cost

08:59

cost us

09:00

$129 versus the Thor's

09:03

$359 I feel like it was a fair trade and

09:06

then I think that's pretty much it again

09:08

the same case oh the graphics card of

09:09

course so for graphics card the Zotac

09:11

470 TI super Trinity Black Edition this

09:14

is an MSRP card at$ 799 uh versus the uh

09:17

MSI gaming X slim which was uh

09:20

$879 so it is a $70 cheaper

09:24

card I think a lot of people myself

09:26

included expected this to be an area to

09:28

easily spend way too much money and get

09:30

very little for it I I don't think

09:32

that'll happen until you get up into

09:33

like the 4080 super plus range because

09:35

you have a bigger gap between cards and

09:37

then last but not least we have our

09:38

cooler Cooler Master Master liquid

09:40

Master maker 360 core maker Master RGB

09:43

Master cooler maker it's a $99 360 AIO

09:47

nothing super special um but still going

09:50

to give us enough cooling to where we

09:51

can get full Boost clocks out of our CPU

09:54

as long as we want to hold those boost

09:55

clocks so what was the total on this one

09:57

before tax 2,1 $29 so a difference of

10:01

exactly $1,300 actually it's $

10:06

22992 versus $ 3429 92 exactly the same

10:10

sents that's weird so exactly $1,300

10:12

difference or another computer

10:14

difference worth of cost because we

10:16

could easily have bought and built like

10:18

a 14600 system with a uh even the same

10:23

motherboard if we wanted and a like a

10:25

4060 and a 1 TB drive and an 800 W power

10:29

supply and a case and everything for

10:31

that extra money so ask yourself is it

10:33

worth spending that much money for a

10:35

system when you could have bought made

10:37

two systems for the same price let's go

10:39

build them and put them side by side and

10:41

see

10:49

[Music]

10:59

oh

11:02

[Music]

11:48

okay so the computers are built as you

11:50

can see we've got the prices there 3429

11:52

versus 2129 from this angle you can see

11:55

they actually don't look really any

11:56

different the Lesser expensive PC

11:58

doesn't look any less like quality like

12:00

sometimes you go base bottom line PC uh

12:04

they look that way this still looks like

12:06

a high-end PC let's start with some CPU

12:08

tests here so our I'm going to say cheap

12:10

PC I don't mean cheap it's just cheaper

12:12

okay our cheaper PC here and Center

12:14

bench uh R23 multicore was a

12:17

34505 that's actually really high cuz a

12:20

30 a 13 or excuse me a 14900 K hits like

12:23

38,000 so it's actually really close to

12:25

that and the only difference between the

12:27

two CPUs honestly is there's more EC Cor

12:29

with an I9 versus an i7 otherwise there

12:31

the same PE cor count uh so

12:34

34505 versus a

12:37

35977 so about a 1,400 Point difference

12:40

there or one oh excuse me a 4.3%

12:43

difference now single core a 2171 on the

12:47

cheaper PC versus a 2210 on the one on

12:50

the uh expensive PC at a 1.8% difference

12:54

there um cinebench r24 2052 on the

12:58

cheaper versus is 20080 on the more

13:01

expensive that's probably a more

13:02

realistic side-by-side comparison in

13:05

real world performance because r24

13:06

actually does different types of

13:08

instructions in that test and different

13:09

loads on different cores rather than

13:11

just hammering all the cores and P cores

13:13

and E cores as hard as it can um so it

13:16

gives you a more realistic separation in

13:18

performance between the two so 1.4%

13:20

difference in performance now single

13:22

core on the cheaper PC was a 128 versus

13:25

a 131 or 2.3% difference there we also

13:28

use geek bench uh six for this one free

13:31

test so if you also these tests are free

13:32

that we're mentioning here so you can go

13:33

and download them and compare them to

13:35

your own system if you're just curious

13:36

as to how these prices stacked up versus

13:38

your build uh geekbench 6 on the cheaper

13:41

PC was a 2,9

13:43

$2,987 on multicore versus a

13:47

2,578 on the more expensive PC uh for a

13:50

difference of

13:51

2.8% and then single core performance

13:54

$29.99 on cheaper versus 3112 on more

13:58

expensive for a difference of 3.8% so

14:00

you can see we're really low on the

14:02

percentage differences here now let's

14:04

talk about why they would be different

14:05

even though they're the exact same CPU

14:08

we have two different manufacturers of

14:09

motherboards here with two different

14:10

Logics on how they're going to take

14:12

advantage of Intel allowing higher

14:14

Headroom and power table frequency

14:16

charts you know power versus frequency

14:18

curve or the VF curve um or voltage

14:21

curves and all that between the two

14:22

motherboards Asus as we know is very

14:25

aggressive so the Asus motherboard here

14:28

still has the out of the box bios we did

14:30

not update the BIOS because I did not

14:31

want to put into effect right

14:33

now some of the newer bios that have

14:35

come out since we've talked about the

14:37

BIOS being too aggressive they sort of

14:38

went the other direction now the voltage

14:40

is too low and CPUs are crashing because

14:41

there's not enough voltage so it's kind

14:43

of the other direction now so we just

14:45

went out of the box um so the enhanced

14:48

multi or multi-core enhancement or let

14:50

bios optimize settings that are on on

14:52

Asus is more aggressive in terms of

14:54

allowing more power more temperature

14:56

Headroom and more importantly a a longer

14:59

thermal velocity boost which means we're

15:01

holding the core clocks higher even

15:03

though it's only going to 5.5 which is

15:04

the outof thebox settings for all core

15:06

uh higher and longer on the Asus board

15:10

than the gigabyte board now the gigo

15:12

gigabyte board does have the enhanced

15:14

features also on but they're not nearly

15:16

as aggressive as Asus is because it's a

15:18

completely different tier of motherboard

15:19

which is the whole point of this video

15:21

but was $16 motherboard versus a

15:25

$579 motherboard I think that was a

15:27

price does that weren't 3% at the most

15:30

on performance I think 4% is what we saw

15:32

in like a single core in one of them uh

15:34

no it was 4.3% on Center bench R23 for

15:38

allore CU it was significantly more

15:40

expensive than 4.3% it was like 300%

15:45

more expensive for that one part so we

15:48

could easily go in because this is a k

15:50

skube CPU we could easily go in there

15:52

and overclock the board a little bit or

15:55

just enable a longer longer thermal

15:57

velocity boost timer if we wanted and

15:59

easily match the performance but out of

16:00

the box built XMP turned on on both

16:02

boards so we're talking like 6600 versus

16:05

I think it was 5600 on the ram okay

16:08

let's talk about gaming cuz this is

16:09

obviously going to be where the two SKS

16:12

definitely compare to each other Port

16:13

Royal on the cheaper PC was a 15,590

16:17

versus the more expensive PCS 15,776 or

16:20

a whopping

16:22

1.2% difference so cyberpunk 2077 the

16:25

cheaper PC and 1080p gave us 127 .45 FPS

16:31

versus the more expensive PCS

16:34

131.8 or

16:36

2.9% FPS difference so 1440p on the

16:39

cheaper PC uh was

16:42

10599 versus the more expensive PCS

16:46

10987 for an even more narrow difference

16:48

of

16:49

3.7% we also tested f123 a new title for

16:53

us I didn't test that yet but I just

16:54

paid 70 bucks for today cuz I wanted to

16:56

include it in today's test even though

16:58

F1 2024 comes out in literally just a

17:01

few days from now and I still had to pay

17:03

$70 for the old version even though the

17:06

new one is available for pre- purchase

17:08

right now at the same 70 bucks first of

17:11

all why the is it 70 bucks why are

17:13

games 70 bucks now 1080p on the cheaper

17:15

PC was 178 1080p on the more expensive

17:18

PC was 182 for a whopping difference of

17:20

2.2% or 4 FPS uh 1440p 143 versus 146

17:25

for a difference of

17:27

2.1% okay let's talk about why some of

17:30

those performance differences even exist

17:32

if the parts are identical well let's go

17:35

ahead and do some live stuff so you can

17:36

see what's happening so we can talk

17:38

about it okay so expensive on the left

17:40

cheaper on the right anyway let's talk

17:41

about the clock speeds you can see our

17:43

GPU is currently at 63c 64c 100% load

17:48

2715 2730 2715 2760 so if we go to the

17:53

other side you can see the CPU GPU is a

17:55

little bit hotter running slightly

17:57

slower 268 85 27 2685 27 2685 2715 so

18:03

this one is generally about 50 MHz

18:06

higher on average on the left side uh

18:08

you can also notice that our CPUs are

18:11

very comparable in their load their

18:12

frequencies are going to fluctuate

18:14

they're always going to fluctuate CU

18:15

it's not a very CPU intensive test but

18:18

you'll notice the temperatures are very

18:19

comparable which doesn't bode well for

18:21

this AIO versus the the $100 AIO versus

18:24

the $360 AIO um or $350 whatever it is

18:28

although this one does have a really

18:29

cool screen and stuff on it I'll give it

18:31

that the magnetic connectors there's a

18:32

lot of Premium you pay for in that maybe

18:34

I'll do a video about the premiums and

18:36

what you actually get so we could

18:38

technically go into afterburner over

18:40

there and match those clock speeds and

18:42

then we would get pretty much an

18:44

identical score between the two so that

18:46

is why we're getting a different

18:49

performance in one PC versus the other

18:51

when it comes to identical grade

18:53

graphics cards and even identical grade

18:55

CPUs so whereas the vbios in those

18:58

graphics cards are a little bit more

19:00

aggressive in the non- MSRP card that's

19:03

essentially what our motherboards are

19:05

doing to our CPUs our motherboards are

19:07

being a little more aggressive one

19:10

versus the other on the CPU allowing

19:11

core clocks to go maybe a little higher

19:13

or stay higher longer which is giving us

19:15

that single digigit performance

19:16

difference so let's go into a real title

19:19

now something like cine bench or cine

19:21

bench that's not a that's not a game

19:22

title it's a game for me I love playing

19:23

zenov bench uh but let's go into like

19:25

cyberpunk and a real game and a real

19:27

game load side by side in the exact same

19:29

load and then let's see what the clocks

19:31

are doing there and then we'll adjust

19:34

the speeds dynamically and then see what

19:35

happens if we get them all exactly the

19:37

same okay so now that we have FPS loaded

19:40

you can look look in a real 118 114 113

19:43

119 119 120 119 so it's actually a fair

19:48

amount of difference here by having 2805

19:51

versus 2745 over there but what we're

19:53

going to do now is I'm going to go into

19:55

this one here and I'm going to see if we

19:57

can't make it match so I'm do this I'm

19:59

have Nick do it there we

20:01

go so we're at the same

20:04

20805 interestingly enough

20:08

there's still an FPS difference between

20:11

the

20:11

two because 112 113 115 116 so I feel

20:16

like that GPU would have to be

20:16

overclocked slightly to match it so go

20:19

from 60 now to like say 100 on that core

20:22

clock okay well you know what so the

20:24

only other thing we can consider here is

20:26

the cheaper PC does have a whole 1 GHz

20:28

slower Ram speed which does come into

20:31

effect during gaming gaming does RAM

20:33

speed does have an effect on games

20:34

especially a game like this that's

20:35

rendering a lot of AI apcs and stuff or

20:38

NPCs in the game so and then obviously

20:41

there's fluctuation because I have a lot

20:42

less cars on screen than that one cuz it

20:45

is completely randomized they're not

20:47

identical on the way it's happening on

20:48

each save but you can see the numbers

20:51

are so close together now by us adding

20:53

an overclock which clearly has plenty of

20:55

stability plenty of temperature headro

20:58

to where now you would not even be able

21:00

to notice the difference like this one's

21:01

actually slightly lower than that one

21:03

now was at a moment but I don't know

21:04

about you I'd rather go in here and

21:06

toggle some settings and dice roll to

21:08

see if I can make up 3% different two

21:10

excuse me 2.2% or whatever it was

21:12

difference in a game versus spending

21:14

$1,300 more to match the system that's

21:17

doing it out of the box now obviously

21:19

there's a whole lot of extra digging we

21:21

could have done on this to uh get down

21:23

to some real nitty-gritty like to

21:24

actually compare the BIOS frequency

21:26

settings to see what that voltage

21:28

frequency chart looks like what is the

21:31

actual turbo timer settings we know the

21:33

Asus one is pushing things the the

21:35

hardest out of all the motherboards as

21:36

far as the ones we've tested and seen I

21:39

know for a fact this that's having an

21:40

effect on the CPU which is also having

21:42

an effect on the overall performance of

21:43

the CPU um even though they were locked

21:46

5.52 5.52 okay so they're not affecting

21:49

this title so much but the RAM

21:51

definitely could be but again the

21:52

difference in price that we spent for

21:54

that ram versus the again $1,300 is

21:58

nothing jump change I mean that's like

21:59

rent for a lot of people right there so

22:02

I don't know about you we could have

22:03

probably gotten this build on the

22:05

cheaper build even under two grand if we

22:06

wanted we could have easily saved

22:08

another two 300 bucks no problem by even

22:11

going with like 32 GB of RAM or going

22:13

with even slightly slower Ram like 4,800

22:15

megat transfers per second or even

22:18

reducing the power supply down to like

22:20

850 Watts cuz we don't really need 1,000

22:22

that's just future proofing to make sure

22:23

that GPU or assuming that power supply

22:25

stays relevant for longer now when it

22:28

comes to the quality of the parts these

22:30

are still top tier parts for both sides

22:33

even though this is a cheaper build this

22:34

is not a a a cheap PC by any means it is

22:36

a high-end PC for all intents and

22:38

purposes it's just as you can see you

22:41

could easily spend way too much on one

22:43

tier because realistically for the price

22:45

we paid for this we should have had an

22:47

upper price point on everything we

22:49

should have had a 4080 super in there we

22:50

should have had an I9 in there cuz we

22:52

could easily have a 48 super and an I9

22:55

in this system and still spend less than

22:57

we did by not going as high on the

22:59

motherboard and such cuz this

23:01

motherboard could still support that no

23:02

problem whatsoever so I think it's

23:04

really important for you to to consider

23:06

the fact that you can easily overspend

23:09

on Parts you don't need to necessarily

23:11

sort by show me cheapest but I think

23:14

there's a there's definitely uh a a good

23:19

just meat and potato section of the

23:21

genre right I think 200 bucks for a

23:23

motherboard is where you should

23:24

realistically cap out on a real build uh

23:27

I don't think personally you should ever

23:29

really look at higher than MSRP cards

23:31

when it comes to graphics cards uh

23:34

especially in the 4070 range like we are

23:35

right now the 4070 TI super because when

23:37

it came to GPU choice for us I mean the

23:39

470 TI super was as high as we could go

23:41

without jumping to that, graphics card

23:43

range but we could obviously jump to a

23:44

gra $1,000 graphics card here easily if

23:47

we wanted because we're talking $799

23:49

versus I think it was $869 now we're

23:51

talking a difference of $130 to get to a

23:54

480 super MSRP which would be much

23:56

faster than these even so

23:59

yeah you can see right there and it's

24:00

also unfortunately some of the confusion

24:02

for a lot of new buyers or people that

24:04

haven't bought Parts in a while that are

24:05

now shopping trying to figure out like

24:07

oh my gosh where should I go cuz you can

24:08

easily Lea frog parts and overspend here

24:12

and UND spend there so you can see the

24:14

easiest component the the single

24:17

component we overspent and spent way too

24:19

much money on undoubtedly is the

24:21

motherboard and I don't know why

24:24

motherboards have gotten so expensive I

24:25

think it's just it's become like a an

24:28

arms race for the motherboard

24:29

manufacturers to you can make the

24:30

biggest most ridiculous motherboard that

24:33

means nothing to the consumer like they

24:36

L and2 overclocking championships okay

24:38

cool but what does that mean to a

24:39

average consumer nothing we got a $159

24:42

motherboard right here holding its own

24:44

against the

24:45

$579 motherboard hope this video has

24:48

helped shed some literal light on things

24:50

so you guys can see where to uh save

24:52

some money and where to spend that money

24:54

if you have that budget and you're like

24:55

I'm going to spend all 3500 bucks I got

24:58

cuz I I did my chores I got my birthday

25:01

money from Grandma and I got all A's so

25:04

I got like some extra money from my

25:06

parents or I graduated I got I'm going

25:08

to spend it I'm just going to be

25:09

frivolous I'm going to spend it I don't

25:11

care as you can see save money in other

25:13

components and put them in other ones

25:15

easily easily easy place to save money

25:18

is the motherboard and the the cooler

25:20

although the ryen 3 the ryogen 3 is

25:22

really really cool but not 3 and 1/2

25:25

times the cost of The Cooler Master

25:27

cooler that's over here

25:29

keeping the CPUs what 65c 66 66 oh my

25:34

gosh imagine that it's like 360 aios are

25:37

comparable anyway all right I've rambled

25:39

on enough tell me down below what you

25:41

think your biggest tip would be for

25:44

Builders to save money cuz I think we're

25:48

going to probably see some varying

25:49

answers but motherboard cooler RAM and

25:52

storage is really easy to overspend

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Verwandte Tags
PC BuildingBudget BuildsHigh-End BuildsComponent CostsPerformance ComparisonMotherboard SelectionRAM SpeedStorage OptionsCooling SolutionsGaming PerformanceValue for MoneyHardware Reviews
Benötigen Sie eine Zusammenfassung auf Deutsch?